Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.5.1 beta 2 Sanity tests
On 06/19/2014 11:32 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 19/06/2014, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote: snip I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid for GlusterFS. This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am thinking it may have something to do with a sym link to the same directory bz i found a while back? Idk, I'll get it sorted tomorrow. I got this sorted, I needed to add a sleep between the file create and the link. I ran through it manually and it worked every time, took me a few goes to think of timing issue. I didn't need this on 3.4.0.59, is there anything that needs investigated? Any ideas? :) Nope :-( Pranith + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.5.1 beta 2 Sanity tests
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yup,
On Jun 17, 2014 7:45 PM, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote:
On 17/06/2014, at 11:33 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
Here are the tests that failed. Note that n0 is a generated wname,
name255 is a 255 character string, and path 1023 is a 1023 long path
/opt/qa/tools/posix-testsuite/tests/link/02.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 10
Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 4, 6
expect 0 link ${n0} ${name255} #4
expect 0 unlink ${n0} #5 - this passed
expect 0 unlink ${name255} #6
/opt/qa/tools/posix-testsuite/tests/link/03.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 16
Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 8-9
expect 0 link ${n0} ${path1023} #8
expect 0 unlink ${path1023} #9
I gotta go for the day, I'll try to repro outside the script tomorrow.
As a data point, people have occasionally mentioned to me in IRC
and via email that these posix tests fail for them... even when
run against a (non-glustered) ext4/xfs filesystem. So, it _could_
be just some weird spurious thing. If you figure out what though,
that'd be cool. :)
+ Justin
--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid
for GlusterFS. This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am
thinking it may have something to do with a sym link to the same directory
bz i found a while back? Idk, I'll get it sorted tomorrow.
I got this sorted, I needed to add a sleep between the file create and
the link. I ran through it manually and it worked every time, took me a
few goes to think of timing issue. I didn't need this on 3.4.0.59, is
there anything that needs investigated?
-b
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.5.1 beta 2 Sanity tests
On 19/06/2014, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote: snip I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid for GlusterFS. This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am thinking it may have something to do with a sym link to the same directory bz i found a while back? Idk, I'll get it sorted tomorrow. I got this sorted, I needed to add a sleep between the file create and the link. I ran through it manually and it worked every time, took me a few goes to think of timing issue. I didn't need this on 3.4.0.59, is there anything that needs investigated? Any ideas? :) + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
