[exim] exim identica group

2011-09-12 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby

Hi all,

For those users of those twitter-like things, I just set up an Exim 
identica group.

http://identi.ca/group/exim

Thank you.

--
RMA.


--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Craig Whitmore


On 12/09/11 6:53 PM, Pedro Mansilla pedro.mansi...@gmail.com wrote:

Well 4.69 does have DomainKeys and DKIM both in Experimental. I saw some
webpages of users that did granted to make it work with both.

What I do not know now regarding latest source codes is if for domainkeys
one can edit Makefile and add the usage and libs links for domainkeys.
Like
it was done in the exims wiki for v4.68.

We need it because of our country internet laws. All sort of email
comunication are mandatory to use DomainKeys, SPF, DKIM, SenderID.


What country are you in which mandates by law DomainKeys and DKIM ? Can
you give specific links where it says this?





-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Ted Cooper
On 12/09/11 16:53, Pedro Mansilla wrote:
 We need it because of our country internet laws. All sort of email
 comunication are mandatory to use DomainKeys, SPF, DKIM, SenderID.

DomainKeys was been deprecated in favour of DKIM around Aug 2007 (maybe
2005).

If its use has been enshrined in legislation, I would suggest you start
working with your local authorities to remove it, along with any other
specific naming of any technology and replace it with more general
terms. Such specific restrictions on technologies will only cause issues
in the future when whatever the next big idea comes along.

DomainKeys RFC - Historical (Deprecated)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4870.txt

DKIM RFC - Standards Track
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4871.txt

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Ian Eiloart

On 12 Sep 2011, at 07:53, Pedro Mansilla wrote:

 Well 4.69 does have DomainKeys and DKIM both in Experimental. I saw some
 webpages of users that did granted to make it work with both.



The distribution for 4.69 contains instructions on configuring DK and DKIM, in 
the doc/experimental-spec.txt file. Version 4.70 removed DK functionality.

Both require external libraries, which may no longer be available. 

There are significant changes in the current DKIM code, including security 
updates. You may find that 4.69 is adequate for adding DK signatures, but then 
you'll probably want to push the mail through 4.76 to add the DKIM signatures. 



-- 
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
 -Original Message-
 From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org 
 [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of Pedro 
 Mansilla
 Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 1:59 PM
 To: exim-users@exim.org
 Subject: Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?
 
 Hi Phil, thanks for the answers.
 
 Ok, so lets say that I need both. What was the last version that supported
 both as Experimental. I mean the SRC. And what should I do or need to
 compile it and have both working and signing out messages.
 
 Is any other way to have DK, DKIM and SPF signing out messages. Something
 like DKIMProxy which I recently saw?

DKIMproxy will sign or verify mail, but only with DKIM.  It doesn't do 
DomainKeys.

As others have said, DomainKeys is obsolete.  In fact the only reason any of 
the big mailbox providers are still checking it is because there's only one big 
sending company still using it, and that's only because it takes a long time to 
change over a large infrastructure.  All of them have said they will be 
dropping it as soon as possible.  So, the requirement to sign with DomainKeys 
doesn't really provide any value.  Legislation that says so probably needs to 
be changed.  I realize that doesn't help you much, but that is why you're not 
likely to find much help retrofitting exim to meet this requirement.

I think you also mentioned Sender-ID, which by most accounts is also largely 
dead.

You don't sign with SPF, and so you don't need any software changes in exim 
to support it outbound.  I believe it already has inbound support.

-MSK

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Kevin Shaum
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Pedro Mansilla
pedro.mansi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well 4.69 does have DomainKeys and DKIM both in Experimental. I saw some
 webpages of users that did granted to make it work with both.

 What I do not know now regarding latest source codes is if for domainkeys
 one can edit Makefile and add the usage and libs links for domainkeys. Like
 it was done in the exims wiki for v4.68.

 We need it because of our country internet laws. All sort of email
 comunication are mandatory to use DomainKeys, SPF, DKIM, SenderID.

