Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Zyumbilev, Peter


On 27/01/2013 06:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
 If you needed version control features on your ports tree (especially if
 you were regularly contributing changes to ports), getting and updating
 your tree through subversion would have some extra features you might
 want, but it doesn't sound as if that is the case for you.
 
 Unless you have a specific reason why portsnap doesn't fit your use
 case, it's definitely the way to go for just keeping a ports tree
 updated regularly.


Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to
subversion  ?

For ports is easy(portsnap), but I for system update I still have
problems saying good bye to old habits and I still use cvsup...:-)

Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/01/2013 00:11, W. D. wrote:
 What would be the best Cron command to keep ports updated on a daily
 basis?

Try this as a crontab entry:

0  3  *  *  *  *  /usr/sbin/portsnap cron update

Two points to note:

1) The 'cron' verb is important for anyone setting up an automated job
like this.  It causes portsnap to wait for a random number of seconds
(but less than 1 hour) before connecting to the portsnap server.  Since
the tendency is for people to schedule cron jobs to happen on the hour,
this helps to avoid everyone connecting at once and smooths out the
server load.

2) This assumes that you have previously run

   portsnap fetch extract

to get yourself a portsnap-ready copy of the ports tree.  You only need
to do that once, but you should move aside any pre-existing copy of
/usr/ports obtained by any means other than portsnap(8) before you do
(but keep anything under /usr/ports/distfiles and maybe
/usr/ports/packages).  Something like:

   cd /usr
   mv ports ports.old
   mkdir ports
   mv ports.old/distfiles ports/distfiles
   mv ports.old/packages ports/packages
   portsnap fetch extract

Although this may be complicated if any of /usr/ports,
/usr/ports/distfiles or /usr/ports/packages are on a separate partition
or ZFS.

I say 'move aside' due to the caution imbued by having been a
professional sysadmin for more years than I care to remember.  If you
are still convinced of your own infallibility, then you might find rm(1)
an acceptable alternative.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.

PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Mike Clarke
On Sunday 27 Jan 2013 09:46:51 Matthew Seaman wrote:

 to get yourself a portsnap-ready copy of the ports tree.  You only need
 to do that once, but you should move aside any pre-existing copy of
 /usr/ports obtained by any means other than portsnap(8) before you do
 (but keep anything under /usr/ports/distfiles and maybe
 /usr/ports/packages).  Something like:
 
cd /usr
mv ports ports.old
mkdir ports
mv ports.old/distfiles ports/distfiles
mv ports.old/packages ports/packages
portsnap fetch extract
 
 Although this may be complicated if any of /usr/ports,
 /usr/ports/distfiles or /usr/ports/packages are on a separate partition
 or ZFS.

I suppose the best approach with ZFS would be to make a snapshot immediately 
prior to running portsnap.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/01/2013 08:35, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
 Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to
 subversion  ?

Most of the guides around freebsd.org are aimed at developers who will
be using SVN read-write.  For simple read-only use (ie. not checking
anything into the repository) the following should suffice:

  0) Install svn

 It isn't part of the base system, and it has too many external
 dependencies with different licensing terms for it to be bought
 in easily.  There's been some discussion about this, but it hasn't
 happened yet.  If it did, the imported version would be fairly
 minimal, and anyone wanting to use it for serious development
 would probably just grab the ports version anyhow.

 If all you want to do is pull down a copy of the sources then you
 can turn off most of the options to reduce the fairly large
 dependency tree to something more manageable:

 BDB=off: Berkeley Database
 BOOK=off: Install the Subversion Book
 ENHANCED_KEYWORD=on: Enhanced svn:keyword support
 FREEBSD_TEMPLATE=on: FreeBSD Project log template
 GNOME_KEYRING=off: Build with GNOME Keyring auth support
 KDE_KWALLET=off: Build with KDE KWallet auth support
 MAINTAINER_DEBUG=off: Build debug version
 MOD_DAV_SVN=off: mod_dav_svn module for Apache 2.X
 MOD_DONTDOTHAT=off: mod_dontdothat for Apache 2.X
 NEON=off: WebDAV/Delta-V repo access module (neon)
 P4_STYLE_MARKERS=off: Perforce-style conflict markers
 SASL=off: SASL support
 SERF=on: WebDAV/Delta-V repo access module (serf)
 STATIC=off: Build static version (no shared libs)
 SVNAUTHZ_VALIDATE=off: install svnauthz-validate
 SVNMUCC=off: Install Multiple URL Command Client
 SVNSERVE_WRAPPER=off: Enable svnserve wrapper
 TEST=off: Run subversion test suite

 There is the new devel/subversion-static port which does all that,
 and compiles subversion with static linkage so it has *no* runtime
 dependencies on anything else.  The disadvantage here is that if
 there is, say, a security hole discovered in the one of the
 libraries subversion links against, you won't secure the
 statically linked copy of subversion simply by updating to a fixed
 version of the shlib.  subversion-static is really only intended
 for providing a one-off binary package that people can download
 and install in order to bootstrap a more standard FreeBSD
 environment.

