Re: [digitalradio] Fwd: [KenwoodTS-2000] D-Star with the TS-2000

2010-09-07 Thread Tony


I have to agree that it would be interesting to experiment with the 
D-Star modem, but it doesn't seem practical for HF. In addition to 
gobbling up a fair amount of spectrum, I suspect that it would be 
difficult to maintain the required SNR with a modem that's 6KHz wide.


The narrow-band FDMDV modem worked out well by not only improving 
sensitivity over WinDRM, but by allowing one to squeeze the signal 
between the adjacent QRM. The modems quick recover time was a real plus 
as well - not sure how long it takes for the D-Star modem to re-sync.


Tony -K2MO









-- Forwarded message --
From: *J. Moen* 
Date: Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:42 AM
Subject: [KenwoodTS-2000] D-Star with the TS-2000
To: kenwoodts-2...@yahoogroups.com mailto:kenwoodts-2...@yahoogroups.com


I've gotten interested in D-Star, and have been running what's called 
a D-Star Hotspot at my home. This is a small piece of hardware that 
functions as a gmsk modem and connects to an analog radio's 9600bps 
Data port. The board is connected to a PC running software that allows 
the radio to be linked to various worldwide D-Star repeaters and 
reflectors. I did this since my location does not provide reliable 
access to a D-Star repeater. I just use a D-Star HT to communicate 
with my Hotspot, which forwards my voice on to the connected repeater, 
etc.


While my Hotspot is using a spare KW TM-D700A for everyday duty, I've 
wired up a cable to use it with my TS-2000. For this, I'm interested 
in adapting the 2000 to be a D-Star-capable radio. There are various 
ways to do this, and one more way that's soon to be released. Those 
are listed below.


I'm interested so I can do D-Star on 6 and 10 meters. ICOM will soon 
be releasing their new IC-9100 radio, and with the optional D-Star 
card, it will do D-Star on 6 and 10 meters as well as VHF/UHF and 
optional 1.2ghz. Except for the very high price, this DC to Daylight 
radio could be considered a competitor to the TS-2000.


Anyway, I want to be able to make simplex D-Star contacts on 6 and 10 
meters, but I don't want to spend an arm and a leg. My Hotspot cost 
about US $140 (built, the kits are cheaper). To function as a 
standalone D-Star radio, right now I also need a DV Dongle to handle 
the conversion of audio to and from the AMBE compressed format. The DV 
Dongle costs $200. So for $340 I have a D-Star capable HF, VHF and UHF 
radio. And I'm hoping future developments will bring the price down.


If anyone else is able to get on 10 meters with D-Star and would like 
to try to plan a sked, please contact me directly. I am revamping my 
antennas, but my current end-fed sloper might do the job now, 
otherwise my vertical should be up and running in a few weeks.


Here are the current ways to adapt an analog radio, including HF, that 
has a 9600 Data port, to D-Star:


1. FunkAmateur DV-Adapter 2.0 fully hardware solution. Built: $600. 
Kit with ICOM UT-118 about $500.


2. Mini HotSpot or node adapter board with DVAR Hot Spot software 
connected to DV Dongle's DVTools software. US $340. This is what I'm 
doing right now.


3. Under development: new node adapter-type board from Fred van Kempen 
PA4YBR, fully hardware solution. Price and release date unknown. This 
is cheaper than option 1 and simpler than option 2. I may switch to 
this approach when available.


4. D-Star Client soundcard software by Jonathan G4KLX. Finding the 
correct soundcard or dongle is critical, and the interface (unlike 
traditional data mode interfaces for PSK31, etc.) must contain no 
filters. But the price is right: Free if you build your own interface 
between soundcard and radio. Jonathan may support a gmsk or node 
adapter interface some time in the future, but for now it is soundcard 
based.


One further note -- For a while, I did some digital voice on 20 meters 
using the FDMDV program that used the MELP codec. This used a fairly 
narrow bandwidth, about the same as SSB. But it turned out MELP was 
encumbered with license restrictions that none of us initially knew 
about. When we found out, that version died immediately. What I 
learned was digital voice can be done long range with a skip signal as 
long as conditions are nearly perfect, with little multipath, phase 
changes or QSB. But, those conditions are not uncommon if you are 
patient, so I'm hoping to have some long range D_Star QSOs on 10 
meters. The bandwidth is theoretically 6.25 hHz, but in practice it is 
wider than that, hence in my opinion, it would not be advisable in FCC 
jurisdictions on 160 through 15m. I think on 10 and 6m it could be 
fun. But I will not use it during a lively contest. Just too wide at 
that time.


