RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] access list
ok, I'll bite. Can you forward any instructions to setting that up with imail 2006? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti Haack Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:21 AM To: John T (lists) Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] access list Or again: Use ASSP. It can block or score connections by the sender location (using the senderbase data) and by blocking or scoring Charsets. I feel a little bit as I repeat myself again and again - but ASSP will do nearly everything to protect you against spam, you can think of... Matti Get a statement in writing from ARIN stating exactly which IP blocks are assigned to ISPs in those countries, which you will have to do again in 30 days since things change. You are better off using an RBL that is based upon country. Some Firewalls support the use of RBLs now. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:52 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] access list How can I simply block an entire country's email by using the access list? I'm done with spam from China and Amsterdam. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 - Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de Registergericht Passau HRB 5678 USt. ID: DE195625715 Besuchen Sie jetzt unseren neuen INTERNETNETWORK Security Shop mit faszinierenden Angeboten rund um Ihre Netzwerk- Sicherheit: http://www.inn.de -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde auf Viren gescannt -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [Spam] [IMail Forum] SPAM Box
we stopped using a spam box and had spam delivered directly to the inbox due to this very problem. The bottom line is that people don't check their spam box nor download it. The other option is to delete spam after x days automatically. Just easier to deliver to the inbox marked as spam in the subject line. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark LeBlanc Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:04 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [Spam] [IMail Forum] SPAM Box I recently started imposing limits on user accounts. I have email notifications sent to users as their boxes approach their limit and I also received a copy so that I am aware of what is going on. Today I discovered that when the SPAM user box reaches its limit, all users are getting undeliverable notices. I emptied the SPAM box to resolve this, but I am confused because when I looked at the mail in the SPAM box, it all looked like legitimate email. Can someone explain this to me? I am using IMail 2006.22. Thanks, Mark LeBlanc Technology Director Tri-County RVTHS 147 Pond Street Franklin, MA 02038 508-528-5400 x219 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [Spam] [IMail Forum] SPAM Box
it's a rule you delete if that's how yours is working. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:50 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [Spam] [IMail Forum] SPAM Box The other option is to delete spam after x days automatically. Hi How can I apply that rule to all domains? We have the same issue as others with Spam boxes never checked. Thanks Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Fusio.net To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] access list
How can I simply block an entire country's email by using the access list? I'm done with spam from China and Amsterdam. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
[IMail Forum] access list
I was wondering if reading the daily imail logfile one could determine trends that spammers use and then accumulate the IP's of the sending servers based on the trends to populate the smtp control access list? It seems to me that from looking over my own logs I can see patterns of abuse by spammers such as sending a test batch of 20 spams to the server and other such things that are later filtered by mxguard/sniffer. My goal is more of a 90% reduction in mail processed/filtered which would substantially reduce the load on the server. Thoughts? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] access list
Hey Pete, That would be after mail was received though. I'm interested in saving the bandwidth that we all pay for to receive spam. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:57 AM To: Matrosity Hosting Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] access list On Thursday, October 25, 2007, 6:27:55 AM, Matrosity wrote: I was wondering if reading the daily imail logfile one could determine trends that spammers use and then accumulate the IP's of the sending servers based on the trends to populate the smtp control access list? It seems to me that from looking over my own logs I can see patterns of abuse by spammers such as sending a test batch of 20 spams to the server and other such things that are later filtered by mxguard/sniffer. My goal is more of a 90% reduction in mail processed/filtered which would substantially reduce the load on the server. Thoughts? Since you mention Sniffer, the new version (currently in beta V2-9b1.5) includes a collaborative IP reputation system called GBUdb. That engine keeps track of IPs and will truncate it's scanning process (virtually eliminating the SNF based CPU load for that message) whenever the IP is sufficiently bad. When that happens the engine returns a specific result code also - so you can alter any scanning that comes after SNF, if you wish. You might give that a try. http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.GettingStarted.Dis tributions#NEW_SNF_V2-9_Wide_Beta IIRC, the Imail acl can be a challenge to use in the way you describe. If that has changed please let me know. What would be ideal is if the ACL could be modified at any time, and that IMail would automatically pick up the changes without a restart etc. It would also be good to know the limitations of the ACL since the number of entries could become quite large. Hope this helps, _M To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Lightweight Webmail Interface
MANY of us feel the same way about this. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 6:58 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Lightweight Webmail Interface There have been a few reports of issues with the web client under high load situations and we have been working hard tying to isolate and fix these problems. It has been very difficult to duplicate, but we feel that we have made progress. There will be a 2006.22 (9.22) release soon that should address the problem. Tripp - Original Message - From: Matt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Lightweight Webmail Interface Tripp, For those of us (most of us) that purchased a software subscription for IMail 9.x and are still waiting for a stable webmail interface, is there going to be any sort of attempt made to fix the current issues without another major version upgrade? I am afraid that I paid for a service agreement about a year and a half ago and a product that is stable has not yet been made available, and I get the impression that I am going to be told to upgrade to version 10 and pay for another service agreement. Thanks, Matt Tripp Allen wrote: We are also working on a low bandwidth template set for IMail 10. Be on the look out for a Technical Preview (beta) before the end of the year. Tripp - Original Message - From: Greg Taylor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum mailto:Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 8:20 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Lightweight Webmail Interface Just an FYI for those of you looking for a lightweight webmail interface for users with low speed internet connections... check out squirrelmail... I am using it... so far so good! www. http://www.squirrelmail.org squirrelmail.org --- Greg Taylor
RE: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: corrupt tcp/ip stack?
I seem to recall windows itself having a problem with tcp/ip connections and you had to change something in the registry to give it more. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:19 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: corrupt tcp/ip stack? Hi Sharon, It's interesting - I've been battling these symptoms on a Win 2003 server running Imail/Declude/Sniffer and nothing else. Mine have Broadcom NICs. I have the exact same machine (ordered together) running same operating system, but IIS - and it never has had any problem. Only the Imail machine seems to lose TCP/IP functions every few weeks (but one time actually a few times a day - then it quited down again). I'm suspecting that it's effected by either the type or volume of email which then triggers some software component to take a different code path, which in turn uncovers some shortcoming in the TCP/IP stack or the NIC driver. Any kind of TCP/IP debug action, such as disabling/enabling the device, certain command line tools - even running certain Broadcom connectivity tests will freeze altogether. Eventually only a power cycle will help. Each occurrence I have tried to follow one theory - and then eliminated it (such as restarting various services, checking for paged pool shortages, checking the number of TCP/IP offload sessions, upgrading BIOS, drivers, etc.) My next step will be a different NIC brand to see if a different driver will act differently... None of that will help you - just letting you know that you're not alone with respect to the weirdness and inconsistency of the occurrences. Best Regards, Andy To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] copy all
We're currently using the copy all option for a client but now need to add another client to this option. Do we just put the other copyall address in there separated by a comma? Thanks, Bill
RE: [IMail Forum] SA renewal
Provantage is selling it for $800 which is exactly what we can buy Smartermail Enterprise for. It's not surprising that they price their software at what ipswitch renewal is. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 7:17 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SA renewal I used to buy at www.provantage.com (credit card verification by fax for foreign customers). -Original Message- Who's got the best price on an SA? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] SA renewal
Who's got the best price on an SA?
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
where can I get RC1? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 7:26 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Aprox 30K in/out per day, about 2K users on 125 domains, RC1 installed 2 AM this morning and no complaints from users as of yet and no significant problems seen in the logs. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:13 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare John, How long have you been running this version on the high volume server and what are you calling high volume? I really want to upgrade mine but was waiting on the released version. Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:02 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Yes, when Imail 2006.2 was released and many started to use it, including installations on high volume or heavily used servers, the webmail bugs started to show themselves. As an example, I was running the preview for Imail 2006.2 on my server and had no errors or problems whatsoever. However my server is low volume. After its release, when I installed it on a high volume client server with users all over the place the problems arose. As of right now, Imail 2006.21 RC1 is installed on my server and on my client's high volume server and so far no errors have been seen or reported. The preferences.config file is in each users file directory and is used by webmail to set how the user wants certain things. If it does not exist, that means the user has never changed anything from default and that is fine, although in some cases having a preferences.config file even if everything is default settings has helped. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spaminator Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:25 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare This is a HUGE problem. I have a client with 800 accounts saying they're going to leave the platform because they're constantly getting logged out. I can't actually reproduce the probem here and am having a hard time tracking down their browser settings because they're across the country. Are there any temporary workarounds? What's the preferences.config fix? What is the ETA on 2006.21? I know it's in RC1 status, but we need it FAST FAST FAST! I really think Ipswitch should start publishing a KNOWN ISSUES list with every release, and constantly keep it updated as things arise. Forget scaring off potential customers, they WANT to see this stuff. Be more concerned with taking care of the many customers you already have! I looked through the forums and boards before upgrading to this version, which was released on March 6th I think, before upgrading our system. I saw a reference here and there, but it didn't sound like the widespread revolt that I'm experiencing! Thanks, One bloody and bruised IT guy -Original Message- From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 6/18/2007 5:16:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity
[IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
I'm running 2006.2 preview 3 now. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:17 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: Re: [IMail Forum]
That seems to be in place, thanks. The challenge is assigning the local
network service account full permissions to the user directories.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 8:31 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [Spam] Re: [IMail Forum]
Hi, Bill-
I'm still on 2006.1, so this may not help, but maybe it will.
Check the WebDir directory to be sure that the ASP.NET user has permissions
there and below. This may not happen automatically if you installed ASP.NET
Framewaork 2.0 after ASP.NET Framework 1.1.
Also double check to see that IUSR and IWAM alse have permissions.
And I beleive IMail 2006.2 requires ASP.NET 2, so check the IIS Manager to
be sure you have the Imail website pointed to ASP.NET 2.0, not 1.1.
I hope this helps. Good luck.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
97 Webster Street
Worcester, MA 01603
508-425-7176
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
This looks like a permissions issue from what I've read. I may be hosed
because our mail server is a Domain controller and has been since Imail
version 6.x so I can't add Network Service to the user account files.
Anyone got any ideas?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity
Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
No blasting necessary from me. I just expect software that is deemed
released to not have HUGE flaws like this. I guess I just expect too
much.
I also shouldn't have to help a company develop functional software.
Such
an idea is why things are called Alpha and Beta.
Does Tech release 3 fix this problem or would that be expecting too much?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
From8[John T \(lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:49:22 -0700
Organization: eServices For You
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index:
Aceq0+W305fSwTo5Tx+CWV1kzQZZgQAAMsNwAACK8yAAAZvZ0AAAIxCwAABae5A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Note:
###
X-Note: This message scanned by eServices For You for viruses and
junkmail.
