Re: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:13:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Jose, I've disabled the merge with the XFree86 4.2.0 code to see if that helps and fired up a new build. Please check if the next binaries are ok. Sorry to report that the latest SF binaries (well, at least radeon-20020623-linux.i386) are still broken. Same problem, X server catches a SIG11. Also, something I've noticed with these broken binaries (all of them) is that the kernel drm module doesn't get loaded automatically - you need to preload it by hand. Clearly very broken... Andrew This is all very strange indeed, and I don't know what the problem may be or what to do... In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? José Fonseca --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
RE: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other ones ... broken! Andrew --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:52:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other ones ... broken! Andrew This is very strange! I'm going to build a binary from a date previous to 11 of Jun to determine whether the problem is in the system or in the current CVS. Keith, is it possible that the TCL merge introduced some kind of binary incompatability? Even stranger is that it was also reported here that the problem isn't exclusive of radeon and affects voodoo cards too. But, e.g., the mach64 snapshots had given no problem. José Fonseca --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
José Fonseca wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:52:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other ones ... broken! Andrew This is very strange! I'm going to build a binary from a date previous to 11 of Jun to determine whether the problem is in the system or in the current CVS. Keith, is it possible that the TCL merge introduced some kind of binary incompatability? Certainly not impossible... The pageflipping code introduced some new callbacks in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/dri/dri.h -- that's a possibility that I hadn't thought about earlier. Keith --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
Am Mon, 2002-06-24 um 16.03 schrieb José Fonseca: On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:52:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other ones ... broken! Andrew This is very strange! I'm going to build a binary from a date previous to 11 of Jun to determine whether the problem is in the system or in the current CVS. I've built a version from the 10 of June and it is working. The binary snapshot from the 16.did work. So it is happen within that week. Keith, is it possible that the TCL merge introduced some kind of binary incompatability? Even stranger is that it was also reported here that the problem isn't exclusive of radeon and affects voodoo cards too. But, e.g., the mach64 snapshots had given no problem. The Matrox cards are also affected. Bye, Michael --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 18:21, Michael Schlueter wrote: Am Mon, 2002-06-24 um 16.03 schrieb José Fonseca: On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:52:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other ones ... broken! Andrew This is very strange! I'm going to build a binary from a date previous to 11 of Jun to determine whether the problem is in the system or in the current CVS. I've built a version from the 10 of June and it is working. The binary snapshot from the 16.did work. So it is happen within that week. This leaves http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=817856forum_id=6512 as the primary suspect, or am I missing something? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] SF binaries still broken
Am Mon, 2002-06-24 um 20.00 schrieb Michel Dänzer: On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 18:21, Michael Schlueter wrote: Am Mon, 2002-06-24 um 16.03 schrieb José Fonseca: On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:52:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/cf are binaries produced by the SourceForge compiler farm. These were intended to replace the ones made on my workstation but I never actualy did that because I wasn't so confident with all the hacks that were necessary to get them to compile. Could you please try if these do any good? Sorry Jose, but the CF binaries behave exactly the same as the other ones ... broken! Andrew This is very strange! I'm going to build a binary from a date previous to 11 of Jun to determine whether the problem is in the system or in the current CVS. I've built a version from the 10 of June and it is working. The binary snapshot from the 16.did work. So it is happen within that week. Ups, it should be from 16. didn't work. Sorry. --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