Jim - K6JM







Re: [digitalradio] Fwd: [KenwoodTS-2000] D-Star with the TS-2000

2010-09-07 Thread J. Moen
There are people who probably have the answers to the points you make since 
some have already had DX QSOs using D-Star -- I haven't, so I'm looking to try 
this out on 10 meters.  Mostly I think your prediction will turn out to be 
correct.  I am expecting that only under near-perfect conditions between the 
two parties will D-Star make it via HF propagation.  My experience on VHF is 
that it's extremely susceptible to multipath.

On the other hand, during previous sunspot cycles, I've experienced 
near-perfect conditions on 10 meters.  I definitely would not see the present 
D-Star for everyday digital voice on HF, though I can see some value in a 6 
meter repeater, and some 10 meter activity, with callsign routing, 
repeater/reflector linking, low speed data, short messages, etc.  

10 meters has a lot of real estate, so I would think the wider bandwidth of 
D-Star will not be un-neighborly except possibly during a busy contest.  But 
then, that's true of a lot of modes on HF during contests.

It will be fun to watch David Lowe's Codec2 project evolve and see how narrow a 
bandwidth he can achieve.  For everyday DV on HF, that may be the best path.  
In the meantime, I'd just like to experiment and learn.

   Jim - K6JM

  - Original Message - 
  From: Tony 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:04 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fwd: [KenwoodTS-2000] D-Star with the TS-2000  

  I have to agree that it would be interesting to experiment with the D-Star 
modem, but it doesn't seem practical for HF. In addition to gobbling up a fair 
amount of spectrum, I suspect that it would be difficult to maintain the 
required SNR with a modem that's 6KHz wide. 

  The narrow-band FDMDV modem worked out well by not only improving sensitivity 
over WinDRM, but by allowing one to squeeze the signal between the adjacent 
QRM. The modems quick recover time was a real plus as well - not sure how long 
it takes for the D-Star modem to re-sync.

  Tony -K2MO 


Re: [digitalradio] Fwd: [KenwoodTS-2000] D-Star with the TS-2000

2010-09-07 Thread Tony

 Jim,

It would be interesting to see how the D-Star modem performs so please 
keep us in the loop. From what I gather, the modem for Dave's codec will 
not be as narrow as the one used for FDMDV. It will still use Peter's 
FDM modem, but the bandwidth will most likely be closer to 2KHz.


Tony -K2MO

On 9/7/2010 3:50 PM, J. Moen wrote:


There are people who probably have the answers to the points you make 
since some have already had DX QSOs using D-Star -- I haven't, so I'm 
looking to try this out on 10 meters.  Mostly I think your prediction 
will turn out to be correct.  I am expecting that only under 
near-perfect conditions between the two parties will D-Star make it 
via HF propagation.  My experience on VHF is that it's extremely 
susceptible to multipath.
On the other hand, during previous sunspot cycles, I've experienced 
near-perfect conditions on 10 meters.  I definitely would not see the 
present D-Star for everyday digital voice on HF, though I can see some 
value in a 6 meter repeater, and some 10 meter activity, with callsign 
routing, repeater/reflector linking, low speed data, short messages, etc.
10 meters has a lot of real estate, so I would think the wider 
bandwidth of D-Star will not be un-neighborly except possibly during a 
busy contest.  But then, that's true of a lot of modes on HF during 
contests.
It will be fun to watch David Lowe's Codec2 project evolve and see how 
narrow a bandwidth he can achieve.  For everyday DV on HF, that may be 
the best path.  In the meantime, I'd just like to experiment and learn.

   Jim - K6JM

- Original Message -
*From:* Tony mailto:d...@optonline.net
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:04 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Fwd: [KenwoodTS-2000] D-Star with
the TS-2000

I have to agree that it would be interesting to experiment with
the D-Star modem, but it doesn't seem practical for HF. In
addition to gobbling up a fair amount of spectrum, I suspect that
it would be difficult to maintain the required SNR with a modem
that's 6KHz wide.

The narrow-band FDMDV modem worked out well by not only improving
sensitivity over WinDRM, but by allowing one to squeeze the
signal between the adjacent QRM. The modems quick recover time was
a real plus as well - not sure how long it takes for the D-Star
modem to re-sync.

Tony -K2MO