RE: Broken quoting (was Re: XFCE4)

2008-11-03 Thread Bob McConnell
On Behalf Of Jonathan McKeown
On Monday 03 November 2008 08:38:07 joeb wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eitan Adler
 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:14 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
 Subject: Re: XFCE4

 Thank you for your random guess, but research of the ports system
seem to
 indicate a whole suite of ports are needed to build a complete
working
 environment.
 Waiting for a real user to fill in the details of what combination of
ports
 they used to build their XFCE4 desktop.
 
 I don't know whether it's you or your email client, but your quoting
is 
 hideously broken. Please fix it.

It's his email client. Microsoft Lookout will no longer do standard
quoting and forces top posting of replies. I am also required to use it
by our IT department policies and have to manually reformat each message
I reply to. There used to be an option that could be set to get angle
bracket quoting, but that disappeared in the update from MS-Office 2000
to 2003.

The top line, -Original Message-, is the clue that he is using
the Microsoft client. That is its standard separator for all replies.
Yes, it is a major pain. I really do prefer Thunderbird.

Bob McConnell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Broken quoting (was Re: XFCE4)

2008-11-03 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Monday 03 November 2008 16:17:20 Bob McConnell wrote:

[Jonathan to joeb via freebsd-questions]
  I don't know whether it's you or your email client, but your quoting
  is hideously broken. Please fix it.

 It's his email client. Microsoft Lookout will no longer do standard
 quoting and forces top posting of replies. I am also required to use it
 by our IT department policies and have to manually reformat each message
 I reply to. There used to be an option that could be set to get angle
 bracket quoting, but that disappeared in the update from MS-Office 2000
 to 2003.

 The top line, -Original Message-, is the clue that he is using
 the Microsoft client. That is its standard separator for all replies.
 Yes, it is a major pain. I really do prefer Thunderbird.

I'm used to seeing the original message starting with its headers in the 
Outlook style - that's not what's confusing me here.

joeb, I don't mean to be rude but I find your posts hard to read (and I've 
seen others comment so as well), because instead you somehow end up with the 
original headers AFTER the original message, which is unexpected, and your 
response after that again - looking as though it belongs to the original 
header block.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Broken quoting (was Re: XFCE4)

2008-11-03 Thread Frank Steinborn


That's wrong.


Am 03.11.2008 um 15:59 schrieb Jonathan McKeown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
:



On Monday 03 November 2008 16:17:20 Bob McConnell wrote:

[Jonathan to joeb via freebsd-questions]

I don't know whether it's you or your email client, but your quoting
is hideously broken. Please fix it.


It's his email client. Microsoft Lookout will no longer do standard
quoting and forces top posting of replies. I am also required to  
use it
by our IT department policies and have to manually reformat each  
message

I reply to. There used to be an option that could be set to get angle
bracket quoting, but that disappeared in the update from MS-Office  
2000

to 2003.

The top line, -Original Message-, is the clue that he is  
using

the Microsoft client. That is its standard separator for all replies.
Yes, it is a major pain. I really do prefer Thunderbird.


I'm used to seeing the original message starting with its headers in  
the

Outlook style - that's not what's confusing me here.

joeb, I don't mean to be rude but I find your posts hard to read  
(and I've
seen others comment so as well), because instead you somehow end up  
with the
original headers AFTER the original message, which is unexpected,  
and your
response after that again - looking as though it belongs to the  
original

header block.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Broken quoting (was Re: XFCE4)

2008-11-03 Thread Frank Steinborn
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Frank Steinborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 That's wrong.


 Am 03.11.2008 um 15:59 schrieb Jonathan McKeown
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Monday 03 November 2008 16:17:20 Bob McConnell wrote:

 [Jonathan to joeb via freebsd-questions]

 I don't know whether it's you or your email client, but your quoting
 is hideously broken. Please fix it.

 It's his email client. Microsoft Lookout will no longer do standard
 quoting and forces top posting of replies. I am also required to use it
 by our IT department policies and have to manually reformat each message
 I reply to. There used to be an option that could be set to get angle
 bracket quoting, but that disappeared in the update from MS-Office 2000
 to 2003.

 The top line, -Original Message-, is the clue that he is using
 the Microsoft client. That is its standard separator for all replies.
 Yes, it is a major pain. I really do prefer Thunderbird.

 I'm used to seeing the original message starting with its headers in the
 Outlook style - that's not what's confusing me here.

 joeb, I don't mean to be rude but I find your posts hard to read (and I've
 seen others comment so as well), because instead you somehow end up with
 the
 original headers AFTER the original message, which is unexpected, and your
 response after that again - looking as though it belongs to the original
 header block.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm sorry, this was not intended to go to you Jonathan, nor to the
list. I messed something up here. Sorry.

Frank
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Broken quoting (was Re: XFCE4)

2008-11-02 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Monday 03 November 2008 08:38:07 joeb wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 FBSD1 wrote:
  What port names need to be installed to create a XFCE4 desktop

 environment?

  I was looking for a mega port like kde3 has but could not identify one.
  Thanks in advance.

 I'm going to rake a random guess: x11-wm/xfce4 ?
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eitan Adler
 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:14 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
 Subject: Re: XFCE4

 Thank you for your random guess, but research of the ports system seem to
 indicate a whole suite of ports are needed to build a complete working
 environment.
 Waiting for a real user to fill in the details of what combination of ports
 they used to build their XFCE4 desktop.

I don't know whether it's you or your email client, but your quoting is 
hideously broken. Please fix it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]