Re: [digitalradio] mt63
Tony, Just got in from work(night job) 11:48Z. I am off today but will have to take a nap, then get up. Will try and catch up with you later today or tonight. Thanks Hal - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] mt63 On 5/26/2010 9:41 PM, Hal Stang wrote: If so What frequencies do they normally hang out on -80/40/20 meters? Hal Hal, Seems the majority of MT63 activity is on 20 meters - 14108.0 / 14109.0. It is sparse though. I do see some using the 500Hz mode around 3586.0. I can meet you on 14108.0 if you like -- it's 0210z. Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: obie47165 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:07 PM Subject: [digitalradio] mt63 Is there any activity on mt63 on 20 meters or is it far and few between.. POB/K8LEN __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5148 (20100526) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
[digitalradio] Digital Suite Performance
While training for the Buffalo Marathon, I have been pondering (while on some LONG runs) which of the popular digital software (for Windows) offers the most performance. By that, I mean, best and most capable under the conditions, and not number of modes offered. By THAT comparison, MultiPSK would win handily, and there would be no need for any more discussion. However, having a QRP-only station forces me to try different suites for different reasons. Which software do YOU the members use? Which ones are better at weak-signal levels? Best ALL AROUND performer? I started wondering this recently as I downloaded the Weak Olivia wav file off of this group's FILES section. And MultiPSK could copy most of it, while fldigi could copy more than 99% of it with very few misses or errors. I haven't tried this experiment with DM780 yet...or MixW for that matter. Although I prefer the eye-candy/beauty of DM780, I still can't get away from MultiPSK and its usefulness...especially with ALE400, Pactor, or basic QRSS. John KB2HSH
AW: [digitalradio] Digital Suite Performance
As multi mode soft you can not beat multipsk (i think) For extreme qrp you should also try out the new mode ros .. With 5 w and a wire you can work the world with almost no conditions (band closed) For sstv I use mmsstv most of the time (or easypal for digisstv) Just my 2 cents Dg9bfc Sigi _ Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von kb2hsh Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 13:50 An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Betreff: [digitalradio] Digital Suite Performance While training for the Buffalo Marathon, I have been pondering (while on some LONG runs) which of the popular digital software (for Windows) offers the most performance. By that, I mean, best and most capable under the conditions, and not number of modes offered. By THAT comparison, MultiPSK would win handily, and there would be no need for any more discussion. However, having a QRP-only station forces me to try different suites for different reasons. Which software do YOU the members use? Which ones are better at weak-signal levels? Best ALL AROUND performer? I started wondering this recently as I downloaded the Weak Olivia wav file off of this group's FILES section. And MultiPSK could copy most of it, while fldigi could copy more than 99% of it with very few misses or errors. I haven't tried this experiment with DM780 yet...or MixW for that matter. Although I prefer the eye-candy/beauty of DM780, I still can't get away from MultiPSK and its usefulness...especially with ALE400, Pactor, or basic QRSS. John KB2HSH
Re: AW: [digitalradio] Digital Suite Performance
For extreme qrp you should also try out the new mode ros With 5 w and a wire you can work the world with almost no conditions (band closed) I consistently work the world on 20m with only ONE watt (My PSK-20), an attic wire dipole, DigiPan, and PSK31, whether the band is open or not, but I take up less than 50 Hz of spectrum. I think may others do that also. If you can hear'em, you can work'em on PSK31, except over the polar paths. 73, Skip KH6TY
Re: [digitalradio] Digital Suite Performance
There is some discussion about the viability of ROS, as it appeasr to take up the same bandwidth as an SSB signal, thus defeating the reason to use digital. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KH6TY kh...@... wrote: For extreme qrp you should also try out the new mode ros With 5 w and a wire you can work the world with almost no conditions (band closed) I consistently work the world on 20m with only ONE watt (My PSK-20), an attic wire dipole, DigiPan, and PSK31, whether the band is open or not, but I take up less than 50 Hz of spectrum. I think may others do that also. If you can hear'em, you can work'em on PSK31, except over the polar paths. 73, Skip KH6TY
Re: [digitalradio] About digital reception and SDR.
Thanks so much Simon. Really appreciated! On 5/27/10, Simon HB9DRV simon.br...@kns.ch wrote: Hi, If Windows 7 crashes with BSOD then it's a driver issue - I suggest serial port or USB soundcard. If it's the program crashing shout at me - I've been *very* busy getting SDR software written but in maybe two weeks will be able to get back into the HRD suite. I'll get a dump file from you... Simon Brown, HB9DRV http://sdr-radio.com From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Frank MacDonell Simon - A little off topic, but I have scoured the internet and forums and I cannot find a fix for Windows 7 crashing with DM 780. I am a loyal fan of the software and have donated as well. Can you point me in the right direction? Frank KD8FIP -- Sent from my mobile device Frank KD8FIP
