Bug#874418: libdislocker0.7: fails to upgrade from 'stretch' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/libdislocker.so

2017-09-12 Thread Giovani Ferreira
Hi,

Em 05-09-2017 18:48, Andreas Beckmann escreveu:

> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'stretch'.
> It installed fine in 'stretch', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
> Breaks+Replaces relation.

I'm learning to keep shared libraries, after researching and getting help 
from other developers I noticed that I did not put the correct version in 
Breaks + Replaces, I'll fix it soon.

> Why is this .so link in the shared library package and not in
> the -dev package?

This was a palliative solution to solve the problem on #840489 until the 
upstream fix. As I have already forwarded this bug to the upstream as 
described at https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/issues/96 but it still 
has not resolved this.

> And please get rid of the insane idea of a libdislocker0.6
> transitional package in sid.

Sorry, I did not do it the right way and I will fix it ASAP.

greetings,

-- 
Giovani Ferreira
0x78494EF72375A66C

___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel


Bug#874418: libdislocker0.7: fails to upgrade from 'stretch' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/libdislocker.so

2017-09-05 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libdislocker0.7
Version: 0.7.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stretch'.
It installed fine in 'stretch', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package libdislocker0.7.
  Preparing to unpack .../libdislocker0.7_0.7.1-2_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking libdislocker0.7 (0.7.1-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libdislocker0.7_0.7.1-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libdislocker.so', which is also in package 
libdislocker0.6 0.6.1-7
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libdislocker0.7_0.7.1-2_amd64.deb

Why is this .so link in the shared library package and not in
the -dev package?

And please get rid of the insane idea of a libdislocker0.6
transitional package in sid.


cheers,

Andreas


libdislocker0.6=0.6.1-7_libdislocker0.7=0.7.1-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel