Re: php problems
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Mark Moellering wrote: I tried a simple hello world type program the actual code is : ?php echo test ? and the output was; testsegmentation fault First, try it with clean code: put the ; after the command and stop closing the ?php tag at the end of the file. The system is FreeBSD 8.2 and php 5.3 If anyone has any idea of what changes might have been made that could cause this, please let me know. My other thought was to try reinstalling / upgrading php. Thanks in advance Mark Moellering ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Doc
Doc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: php problems
On 06/08/2013 15:21, Lars Eighner wrote: On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Mark Moellering wrote: I tried a simple hello world type program the actual code is : ?php echo test ? and the output was; testsegmentation fault First, try it with clean code: put the ; after the command and stop closing the ?php tag at the end of the file. Actually that should work and does work. I'm in the happy position of being able to recreate (but without the fault): %php test.php test %php --version PHP 5.3.6 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jul 27 2011 20:41:21) Copyright (c) 1997-2011 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2011 Zend Technologies %uname -v FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC 2011 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC %cat test.php ?php echo test ? %php test.php test % So what you're should doing should work. I should try recompiling and reinstalling PHP as a first step, unless you have reasons you don't want to do that. Email me directly if you want to cross-check config files and so on on what may be a very similar environment. Regards, Frank. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: php problems
On 06/08/2013 15:21, Lars Eighner wrote: On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Mark Moellering wrote: I tried a simple hello world type program the actual code is : ?php echo test ? and the output was; testsegmentation fault First, try it with clean code: put the ; after the command and stop closing the ?php tag at the end of the file. Actually that should work and does work. I'm in the happy position of being able to recreate (but without the fault): %php test.php test %php --version PHP 5.3.6 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jul 27 2011 20:41:21) Copyright (c) 1997-2011 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2011 Zend Technologies %uname -v FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC 2011 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC %cat test.php ?php echo test ? %php test.php test % So what you're should doing should work. I should try recompiling and reinstalling PHP as a first step, unless you have reasons you don't want to do that. Email me directly if you want to cross-check config files and so on on what may be a very similar environment. Regards, Frank. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: php problems
Le Mon, 05 Aug 2013 23:33:08 -0400, Mark Moellering m...@msen.com a écrit : I discovered that all php scripts now generate a seg fault. I tried a simple hello world type program the actual code is : ?php echo test ? and the output was; testsegmentation fault The system is FreeBSD 8.2 and php 5.3 If anyone has any idea of what changes might have been made that could cause this, please let me know. My other thought was to try reinstalling / upgrading php. That could be a problem with the extensions order in php.ini (search google php + crash + freebsd) There is a script to fix the order, I have not tried it. http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/scripts/fixphpextorder.sh Regards. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: php problems
On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Mark Moellering m...@msen.com wrote: A few years ago (2011) I set up an email system for a small internet based company. I used postfix with a mysql backend for virtual accounts. I also set up apache to test a php based webmail front-end. I set up several php scripts that would run from cron that would query a database and look for new email account requests and then do a variety of tasks to get everything set up properly. After I left, someone else made modifications to the system and things stopped working properly. A few months ago I was asked to try and get things working again. I discovered that all php scripts now generate a seg fault. I tried a simple hello world type program the actual code is : ?php echo test ? and the output was; testsegmentation fault The system is FreeBSD 8.2 and php 5.3 If anyone has any idea of what changes might have been made that could cause this, please let me know. My other thought was to try reinstalling / upgrading php. Thanks in advance Mark Moellering ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Hey Mark, Do you have a backup/alternative system you can test the code on? In lieu of that I would seriously consider rebuilding php. After you get it working it would be worth also considering upgrading to 55. Also make a complete revision backup of the code and config files once you get it working, this will save a lot of hair if the company in question hires someone else to tweak things in the future… Cheers, Mikel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE). Where would I get that from? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
How to Fix Port Audit showing ports not installed on a system
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on the system. These may have been installed at one point and removed. Firefox is one of the ones listed, I know that it was on the system previously, but was removed a few months back. portmaster -l and pkg info don't list it as installed, but port audit shows: firefox-20.0,1. Where would portaudit be picking up these ports from? Is there anyway to reset its database? -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:20:05 -0600, markham breitbach wrote: On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE). Where would I get that from? Maybe from sysutils/bsdconfig in the ports collection? I have not checked if this specific subroutine file is part of the port... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
On Aug 6, 2013, at 9:20 AM, markham breitbach wrote: On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE). Where would I get that from? It's in up-coming 9.2-R (and present 9.2-* snapshots leading up to 9.2-R). You can snatch a copy of the code by installing sysutils/bsdconfig from the ports tree. However, the port is marked (correctly-so) as requiring FreeBSD 9.0 or higher. But don't let that stop you... the only reason it's marked as requiring 9.0 is because 9.0 brings in a new dialog(1) implementation. However, if you're interested in the TCP validation code... that will work on any release. It's only the dialog(1) stuff that won't work on 8.x or older. Luckily, it'll be pretty easy to avoid the land-mines. All functions starting with f_dialog_* should be avoided on 8.x or older. So here's the latest package to download (in case you're unsuccessful in getting the port to behave -- afterall, it may just balk at you for not running 9.x): fetch http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/bsdconfig/bsdconfig-0.9.0.tbz That's a FreeBSD package. You can download it and say (as root): pkg_add bsdconfig-0.9.0.tbz Just be forewarned (again), on 8.x or older, executing bsdconfig will have widely unexpected results (it won't eat your homework, but it may or may not actually *run*). However, doing the above 2-step (fetch pkg_add) will bring in the files you're looking for and give you the functionality you're wanting on 8.x. -- Devin P.S. I really *can't* make the dialog(1) stuff backward compatible with 8.x's (or any older's) version of dialog(1). The new `cdialog' variant that was brought into 9.x to replace the aging dialog(1)/libdialog pair is has a *lot* of functionality that I depend on. It could potentially take months to make bsdconfig *fully* backward compatible with 8.x. For now, it's safe if you just use the libraries and avoid any/all functions beginning with f_dialog_. _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
On Aug 6, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:20:05 -0600, markham breitbach wrote: On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE). Where would I get that from? Maybe from sysutils/bsdconfig in the ports collection? I have not checked if this specific subroutine file is part of the port... Ah, Polytropon beat me ;D And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base. (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care about the dialog(1) aspects of the library code). -- Devin -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to Fix Port Audit showing ports not installed on a system
On 06/08/2013 17:25, dweimer wrote: I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on the system. These may have been installed at one point and removed. Firefox is one of the ones listed, I know that it was on the system previously, but was removed a few months back. portmaster -l and pkg info don't list it as installed, but port audit shows: firefox-20.0,1. Where would portaudit be picking up these ports from? Is there anyway to reset its database? rm -R /var/db/portaudit/ then run portaudit -Fda -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546 e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA High Specification Dedicated Servers from £100.00pm ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Alert! Broken Link on blazej.org
