Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses
We are a SERVICE Provider, so we want to provide a good service to our customers. After the first issue from them, they cleaned up all Maschines, but the proplem reappered two wekks later. Maybe it is some mobile device which gets attached to their network. So Yes, I shut down their service weeks ago. They told me, they corrected the problem, I reactivated the account and after two weeks it happend again... Unfortunatly they can't send from their DUP Provider, as they force them to use the providers free eMail Adress. The main Problem is that this spammings normaly happens during night time. So I am looking for a method to prevent them (and other customers) to start this again. When we detect it (kiwi-Syslog sends alarm), it is normally to late and our queue is filled with bounces which has to be removed manually. To mitigate this problem, I made a small script wich monitors the queue size and send alarm messages, if the queue grows unusual. As the from adress is faked to, we got masses of bounces. - And the sender has no idea what he did... So do you have any Idea how to force users to a special from: domain? Technical, not idiological... With best regards Matti Haack I have some problem with the way IMAL (8.x) handles SMTP-Auth email. A customer from us seems to have a compromised host, which sends Spam evry two weeks or so trough their local gateway tell them that you will not relay outbound mail that has been submitted to their system without SMTP AUTH. Since they are spamming you from a trusted IP, you show them your logs and shut them off until they fix their system. In the meantime, their own gateway can send directly to Internet and shift the problem onto them. - which is relayed over our IMAIL Server. Their Mail server requires no authentification for their local hosts to send mail I'd be surprised if a mail-bot/trojan in a compromised machine is doing SMTP AUTH to submit spam to their mail server. Their mail server is more likely doing relay for addresses. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jegliche Art von Reproduktion, Verbreitung, Vervielfaeltigung, Modifikation, Verteilung und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail-Nachricht ist untersagt, soweit dies nicht ausdruecklich genehmigt wurde. Jegliche Haftung fur Ansprueche, die aufgrund der Kommunikation per E-Mail begruendet werden koennten, ist ausgeschlossen, soweit der Haftungsausschluss gesetzlich zulaessig ist. -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses
You could set up a special gateway dedicated only to them. Put it on a timer so it only runs during the day. But you really have to solve the problem or help them to do that. Maybe they would hire you as a consultant to do just that. Presumably, you could check the logs to determine the originating IP and track the source down that way. If not, then use process of elimination - what is left on at night? -d - Original Message - From: Matti Haack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Len Conrad Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 4:58 AM Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses We are a SERVICE Provider, so we want to provide a good service to our customers. After the first issue from them, they cleaned up all Maschines, but the proplem reappered two wekks later. Maybe it is some mobile device which gets attached to their network. So Yes, I shut down their service weeks ago. They told me, they corrected the problem, I reactivated the account and after two weeks it happend again... Unfortunatly they can't send from their DUP Provider, as they force them to use the providers free eMail Adress. The main Problem is that this spammings normaly happens during night time. So I am looking for a method to prevent them (and other customers) to start this again. When we detect it (kiwi-Syslog sends alarm), it is normally to late and our queue is filled with bounces which has to be removed manually. To mitigate this problem, I made a small script wich monitors the queue size and send alarm messages, if the queue grows unusual. As the from adress is faked to, we got masses of bounces. - And the sender has no idea what he did... So do you have any Idea how to force users to a special from: domain? Technical, not idiological... With best regards Matti Haack I have some problem with the way IMAL (8.x) handles SMTP-Auth email. A customer from us seems to have a compromised host, which sends Spam evry two weeks or so trough their local gateway tell them that you will not relay outbound mail that has been submitted to their system without SMTP AUTH. Since they are spamming you from a trusted IP, you show them your logs and shut them off until they fix their system. In the meantime, their own gateway can send directly to Internet and shift the problem onto them. - which is relayed over our IMAIL Server. Their Mail server requires no authentification for their local hosts to send mail I'd be surprised if a mail-bot/trojan in a compromised machine is doing SMTP AUTH to submit spam to their mail server. Their mail server is more likely doing relay for addresses. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jegliche Art von Reproduktion, Verbreitung, Vervielfaeltigung, Modifikation, Verteilung und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail-Nachricht ist untersagt, soweit dies nicht ausdruecklich genehmigt wurde. Jegliche Haftung fur Ansprueche, die aufgrund der Kommunikation per E-Mail begruendet werden koennten, ist ausgeschlossen, soweit der Haftungsausschluss gesetzlich zulaessig ist. -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses
Have you found the IP address of the host? Should not it be easy to find it in one of the spam messages? adamc Matti Haack wrote: We are a SERVICE Provider, so we want to provide a good service to our customers. After the first issue from them, they cleaned up all Maschines, but the proplem reappered two wekks later. Maybe it is some mobile device which gets attached to their network. So Yes, I shut down their service weeks ago. They told me, they corrected the problem, I reactivated the account and after two weeks it happend again... Unfortunatly they can't send from their DUP Provider, as they force them to use the providers free eMail Adress. The main Problem is that this spammings normaly happens during night time. So I am looking for a method to prevent them (and other customers) to start this again. When we detect it (kiwi-Syslog sends alarm), it is normally to late and our queue is filled with bounces which has to be removed manually. To mitigate this problem, I made a small script wich monitors the queue size and send alarm messages, if the queue grows unusual. As the from adress is faked to, we got masses of bounces. - And the sender has no idea what he did... So do you have any Idea how to force users to a special from: domain? Technical, not idiological... With best regards Matti Haack I have some problem with the way IMAL (8.x) handles SMTP-Auth email. A customer from us seems to have a compromised host, which sends Spam evry two weeks or so trough their local gateway tell them that you will not relay outbound mail that has been submitted to their system without SMTP AUTH. Since they are spamming you from a trusted IP, you show them your logs and shut them off until they fix their system. In the meantime, their own gateway can send directly to Internet and shift the problem onto them. - which is relayed over our IMAIL Server. Their Mail server requires no authentification for their local hosts to send mail I'd be surprised if a mail-bot/trojan in a compromised machine is doing SMTP AUTH to submit spam to their mail server. Their mail server is more likely doing relay for addresses. Len - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [Fwd: RE: [IMail Forum] [IMail 8.15] James Mason - SIS-E000192470 [T20060322001D]]
If [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on machine A sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on machine B it will never get there if using the home IMail server as their outbound MTA. IMail doesn't send all mail through the gateway. It only send remote mail through the gateway and since example.com is defined on both servers you will get an envelope rejection right after the RCPT TO unless the peer list is active. Eric S - Original Message - From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [IMail Forum] [IMail 8.15] James Mason - SIS-E000192470 [T20060322001D]] This will work except you must point your local users to the IMGate machine as well otherwise inter-domain mail where the users are on different machines won't work For Imail domain users to send to recipients of peered domains on other machines, each Imail box runs send all mail to gateway of IMGate. A peered IMail domain doesn't have probe other peered machines to find the recipient's account. Imail msgs to off-machine peered domains go to gateway IMGate which then relays directly to the correct Imail machine. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender retry with delete? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
they appear to be stuck with "T" files. We have 2 retried and delete checked. Eric Shanbrom wrote: Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender retry with delete? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses
Have you found the IP address of the host? Should not it be easy to find it in one of the spam messages? They use some local mailserver (ken? Jana? or something like this) which relays the mail to us. So the mails are orginating from this server and uses the account configured in this server. It's some old NT machine and will be replaced in future. But the real Problem is: Anyone from our customers could encounter a problem like this. So I am looking for a way to prevent it. But it seems as I have to use another mail-server to be shure that it could not happen again. So what I am looking for: I like to force users to use the email adress as mail-from, which they used to authenticate on our Server. Is this possible with imail? Registry hack? Filter rule? Script? Everyone of you who offers SMTP Services to customers could encounter thisproblem, that a Virus or Trojan send lots of UCE with faked adress-lines to anybody. Greetings Matti - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jegliche Art von Reproduktion, Verbreitung, Vervielfaeltigung, Modifikation, Verteilung und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail-Nachricht ist untersagt, soweit dies nicht ausdruecklich genehmigt wurde. Jegliche Haftung fur Ansprueche, die aufgrund der Kommunikation per E-Mail begruendet werden koennten, ist ausgeschlossen, soweit der Haftungsausschluss gesetzlich zulaessig ist. -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO:
Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO:
Hi Dave, a few weeks ago, we made the experience that the X-RCPT-TO can't be used. This data will be written at the moment, the message will be appended to the mail box file. So, it's too late to catch it with a rule. Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 um 18:39 schrieben Sie: Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 44 391 30 00 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 News - Neue Produkte: .:. NOD32 Antivirus System .:. BlueDragon .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer .:. SmarterTools To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO:
Hmm.. So I have an issue.. Lets see if anyone can think of a solution. I have an alias that has been found out by spammers. The alias forwards to a cell and 2 other emails. Imail is catching the sender as SPAM and flagging it, but since rules dont seem to apply to aliases, it forwards anyway. I have a rule (#1) that says if it's spam, delete it. So, what I need is to have a rule (#2) that says if an email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], either as the to, cc, or bcc, then forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using 8.12. Any ideas? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:45 AM To: Beach Computers Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO: Hi Dave, a few weeks ago, we made the experience that the X-RCPT-TO can't be used. This data will be written at the moment, the message will be appended to the mail box file. So, it's too late to catch it with a rule. Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 um 18:39 schrieben Sie: Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 44 391 30 00 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 News - Neue Produkte: .:. NOD32 Antivirus System .:. BlueDragon .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer .:. SmarterTools To Unsubscribe:
Re: [Fwd: RE: [IMail Forum] [IMail 8.15] James Mason - SIS-E000192470 [T20060322001D]]
If [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on machine A sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on machine B it will never get there if using the home IMail server as their outbound MTA. IMail doesn't send all mail through the gateway. It only send remote mail through the gateway and since example.com is defined on both servers you will get an envelope rejection right after the RCPT TO unless the peer list is active. ok, peering is active, but only works for peered domain users sending from Imail-A to Imail-B, which is typically (much) less that 10% of total traffic. The vast majority of traffic is inbound via MX, and IMGate would relay that traffic precisely to the user's mailbox server, so peering wouldn't kick in. Typically a peering system does it to distribute the mailbox load. IMGate also removes tons of other work and abuse from the Imail boxes, as well as pre-routing MX traffic so the peers don't have to probe the peers. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO:
Use outbound rules? How about creating a mailbox instead of the alias and putting in a main.fwd? adamc Beach Computers wrote: Hmm.. So I have an issue.. Lets see if anyone can think of a solution. I have an alias that has been found out by spammers. The alias forwards to a cell and 2 other emails. Imail is catching the sender as SPAM and flagging it, but since rules don’t seem to apply to aliases, it forwards anyway. I have a rule (#1) that says if it's spam, delete it. So, what I need is to have a rule (#2) that says if an email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], either as the to, cc, or bcc, then forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using 8.12. Any ideas? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:45 AM To: Beach Computers Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO: Hi Dave, a few weeks ago, we made the experience that the X-RCPT-TO can't be used. This data will be written at the moment, the message will be appended to the mail box file. So, it's too late to catch it with a rule. Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 um 18:39 schrieben Sie: Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO:
This is for incoming mail though. How would outbound rule help? Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Campbell Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:20 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO: Use outbound rules? How about creating a mailbox instead of the alias and putting in a main.fwd? adamc Beach Computers wrote: Hmm.. So I have an issue.. Lets see if anyone can think of a solution. I have an alias that has been found out by spammers. The alias forwards to a cell and 2 other emails. Imail is catching the sender as SPAM and flagging it, but since rules dont seem to apply to aliases, it forwards anyway. I have a rule (#1) that says if it's spam, delete it. So, what I need is to have a rule (#2) that says if an email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], either as the to, cc, or bcc, then forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using 8.12. Any ideas? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:45 AM To: Beach Computers Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO: Hi Dave, a few weeks ago, we made the experience that the X-RCPT-TO can't be used. This data will be written at the moment, the message will be appended to the mail box file. So, it's too late to catch it with a rule. Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 um 18:39 schrieben Sie: Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and
RE: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
T files are _not_ email (message content was not fully delivered to IMail), just delete them! Is your SMTP service being stopped by something on a regular basis? Any message in process at that time could result in one or more T files. Daniel Donnelly -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:51 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spoolthey appear to be stuck with "T" files. We have 2 retried and delete checked.Eric Shanbrom wrote: Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender retry with delete? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO:
When you said that it forwards to 2 other emails, I assumed emails on another host. adamc Beach Computers wrote: This is for incoming mail though. How would outbound rule help? Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Campbell Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:20 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO: Use outbound rules? How about creating a mailbox instead of the alias and putting in a main.fwd? adamc Beach Computers wrote: Hmm.. So I have an issue.. Lets see if anyone can think of a solution. I have an alias that has been found out by spammers. The alias forwards to a cell and 2 other emails. Imail is catching the sender as SPAM and flagging it, but since rules don’t seem to apply to aliases, it forwards anyway. I have a rule (#1) that says if it's spam, delete it. So, what I need is to have a rule (#2) that says if an email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], either as the to, cc, or bcc, then forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using 8.12. Any ideas? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| -- Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:45 AM To: Beach Computers Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to forward mail based on X-RCPT-TO: Hi Dave, a few weeks ago, we made the experience that the X-RCPT-TO can't be used. This data will be written at the moment, the message will be appended to the mail box file. So, it's too late to catch it with a rule. Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 um 18:39 schrieben Sie: Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Dave --- |Beach Computers| |Affordable Hosting Solutions | |http://www.beachcomp.com | === |Cheap Domain Warehouse | |Get Your Own Dot! | |http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com| --
Re: [Fwd: RE: [IMail Forum] [IMail 8.15] James Mason - SIS-E000192470 [T20060322001D]]
Was not disputing you Len. Just wanted all the bases covered so there weren't any surprises Eric S - Original Message - From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:02 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [IMail Forum] [IMail 8.15] James Mason - SIS-E000192470 [T20060322001D]] If [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on machine A sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on machine B it will never get there if using the home IMail server as their outbound MTA. IMail doesn't send all mail through the gateway. It only send remote mail through the gateway and since example.com is defined on both servers you will get an envelope rejection right after the RCPT TO unless the peer list is active. ok, peering is active, but only works for peered domain users sending from Imail-A to Imail-B, which is typically (much) less that 10% of total traffic. The vast majority of traffic is inbound via MX, and IMGate would relay that traffic precisely to the user's mailbox server, so peering wouldn't kick in. Typically a peering system does it to distribute the mailbox load. IMGate also removes tons of other work and abuse from the Imail boxes, as well as pre-routing MX traffic so the peers don't have to probe the peers. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
smtpd32 is sucking up memory to the tune of 700+ MB's and we restart it daily. Interestingly most of that memory is virtual. We've got an open case to figure out what's up but no resolution yet. Daniel Donnelly wrote: T files are _not_ email (message content was not fully delivered to IMail), just delete them! Is your SMTP service being stopped by something on a regular basis? Any message in process at that time could result in one or more T files. Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool they appear to be stuck with "T" files. We have 2 retried and delete checked. Eric Shanbrom wrote: Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender retry with delete? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
[IMail Forum] feature suggestion
I would like to have a place that I can have ANY error generated from webmail emailed to us so we know there are problems before a client informs us of one. Bill
RE: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