X-Note: Scan time start at 14:49:40 on 09 Jun 2007.
X-Note: Total weight of message as a result of tests: 0
X-Note: TESTS FAILED: Whitelisted
X-Note: Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and spool file is
{D206300b0f10f.smd}.
X-Note: The received from server has a RevDNS of: {(Private IP)}
X-Note: The received from server has an IP: {192.168.16.11}
X-Note: The received from server has a HELO of: {wks1}
X-Note: To report any issues, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note:
###
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bill, I am going to go and state something here I probably should not but
I
used to easily do and I am going to do it now:
RANT ON
Get off you duff and start doing some home work. Problems with Imail
Webmail
including the current beta3 version of the upcoming 2006.21 version of
which
you are aware of have been discussed both here and on the Ipswitch Imail
online forum and such discussions included several conversations about the
problems and ways to attempt to resolve them. However your participation
in
those is clearly lacking for if you had bothered to review such
discussions
you would be making efforts to better serve your customers by working with
Ipswitch on this and implementing suggested fixes to verify if they work.
No, Ipswitch is not perfect nor is Imail. Are you?
RANT OFF
Blast shields on, fire away.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity
Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 2:36 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
RE: Re: [IMail Forum]
The Network Service does have full permissions to the webdir directory which
probably explains why the web admin works fine. How do I get Network Service
on the user dir's keeping in mind that this is a DC?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 7:10 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: Re: [IMail Forum]
That seems to be in place, thanks. The challenge is assigning the local
network service account full permissions to the user directories.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 8:31 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [Spam] Re: [IMail Forum]
Hi, Bill-
I'm still on 2006.1, so this may not help, but maybe it will.
Check the WebDir directory to be sure that the ASP.NET user has permissions
there and below. This may not happen automatically if you installed ASP.NET
Framewaork 2.0 after ASP.NET Framework 1.1.
Also double check to see that IUSR and IWAM alse have permissions.
And I beleive IMail 2006.2 requires ASP.NET 2, so check the IIS Manager to
be sure you have the Imail website pointed to ASP.NET 2.0, not 1.1.
I hope this helps. Good luck.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
97 Webster Street
Worcester, MA 01603
508-425-7176
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
This looks like a permissions issue from what I've read. I may be
hosed because our mail server is a Domain controller and has been
since Imail version 6.x so I can't add Network Service to the user account
files.
Anyone got any ideas?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity
Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
No blasting necessary from me. I just expect software that is deemed
released to not have HUGE flaws like this. I guess I just expect too
much.
I also shouldn't have to help a company develop functional software.
Such
an idea is why things are called Alpha and Beta.
Does Tech release 3 fix this problem or would that be expecting too much?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
From8[John T \(lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:49:22 -0700
Organization: eServices For You
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index:
Aceq0+W305fSwTo5Tx+CWV1kzQZZgQAAMsNwAACK8yAAAZvZ0AAAIxCwAABae5A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Note:
###
X-Note: This message scanned by eServices For You for viruses and
junkmail.
X-Note: Scan time start at 14:49:40 on 09 Jun 2007.
X-Note: Total weight of message as a result of tests: 0
X-Note: TESTS FAILED: Whitelisted
X-Note: Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and spool file
is {D206300b0f10f.smd}.
X-Note: The received from server has a RevDNS of: {(Private IP)}
X-Note: The received from server has an IP: {192.168.16.11}
X-Note: The received from server has a HELO of: {wks1}
X-Note: To report any issues, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note:
###
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bill, I am going to go and state something here I probably should not
but I used to easily do and I am going to do it now:
RANT ON
Get off you duff and start doing some home work. Problems with Imail
Webmail
including the current beta3 version of the upcoming 2006.21 version of
which
you are aware of have been discussed both here and on the Ipswitch Imail
online forum and such discussions included several conversations about the
problems and ways to attempt to resolve them. However your participation
in
those is clearly lacking for if you had bothered to review
RE: [IMail Forum]
Remember this is a Domain Controller so there are no local accounts to
assign such as network service but thanks.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 1:56 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum]
Search the KB for IIS Permissions and there is a document that explains
what directories need what permissions.
Matt
Matrosity Hosting wrote:
The Network Service does have full permissions to the webdir directory which
probably explains why the web admin works fine. How do I get Network Service
on the user dir's keeping in mind that this is a DC?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 7:10 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: Re: [IMail Forum]
That seems to be in place, thanks. The challenge is assigning the local
network service account full permissions to the user directories.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 8:31 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [Spam] Re: [IMail Forum]
Hi, Bill-
I'm still on 2006.1, so this may not help, but maybe it will.
Check the WebDir directory to be sure that the ASP.NET user has permissions
there and below. This may not happen automatically if you installed ASP.NET
Framewaork 2.0 after ASP.NET Framework 1.1.
Also double check to see that IUSR and IWAM alse have permissions.
And I beleive IMail 2006.2 requires ASP.NET 2, so check the IIS Manager to
be sure you have the Imail website pointed to ASP.NET 2.0, not 1.1.
I hope this helps. Good luck.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
97 Webster Street
Worcester, MA 01603
508-425-7176
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Hosting mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mailto:Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
This looks like a permissions issue from what I've read. I may be
hosed because our mail server is a Domain controller and has been
since Imail version 6.x so I can't add Network Service to the user account
files.
Anyone got any ideas?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity
Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
No blasting necessary from me. I just expect software that is deemed
released to not have HUGE flaws like this. I guess I just expect too
much.
I also shouldn't have to help a company develop functional software.
Such
an idea is why things are called Alpha and Beta.
Does Tech release 3 fix this problem or would that be expecting too much?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
From8[John T \(lists\) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mailto:Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:49:22 -0700
Organization: eServices For You
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index:
Aceq0+W305fSwTo5Tx+CWV1kzQZZgQAAMsNwAACK8yAAAZvZ0AAAIxCwAABae5A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Note:
###
X-Note: This message scanned by eServices For You for viruses and
junkmail.
X-Note: Scan time start at 14:49:40 on 09 Jun 2007.
X-Note: Total weight of message as a result of tests: 0
X-Note: TESTS FAILED: Whitelisted
X-Note: Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and spool file
is {D206300b0f10f.smd}.
X-Note: The received from server has a RevDNS of: {(Private IP)}
X-Note: The received from server has an IP: {192.168.16.11}
X-Note: The received from server has a HELO of: {wks1}
X-Note: To report any issues, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note:
###
This is a multipart message in MIME
[IMail Forum] Pop3 restrictions
One of the major reasons for our upgrading to 2006.2 was the pop3 restriction feature. Where is it? Nothing in the kb nothing in the help info that came with the server? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Found pop3 restrictions
I was expecting to see the pop3 restriction feature on the pop3 admin page but it's on the domain properties of each domain. Does setting this for the primary domain set it for all the domains just as it does for max message size, etc..? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
[IMail Forum] Disk usage doesn't work
No idea why but disk usage displays but says 0 b used of whatever. Anyone else have this problem? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
[IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
webmail is slow to login messages do not display when clicked Usage meter doesn't work Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
what's wrong with yours? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will let you have a couple of mine. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade webmail is slow to login messages do not display when clicked Usage meter doesn't work Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
it would just be nice to upgrade to a new version and not take two steps back. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will let you have a couple of mine. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade webmail is slow to login messages do not display when clicked Usage meter doesn't work Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
well, here I am again f'ked by ipswitch. Web mail is all but useless again. You can't make updates like this during business hours and support is closed as per usual. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:30 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade OH, I didn't say it was necessarily with Imail. ;-0 John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:44 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade what's wrong with yours? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will let you have a couple of mine. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade webmail is slow to login messages do not display when clicked Usage meter doesn't work Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum]
No blasting necessary from me. I just expect software that is deemed
released to not have HUGE flaws like this. I guess I just expect too much.
I also shouldn't have to help a company develop functional software. Such
an idea is why things are called Alpha and Beta.
Does Tech release 3 fix this problem or would that be expecting too much?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
From8[John T \(lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:49:22 -0700
Organization: eServices For You
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index:
Aceq0+W305fSwTo5Tx+CWV1kzQZZgQAAMsNwAACK8yAAAZvZ0AAAIxCwAABae5A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Note: ###
X-Note: This message scanned by eServices For You for viruses and
junkmail.
X-Note: Scan time start at 14:49:40 on 09 Jun 2007.
X-Note: Total weight of message as a result of tests: 0
X-Note: TESTS FAILED: Whitelisted
X-Note: Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and spool file is
{D206300b0f10f.smd}.
X-Note: The received from server has a RevDNS of: {(Private IP)}
X-Note: The received from server has an IP: {192.168.16.11}
X-Note: The received from server has a HELO of: {wks1}
X-Note: To report any issues, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: ###
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bill, I am going to go and state something here I probably should not but I
used to easily do and I am going to do it now:
RANT ON
Get off you duff and start doing some home work. Problems with Imail Webmail
including the current beta3 version of the upcoming 2006.21 version of which
you are aware of have been discussed both here and on the Ipswitch Imail
online forum and such discussions included several conversations about the
problems and ways to attempt to resolve them. However your participation in
those is clearly lacking for if you had bothered to review such discussions
you would be making efforts to better serve your customers by working with
Ipswitch on this and implementing suggested fixes to verify if they work.
No, Ipswitch is not perfect nor is Imail. Are you?
RANT OFF
Blast shields on, fire away.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 2:36 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
well, here I am again f'ked by ipswitch. Web mail is all but useless again.
You can't make updates like this during business hours and support is closed
as per usual.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:30 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
OH, I didn't say it was necessarily with Imail.
;-0
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:44 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
what's wrong with yours?
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will
let you have a couple of mine.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
webmail is slow to login
messages do not display when clicked
Usage meter doesn't work
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
--=_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
html xmlns:v=3Durn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml =
xmlns:o=3Durn:schemas-microsoft
RE: [IMail Forum]
This looks like a permissions issue from what I've read. I may be hosed
because our mail server is a Domain controller and has been since Imail
version 6.x so I can't add Network Service to the user account files.
Anyone got any ideas?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
No blasting necessary from me. I just expect software that is deemed
released to not have HUGE flaws like this. I guess I just expect too much.
I also shouldn't have to help a company develop functional software. Such
an idea is why things are called Alpha and Beta.
Does Tech release 3 fix this problem or would that be expecting too much?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
From8[John T \(lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:49:22 -0700
Organization: eServices For You
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index:
Aceq0+W305fSwTo5Tx+CWV1kzQZZgQAAMsNwAACK8yAAAZvZ0AAAIxCwAABae5A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Note: ###
X-Note: This message scanned by eServices For You for viruses and
junkmail.
