Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

[John Levine via dmarc-discuss]

>I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast.
>They send an unusual Content-Type: application-x-gzip;

The most recent Comcast reports I have are from September, and they have
the same wrong content type.  It should be 

 Content-Type: application/gzip; ... whatever ...

(That's why I wrote RFC 6713.)

While our pals at Comcast are checking their header writing code, they
might also want to check why there aren't more recent reports.

R's,
John
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

[Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss]

Yes, the slash is mandatory. From RFC 2045 5.1:


 content := "Content-Type" ":" type "/" subtype
*(";" parameter)
; Matching of media type and subtype
; is ALWAYS case-insensitive.

- Roland


Roland Turner | Labs Director
Singapore | M: +65 96700022
roland.tur...@trustsphere.com




From: dmarc-discuss  on behalf of Murray 
Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss 
Sent: Thursday, 12 November 2015 07:05
To: A. Schulze; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

That has to be a syntax error.

On 11/10/15, 12:02 AM, "dmarc-discuss on behalf of A. Schulze via
dmarc-discuss"  wrote:

>
>Hello,
>
>I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast.
>They send an unusual Content-Type: application-x-gzip;
>No idea if that's right or wrong. The attached patch extend rddmarc to
>import
>these reports.
>
>Andreas


___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

[Murray Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss]

That has to be a syntax error.

On 11/10/15, 12:02 AM, "dmarc-discuss on behalf of A. Schulze via
dmarc-discuss"  wrote:

>
>Hello,
>
>I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast.
>They send an unusual Content-Type: application-x-gzip;
>No idea if that's right or wrong. The attached patch extend rddmarc to
>import
>these reports.
>
>Andreas


___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)