  1) Choose a SVN mirror close to you.  Currently there are two choices:

svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org  -- Western USA
svn0.us-east.FreeBSD.org  -- Eastern USA

 Use whichever one gives you best performance.  Certainly from
 Europe at the moment us-east seems to be the best choice.

 The number of SVN mirrors and their global coverage should increase
 over time, but it will never need as many servers as the old cvsup
 network.

 The canonical list of SVN mirrors is here:


http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/svn-mirrors.html

  2) Choose a protocol for access the SVN servers.  Your choices in
 order of preference are

 svn://
 https://
 http://

 Use svn:// for best performance.  If you're concerned about MITM
 attacks injecting trojans into the FreeBSD sources, then use
 https and be sure to verify the certificate hashes on first
 connection.  Otherwise, if you're stuck behind a restrictive
 firewall, use http://

  3) Choose which branch you want to mirror.  It's relatively easy to
 switch between branches and doesn't involve downloading the entire
 contents of /usr/src all over again if you change your mind.
 However right now, the viable choices are

head --- Current, the bleeding edge, really only suitable
 for development purposes

stable/9 --- 9-STABLE  Still a rapidly changing development
 branch, but not quite so close to the edge, and
 with less bleeding involved.

stable/8 --- 8-STABLE  Ditto.

releng/9.1 --- 9.1-RELEASE  This tracks any security patches to
 version 9.1.  However, in this case you would be
 better advised to use freebsd-update(8) to maintain
 your /usr/src directory tree instead.

Similarly releng/9.0 releng/8.3 releng/7.4 for other supported
release versions.

 Don't be fooled into pulling down release/9.1.0 or the like --
 this is not a *branch* but a *snapshot*.  If you think you want
 release/9.1.0 then you really want releng/9.1 instead.

  4) Make sure /usr/src is empty.  Pre-existing files can cause you
 grief at some unexpected later date even if they don't cause the
 initial checkout to fail.

  5) Put it all together.  Run a command like so to check out the
 content of /usr/src for your chosen branch from your chosen 

Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/01/2013 10:07, Mike Clarke wrote:

 I suppose the best approach with ZFS would be to make a snapshot immediately 
 prior to running portsnap.

Yes.  That would do the trick quite neatly.  In fact, snapshot before
each time you run portsnap.

Cheers

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.

PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Zyumbilev, Peter


On 27/01/2013 12:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:

   Cheers,
 
   Matthew
 


Matthew,

Fantastic howto ! Thanks ! Really a good job...as usual :-)

Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread MFV
Hello Matthew,

Thanks for an outstanding piece of documentation.  It resolves a number of 
concerns I had and convinced me to move from portsnap where I discovered an 
apparent bug  that gave me security concerns.  More specifically I manually 
edited /usr/ports/UPDATING and portsnap did not recognise the change and 
download a proper copy.

The only downside with svn seems to be the 728 MB footprint.

Cheers ...

Mark

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:46:23 Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On 27/01/2013 08:35, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
  Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to
  subversion  ?
 
 Most of the guides around freebsd.org are aimed at developers who will
 be using SVN read-write.  For simple read-only use (ie. not checking
 anything into the repository) the following should suffice:
 
   0) Install svn
 
  It isn't part of the base system, and it has too many external
  dependencies with different licensing terms for it to be bought
  in easily.  There's been some discussion about this, but it hasn't
  happened yet.  If it did, the imported version would be fairly
  minimal, and anyone wanting to use it for serious development
  would probably just grab the ports version anyhow.
 
  If all you want to do is pull down a copy of the sources then you
  can turn off most of the options to reduce the fairly large
  dependency tree to something more manageable:
 
  BDB=off: Berkeley Database
  BOOK=off: Install the Subversion Book
  ENHANCED_KEYWORD=on: Enhanced svn:keyword support
  FREEBSD_TEMPLATE=on: FreeBSD Project log template
  GNOME_KEYRING=off: Build with GNOME Keyring auth support
  KDE_KWALLET=off: Build with KDE KWallet auth support
  MAINTAINER_DEBUG=off: Build debug version
  MOD_DAV_SVN=off: mod_dav_svn module for Apache 2.X
  MOD_DONTDOTHAT=off: mod_dontdothat for Apache 2.X
  NEON=off: WebDAV/Delta-V repo access module (neon)
  P4_STYLE_MARKERS=off: Perforce-style conflict markers
  SASL=off: SASL support
  SERF=on: WebDAV/Delta-V repo access module (serf)
  STATIC=off: Build static version (no shared libs)
  SVNAUTHZ_VALIDATE=off: install svnauthz-validate
  SVNMUCC=off: Install Multiple URL Command Client
  SVNSERVE_WRAPPER=off: Enable svnserve wrapper
  TEST=off: Run subversion test suite
 
  There is the new devel/subversion-static port which does all that,
  and compiles subversion with static linkage so it has *no* runtime
  dependencies on anything else.  The disadvantage here is that if
  there is, say, a security hole discovered in the one of the
  libraries subversion links against, you won't secure the
  statically linked copy of subversion simply by updating to a fixed
  version of the shlib.  subversion-static is really only intended
  for providing a one-off binary package that people can download
  and install in order to bootstrap a more standard FreeBSD
  environment.
 