X-Note: Scan time start at 14:49:40 on 09 Jun 2007.
X-Note: Total weight of message as a result of tests: 0
X-Note: TESTS FAILED: Whitelisted
X-Note: Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and spool file is
{D206300b0f10f.smd}.
X-Note: The received from server has a RevDNS of: {(Private IP)}
X-Note: The received from server has an IP: {192.168.16.11}
X-Note: The received from server has a HELO of: {wks1}
X-Note: To report any issues, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: ###
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0079_01C7AAA5.5E47AD70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bill, I am going to go and state something here I probably should not but I
used to easily do and I am going to do it now:
RANT ON
Get off you duff and start doing some home work. Problems with Imail Webmail
including the current beta3 version of the upcoming 2006.21 version of which
you are aware of have been discussed both here and on the Ipswitch Imail
online forum and such discussions included several conversations about the
problems and ways to attempt to resolve them. However your participation in
those is clearly lacking for if you had bothered to review such discussions
you would be making efforts to better serve your customers by working with
Ipswitch on this and implementing suggested fixes to verify if they work.
No, Ipswitch is not perfect nor is Imail. Are you?
RANT OFF
Blast shields on, fire away.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 2:36 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
well, here I am again f'ked by ipswitch. Web mail is all but useless again.
You can't make updates like this during business hours and support is closed
as per usual.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:30 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
OH, I didn't say it was necessarily with Imail.
;-0
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:44 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
what's wrong with yours?
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will
let you have a couple of mine.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent
RE: [IMail Forum] domain size limit exceeded
it would be nice if imail actually did this but I don't think it does. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:19 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] domain size limit exceeded Hi list, a customer of us complaints she is getting the following message: Domain size limit exceeded I searched Ipswitch's archives of Imail but didn't find anything. This is strange, since I don't limit domains sizewise. Anybody who has an idea ? Uwe
RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error
yes Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:46 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Is your Imail server also a DC? It is indeed has something have something to do with IIS. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:40 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Thanks Daniel but since this only exists on our imail server I don't believe it to be an IIS issue. I'm hoping ipswitch will chime in and tell me why this is happening or if its fixed in 2006.2x Regards, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Bill, Looks like an MS error and a search of MS gave me this: http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?q=%22Template+Persistent+Cache%22 http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?q=%22Template+Persistent+Cache%22; qsc0=0SearchBtn0=SearchFORM=QBME1l=1mkt=en-USPageType=99 qsc0=0SearchBtn0=SearchFORM=QBME1l=1mkt=en-USPageType=99 Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:41 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error I'm seeing the following error in the application log for the imail server: Error: The Template Persistent Cache initialization failed for Application Pool 'IAdmin' because of the following error: Could not create a Disk Cache Sub-directory for the Application Pool. The data may have additional error codes.. Any idea how to correct this? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 attachment: winmail.dat text/html; charset=us-ascii: Unrecognized
[IMail Forum] Footer on a virtual
Is there a way to add a footer to all outbound emails from a virtual domain? Read the KB and most of the results are complaints about a lack of this feature. Thanks, Bill
RE: [IMail Forum] Firefox 2.0.0.1 and WebMail ICS2006
What problem did you have with Smartermail that would make you switch back? From looking at 4.x of Smartermail it has so many features that it puts Imail back two years already to catch up. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Toussaint Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:26 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Firefox 2.0.0.1 and WebMail ICS2006 Hello people!!! I was using SmarterMail since 2005... We're looking to go back with Imail or ICS. I have downloaded the 30 trial and I am having some little problem with Firefox. In WebMail, when I use Firefox 2.0.0.1, when I click on INBOX, the first message in the list is selected. I can't select another one (just single click) to get the preview. If I want to read the second or third or any other message in the list, I have to double click it to open it in a new window or new tab. The resize of column is also not behaving as it should... It messes the screen and the column are not keeping the desired size... If anyone out there have an idea of what it could be, it would be nice to here it from you... Ok... out for today!!! I'm glad to be back on this mailing list!! :) -- Vincent Toussaint Administrateur réseau - Network Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hybride.com  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail rule to copy to question
How about forwarding it to an alias that lists both address? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:14 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail rule to copy to question In creating a rule to forward a copy of an email to another address, is it possible to copy it to 2 email addresses, or do I have to set up 2 rules, one for each email address to copy to? John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Exchange and Imail
you could allow relaying for his IP. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 9:42 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Exchange and Imail Hello, We have an Imail server running which requires smtp authentication. Now we have a customer who is using MS Exchange in his company for fetching the emails and distributing them locally. However, he is not able to send the emails outside using our SMTP because of lack of authentication. Can anybody tell me how to enabled SMTP authentication? Regards Nitaish __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
Tripp Allen wrote me a custom dll. Ask Tripp for the dll he sent to me. Since you're also having the problem I think Ipswitch really needs to look in this as it may resurface in 2006.2 which is of concern. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steinar Rasch Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 6:10 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue I have the same problem. How do I get rid of the disk quota display? Is there a new .dll to download? Regards, Steinar _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: 1. november 2006 08:11 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Since I've been complaining about getting a solution from ipswitch so I thought I should post that I did get one from them (Tripp). Basically, logins for web messaging were taking as much as 30 seconds if at all after the upgrade from 2006.04a, which ran perfectly, to 2006.1 as demanded by the security issue. Tripp created a new dll which removed the disk quota display in the new web messaging that resolved our login problems. This way I can hang in with this until 2006.2 shows up and decide what to do at that point. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf / Internet Specialists, LLC Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:10 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue What workaround? What dll? More info please! -Joe - Original Message - From: Matrosity mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:59 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Tripp, Thank you very much for getting this workaround for me. I absolutely appreciate your efforts and it looks like your new dll saved the day. I reset the permissions to match the old dll and everything seems to be working as it should be now. Removing the quota display did the trick. Many thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:28 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue ok, thanks. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We're still looking at it but don't have anything to report right now. Tripp _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Tripp, I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the plan? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue No difference as far as browsers go on login, Tripp. -Original Message- From: Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue So where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 2006.2 (no idea why that was done since I can't run it) and now what? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We went back to the originals. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Maybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the earlier versions? Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use Bill's original registry settings or the ones from the test server? -d - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue There must be something that .2 changes that isn't reversed by downgrading. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times
Yes, but you don't pay them $1000 per TV for tech support. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 1:35 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Some thing to post on this weekend. You think hold times for Ipswitch are long, I am on hold waiting for support for Time Warner Cable for 1 hr 15 minutes so far and counting. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times
My point is that hold times shouldn't be this bad after this amount of time on top of a huge increase in the SA. Not to mention all the new bugs in 2006 which seems to be constant with their development methodology. I'm very concerned about 2006.2 since it will be .net 2 and a complete rewrite of software that already has problems that have yet to be fixed. On the surface the new features and constant updates are wonderful but they do insert major problems when things go bad and you can't get through to tech support in a reasonable amount of time. Since ipswitch tech support is 9 to 5 you can't even risk an after hours upgrade for fear of things being down until 9am their time if you can get through right away. Nothing like your phone system lit up like a christmas tree while your on hold waiting for a tech. It makes one not ever want to install an upgrade. I think the best method of installing an imail upgrade is to call tech support and click Next when someone finally answers. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Not a TV in the house. This is my Internet connection. DSL is not feasible where I live. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 12:05 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Yes, but you don't pay them $1000 per TV for tech support. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 1:35 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Some thing to post on this weekend. You think hold times for Ipswitch are long, I am on hold waiting for support for Time Warner Cable for 1 hr 15 minutes so far and counting. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times
Bah Hum Bug! :) I don't hate you guys, I just wish things would go smoother for us poor ipswitch customers. We shouldn't have to cringe every time we install your software like the bomb squad rookie snipping a wire. Merry Xmas and I do hope everyone has a great holiday! Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:46 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times My point is that hold times shouldn't be this bad after this amount of time on top of a huge increase in the SA. Not to mention all the new bugs in 2006 which seems to be constant with their development methodology. I'm very concerned about 2006.2 since it will be .net 2 and a complete rewrite of software that already has problems that have yet to be fixed. On the surface the new features and constant updates are wonderful but they do insert major problems when things go bad and you can't get through to tech support in a reasonable amount of time. Since ipswitch tech support is 9 to 5 you can't even risk an after hours upgrade for fear of things being down until 9am their time if you can get through right away. Nothing like your phone system lit up like a christmas tree while your on hold waiting for a tech. It makes one not ever want to install an upgrade. I think the best method of installing an imail upgrade is to call tech support and click Next when someone finally answers. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Not a TV in the house. This is my Internet connection. DSL is not feasible where I live. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 12:05 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Yes, but you don't pay them $1000 per TV for tech support. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 1:35 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Tech Support Wait times Some thing to post on this weekend. You think hold times for Ipswitch are long, I am on hold waiting for support for Time Warner Cable for 1 hr 15 minutes so far and counting. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Global users changes not working
similar problem exists for us with regard to mailbox size. If I select Use the default setting for the domain no changes are applied but if I select Specify Size it does make the changes. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duffin, Gregory J Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:36 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Global users changes not working I am running Imail 2006.1. When I go to Global user changes and select allow web access and Yes it takes a minute or two and completes the save. However, some user calls and are denied access. When I check to see if Allow web access is checked for them it is not. Is anyone else experiencing this problem? I am using the AD directory for my user base, running Imail on Windows 2003 R2 srv pack 1. Thank You __ Greg Duffin
RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
Imail antispam is weak because the idea is to buy the more expensive imail secure. I've lobbied for quite some time that imail is too expensive and at the renewal fees now being charged should include the antispam. That being said the 3rd party solutions offer arguably better solutions anyway. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti Haack Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 10:50 AM To: Heimir Eidskrem Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again HE Are you telling us that we need to install a 3rd party application HE to make Imail run stable? I think beside the small bugs in Imail, there are lot of essential parts missing (or very basic) which have to be added by third Party products (Mail-Flow monitoring, Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus, Penalty Blocking) I use Imail since Version 4 and love it - but it needs some add on's (which are all free available - Like Hmailserver for Viruschecking, ASSP for all Spam and Blockin Issues) etc.. Matti -- Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
Also, you can't complain too much if you're not using the current version. You can't have bluethooth in your car unless it came with it or you buy a new one. Same logic. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:00 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Matti Haack wrote: HE Are you telling us that we need to install a 3rd party application HE to make Imail run stable? I think beside the small bugs in Imail, there are lot of essential parts missing (or very basic) which have to be added by third Party products (Mail-Flow monitoring, Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus, Penalty Blocking) I use Imail since Version 4 and love it - but it needs some add on's (which are all free available - Like Hmailserver for Viruschecking, ASSP for all Spam and Blockin Issues) etc.. Matti Been running Imail since version 4 myself. But I do expect that Imail should run on its own and not need 3rd party application to survive. Frankly, I think its a disgrace how the 2006 was released and how poor job Ipswitch has done with it since. I bet there are a ton of users that has not upgraded yet put paid for it over a year ago. So you think that its ok for Imail to require 3rd party programs to run stable? Its pretty piss poor when the servers crashed from malformed messages and its been going on for a while now. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
Seems to me that ipswitch would be smart to support an assp hook to retain customers. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:50 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Just my experience... don't care how emabarrasing is for IpSwitch team. I'm srry for them, but a free-open-source-3rd-party software mantains my $USD application alive. If assp wasn't installed, we had moved to other software. We found assp looking for mail servers :o -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 17:37 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Thank you for the suggestion but it must be so embarrassing for Ipswitch to read it. Customers required to run 3rd party applications to make Imail stable. Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] wrote: yes, install 3rd party such as assp http://www.asspsmtp.org We had the same problem. Our queue hangs up to ten times per day. we had a script running every 30 minutes to check if queue was running or stop pending, killing task and starting service again. the problem went away after installing ASSP, never more queuemgr hangs (8 months assp running). Just try. You'll be surprised!! Regards, Pere. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 16:11 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Doug Traylor wrote: Quemanager goes into stopping mode but will never stop. You have to kill the process and restart it for it to work. How about fixing this problem once for all. I have a similar problem with 8.22 and a certain mail which kills SMTPd32 - Only the first line of the header gets stuck in the SPOOl directoy, when the service dies. Now I use ASSP to block it on the Adres, I found in the logs. Use the free version of serversalive with the SMTP-Roundtrip Plugin If it fails, start a batch to Stop all Imail-Services, kill all hanging Services and finally restart all Services. http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/index.asp Not to minimize the problems others are having, but we've been running 8.22 for a year and it has been rock solid on an old Dell server with a T1. We've always kept up with the patches and haven't had a lick of trouble with Imail stopping or dying, in over 6 years. With only 10k SMTP connections a day and 3k emails a day actually handled by Imail, I would think we are also substatially smaller than most Imail sites, so maybe that has something to do with it. It is, more importantly, completely insolated from the internet and no external SMTP gets to it without first going through ASSP, Trend AV gateway, hMailserver (ClamAV/antiphish gateway). These odd, killer emails are apparently just not reaching our Imail. I also use Servers Alive to monitor the services from another computer, although I am not using the roundtrip plugin. It has been very stable and useful, and I use it to monitor other servers and services as well. Very configurable but can momentarily run the cpu at 100% when trying to communicate with a service that is down. Noticable since I run it on my desktop at work and things come to a screaming halt for a few moments and my system fan spools up right before I get notice that a problem exists. Probably my fault since I am running it on a 2ghz Celeron with 512MB ram and have that much and more in use most of the time. Good luck, Doug Traylor To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ I am not sure about the point in your email. I did not see any suggestion on how to correct this problem or your own personal experience. I read your blurb about a lightweight mail server that has nothing to do with this Are you telling us that we need to install a 3rd party application to make Imail run stable? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List
RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
I would say that assp is pretty high on the list of software that actually works well but I see your point. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 12:01 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Sure..and then should they support any third party free utility to do AntiSpam? Because I got a WHOLE lot of free Linux ones that I would like to add into that mix. I think that seems pretty unrealistic. ASSP would need to partner with Ipswitch and do what any partnership would fees/contracts/ndc's and so on. Not as easy as you think. - Travis Rabe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 8:56 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Seems to me that ipswitch would be smart to support an assp hook to retain customers. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:50 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Just my experience... don't care how emabarrasing is for IpSwitch team. I'm srry for them, but a free-open-source-3rd-party software mantains my $USD application alive. If assp wasn't installed, we had moved to other software. We found assp looking for mail servers :o -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 17:37 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Thank you for the suggestion but it must be so embarrassing for Ipswitch to read it. Customers required to run 3rd party applications to make Imail stable. Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] wrote: yes, install 3rd party such as assp http://www.asspsmtp.org We had the same problem. Our queue hangs up to ten times per day. we had a script running every 30 minutes to check if queue was running or stop pending, killing task and starting service again. the problem went away after installing ASSP, never more queuemgr hangs (8 months assp running). Just try. You'll be surprised!! Regards, Pere. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 16:11 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Doug Traylor wrote: Quemanager goes into stopping mode but will never stop. You have to kill the process and restart it for it to work. How about fixing this problem once for all. I have a similar problem with 8.22 and a certain mail which kills SMTPd32 - Only the first line of the header gets stuck in the SPOOl directoy, when the service dies. Now I use ASSP to block it on the Adres, I found in the logs. Use the free version of serversalive with the SMTP-Roundtrip Plugin If it fails, start a batch to Stop all Imail-Services, kill all hanging Services and finally restart all Services. http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/index.asp Not to minimize the problems others are having, but we've been running 8.22 for a year and it has been rock solid on an old Dell server with a T1. We've always kept up with the patches and haven't had a lick of trouble with Imail stopping or dying, in over 6 years. With only 10k SMTP connections a day and 3k emails a day actually handled by Imail, I would think we are also substatially smaller than most Imail sites, so maybe that has something to do with it. It is, more importantly, completely insolated from the internet and no external SMTP gets to it without first going through ASSP, Trend AV gateway, hMailserver (ClamAV/antiphish gateway). These odd, killer emails are apparently just not reaching our Imail. I also use Servers Alive to monitor the services from another computer, although I am not using the roundtrip plugin. It has been very stable and useful, and I use it to monitor other servers and services as well. Very configurable but can momentarily run the cpu at 100% when trying to communicate with a service that is down. Noticable since I run it on my desktop at work and things come to a screaming halt for a few moments and my system fan spools up right before I get notice that a problem exists. Probably my fault since I am running it on a 2ghz Celeron with 512MB ram and have that much and more in use most of the time. Good luck, Doug Traylor To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ
RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
Received an email a bit ago that states SmarterMail 4 will incorporate SpamAssassin out of the box. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 12:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again You're right, not easy, not realistic. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Travis Rabe Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 18:01 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Sure..and then should they support any third party free utility to do AntiSpam? Because I got a WHOLE lot of free Linux ones that I would like to add into that mix. I think that seems pretty unrealistic. ASSP would need to partner with Ipswitch and do what any partnership would fees/contracts/ndc's and so on. Not as easy as you think. - Travis Rabe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 8:56 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Seems to me that ipswitch would be smart to support an assp hook to retain customers. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:50 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Just my experience... don't care how emabarrasing is for IpSwitch team. I'm srry for them, but a free-open-source-3rd-party software mantains my $USD application alive. If assp wasn't installed, we had moved to other software. We found assp looking for mail servers :o -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 17:37 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Thank you for the suggestion but it must be so embarrassing for Ipswitch to read it. Customers required to run 3rd party applications to make Imail stable. Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] wrote: yes, install 3rd party such as assp http://www.asspsmtp.org We had the same problem. Our queue hangs up to ten times per day. we had a script running every 30 minutes to check if queue was running or stop pending, killing task and starting service again. the problem went away after installing ASSP, never more queuemgr hangs (8 months assp running). Just try. You'll be surprised!! Regards, Pere. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 16:11 Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again Doug Traylor wrote: Quemanager goes into stopping mode but will never stop. You have to kill the process and restart it for it to work. How about fixing this problem once for all. I have a similar problem with 8.22 and a certain mail which kills SMTPd32 - Only the first line of the header gets stuck in the SPOOl directoy, when the service dies. Now I use ASSP to block it on the Adres, I found in the logs. Use the free version of serversalive with the SMTP-Roundtrip Plugin If it fails, start a batch to Stop all Imail-Services, kill all hanging Services and finally restart all Services. http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/index.asp Not to minimize the problems others are having, but we've been running 8.22 for a year and it has been rock solid on an old Dell server with a T1. We've always kept up with the patches and haven't had a lick of trouble with Imail stopping or dying, in over 6 years. With only 10k SMTP connections a day and 3k emails a day actually handled by Imail, I would think we are also substatially smaller than most Imail sites, so maybe that has something to do with it. It is, more importantly, completely insolated from the internet and no external SMTP gets to it without first going through ASSP, Trend AV gateway, hMailserver (ClamAV/antiphish gateway). These odd, killer emails are apparently just not reaching our Imail. I also use Servers Alive to monitor the services from another computer, although I am not using the roundtrip plugin. It has been very stable and useful, and I use it to monitor other servers and services as well. Very configurable but can momentarily run the cpu at 100% when trying to communicate with a service that is down. Noticable since I run it on my desktop at work and things come to a screaming halt for a few moments and my system fan spools up right before I get notice that a problem exists. Probably my fault since I am
[IMail Forum] OT: Diskeeper 2007
Anyone using diskeeper 2007? Worth the upgrade? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Thinking about upgrade. Looking for opinions.
I've heard some grumblings about imail secure but I balked at the cost of it. Since antispam is a value add, having to pay as much as ipswitch wants for imail secure was a bit high for what it is. There have been complaints about it but I think those were when updates were having issues. I do know that the antivirus is symantec which some don't care for. IMHO - better value with mxguard and messagesniffer. Declude folks don't seem too happy these days. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Traylor Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:17 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Thinking about upgrade. Looking for opinions. Either that, or some great suggestions on tweaking the antispam capabilities of plain old Imail Server. Plain old Imail server works great with an antispam proxy or a gateway in front of it. Imgate is a good solution if you have a spare box to install it on and Len can give you support. On the other hand, if you want to just add to your existing Imail server you can install the opensource ASSP. It has a very active community and does wonders for an overworked Imail server. It does a tremendous job identifying/blocking spam. The only people that have said great things about the antispam capabilities of Imail Server Plus have been IPSwitch employees as far as I can remember. Someone else chime in here if I am mistaken please. Good luck Doug Traylor IMGate: http://IMGate.MEIway.com ASSP win32 installer: http://www.andersonit.com/assp.html ASSP resources: http://www.asspsmtp.org/ http://assp.sourceforge.net http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Spam_SMTP_Proxy http://www.howtoforge.com/antispam_smtp_proxy To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Can't Start WorkGroup Share Service
Would help if I knew much about ICS, sorry. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John E. Richardson Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 11:14 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Can't Start WorkGroup Share Service Does anybody have any thoughts on this? Thanks, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John E. Richardson Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:45 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Can't Start WorkGroup Share Service Good Tuesday Morning, I can't get the WorkGroup Share Service to start. I'm using ICS2006.1 on a Windows 2003 standalone server, not in an AD environment. This is a production machine, serving mail correctly without issue. The WorkGroup Share Service had been running properly for approximately two months (somewhere in early September to early November). Fortunately, this is an additional service that we're working towards turning on and making available to our users, so there is no legitimate data in the WorkGroup Share to be concerned with at this time. I have only been able to look at this off and on, but it if memory serves me correctly only two things took place prior to this service starting to fail that may be related: an attempt to add https to the WebMail site via IIS and Windows Updates, both on November 3, 2006. The log entries showing errors for the failed https configuration have gone away since those settings were undone, so I am leaning away from those at this point although I am keeping them in mind. The event viewer log entries for the WorkGroup Share service start failure - Event ID 7000: The WorkgroupShare service failed to start due to the following error: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. Event ID 7009: Timeout (3 milliseconds) waiting for the WorkgroupShare service to connect. Windows Updates installed on that date include the following: KB922582, KB923414, KB924191, KB890830, KB924496, KB920685, KB922819, KB921883, KB923191, KB925486 I also tried altering the DEP settings, to no avail. Short of un-installing each of those updates and installing them one by one to determine a possible problem, does anybody have any ideas about any specific problems that may cause the WorkGroup Share Service to be unable to start? It fails to start under the Windows services console as well as through the ICS web interface. Would it be possible to do a repair type of installation to remove only the WGS component and then put it back? Since this is a production machine, it would have to be without having any affect or concern for the mail data and settings. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated, thank you for your time. John Richardson To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP high CPU usage
How about upgrading to 8.2x along with the newer smtp fix? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:26 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP high CPU usage Hi all, I tried running ASSP again but it didn't matter. As soon as I start up Queuemgr or SMTPD the CPU usage sky rockets to 100%, at this point I think IMail is hosed. Reading through the SMTP log file I see a lot of 12:06 18:15 SMTP-() Info - Adding Queue file C:\IMAIL\spool\Q33950809004cce99.SMD It doesn't get processed, so all I have are bunch of emails sitting there in the queue. Any other ideas? Thanks again, Jon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 6:48 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP high CPU usage I used to see this a lot, running Imail 6.xx, before I put our ASSP gateway in place. I don't know how or if it was related, but I haven't had any trouble since we started turning away all the junk. Same with IMGate, which has fixed and salvaged so many IMail boxes that were overwelmed and submerged trying to handle high-volume abuse. IMGate recently cost Barracuda the sale of a $25K BC800 which was sent back to Barracuda after IMgate was installed in front of a dying BC400, now resurrected. :) Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Odd spam run today - message with just five numbers
yup Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. Bhandari Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 5:05 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Odd spam run today - message with just five numbers Yup - I just started seeing that this afternoon. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Hitchcock Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:52 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Odd spam run today - message with just five numbers I'm being flooded what appears to be messages from someone's broken spamware. The message body has just five numbers, nothing else. Anyone else seeing this? Jeff Hitchcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
I tried the e-mail tester at dnsstuff and it shows the user being unknown. Why would imail kick back not local rather than a simple bounce? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:27 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem You need to look at your SMTP log for that message to 1) make sure the user authenticated and 2) make sure that is not a delivery NDR. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
here's the log info: 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] MAIL FROM: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ourcustomer.com 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] RCPT TO: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @fcohenlaw.com (recipient) 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] ERR pine.matrosity.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:27 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem You need to look at your SMTP log for that message to 1) make sure the user authenticated and 2) make sure that is not a delivery NDR. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
2006.1 Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem Yeah I have been tracking that same error, under the thread 550 not local host error on Imail 8.22 seems to have come on about the time we did the SMTP fix, I don't know if they are related. Are you running 8.22 as well? _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:13 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem here's the log info: 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] MAIL FROM: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ourcustomer.com 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] RCPT TO: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @fcohenlaw.com (recipient) 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] ERR pine.matrosity.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:27 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem You need to look at your SMTP log for that message to 1) make sure the user authenticated and 2) make sure that is not a delivery NDR. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
no, I have a feeling this is a bug. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:26 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem Any gateway running on the machine? ASSP here. The setup is acting as a proxy/gateway for an Exchange system in and oubound. Trying to find some simularity in the setup. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:20 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem 2006.1 Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem Yeah I have been tracking that same error, under the thread 550 not local host error on Imail 8.22 seems to have come on about the time we did the SMTP fix, I don't know if they are related. Are you running 8.22 as well? _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:13 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem here's the log info: 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] MAIL FROM: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ourcustomer.com 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] RCPT TO: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @fcohenlaw.com (recipient) 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] ERR pine.matrosity.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:27 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem You need to look at your SMTP log for that message to 1) make sure the user authenticated and 2) make sure that is not a delivery NDR. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
The sender did smtp auth which is why this is weird. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:53 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem This usually means the sender didn't SMTP Auth in to send the message. Why not try to send a test message to them yourself using SMTP Auth? Eric S - Original Message - From: Matrosity mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:12 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem here's the log info: 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] MAIL FROM: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ourcustomer.com 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] RCPT TO: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] someone mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @fcohenlaw.com (recipient) 11:30 14:51 SMTPD(362b017d6f71) [65.115.150.130] ERR pine.matrosity.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:27 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem You need to look at your SMTP log for that message to 1) make sure the user authenticated and 2) make sure that is not a delivery NDR. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
[IMail Forum]
I have a file in the root of my c drive called eAladdinLog.txt Which has this in it: 001: _TrialOkToRun ok to run Ending. 002: _TrialOkToRun ok to run Ending. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum]
I was wondering if that was an imail file since I don't have anything else installed on this box other than that. That I know of :) Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:41 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Seems to be something from this company: http://www.aladdin.com/ Darin. - Original Message - From: Matrosity mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:30 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] I have a file in the root of my c drive called eAladdinLog.txt Which has this in it: 001: _TrialOkToRun ok to run Ending. 002: _TrialOkToRun ok to run Ending. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting http://www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum]
ahah! Can someone from ipswitch tell me why this file would change everyday? I want to make sure I'm not running a trial from upgrading to 2006.1 thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Campbell Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20050727-DM01.htm eAladdin now used for licensing. adamc _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 14:05 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] This message means I'm feeling good, even if you have a full licensed version. Just leave it there. -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 44 391 30 00 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch http://www.merlinconsulting.ch/ Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch http://support.merlinconsulting.ch/ GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 News - Neue Produkte: .:. mxGuard - InvURIBL - MessageSniffer .:. NOD32 Antivirus System .:. BlueDragon .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. SmarterTools _ Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Matrosity Hosting Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. November 2006 19:30 An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Betreff: [IMail Forum] I have a file in the root of my c drive called eAladdinLog.txt Which has this in it: 001: _TrialOkToRun ok to run Ending. 002: _TrialOkToRun ok to run Ending. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file://www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Clam AV with IMail?
via mxguard, yes. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Clam AV with IMail? Has anybody rigged up Clam AV to work with IMail? If so, how did you do it? -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 508-425-7176
[IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
No, this is our client sending email just fine and this comes out of the blue. This is the 3rd person to report this problem. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem Have them check my server requires authentication in there email client? ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:14 PM - MGMT To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem One of our customers attempted to email someone at fcohenlaw.com (I've removed their username) and they got a bounce back of the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Hi Sent: 11/30/2006 2:51 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 11/30/2006 2:51 PM 550 not local host fcohenlaw.com, not a gateway This is one of our customers emailing someone else not someone else emailing our customer. Any ideas? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file://www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem
I've always run the analyze tool for pop logins to see how many people are checking email every 1 minute. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:05 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hello, Recently, we have been facing a heavy load on the pop3 service because of which the server becomes slow. Is there an utilty to find out how many users are connecting to the pop3 in short intervals and what is causing the problem for the load? Nitaish _ Cheap Talk? Check http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev t=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem
just curious how that works? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hi All, In 2006.2, there is a new capability (optional), settable by admin, that allows you to set the POP frequency. For example, if set to 5 mins, end users can only POP once every 5 minutes. Bye for now, kg _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 08:36 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem I've always run the analyze tool for pop logins to see how many people are checking email every 1 minute. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:05 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hello, Recently, we have been facing a heavy load on the pop3 service because of which the server becomes slow. Is there an utilty to find out how many users are connecting to the pop3 in short intervals and what is causing the problem for the load? Nitaish _ Cheap Talk? Check http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev t=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem
I think it's a great option, I'm just wondering if the client gets an errors on their end? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:11 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem hi bill, per domain, you set that pop users can only pop once per x minutes - this is tracked accordingly. once the x minutes has passed, block is cleared and user can pop again. we can pass more details offline if necessary again, this is optional. bye for now, kg _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 09:53 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem just curious how that works? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hi All, In 2006.2, there is a new capability (optional), settable by admin, that allows you to set the POP frequency. For example, if set to 5 mins, end users can only POP once every 5 minutes. Bye for now, kg _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 08:36 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem I've always run the analyze tool for pop logins to see how many people are checking email every 1 minute. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:05 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hello, Recently, we have been facing a heavy load on the pop3 service because of which the server becomes slow. Is there an utilty to find out how many users are connecting to the pop3 in short intervals and what is causing the problem for the load? Nitaish _ Cheap Talk? Check http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev t=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem
sounds fine to me. Does the error message say something regarding the interval setting or can it be customized? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:35 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem We return an error message to the client and don't allow the log in, but we can't control how the client handles it. Outlook and Outlook express pop up the userid / password dialog box. If you hit cancel, they then show you the error message that was received. Tripp _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:22 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem I think it's a great option, I'm just wondering if the client gets an errors on their end? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:11 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem hi bill, per domain, you set that pop users can only pop once per x minutes - this is tracked accordingly. once the x minutes has passed, block is cleared and user can pop again. we can pass more details offline if necessary again, this is optional. bye for now, kg _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 09:53 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem just curious how that works? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hi All, In 2006.2, there is a new capability (optional), settable by admin, that allows you to set the POP frequency. For example, if set to 5 mins, end users can only POP once every 5 minutes. Bye for now, kg _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 08:36 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem I've always run the analyze tool for pop logins to see how many people are checking email every 1 minute. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:05 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem Hello, Recently, we have been facing a heavy load on the pop3 service because of which the server becomes slow. Is there an utilty to find out how many users are connecting to the pop3 in short intervals and what is causing the problem for the load? Nitaish _ Cheap Talk? Check http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev t=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...
I agree but the old text only 8.xx worked that way and people are usually adverse to change. It seems the young dogs don't want to learn new tricks these days. :) Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:37 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ... Not really bizarre behavior, been around the world of computers for quite some time! I remember one of my first Word (or was it WordPerfect?) experiences and encountering the double line when I hit enter and I finally figured it means 'new paragraph', so you get 2 linefeeds. If you want a single linefeed, just hold shift and hit enter. I thought everyone knew this by now... but then again I did have to tell some folks here this 'trick' when we started using a new CRM software... guess an old dog can still teach old tricks... Oh, the online forum does the same thing, so it is not all that uncommon... Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gil Gomes Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:29 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ... How would one enable plain-text mode? Also... I'm assuming you guys have contacted the techies at freetextbox.com querying the cause for this bizarre behaviour... What was their response? -Gil -Original Message- From: Kevin Gillis Sent 11/27/2006 5:02:02 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ... Hi All, Just wanted to interject that although #2 and #3 are fixed in 2006.2, we are still looking at #1 - the double spacing that occurs in compose mode. At this point, we don't have a fix that we can include in 2006.2 - something strange with the rich text editor (freetextbox - http://freetextbox.com/default.aspx). We are more than open to any technical tips/tricks/techniques to get around this annoying behavior. One workaround, perhaps acceptable to some, might be a plain-text mode for composing in which single spacing would be the default/expected behavior. Bye for now, kg _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Gomes Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 11:15 To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ... Kevin, Tripp and others have been very helpful in testing these three issues and insuring that they've all been corrected in 2006.2. I'm now looking forward to moving to that version as the correction of these three nagging problems alone is more than enough to offset the pain of upgrading... Thanx, guys... -Gil 1) Hitting the Enter key double spaces 2) Some incoming email displays a date of December 1969 3) Some attachments retain the name Download.aspx as opposed to their actual filename as sent. -Original Message- From: Gil Gomes Sent 11/17/2006 8:20:33 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ... Kevin: This is your entire list and current prioritization for WebMail? Should we assume the issues we've been constantly bringing up aren't going to be addressed in the near term? To name a few: Hitting the Enter key double spaces Some incoming email displays a date of December 1969 Some attachments retain the name Download.aspx as opposed to their actual filename as sent. Please advise... -Gil -Original Message- From: Kevin Gillis Sent 11/16/2006 3:10:06 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ... Hi Matt, Thanks, good additions. I've added to the list which, in entirety is. Our current prioritization is as noted below and we'll adjust as feedback comes in. 1. what to do with deleted messages 2. what to do with Sent messages 3. disabling Forwarding 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default 5. CC/BCC on/Off by default 6. Disabling Vacation Messages. 7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 8. Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or without. 9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if allowed by system admin. 10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator. Bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday
RE: [IMail Forum] Cannot delete items in web interface
restart services and it will let go of the file. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Cannot delete items in web interface I just deleted the Deleted.mbx, uid and xml files. I deleted all mail in the INBOX and it was moved to the deleted items folder as expected. When I went to the deleted items folder, and click on Empty Deleted Folder, it refreshes and nothing is emptied/removed. Travis _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:40 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Cannot delete items in web interface Sorry - no go, but thanks. It isn't locked and there is no tilda box name either. Travis _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:32 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Cannot delete items in web interface I've seen this before and it was related to a locked mailbox. Try this: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-2118-DM01.htm Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:14 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Cannot delete items in web interface All, I have been trying to empty the deleted items folder on of my accounts and it does nothing when I click on Empty Deleted Items. If I select them and delete them, they disappear from the view, but never actually go away. Is there something I am missing? Is there a workaround for this? - Travis Rabe
RE: [IMail Forum] I don't care who wrote what... anyone else catching these?
All the ones I've seen have links to geocities in them. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S.J.Stanaitis Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:14 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] I don't care who wrote what... anyone else catching these? Likely worm generated, subject line is the format Name wrote: with various ads for stocks in the body of the message. They keep slipping past SpamAssassin, I'm starting to think the only way to completely block them is to filter out anything with wrote in the subject. Any other ideas / suggestions? Thanks, Sam SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator Decorative Product Source E-commerce Network To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] I don't care who wrote what... anyone else catching these?
Ours didn't over the weekend but it seems to be now. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:45 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] I don't care who wrote what... anyone else catching these? Hi, mxGuard with MessageSniffer catches these messages for an affordable price ;-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 44 391 30 00 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 News - Neue Produkte: .:. mxGuard - InvURIBL - MessageSniffer .:. NOD32 Antivirus System .:. BlueDragon .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. SmarterTools -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Daniel Donnelly Gesendet: Montag, 27. November 2006 18:10 An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] I don't care who wrote what... anyone else catching these? The Premium Anti-Spam in IMail/ICS is catching these... Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of S.J.Stanaitis Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:14 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] I don't care who wrote what... anyone else catching these? Likely worm generated, subject line is the format Name wrote: with various ads for stocks in the body of the message. They keep slipping past SpamAssassin, I'm starting to think the only way to completely block them is to filter out anything with wrote in the subject. Any other ideas / suggestions? Thanks, Sam SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator Decorative Product Source E-commerce Network To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Problem with POP3 service
What's a lot? I would run analyze.exe on your logs to see how frequently people are checking email. If you don't do this on a regular basis you'll find your users will be checking email every 1 minute. We send them a polite don't do that email. It does sound like there is a problem though since pop3 should be fairly light in terms of cpu. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:41 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Problem with POP3 service Hello, After upgrading to Imail 8.22, the POP3 service seems to be continuously consuming lot of CPU usage. This is happening with all the servers with Imail 8.22 running. Is there a problem with the POP3 service in Imail 8.22? Is there some patch available for the problem? Nitaish _ Everyone is raving about the http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42297/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb eta all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
I've had one case of this where the sender wasn't using our system and got a 550 message from imail. Since he's not a customer of our system and simply sent an email to our customer it makes no sense that he would get a 550. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 8:38 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error Sorry for the delay, I had to wait for another report... The setup is Exchange on another server, and ASSP/Imail on the other. The change in this setup has been the Exchange server. Incoming email into ASSP/Imail is forwarded to Exchange in local domain. For outgoing email, users sent to Exchange and Exchange sends through the Imail/ASSP server. Nothing is showing up in the Exchange or ASSP logs as strange, just the Imail logs. Can anyone figure out the pattern that is happening here? The user sent one email, it looks like Imail resets and starts another delivery thread which goes hunting for DNS, I don't think it's finding it. Here is the Verbose logs for Imail on the most recent complaint I have gotten: 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [192.168.0.2] connect 127.0.0.1 port 2431 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [127.0.0.1] EHLO driller.com 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [127.0.0.1] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [127.0.0.1] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=NEVER 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com in HOSTS 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [127.0.0.1] DATA 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aeb) [127.0.0.1] D:\IMail\spool\Db25301990aeb.SMD 1643 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [127.0.0.1] RSET 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [127.0.0.1] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [127.0.0.1] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTP () Info - Adding Queue file D:\IMail\spool\Qb25301990aeb.SMD 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) processing D:\IMail\spool\Qb25301990aeb.SMD 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com in HOSTS and MX 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com in HOSTS 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com by stack 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [127.0.0.1] ERR mail.driller.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [127.0.0.1] RSET 20061116 134747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25301990aec) [127.0.0.1] QUIT 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [192.168.0.2] connect 127.0.0.1 port 2452 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [127.0.0.1] EHLO driller.com 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [127.0.0.1] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [127.0.0.1] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=NEVER 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com in HOSTS 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [127.0.0.1] DATA 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aed) [127.0.0.1] D:\IMail\spool\Db25901b20aed.SMD 1605 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTP () Info - Adding Queue file D:\IMail\spool\Qb25901b20aed.SMD 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25901b20aed) processing D:\IMail\spool\Qb25901b20aed.SMD 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25901b20aed) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com in HOSTS and MX 20061116 134753 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (b25901b20aee) [127.0.0.1] QUIT 20061116 134801 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com in HOSTS and MX 20061116 134801 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com by stack 20061116 134808 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25901b20aed) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com by stack 20061116 134813 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) Info - Found dlcinvestments.com in skip list 20061116 134814 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) requeuing D:\IMail\spool\Qb25301990aeb.SMD R0 T1 20061116 134814 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25301990aeb) finished D:\IMail\spool\Qb25301990aeb.SMD status=3 20061116 134840 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25901b20aed) [x] looking up dlcinvestments.com by stack 20061116 134857 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25901b20aed) Info - Found dlcinvestments.com in skip list 20061116 134858 127.0.0.1 SMTP (b25901b20aed) requeuing D:\IMail\spool\Qb25901b20aed.SMD R0 T1
RE: [IMail Forum] Migration from 8.22 to 2006 on new box
check the kb, there's an article that will tell you everything you need to know. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evan Eggers Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:40 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Migration from 8.22 to 2006 on new box We're getting ready to bite the bullet and move from 8.22 to 2006, on a new box. I hope it's possible to do a brand-new install of 2006 (rather than having to install 8.22 first), then copy over accounts/mailboxes from the other box's 8.22 install. Possible? Has anyone done this? Any advice/watchouts? A quick search of the archives, and the Ipswitch knowledgebase, didn't turn anything up. In fact I'm waiting on hold with Ipswitch right now to ask them this very question... I would love to find a to do punchlist of best practices (least pain) for the migration steps. Any advice, or pointers to others' experiences would be terrific. Thanks! Evan
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Continuing issues - patch date?
There is an empty folder option which is what I think they went to instead of checkboxes. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:24 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Continuing issues - patch date? Kevin- One more item that I passed along to support, but I think you should know. On the webmail interface there is no select all at the top of the checkbox column. Some of my users like to be able to delete spam without checking the individual boxes. We had this in 8.15 and previous versions, and I've heard about it from several customers. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Export username and password..