Well, a single daily restart should not cause more than a few T files be created (I'm assuming you do this at night when your users are less likely to be connected and spammers are more likely). Do the ones you see in the spool folder have timestamps close to the restart time? If they do, then it is likelyone of the causes. If the timestamps are more random, there are other possibilities, like the client side terminating the connection before completion (a spammer might do this) or a networksituation that does the same. I'm not sure that I can help more on this It might be possible that these terminated SMTP sessions are affecting memory usage (only a guess, it really should not!), so maybe a count of the T files on a daily basis vs the memory used by SMTPD32, might show some correlation. Or I may be barking up the wrong tree! Logs may be helpful. The T files will have names just like Q/D files, so tracking them in the log should be simpler today than in the past. Can you find the same 'X_filename.*' names in the logs as the T files? Can you send a sample of the log lines with that number in them (to Support, but I'd be happy to look them over here, too)? Daniel Donnelly -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:14 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spoolsmtpd32 is sucking up memory to the tune of 700+ MB's and we restart it daily. Interestingly most of that memory is virtual. We've got an open case to figure out what's up but no resolution yet.Daniel Donnelly wrote: T files are _not_ email (message content was not fully delivered to IMail), just delete them! Is your SMTP service being stopped by something on a regular basis? Any message in process at that time could result in one or more T files. Daniel Donnelly -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:51 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spoolthey appear to be stuck with "T" files. We have 2 retried and delete checked.Eric Shanbrom wrote: Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender retry with delete? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool
The times are not matched to a restart of the service. I emailed logs to support on this very issue yesterday but haven't heard back yet. Bill Daniel Donnelly wrote: Well, a single daily restart should not cause more than a few T files be created (I'm assuming you do this at night when your users are less likely to be connected and spammers are more likely). Do the ones you see in the spool folder have timestamps close to the restart time? If they do, then it is likelyone of the causes. If the timestamps are more random, there are other possibilities, like the client side terminating the connection before completion (a spammer might do this) or a networksituation that does the same. I'm not sure that I can help more on this It might be possible that these terminated SMTP sessions are affecting memory usage (only a guess, it really should not!), so maybe a count of the T files on a daily basis vs the memory used by SMTPD32, might show some correlation. Or I may be barking up the wrong tree! Logs may be helpful. The T files will have names just like Q/D files, so tracking them in the log should be simpler today than in the past. Can you find the same 'X_filename.*' names in the logs as the T files? Can you send a sample of the log lines with that number in them (to Support, but I'd be happy to look them over here, too)? Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool smtpd32 is sucking up memory to the tune of 700+ MB's and we restart it daily. Interestingly most of that memory is virtual. We've got an open case to figure out what's up but no resolution yet. Daniel Donnelly wrote: T files are _not_ email (message content was not fully delivered to IMail), just delete them! Is your SMTP service being stopped by something on a regular basis? Any message in process at that time could result in one or more T files. Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool they appear to be stuck with "T" files. We have 2 retried and delete checked. Eric Shanbrom wrote: Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender retry with delete? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spam stuck in the spool This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it would be better if they got processed by imail. There was a thread a while back on this but is anyone else still getting this?
Re: [IMail Forum] feature suggestion
Hi, Use a monitoring software like WassUp. Am Dienstag, 28. Mrz 2006 um 23:06 schrieben Sie: I would like to have a place that I can have ANY error generated from webmail emailed to us so we know there are problems before a client informs us of one. Bill -- Mit freundlichen Grssen Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 44 391 30 00 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49 Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch Support:http://support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 News - Neue Produkte: .:. NOD32 Antivirus System .:. BlueDragon .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer .:. SmarterTools To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Upgrading to ICS version 3. Any suggestions
Anything I should watch out for when I upgrade IMail 8.22 to ICS version 3 on a Windows 2003 Server Domain Controller, this is going to be an upgrade for IMail that is already there. Thank You; Eddie
Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrading to ICS version 3. Any suggestions