DKIM is based almost entirely on DomainKeys (DKIM = DomainKeys
Identified Mail), basically merging it with a couple of other
standards. It uses the same mechanism, a public encryption key stored
in a DNS record, to authenticate the sender. (The message header is
slightly different.)

So if you have a regulatory or contractual requirement to use
DomainKeys, using DKIM may satisfy that requirement. (Though IANAL, of
course.)

--
Kevin Shaum

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Pedro Mansilla
Hi to all.

Thanks for giving your opinions about this.

What I actually need is  to know how to get both active. Regardless of the
version I need to have both DK  DKIM to sign out all emails.

If anyone can give me ideas or a procedure I would be absolutly thanked.

I hope you guys can help me out.


Regards,


El 12/09/11 18:43, Kevin Shaum ke...@kevinshaum.com escribió:

 On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Pedro Mansilla
 pedro.mansi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well 4.69 does have DomainKeys and DKIM both in Experimental. I saw some
 webpages of users that did granted to make it work with both.
 
 What I do not know now regarding latest source codes is if for domainkeys
 one can edit Makefile and add the usage and libs links for domainkeys. Like
 it was done in the exims wiki for v4.68.
 
 We need it because of our country internet laws. All sort of email
 comunication are mandatory to use DomainKeys, SPF, DKIM, SenderID.
 
 DKIM is based almost entirely on DomainKeys (DKIM = DomainKeys
 Identified Mail), basically merging it with a couple of other
 standards. It uses the same mechanism, a public encryption key stored
 in a DNS record, to authenticate the sender. (The message header is
 slightly different.)
 
 So if you have a regulatory or contractual requirement to use
 DomainKeys, using DKIM may satisfy that requirement. (Though IANAL, of
 course.)
 
 --
 Kevin Shaum



-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Is DomainsKeys (DK not DKIM) disabled since v4.70-4.71?

2011-09-12 Thread Craig Whitmore


On 13/09/11 12:17 PM, Pedro Mansilla pedro.mansi...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi to all.

Thanks for giving your opinions about this.

What I actually need is  to know how to get both active. Regardless of the
version I need to have both DK  DKIM to sign out all emails.

If anyone can give me ideas or a procedure I would be absolutly thanked.

I hope you guys can help me out.

I presume that you have not looked up google yet as this found easily.

http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and
-domainkeys-signing/

Its 2 + years old and by default exim will NOT sign DKIM and DK at the
same time. DK is old and not supported by exim (or nearly anyone) these
days



-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


Re: [exim] Cannot send mail to gmail.com after reconfigure Exim 4.76?

2011-09-12 Thread Face
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Face falaz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello all,

 I had someone  send spam using my SMTP, therefore i had to change my
 configure to stop this. Now I cannot send to gmail.com and i keep
 getting this

 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

 A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
 recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  falaz...@gmail.com
    SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
    host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [74.125.91.27]:
    550-5.7.1 [173.214.173.77       1] Our system has detected an
 unusual rate of
    550-5.7.1 unsolicited mail originating from your IP address. To protect our
    550-5.7.1 users from spam, mail sent from your IP address has been blocked.
    550-5.7.1 Please visit
 http://www.google.com/mail/help/bulk_mail.html to review
    550 5.7.1 our Bulk Email Senders Guidelines. s9si64275qcy.51

 -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. --

 Return-path: ad...@aldimna.com
 Received: from [10.0.1.9]
        by smtp.aldimna.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
        (envelope-from ad...@aldimna.com)
        id 1QzRQp-0003RX-QE
        for falaz...@gmail.com; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:57:07 +0300
 Message-ID: 4e60b683.8030...@aldimna.com
 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:57:07 +0300
 From: admin ad...@aldimna.com
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110628
 Thunderbird/5.0
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 To: Face falaz...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: ss
 References: 
 cakpwb8kt7eazaa7urovshxktpuygrxlx0z0zv1nu_afc2jq...@mail.gmail.com
 cakpwb8l_fcch9tdestffciekip_sgwmkfxhgpl6frkwtap-...@mail.gmail.com
 cakpwb8+ways71svzznubponassxpakc7ganibyjmvqjfrwh...@mail.gmail.com
 In-Reply-To: 
 cakpwb8+ways71svzznubponassxpakc7ganibyjmvqjfrwh...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



 I also checked spamhaus.org and it seem my ip address is not listed.