Having been a person that has asked a FAQ, I think the best response to anyone asking a FAQ is a link to the archive or KB. It's polite and provides the answer without explaining everything all over again. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim F. Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:36 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Export username and password.. Do you even have any idea how age-old the How to export usernames and passwords FAQ is? Do you even know what FAQ stands for? Then why are you so surprised when the question is actually asked frequently? If anybody's panties are in a bunch, it's the how dare this person ask a question that's been asked before without searching the archives? How dare a person ask a support list a question that people frequently ask? camp. Me? I'm not a Sensitive Type, and nor are my panties in a bunch. I'm just an advocate of helpful and friendly discussion, not to mention civility. I can see by your tone and your calling out of list subscribers that obviously those are not your priorities. So be it. And anytime you want to compare my input into the IMail community with your bunched-panty chatter, bring it on. Hey, thanks for the invite. But I've got much more pressing issues to deal with. However, I welcome you to keep contributing. Afterall, the list would be nothing without you, I'm sure. -JF -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:33 PM To: Jim F. Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Export username and password.. ... making people who might not be comfortable asking a question feel even more alienated. Yo, Sensitive Type: saying New threads on this are pretty ridiculous is not an ad hominem attack: it's closer to a point of fact. Do you even have any idea how age-old the How to export usernames and passwords FAQ is? You should check your own archives (or maybe you don't keep any, to make sure you stay fresh). BTW, where's this newbie defense coming from? I'm sure Zul J, who has been asking questions on this list since July 2004 (half of them previously answered in the archives, half of them substantive, several of the latter asked twice on the same day) doesn't fit the usual definition of people who might not be comfortable asking a question. Maybe you mean something closer to people who don't do their own legwork before asking other people to help them with age-old non-problems. Or people who are too comfortable asking questions. And anytime you want to compare my input into the IMail community with your bunched-panty chatter, bring it on. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release / Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downloa d/release/ http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/re lease/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
I believe it has to be an IP'd domain or the primary. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:46 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails Yep. Use an outgoing rule on the domain. Darin. - Original Message - From: Dino Zolezzi To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:41 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails I want to know if there any way to configure Imail to send a copy ofoutgoing mail from one account to another mail account. For example: when [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends amail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the server sends automatically a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . This can be done at the server side? Thanks, Dino Zolezzi A. Peru Virtual S.A.
RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
Ipswitch removed outbound rules for virtuals in 2006. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:13 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails Nope. Virtual domains as well. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:57 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails I believe it has to be an IP'd domain or the primary. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:46 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails Yep. Use an outgoing rule on the domain. Darin. - Original Message - From: Dino Zolezzi To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:41 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails I want to know if there any way to configure Imail to send a copy ofoutgoing mail from one account to another mail account. For example: when [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends amail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the server sends automatically a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . This can be done at the server side? Thanks, Dino Zolezzi A. Peru Virtual S.A.
RE: [IMail Forum] Export username and password..
Just curious, what are you switching to? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zul J Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 5:03 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Export username and password.. Hi, Anyway of exporting IMail Database user info and passwords to a comma or tab delimited text file ? Rgrds, Zul - Original Message - From: Servei Tècnic [ MICROTECH ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 4:46 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Export username and password.. Did you store this info in a external database like SQL? If you did, you can query SQL from MSAccess, ASP, VBS,etc. if username info is in IMail DataBase, you will find it in registry HKLM\Software\Ipswistch\IMail\Domains\domain.com\Users\ Password is encrypted. You can read registry with winmgmts: and save it in a plain txt file. Regards, Pere Ginabreda -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Zul J Enviado el: viernes, 10 de noviembre de 2006 7:05 Para: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Asunto: [IMail Forum] Export username and password.. Hi, Any tools that can export IMail 8.15 usernames and passwords ? Thanks in advance.. Rgrds, Zul To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ /**\ This message and any attachment(s) are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the content to any other person. Any opinion, view and/or other information in this message and/or any attachment(s) hereto which do not relate to the official business of Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd shall not be deemed given nor endorsed by Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. Our company is not responsible for any activity that might be considered to be an illegal and/or improper use of email. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secured or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, delayed, incomplete or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message or for any virus damage which may arise as a result of this e-mail transmission. /**\ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
I was just sent an instance of this by a customer as well. 2006.1 Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:43 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error I've had an interesting problem that has been cropping up more and more lately. Sometimes a user will send email and it will come back: From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:20 PM To: John Doe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject:Undeliverable: Lunch Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Lunch Sent: 11/8/2006 3:20 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Doe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 11/8/2006 3:20 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. driller.com #5.5.0 smtp;550 not local host gmail.com, not a gateway The logs show this about the email: 20061108 152024 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3c08017b0cf8) [127.0.0.1] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061108 152024 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3c08017b0cf8) [127.0.0.1] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061108 152024 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3c08017b0cf8) [127.0.0.1] ERR mail.driller.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then end suddenly, just like that. Most all the other mail is working fine. A test message to another gmail user went right through. What am I missing? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
Mine was inbound from another setting NOT being sent through our server but to a recipient on our server. The sender was sent the 550 message. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:00 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error I thought you were asking if the local user authenticated with the SMTP server (driller.com in this case) before sending out. :) The email was outbound to gmail. It's almost like for one minute the Imail server at driller.com thought it was responsible for gmail.com and couldn't find the user (invalid user). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:54 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error Thought you said to a gmail account? Even so, if it is in the relay list it should go thru then. Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:50 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error No, this user is sending locally and is in the subnet allowed for relay. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:46 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error I think that usually shows that they did not authenticate before sending out. Is there also a line showing that the user authenticated before trying to send the email? Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:43 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error I've had an interesting problem that has been cropping up more and more lately. Sometimes a user will send email and it will come back: From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:20 PM To: John Doe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject:Undeliverable: Lunch Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Lunch Sent: 11/8/2006 3:20 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Doe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 11/8/2006 3:20 PM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. driller.com #5.5.0 smtp;550 not local host gmail.com, not a gateway The logs show this about the email: 20061108 152024 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3c08017b0cf8) [127.0.0.1] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061108 152024 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3c08017b0cf8) [127.0.0.1] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20061108 152024 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3c08017b0cf8) [127.0.0.1] ERR mail.driller.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then end suddenly, just like that. Most all the other mail is working fine. A test message to another gmail user went right through. What am I missing? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] mail forwarding limit
only problem withan alias is that spammers can get a hold of it but you can use the group alias which will do the same thing as a list without security. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis (188Web)Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:42 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] mail forwarding limit It is difficult for my client to administrate the mailing list. Hewanted to add 6 emails addresses but only the first 3 were delivered. Imail chopped the forth one in middle. I just interest to know why ? Now, I suggest him tomake forwarding to alias account. Alias canforward a lot of email addresses but again I don't know how many it can hold. Rgds, Francis - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:23 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] mail forwarding limit how about forwarding to a list? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis (188Web)Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:18 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] mail forwarding limit Hi,Does anybody know how many email address could be added to mail forwarding ?Is it limited by the character length upto 120 ?Rgds,Francis
RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping
Just curious but have you run analyze.exe on your logs to see the frequency your users are logging in? I run this regularly to weed out the people that are logging in every 1 minute. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Waller Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:14 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping Spoke too soon. Problem restarted at 8:08 this morning. CHKDSK doesn't report any problem. Is there a stability issue with POP3 service based on login rate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Waller Sent: 06 November 2006 20:29 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping Our emails have just crossed. This is valuable information for anyone with this type of problem. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: 06 November 2006 20:04 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping I've made a few connections to your server and some of those lasted over 50 seconds (my telnet program counts time of connection and I saw 70 once, but maybe some timeout makes it think it is longer). I saw numbers that got as high as 80-8, but the second was always larger in the first few seconds after the restart (not really surprising). It seems to take 10-15 seconds before the restart completes. This is very strange operation! POP3 almost never stops and to see it doing it every minute, is bizarre! Does a re-install fix this at all? If not, try renaming the pop3d.exe to .old and reinstall (bad disk sector, maybe?). Set POP3 to Manual in services, and restart computer before install, if at all possible. Reset service back to Automatic, if install does not do this for you. Have you checked the HD? CHKDSK /F is still a good tool for many HD systems. Is your page file 3 times RAM? Did you find any other warnings or errors in the Event logs? Make them go away! Sorry nothing more specific, but it has the feel of a system problem... Can you try another NIC in the computer? Is the driver for the current NIC, the latest? Does the NIC have any power management enabled on it? You might try disabling that... Oh, I saw you playing with the service greeting... seems it's back to normal, now. Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Waller Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:42 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping It definitely is stopping - I get disconnected from Telnet when it happens. The numbers are (for each telnet connection) 59-4 18-2 4-4 The service stops at exactly :53 seconds past the minute every two minutes. Some 30 seconds later the system restarts the POP3 mail service. Imail doesn't log down to the second logging to sys.txt so I've set it to log to the event log instead. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: 06 November 2006 19:12 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping 1 minute is also the default poll interval for IMonitor. Shut it off, at least for a while. What happens when you manually try to stop/start the service? If that goes OK and quickly, does the restart have any effect on the situation? Did you enable logging in the POP3 service? Does the log show the service restarting when you do it and nothing otherwise? Maybe the service is not really stopping? If you telnet to port 110, the numbers at the end tell how many current connections and how many since last restart. If yours is really restarting every minute, I would expect the last number to be fairly small, certainly less than a thousand. What does the first number show? Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:00 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping 6 msec is one minute on the dot. Maybe it is never running. Are you getting mail though the POP3 service? - Original Message - From: David Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 1:26 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IM POP3 service keeps stopping I'm seeing the POP3 service failing every minute - on the dot... Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7031 Date: 06/11/2006 Time: 18:29:53 User: N/A Computer: DRUM Description: The IMail POP3 Server service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action
[IMail Forum] Notify=failure, delay?
Title: Notify=failure, delay? I'm seeing this in our logs: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822; The account is valid so why would there be a delay on our server? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Notify=failure, delay?