Hi Eddie, I just migrated from 8.22 on an NT server to Imail 2006.02a on a Windows 2003 server. Ipswitch has a document somewhere in their KB that describes the migration process. Despite following it to a T I ended up with a bunch of problems that ended up being attributed to incorrect permissions. Mainly a lack of two sets of permissions on the main imail folder: The IUSR_machinename user, and the Network Service account should both have full control on all of IMail files. So far that seems to have taken care of most (not all) of our problems. -Christian At 04:59 PM 3/28/2006, you wrote: Anything I should watch out for when I upgrade IMail 8.22 to ICS version 3 on a Windows 2003 Server Domain Controller, this is going to be an upgrade for IMail that is already there. Thank You; Eddie Christian Heller ( mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Director - Technical Operations AACE International http://www.aacei.org Phone: 800.858.COST 209 Prairie Avenue, Suite 100 Morgantown, WV 26501, USA AACE International's 50'th Anniversary Meeting Total Cost Management - We're All In! Las Vegas, Nevada Technical Program from Tuesday, June 20 - Thursday, June 22, 2006 Looking for technical information and articles? Try: https://www.aacei.org/bookstore/cgi-bin/shop.cgi?page=litsearch.html
Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrading to ICS version 3. Any suggestions
I believe the current version is 2006.03 which is MUCH faster in terms of web messaging, Bill Christian Heller wrote: Hi Eddie, I just migrated from 8.22 on an NT server to Imail 2006.02a on a Windows 2003 server. Ipswitch has a document somewhere in their KB that describes the migration process. Despite following it to a "T" I ended up with a bunch of problems that ended up being attributed to incorrect permissions. Mainly a lack of two sets of permissions on the main imail folder: The IUSR_machinename user, and the Network Service account should both have full control on all of IMail files. So far that seems to have taken care of most (not all) of our problems. -Christian At 04:59 PM 3/28/2006, you wrote: Anything I should watch out for when I upgrade IMail 8.22 to ICS version 3 on a Windows 2003 Server Domain Controller, this is going to be an upgrade for IMail that is already there. Thank You; Eddie Christian Heller ( mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Director - Technical Operations AACE International http://www.aacei.org Phone: 800.858.COST 209 Prairie Avenue, Suite 100 Morgantown, WV 26501, USA AACE International's 50'th Anniversary Meeting "Total Cost Management - We're All In!" Las Vegas, Nevada Technical Program from Tuesday, June 20 - Thursday, June 22, 2006 Looking for technical information and articles? Try: https://www.aacei.org/bookstore/cgi-bin/shop.cgi?page=litsearch.html
Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses
We use Declude Hijack to prevent this sort of thing. It works quite well. -d - Original Message - From: Matti Haack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Adam Campbell Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:33 AM Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid email Adresses Have you found the IP address of the host? Should not it be easy to find it in one of the spam messages? They use some local mailserver (ken? Jana? or something like this) which relays the mail to us. So the mails are orginating from this server and uses the account configured in this server. It's some old NT machine and will be replaced in future. But the real Problem is: Anyone from our customers could encounter a problem like this. So I am looking for a way to prevent it. But it seems as I have to use another mail-server to be shure that it could not happen again. So what I am looking for: I like to force users to use the email adress as mail-from, which they used to authenticate on our Server. Is this possible with imail? Registry hack? Filter rule? Script? Everyone of you who offers SMTP Services to customers could encounter thisproblem, that a Virus or Trojan send lots of UCE with faked adress-lines to anybody. Greetings Matti - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jegliche Art von Reproduktion, Verbreitung, Vervielfaeltigung, Modifikation, Verteilung und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail-Nachricht ist untersagt, soweit dies nicht ausdruecklich genehmigt wurde. Jegliche Haftung fur Ansprueche, die aufgrund der Kommunikation per E-Mail begruendet werden koennten, ist ausgeschlossen, soweit der Haftungsausschluss gesetzlich zulaessig ist. -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] How do I stop this spam
Some people write this off as a mere whitelisting solution, but it is not. It is a solution that allows you to manage your incoming mail flow based on IP reputation: http://www.mujica.com/smtprm.aspx -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Dorman Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:57 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] How do I stop this spam On Monday, March 27, 2006, 08:44:00, Martin Schaible wrote: This means, that your mail server is now a text-only-mail server? Yeah, I'll vote for that. Send all viruses in source code with instructions on how to compile and run it :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote. - Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/295 - Release Date: 3/28/2006 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
