Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
On 2/4/19 6:38 PM, Dominique Martinet wrote: It's the second time I read wireguard would be coming in the 5.0 kernel here - what makes you folk say that? I certainly haven't seen anything to that extent lately and 5.0 is petty well under way, something as big a zinc likely won't make the cut this late. The people that are working on WireGuard think things should be stable by this summer (June) so it most likely won't make 5.0 but something a bit after. My point is, I rather spend my efforts stabilizing the DKMS packages that have worked for years now, rather than change things totally over to using an akmod based approach. Especially with the possibility of having WireGuard upstream sometime this year. (as for akmods, it's packaged as such as well in rpmfusion, and that just works afaict) Indeed. If those fit peoples needs, I urge them to use them. Joe -- Joe Doss j...@solidadmin.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Joe Doss wrote on Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:43:59PM +: > I know what akmods are and I don't have the bandwidth on my end to > switch to them with WireGuard coming in the 5.0 kernel. It's the second time I read wireguard would be coming in the 5.0 kernel here - what makes you folk say that? I certainly haven't seen anything to that extent lately and 5.0 is petty well under way, something as big a zinc likely won't make the cut this late. (as for akmods, it's packaged as such as well in rpmfusion, and that just works afaict) -- Dominique ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Was dkms working before you did the upgrade or was it already in a broken state? wireguard-dkms-0.0.20190123-2.fc29.noarch won't fix an already broken install, so you need to remove it and then install the new version. It should hopefully fix it moving forward. I started a thread on the WireGuard mailing list to track this issue https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-February/003851.html so please reply there with any feedback once the next snapshot is released. Thanks, Joe ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
I know what akmods are and I don't have the bandwidth on my end to switch to them with WireGuard coming in the 5.0 kernel. Joe ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Joe, I found a machine on which I can reproduce the problem. I installed wireguard-dkms-0.0.20190123-2.fc29.noarch on top of wireguard-dkms-0.0.20190123-1.fc29.noarch but the machine while running # dkms autoinstall still returns Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file. File: /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/0.0.20181218/source/dkms.conf does not exist. Actually I am leaving this place, so I will have no longer access to this machine for a certain amount of time ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Il giorno gio 31 gen 2019, 00:15 Joe Doss ha scritto: > Hey Germano, > > I have a working RPM that does not error out with Error! Could not locate > dkms.conf file if you want to test it out before I push it to copr. > Hi Joe, I can test it on next Wireguard snapshot release, actually I cannot reproduce an update action > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 00:15 Joe Doss Hey Germano, > > I have a working RPM that does not error out with Error! Could not locate > dkms.conf file if you want to test it out before I push it to copr. > > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/wireguard-testing/fedora-29-x86_64/00852015-wireguard-dkms/wireguard-dkms-0.0.20190123-2.fc29.noarch.rpm > > It is an issue with DKMS as I suspected. `%post` runs before the new > package's `%preun` and the --rpm_safe_upgrade isn't working as it should. > https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/25#issuecomment-360275619. I followed > this post's suggestion and moved from %post to %posttrans and this issue no > longer happens. It feels hacky and I might spend some more time this > weekend trying to find a better solution. ZFS worked around it with a bunch > of bash > https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/blob/master/rpm/generic/zfs-dkms.spec.in#L74-L102 > so that might be what we try down the road. > On a related note, have you looked into using akmods instead of dkms? In m experience, it works much better, especially because it actually integrates with the packaging system (kernel modules are built as rpm packages and installed with dnf, whenever the kernel or the module itself is updated). Fabio > If anyone on the list has a better idea on how to work around this issue > please let me know. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Hey Germano, I have a working RPM that does not error out with Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file if you want to test it out before I push it to copr. https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/wireguard-testing/fedora-29-x86_64/00852015-wireguard-dkms/wireguard-dkms-0.0.20190123-2.fc29.noarch.rpm It is an issue with DKMS as I suspected. `%post` runs before the new package's `%preun` and the --rpm_safe_upgrade isn't working as it should. https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/25#issuecomment-360275619. I followed this post's suggestion and moved from %post to %posttrans and this issue no longer happens. It feels hacky and I might spend some more time this weekend trying to find a better solution. ZFS worked around it with a bunch of bash https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/blob/master/rpm/generic/zfs-dkms.spec.in#L74-L102 so that might be what we try down the road. If anyone on the list has a better idea on how to work around this issue please let me know. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
I am actively trying to track down why DKMS is not removing the old WireGuard version correctly. I suspect it is something to do with DKMS as other WireGuard users that use DKMS for things like ZFS (https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/MyKernelUpdateSteps) are setting the same kinds of issues. If anyone on this list has any insight on what might be the cause, please let me know. Joe ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Il giorno mar 29 gen 2019 alle ore 17:39 Nicolas Chauvet ha scritto: > There is a wireguard package maintained by Robert-André Mauchin on RPM > Fusion that at least... works. Ah I did not know that, thank you ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file
Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 à 16:33, Germano Massullo a écrit : > > This [1] is the Wireguard spec file from upstream Copr repo [2]. > Wireguard will be included in kernel 5.0, but meanwhile we are using it as > dkms. There is a wireguard package maintained by Robert-André Mauchin on RPM Fusion that at least... works. -- - Nicolas (kwizart) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fixing Wireguard spec file
This [1] is the Wireguard spec file from upstream Copr repo [2]. Wireguard will be included in kernel 5.0, but meanwhile we are using it as dkms. The only problem is that at every Wireguard upgrade, a manual action is required. For example now that I have installed 0.0.20190123, I have to remove the old /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/0.0.20181218/ folder in order to let # dkms autoinstall work. Otherwise I will get a === # dkms status Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file. File: /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/0.0.20181218/source/dkms.conf does not exist. === and wg-quick service unable to start. Do you have any idea about how the Wireguard spec file could be fixed in order to avoid this action having to be runned at every package update? Thank you [1]: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/wireguard/fedora-29-x86_64/00839061-wireguard-dkms/wireguard-dkms.spec [2]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jdoss/wireguard/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
