郭小菲

2018-02-03 Thread 郭小菲



郭小菲
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


郭小菲

2018-02-03 Thread 郭小菲


郭小菲
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Can't import public key

2018-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2018-02-03 09:15:30 -0600, Pijus Kar wrote:

> We are using GnuPG 1.2.1 on AIX. We are trying to import a public key
> received from others which is generated on GnuPG v2.
> Will there be any problem importing the public key. While importing we are
> getting below error -

gnupg 1.2.1 is positively ancient (over 15 years old) with many many
known problems.  please upgrade to a newer version of GnuPG.

Regards,

--dkg

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Can't import public key

2018-02-03 Thread Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users
Hi.

Are you sure it is a RSA key and noit an ECC key?

AFAIK is gpg < 2.X not capable of working with ECC keys.

Regards,
Dirk


Am Samstag, den 03.02.2018, 09:15 -0600 schrieb Pijus Kar:
> Hi,
> 
> We are using GnuPG 1.2.1 on AIX. We are trying to import a public key
> received from others which is generated on GnuPG v2.
> Will there be any problem importing the public key. While importing
> we are
> getting below error -
> 
> gpg: key 1D75115C: invalid self-signature on user id xxx xxx xxx
> gpg: key 1D75115C: invalid subkey binding
> gpg: key 1D75115C: no valid user IDs
> gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
> 
> Is it something for the version incompatibility or in the key?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Pijus
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-- 
Dirk Gottschalk
Paulusstrasse 6-8
52064 Aachen
Tel.: +49 1573 1152350

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Can't import public key

2018-02-03 Thread Pijus Kar
Hi,

We are using GnuPG 1.2.1 on AIX. We are trying to import a public key
received from others which is generated on GnuPG v2.
Will there be any problem importing the public key. While importing we are
getting below error -

gpg: key 1D75115C: invalid self-signature on user id xxx xxx xxx
gpg: key 1D75115C: invalid subkey binding
gpg: key 1D75115C: no valid user IDs
gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature

Is it something for the version incompatibility or in the key?


Regards,
Pijus
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-04

2018-02-03 Thread Tapio Sokura

Hello,

On 3.2.2018 7:25, FuzzyDrawrings via Gnupg-users wrote:

|m: 4f70656e504750040016080006050255f95f9504ff000c
|
|Using the SHA2-256 hash algorithm yields the digest:
|
|d: f6220a3f757814f4c2176ffbb68b00249cd4ccdc059c4b34ad871f30b1740280

I can obtain m, no problem. But fail to obtain d as m's sha256 digest.

Instead I repeatedly get:
d: 30d3de39f655d86b516058ae8c483f1a2cc10f0048882794655d4ce910abb7d6

Can anyone check if they are able to get the result shown in the documentation? 
And if so, is there anything else in addition to m that is input for the sha256 
hash?


I haven't read the context of the draft, so I don't know whether the 
sample 'm' is formed correctly, but this is what I get with the 'm' 
listed above being in file testvec:


$ od -t x1 testvec
000 4f 70 65 6e 50 47 50 04 00 16 08 00 06 05 02 55
020 f9 5f 95 04 ff 00 00 00 0c
031
$ sha256sum testvec
f6220a3f757814f4c2176ffbb68b00249cd4ccdc059c4b34ad871f30b1740280  testvec

So it matches with the document. Are you sure the 'm' you end up is 
exactly the same as in the draft?


  Tapio

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users