On 7/27/2014 3:07 PM, Pine W wrote:
That discussion seems to have fragmented badly away from the original
topic of a civility board, and I'm not sure that listing grievances,
even legitimate ones, is likely to produce any good outcomes in that
discussion. Might be better to start a new discussion with a narrow
focus and specific proposals for change.
Pine
Probably anything less than a proposal worked over and signed on to by
20 editors on this topic would get derailed by those who just want to do
their thing with out mother watching over the shoulder - or whatever.
One of the items I put under suggestions on the talk page of the Gender
Gap Task force agenda is thinking up policy tweaks and changes, like
regarding WP:Civility and WP:Harassment, to make Wikipedia more
comfortable for women. It probably would be best to start a discussion
of solutions there, including some ideas that came up here in the last week.
We're still building infrastructure, so come on by!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Carol Moore dc
carolmoor...@verizon.net mailto:carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
It ranges all over the place on various issues.
Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#Where_and_how_to_request_a_Civility_board
I'm now trying to use it for a definitive ruling as to whether the
Gender Gap task force main page/subpage/essay can list
particularly obnoxious examples of sexism, like a number that were
mentioned here over the time.
Pandora's box is being opened?
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