   1) Choose a SVN mirror close to you.  Currently there are two choices:
 
 svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org  -- Western USA
 svn0.us-east.FreeBSD.org  -- Eastern USA
 
  Use whichever one gives you best performance.  Certainly from
  Europe at the moment us-east seems to be the best choice.
 
  The number of SVN mirrors and their global coverage should increase
  over time, but it will never need as many servers as the old cvsup
  network.
 
  The canonical list of SVN mirrors is here:
 
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/svn-mirrors.html
 
   2) Choose a protocol for access the SVN servers.  Your choices in
  order of preference are
 
  svn://
  https://
  http://
 
  Use svn:// for best performance.  If you're concerned about MITM
  attacks injecting trojans into the FreeBSD sources, then use
  https and be sure to verify the certificate hashes on first
  connection.  Otherwise, if you're stuck behind a restrictive
  firewall, use http://
 
   3) Choose which branch you want to mirror.  It's relatively easy to
  switch between branches and doesn't involve downloading the entire
  contents of /usr/src all over again if you change your mind.
  However right now, the viable choices are
 
 head --- Current, the bleeding edge, really only suitable
  for development purposes
 
 stable/9 --- 9-STABLE  Still a rapidly changing development
  branch, but not quite so close to the edge, and
  with less bleeding involved.
 
 stable/8 --- 8-STABLE  Ditto.
 
 releng/9.1 --- 9.1-RELEASE  This tracks any security patches to
  version 9.1.  However, in this case you would be
  better advised to use freebsd-update(8) to maintain
your /usr/src directory tree instead.
 
 Similarly 

Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:51:12 -0500
MFV mrk...@acm.org wrote:

 The only downside with svn seems to be the 728 MB footprint.

With hard disc space running at around 10c per gigabyte it's a
minor issue.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Robert Huff

Steve O'Hara-Smith writes:

   The only downside with svn seems to be the 728 MB footprint.
  
   With hard disc space running at around 10c per gigabyte it's a
  minor issue.

Doesn't that depend on whose money it is?


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread Warren Block

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:


 2) Choose a protocol for access the SVN servers.  Your choices in
order of preference are

svn://
https://
http://

Use svn:// for best performance.  If you're concerned about MITM
attacks injecting trojans into the FreeBSD sources, then use
https and be sure to verify the certificate hashes on first
connection.  Otherwise, if you're stuck behind a restrictive
firewall, use http://


HTTPS is preferred.  The SVN mirrors section of the Handbook will soon 
reflect that.


Performance should not be very different from svn://.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-27 Thread RW
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:51:12 -0500
MFV wrote:

 Hello Matthew,
 
 Thanks for an outstanding piece of documentation.  It resolves a
 number of concerns I had and convinced me to move from portsnap where
 I discovered an apparent bug  that gave me security concerns.  More
 specifically I manually edited /usr/ports/UPDATING and portsnap did
 not recognise the change and download a proper copy.

I don't see why that's a problem. The function of portsnap update is
to update files in the tree that have been updated, deleted or added
in the repository. Resynchronising the tree and it's metadata with the
snapshot is what portsnap extract is for.  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-26 Thread W. D.
According to:

  http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html

Cvsup is deprecated.  If I have a Cron entry like:

#-
#Min   HrDOM   Mnth  DOW   Command

#   At 3:46 in the morning, everyday, as root, update the ports tree:
46 3 * * * /usr/local/bin/cvsup   -h   cvsup12.FreeBSD.org  
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile 
#-

What should I use: freebsd-update, Subversion, portsnap, or what?

What would be the best Cron command to keep ports updated on a daily
basis?

Thanks for any help you can provide.







Start Here to Find It Fast!™ - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/
$9.99 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Cronjob Cvsup - What?

2013-01-26 Thread Lowell Gilbert
W. D. w...@us-webmasters.com writes:

 According to:

   http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html

 Cvsup is deprecated.  If I have a Cron entry like:

 #-
 #Min   HrDOM   Mnth  DOW   Command

 #   At 3:46 in the morning, everyday, as root, update the ports tree:
 46 3 * * * /usr/local/bin/cvsup   -h   
 cvsup12.FreeBSD.org  /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile 
 #-

 What should I use: freebsd-update, Subversion, portsnap, or what?

 What would be the best Cron command to keep ports updated on a daily
 basis?

portsnap is almost certainly the best answer for you.

freebsd-update is for the base system, not ports. 

If you needed version control features on your ports tree (especially if
you were regularly contributing changes to ports), getting and updating
your tree through subversion would have some extra features you might
want, but it doesn't sound as if that is the case for you.

Unless you have a specific reason why portsnap doesn't fit your use
case, it's definitely the way to go for just keeping a ports tree
updated regularly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org