 Any help would be much appreciated.

 here is a link to my configuration:
 http://goq8.info/Test/exim.conf.html

 $exim -bt -d falaz...@gmail.com
 Exim version 4.76 uid=0 gid=0 pid=11474 D=fbb95cfd
 Berkeley DB: Berkeley DB 5.2.28: (June 10, 2011)
 Support for: crypteq iconv() PAM OpenSSL move_frozen_messages
 Content_Scanning DKIM
 Lookups (built-in): lsearch wildlsearch nwildlsearch iplsearch dbm
 dbmnz mysql sqlite
 Authenticators: cram_md5 dovecot plaintext spa
 Routers: accept dnslookup ipliteral manualroute queryprogram redirect
 Transports: appendfile/maildir autoreply pipe smtp
 Fixed never_users: 0
 Size of off_t: 4
 Compiler: GCC [4.6.1 20110819 (prerelease)]
 Library version: OpenSSL: Compile: OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011
                          Runtime: OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011
 Library version: PCRE: Compile: 8.13
                       Runtime: 8.13 2011-08-16
 Total 8 lookups
 Library version: MySQL: Compile: 5.5.15 [Source distribution]
                        Runtime: 5.5.15
 Library version: SQLite: Compile: 3.7.7.1
                         Runtime: 3.7.7.1
 WHITELIST_D_MACROS unset
 TRUSTED_CONFIG_LIST unset
 changed uid/gid: forcing real = effective
  uid=0 gid=0 pid=11474
  auxiliary group list: none
 seeking password data for user root: cache not available
 getpwnam() succeeded uid=0 gid=0
 configuration file is /etc/mail.d/exim.d/exim.conf
 log selectors = 0ffc 00612001
 trusted user
 admin user
 seeking password data for user mail: cache not available
 getpwnam() succeeded uid=8 gid=12
 user name root extracted from gecos field root
 originator: uid=0 gid=0 login=root name=root
 sender address = root@empty
 Address testing: uid=0 gid=79 euid=0 egid=79

 Testing falaz...@gmail.com

 Considering falaz...@gmail.com

 routing falaz...@gmail.com
  hubbed_hosts router 
 local_part=falazemi domain=gmail.com
 checking domains
 expansion of ${if
 exists{/etc/mail.d/exim.d/hubbed_hosts}{partial-lsearch;/etc/mail.d/exim.d/hubbed_hosts}fail}
 forced failure: assume not in this list
 hubbed_hosts router skipped: domains mismatch
  dnslookup_relay_to_domains router 
 local_part=falazemi domain=gmail.com
 checking domains
 search_open: mysql NULL
 search_find: file=NULL
  key=SELECT domain FROM user WHERE domain='gmail.com' UNION SELECT
 domain FROM alias WHERE domain='gmail.com' UNION SELECT domain FROM
 catchall WHERE domain='gmail.com' partial=-1 affix=NULL starflags=0
 LRU list:
 internal_search_find: file=NULL
  type=mysql key=SELECT domain FROM user WHERE domain='gmail.com'
 UNION SELECT domain FROM alias WHERE domain='gmail.com' UNION SELECT
 domain FROM catchall WHERE domain='gmail.com'
 database lookup required for SELECT domain FROM user WHERE
 domain='gmail.com' UNION SELECT domain FROM alias WHERE
 domain='gmail.com' UNION SELECT domain FROM catchall WHERE
 domain='gmail.com'
 MySQL query: SELECT domain FROM user WHERE domain='gmail.com' UNION
 SELECT domain FROM alias