Hello, My name is Nicole and I'm in the middle of a project to construct a medium-high investment portfolio. My research has taken me to a number of different sites, yours being one of them. I know that a lot of work goes into maintaining a website, so I want you to know that I appreciate all your time and effort! I also wanted to let you know that while I was on your site (more specifically, on this page: (www.blazej.org/news/1999/press.html), I found a broken resource link. When I tried to access the http://cbs.marketwatch.com resource, I was taken to a page that couldn't be found. I thought you might want to update since MarketWatch is such an influential investing tool. So, I did a quick search and discovered that the page is now located here: http://www.marketwatch.com I also have a resource of my own to share for your website. Investing.Answers.com http://investing.answers.com/ is an informative, comprehensive guide containing articles on a variety of investment related topics that I think your visitors will find useful. Check it out and let me know what you think! Investing.Answers.com http://investing.answers.com/ is yours to add if you agree that it's a good addition! Thanks again for providing great resources! Best, Nicole ?Research Assistant ?LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nicole-stoff/17/142/8b5 Answers.com http://www.answers.com? 989 Avenue of the Americas, 17th Floor? New York, NY 10018 (Your e-mail address was found on blazej.org. If you received this e-mail in error or you would no longer like to receive e-mails from us about broken links on your site please let us know and we will remove you from our e-mail address list. We do not mean to bother you and are sorry for any inconveniences we may have caused.) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +, Teske, Devin wrote: And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base. (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care about the dialog(1) aspects of the library code). I think it should be relatively unproblematic to fetch the port and only use the subroutines as is, even if it's just for educational purposes. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
On Aug 6, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +, Teske, Devin wrote: And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base. (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care about the dialog(1) aspects of the library code). I think it should be relatively unproblematic to fetch the port and only use the subroutines as is, even if it's just for educational purposes. :-) Right. Just a warning though, what is fetched in ports is actually in the format of what's in HEAD (read: not in the format of what gets installed). For example, there are things that end up in /usr/share/bsdconfig that aren't in the bsdconfig/share/ source directory (e.g., all the stuff under /usr/share/bsdconfig/networking is under the source directory bsdconfig/networking/share). This may be counter-intuitive from an exploratory view if looking at the source directory (what's fetched by ports). And since the port Makefile will prevent you from turning that fetch'ed source directory into an installed software (putting things where they end up), it might be easier to grab this pre-built package that I stashed... http://druidbsd.sf.net/download/bsdconfig/bsdconfig-0.9.0.tbz Because then you can say pkg_add and everything will be in the right place (/usr/share/bsdconfig/ will be flush with everything and you won't have to hunt-and-peck through the source with a maintainers view). -- Devin _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6
I have some scripts that do fairly crude IPv4/6 validation testing. It is generally assumed that the input is coming from someone who knows what they are doing, but even the best of us have fat fingers sometimes :) Having standardized routines for something like this is great! Thanks, -Markham On 13-08-06 11:45 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: On Aug 6, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +, Teske, Devin wrote: And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base. (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care about the dialog(1) aspects of the library code). I think it should be relatively unproblematic to fetch the port and only use the subroutines as is, even if it's just for educational purposes. :-) Right. Just a warning though, what is fetched in ports is actually in the format of what's in HEAD (read: not in the format of what gets installed). For example, there are things that end up in /usr/share/bsdconfig that aren't in the bsdconfig/share/ source directory (e.g., all the stuff under /usr/share/bsdconfig/networking is under the source directory bsdconfig/networking/share). This may be counter-intuitive from an exploratory view if looking at the source directory (what's fetched by ports). And since the port Makefile will prevent you from turning that fetch'ed source directory into an installed software (putting things where they end up), it might be easier to grab this pre-built package that I stashed... http://druidbsd.sf.net/download/bsdconfig/bsdconfig-0.9.0.tbz Because then you can say pkg_add and everything will be in the right place (/usr/share/bsdconfig/ will be flush with everything and you won't have to hunt-and-peck through the source with a maintainers view). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to Fix Port Audit showing ports not installed on a system
On 08/06/2013 11:58 am, Paul Macdonald wrote: On 06/08/2013 17:25, dweimer wrote: I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on the system. These may have been installed at one point and removed. Firefox is one of the ones listed, I know that it was on the system previously, but was removed a few months back. portmaster -l and pkg info don't list it as installed, but port audit shows: firefox-20.0,1. Where would portaudit be picking up these ports from? Is there anyway to reset its database? rm -R /var/db/portaudit/ then run portaudit -Fda -- Already tried that, but that data only contains the list of known vulnerabilities, not the installed ports/packages. Perhaps, its not using pkgng I discovered if I do a pkg info command I get the correct list of installed ports and packages. If I do a pkg_info I get a much larger list showing everything as corrupted. ... pkg_info: the package info for package 'fftw3-3.3.3_1' is corrupt pkg_info: the package info for package 'filelight-4.10.1' is corrupt pkg_info: the package info for package 'firefox-20.0,1' is corrupt pkg_info: the package info for package 'fixesproto-5.0' is corrupt pkg_info: the package info for package 'flac-1.2.1_3' is corrupt pkg_info: the package info for package 'flex-2.5.37_1' is corrupt ... Of course I have WITH_PKGNG=YES in the make.conf, and I believe that has been there ever since the server was built. Is my best option to get the correct list from pkg info use rm -r /var/db/pkg/* to clear everything out and then reinstall all of the ports? -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Update your profile
Update Contact Details Hello! You can update your profile by clicking the below link. [1]Update your profile. If the above link is not working, copy and paste the below link in your browser. [2]http://traders.maillist-manage.com/up.zc?od=11287eca43f037c=171fe0c 086186b5cId=171fe0c0847e434key=1186b84d4414b5a Thank you, ImporterDeals.com This email was sent to [3]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org by [4]ImporterDeals.com using Zoho Campaigns. This is an auto generated mail. Please do not reply to this mail. If you are receiving this email continuously and if you think this is SPAM, please report to [5]ab...@zohocampaigns.com. References 1. http://traders.maillist-manage.com/up.zc?od=11287eca43f037c=171fe0c086186b5cId=171fe0c0847e434key=1186b84d4414b5a 2. http://traders.maillist-manage.com/up.zc?od=11287eca43f037c=171fe0c086186b5cId=171fe0c0847e434key=1186b84d4414b5a 3. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 4. file://localhost/tmp/ImporterDeals.com 5. mailto:ab...@zohocampaigns.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to Fix Port Audit showing ports not installed on a system
On 06/08/2013 19:23, dweimer wrote: Of course I have WITH_PKGNG=YES in the make.conf, and I believe that has been there ever since the server was built. Is my best option to get the correct list from pkg info use rm -r /var/db/pkg/* to clear everything out and then reinstall all of the ports? If you've had WITH_PKGNG=YES ever since the server was built then you shouldn't have any of the old-style pkg_tools entries in /var/db/pkg. Unless, that is, you've been using pkg_add(1) directly. Don't do that. You just end up with a complete mess. Remember folks -- pkgng is like getting married. Once you go with pkgng, you're not meant to dally with other package tools, but to stay faithful to pkgng from henceforth. I hope you've got the old-style pkg_tools per-package subdirectories in /var/db/pkg because either (i) you used to use pkg_tools and you ran pkg2ng to convert or (ii) you've been using portmaster, in which case those sub-directories only /look/ like the result of what pkg_tools generates, but are really just a place for portmaster to stash a few things. If those sub-directories contain files called thing like +CONTENTS or +COMMENT or other names beginning with '+' then you do have a messed up mixture of old pkg_tools and pkgng. First: remove all the subdirectories but *not* local.sqlite or repo.sqlite -- those are rather important bits of pkgng. Then you can force a reinstall of all packages by pkg upgrade -f Obviusly, you'll need pkg(8) configured to use a repo with all the appropriate packages available. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD
after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am
at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me.
my /etc/printcap entry:
---
HP:\
:rm=192.168.1.105:sd=/var/spool/hp:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\
:if=/usr/local/libexec/hp-network:
---
my /usr/local/libexec/hp-network entry:
---
#!/bin/sh
#
# hp-network - Text filter for HP printer `NPI2B483C' listening
# on port 9100. Installed in /usr/local/libexec/hp-network
#
exec /usr/libexec/lpr/lpf $@ | /usr/local/libexec/netprint 192.168.1.105
9100
---
my /usr/local/libexec/netprint entry:
---
!/usr/bin/perl -w
#
# netprint - Text filter for printer attached to network
# Installed in /usr/local/libexec/netprint
#
$#ARGV eq 1 || die Usage: $0 printer-hostname port-number;
$printer_host = $ARGV[0];
$printer_port = $ARGV[1];
use Socket;
$protocol = getprotobyname('tcp');
$address = inet_aton(192.168.1.105);
$sockaddr = sockaddr_in($printer_port, $address);
socket(PRINTER, PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, $protocol)
|| die Can't create TCP/IP stream socket: $!;
connect(PRINTER, $sockaddr) || die Can't contact $printer_host: $!;
while (STDIN) { print PRINTER; } exit 0;
---
Now my /var/log/lpd-errs is empty and in spool directory I have following
after running command lptest 20 5 | lpr -P HP :
content of /var/spool/hp
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 root juris 4 Aug 6 21:55 .seq
-rw-rw 1 daemon juris 70 Aug 6 21:55 cfA014laptops
-rw-rw 1 root juris 605 Aug 6 21:55 dfA014laptops
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root juris 0 Aug 6 21:55 errs.ukc0YLC
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root juris 5 Aug 6 21:55 lock
My printer is not responding in any way, it keeps on flashing Ready. it is
on the internal network having ip 192.168.1.105
thanks
Juris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to Fix Port Audit showing ports not installed on a system
On 08/06/2013 2:55 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 06/08/2013 19:23, dweimer wrote: Of course I have WITH_PKGNG=YES in the make.conf, and I believe that has been there ever since the server was built. Is my best option to get the correct list from pkg info use rm -r /var/db/pkg/* to clear everything out and then reinstall all of the ports? If you've had WITH_PKGNG=YES ever since the server was built then you shouldn't have any of the old-style pkg_tools entries in /var/db/pkg. Unless, that is, you've been using pkg_add(1) directly. Don't do that. You just end up with a complete mess. Remember folks -- pkgng is like getting married. Once you go with pkgng, you're not meant to dally with other package tools, but to stay faithful to pkgng from henceforth. I hope you've got the old-style pkg_tools per-package subdirectories in /var/db/pkg because either (i) you used to use pkg_tools and you ran pkg2ng to convert or (ii) you've been using portmaster, in which case those sub-directories only /look/ like the result of what pkg_tools generates, but are really just a place for portmaster to stash a few things. If those sub-directories contain files called thing like +CONTENTS or +COMMENT or other names beginning with '+' then you do have a messed up mixture of old pkg_tools and pkgng. First: remove all the subdirectories but *not* local.sqlite or repo.sqlite -- those are rather important bits of pkgng. Then you can force a reinstall of all packages by pkg upgrade -f Obviusly, you'll need pkg(8) configured to use a repo with all the appropriate packages available. Cheers, Matthew Thanks for the info, I have never used pkg_add, everything has been installed via ports and portmaster, but it is possible that some ports were installed prior to having the with pkgng added in make.conf, and that something happened in the pk2ng conversion. I thought I had built this machine after I had been running with pkgng, but perhaps this one was built right as I was switching over to it. I had originally built this machine with Xorg and KDE to use virtual box GUI, and once I became comfortable with the commands, switched to vboxheadless and removed all the GUI components. Which is where all the extra ports that were removed came from. I have removed the sub directories, now portaudit doesn't show any vulnerabilities in non existent ports, pkg info displays the correct installed packages, and portmaster -l matches the installed ports that pkg info displays. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me. Are you sure about that model number? I can't find specs for a Laserjet 1120M. There is a Laserjet M1120. It's a Winprinter. The file entries are confusing and use some non-base programs. You may be mixing the base system's lpr/lpd with the CUPS versions of the same names from ports. For plain lpr/lpd, I have this article: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Terrible disk performance with LSI / FreeBSD 9.2-RC1
We have a machine running 9.2-RC1 that's getting terrible disk I/O performance. Its performance has always been pretty bad, but it didn't really become clear how bad until we did a zpool replace on one of the drives and realized it was going to take 3 weeks to rebuild a 1TB drive. The hardware specs are: - 2 x Xeon L5420 - 32 GiB RAM - LSI Logic SAS 1068E - 2 x 32GB SSD's - 6 x 1TB Western Digital RE3 7200RPM SATA The LSI controller has the most recent firmware I'm aware of (6.36.00.00 / 1.33.00.00 dated 2011.08.24), is in IT mode, and appears to be working fine: mpt0 Adapter: Board Name: USASLP-L8i Board Assembly: USASLP-L8i Chip Name: C1068E Chip Revision: B3 RAID Levels: none mpt0 Configuration: 0 volumes, 8 drives drive da0 (30G) ONLINE FTM32GL25H 10 SATA drive da1 (29G) ONLINE SSDSA2SH032G1GN 8860 SATA drive da2 (931G) ONLINE WDC WD1002FBYS-0 0C05 SATA drive da3 (931G) ONLINE WDC WD1002FBYS-0 0C05 SATA drive da4 (931G) ONLINE WDC WD1002FBYS-0 0C05 SATA drive da5 (931G) ONLINE WDC WD1002FBYS-0 0C05 SATA drive da6 (931G) ONLINE WDC WD1002FBYS-0 0C05 SATA drive da7 (931G) ONLINE WDC WD1002FBYS-0 0C05 SATA The eight drives are configured as ZIL, L2ARC on SSD and a six drive raidz2 on the spinning disks. We did a ZFS replace on the last drive in the line, and the resilver is proceeding at less than 800k/sec. extended device statistics device r/s w/skr/skw/s qlen svc_t %b da00.0 0.0 0.0 0.10 0.9 0 da10.0 8.2 0.019.90 0.1 0 da2 125.6 23.0 768.240.54 33.0 88 da3 126.6 23.1 769.041.34 32.3 89 da4 126.0 24.0 768.542.74 32.1 88 da5 125.9 22.0 768.240.14 31.6 87 da6 124.0 22.0 766.639.95 31.4 84 da70.0 136.9 0.0 801.30 0.6 4 The system has plenty of free RAM, is 99.7% idle, has nothing else going on, and runs like a one-legged dog. There are no error messages or any sign of a problem anywhere, other than the really terrible performance. (When not rebuilding, it does light NFS duty. That performance is similarly bad, but has never really mattered.) Similar systems running Solaris put out 10x these numbers claiming 30% busy instead of 90% busy. Does anyone have any suggestions for how I could troubleshoot this further? At this point, I'm kind of at a loss as to where to go from here. My goal is to try to phase out the Solaris machines, but this is kind of a roadblock. Thanks for any advice! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD
Model number: HP LaserJet M1120n MFP I try your how-to in few days as it seems I need to redo whole config. I will post my results, thanks 2013. gada 6. aug. 23:17 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com rakstīja: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me. Are you sure about that model number? I can't find specs for a Laserjet 1120M. There is a Laserjet M1120. It's a Winprinter. The file entries are confusing and use some non-base programs. You may be mixing the base system's lpr/lpd with the CUPS versions of the same names from ports. For plain lpr/lpd, I have this article: http://www.wonkity.com/~**wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.**htmlhttp://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: 2013. gada 6. aug. 23:17 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com rakst?ja: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me. Are you sure about that model number? I can't find specs for a Laserjet 1120M. There is a Laserjet M1120. It's a Winprinter. The file entries are confusing and use some non-base programs. You may be mixing the base system's lpr/lpd with the CUPS versions of the same names from ports. For plain lpr/lpd, I have this article: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html Model number: HP LaserJet M1120n MFP I try your how-to in few days as it seems I need to redo whole config. I will post my results, thanks The Laserjet M1120 is a winprinter, which means it does not understand plain text or common PDLs like PCL or PostScript. There is print/foo2zjs in ports, but it's meant to be used with CUPS. I have not tested it.___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:57:27 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: 2013. gada 6. aug. 23:17 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com rakst?ja: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me. Are you sure about that model number? I can't find specs for a Laserjet 1120M. There is a Laserjet M1120. It's a Winprinter. The file entries are confusing and use some non-base programs. You may be mixing the base system's lpr/lpd with the CUPS versions of the same names from ports. For plain lpr/lpd, I have this article: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html Model number: HP LaserJet M1120n MFP I try your how-to in few days as it seems I need to redo whole config. I will post my results, thanks The Laserjet M1120 is a winprinter, which means it does not understand plain text or common PDLs like PCL or PostScript. There is print/foo2zjs in ports, but it's meant to be used with CUPS. I have not tested it. It seems that a HPLIP interface is available for this printer, so it should probably work with CUPS and _maybe_ with the normal means of printing (FreeBSD printer spooler plus a printer filter that turns PS, the _default_ output language for printing, into the specific non-standard language that printer wants to be spoken to in). http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/laserjet/hp_laserjet_m1120_mfp.html http://foo2xqx.rkkda.com/ I'm using a similar approach for a terrible Samsung color laserprinter (foo2qpdl-wrapper in my specific case) which I could easily integrate with the already mentioned CUPS, as well as the normal system's printer subsystem. However, I also have not tested if it works for the M1120, because I prefer to use printers that work, that's why I don't own such a thing. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