My bad, should have checked the KB. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Dorman Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:24 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Notify=failure, delay? On Monday, November 6, 2006, 10:56:35, Matrosity Hosting wrote: I'm seeing this in our logs: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822; The account is valid so why would there be a delay on our server? Reread RFC 3461 SMTP DSN Extension http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3461.txt That's a request for, and the conditions under which a Delivery Status Notification should be generated. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote. - Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum]
I've had a scheduled task to perform the following: c:\imail\immsgexp.exe -td:\imail -d1 -mimip.mbx It doesn't seem to be working anymore. I checked the KB, this time, but the syntax looks right to me. I found several imip.mbx's with old messages in them so I know it's not working. Thoughts? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum]
spoke too soon. I had a trailing '\' on the end of 'td:\imail' in the bat file so apparently that causes problems. Sorry, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:56 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] I've had a scheduled task to perform the following: c:\imail\immsgexp.exe -td:\imail -d1 -mimip.mbx It doesn't seem to be working anymore. I checked the KB, this time, but the syntax looks right to me. I found several imip.mbx's with old messages in them so I know it's not working. Thoughts? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] mail forwarding limit
how about forwarding to a list? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis (188Web)Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:18 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] mail forwarding limit Hi,Does anybody know how many email address could be added to mail forwarding ?Is it limited by the character length upto 120 ?Rgds,Francis
RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email
Wouldn't it be nice mail servers could use some flavor of compression on emails between mail servers we would all enjoy bandwidth savings. Anyway, we really need this feature to ensure our servers aren't sent 10 or 50 GB files because it's going to happen at some point. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Richards Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:30 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email In this pay-per-bandwidth age, this is sadly the truth among many asps for isp That host email and web services. Ie, people love to upload images and video. The simple Fix for images would be to have a java app or activex that resizes the image to the size needed Before its uploaded to save bandwidth and use the user's cpu cycles to do the legwork instead Of your server. While this seems obvious, developers don't get it. Especially in these Times of 10 megapixel digital cameras that make 5 meg files. Upload your image here...just resize it, crop it and do a bunch of work on it manually before you Upload...then people say to heck with it. Too much work. What ever happened to making the computer work for US. Make mail smarter. Make it reject mail That is too large ahead of time. The only thing worse than the case you stated is if the server, by chance, only had 100 megs free drive space. Not only did the transfer sit and take place, but you run the risk of running the drive out of space. - Peter R NextPages, LLC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 9:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email That's a much needed feature, ipswitch! There's little point in even having a setting like that if it sucks up bandwidth/resources in and out to tell someone that it's too large. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 12:12 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email But the Imail server will accept the message then reject it when its too large. So the gentleman that reports that he saw a 270mb message could not prevent the user from sending it to his IMail server. Is this correct? Sadly, correct! John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email
Sounds good except I get "Error Message Overflow" when I put that into iadmin. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 1:39 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email Bill,Try to use the proper math for converting from MB to bytes. The registry stores this value in bytes. You want to use the proper standard where converting bytes to a larger measure you use a multiple of 1024. 1,048,576 bytes = 1 megabyte 50 megabytes = 52,428,800 bytesIf you want to change everyone, export the registry and do a search and replace, then import the changes. Make sure to keep an original registry backup of the Ipswitch tree just in case.MattMatrosity Hosting wrote: Seems like this really needs to be fixed as another potential problem. In the meantime, what should be entered into 2006.1 since it looks like the MB option doesn't take? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email
That's a much needed feature, ipswitch! There's little point in even having a setting like that if it sucks up bandwidth/resources in and out to tell someone that it's too large. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 12:12 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email But the Imail server will accept the message then reject it when its too large. So the gentleman that reports that he saw a 270mb message could not prevent the user from sending it to his IMail server. Is this correct? Sadly, correct! John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Maximum size email
Title: Maximum size email I just caught an inbound email that was 270 MB's in the spool. After reaming the moron a new one that sent an email, I'm wondering how I can prevent emails of this size from even being accepted by imail? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email
We haven't had the need to provide an separate IP for anyone so if I set the max message size on the primary then that should cover all the virtuals, right? Will the prevent the message from even being accepted or will imail accept it then determine it's too large? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:26 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email I just caught an inbound email that was 270 MB's in the spool. After reaming the moron a new one that sent an email, I'm wondering how I can prevent emails of this size from even being accepted by imail? Max message size on all IP based domains. Thsi will affect the virtiulals too - but only the ones taht have DNS configured to use that IP as the MX. Regards, David Gregg -- mxGuard for IMail The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution. Download a free 30-day trial at http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email
This is nice. I entered 50 and select MB from the dropdown in 2006.1 and sent a once sentence email from a customer. The response from my own server was 552 message size exceeds maximum message size. I'm assuming this is another bug with 2006.1 so what should I put in there? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:29 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email We haven't had the need to provide an separate IP for anyone so if I set the max message size on the primary then that should cover all the virtuals, right? Will the prevent the message from even being accepted or will imail accept it then determine it's too large? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:26 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email I just caught an inbound email that was 270 MB's in the spool. After reaming the moron a new one that sent an email, I'm wondering how I can prevent emails of this size from even being accepted by imail? Max message size on all IP based domains. Thsi will affect the virtiulals too - but only the ones taht have DNS configured to use that IP as the MX. Regards, David Gregg -- mxGuard for IMail The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution. Download a free 30-day trial at http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp -- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email
Seems like this really needs to be fixed as another potential problem. In the meantime, what should be entered into 2006.1 since it looks like the MB option doesn't take? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:51 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Maximum size email Ipswitch needs to fix their RFC 1870 issues. Their documentation has stated that they are compliant with this since version 4 or 5, but there is almost no support for this, and it certainly is completely ineffective since all other servers rely on the recipient server to reject or accept based on the size of the message.I have been asking Ipswitch to fix this for a year and a half, along with several others that I work with and also experience this issue This is the main cause of messages getting stuck in Outlook's outbox when sending an oversized message to IMail. This is also the main cause of outgoing messages in IMail getting stuck retrying over and over again. All of my IMail customers have experienced this, some more than others. The lower the max E-mail size on either your server or the recipient server, the more frequently you will experience this issue.True and functional RFC 1870 support is where in EHLO connections, the size of the message in bytes is sent as an argument following the Mail From address. The recipient server then can take immediate action to accept or reject the message based on the size, and before a single bit of DATA is sent. IMail doesn't listen to the Size value nor does it send using it. This is further complicated by the fact that several servers, including Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SMTP, and SmarterMail do not communicate oversized messages in a way that IMail understands (they send back the 550 as soon as the message goes oversize instead of waiting for the end of the DATA to stop, and IMail only understands a 550 after the end of DATA). E-mail clients like Outlook, Outlook Express and Entourage have similar issues when sending which is why messages get stuck in their Outbox and sent continually.This not only causes messages to get stuck for long periods of time in a resending pattern, it also sucks up a ton of bandwidth. I have had this completely suck up all of a customer's bandwidth on the end of a T1 with just a few messages stuck, and of course bandwidth costs us money, so this requires constant monitoring.Here are two charts showing a single message being stuck. The first example is one stuck in an Outlook outbox, and the second is a message stuck in IMail's spool trying to be delivered to an Exchange server. Both messages were approximately 25 MB. Both charts start while the problem is already there and then the issue is fixed showing normal traffic.
RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22
How about the max recipient setting? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian T. Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 We have several customers who send out mass mailing to hundreds of people. Since upgrading to Imail 8.22, they lost the abilty to send out to more than 5. Is there a setting somewhere that would be blocking customers from sending an email to more than 5 email addresses? I looked thru the admin settings but I didn't see anything. Thanks in advance, Brian T. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22
Well, that's up to you. I have it set to 15 because I prefer people use mailing lists since this is what they were intended for. Your users may squawk at that but it's really up to your own preferences. I would put something in there though. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian T. Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:07 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 Ok. Found it. It was set at 3. I assume 3 was the default, is it safe to sent it to 0 (unlimited) or not? Brian T. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:55 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 How about the max recipient setting? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian T. Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 We have several customers who send out mass mailing to hundreds of people. Since upgrading to Imail 8.22, they lost the abilty to send out to more than 5. Is there a setting somewhere that would be blocking customers from sending an email to more than 5 email addresses? I looked thru the admin settings but I didn't see anything. Thanks in advance, Brian T. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22
I'm sure this is a grey area in terms of use with imail. They're pricing model looks to be used with exchange not imail. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:39 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Not F-Prot! Read the licensing Bill. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:46 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Use mxguard to call the ondemand scanner which will cost you a whopping $50 per year. You can also use the same license for 9 other workstations. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:35 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Make sure you check out the new pricing for F-Prot. They seemed to have priced themself out of the mail server scanner market. Its very expensive now. Darrell -- -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Nitesh (Ipswitch Mailing List Member) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:35 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Can we use some other antivirus software than F-Prot with AvCatcher? Warm Regards, Nitesh Shah System Admin Technical Desk QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise === Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480 Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224 Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 - 3166 URL: http://www.qualispace.com === For Any Technical Query Please Use: http://helpdesk.qualispace.com QualiSpace Community Discussion forum: http://forum.qualispace.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Moore Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:45 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 I found creek solutions quickest cheapest solution and it does work with 8.22 http://www.avcatcher.com/ Regards David Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] J.P. MCP, MCSE, MCSE + INTERNET, CNE. www.adsldirect.com.au for ADSL and Internet www.romtech.com.au for PC sales Office Phone: (+612) 9453 1990 Fax Phone: (+612) 9453 1880 Mobile Phone: +614 18 282 648 POSTAL ADDRESS: PO BOX 190 BELROSE NSW 2085 AUSTRALIA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2006 10:09 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Hi I upgraded from 8.21 to 8.22 so as to be able to install the SMTP security patch but since then there seems to have been a huge amount of viruses gettting through the system. Most are contained in zip files (but some aren't - e.g. file extensions ending in .scr). The definitions are all up to date. Any idea what might have happened or how to fix this? Clients are NOT too happy. Thanks Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Fusio.net To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.21/511 - Release Date: 11/1/2006 9:40 AM -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.21/511 - Release Date: 11/1/2006 9:40 AM To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing
RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22
If this is the case then we'll run with just Clam then as it catches the lions share anyway. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:49 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 I'm sure this is a grey area in terms of use with imail. They're pricing model looks to be used with exchange not imail. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:39 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Not F-Prot! Read the licensing Bill. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:46 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Use mxguard to call the ondemand scanner which will cost you a whopping $50 per year. You can also use the same license for 9 other workstations. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:35 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Make sure you check out the new pricing for F-Prot. They seemed to have priced themself out of the mail server scanner market. Its very expensive now. Darrell -- -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Nitesh (Ipswitch Mailing List Member) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:35 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Can we use some other antivirus software than F-Prot with AvCatcher? Warm Regards, Nitesh Shah System Admin Technical Desk QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise === Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480 Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224 Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 - 3166 URL: http://www.qualispace.com === For Any Technical Query Please Use: http://helpdesk.qualispace.com QualiSpace Community Discussion forum: http://forum.qualispace.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Moore Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:45 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 I found creek solutions quickest cheapest solution and it does work with 8.22 http://www.avcatcher.com/ Regards David Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] J.P. MCP, MCSE, MCSE + INTERNET, CNE. www.adsldirect.com.au for ADSL and Internet www.romtech.com.au for PC sales Office Phone: (+612) 9453 1990 Fax Phone: (+612) 9453 1880 Mobile Phone: +614 18 282 648 POSTAL ADDRESS: PO BOX 190 BELROSE NSW 2085 AUSTRALIA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2006 10:09 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] AV not catching viruses since upgrade to 8.22 Hi I upgraded from 8.21 to 8.22 so as to be able to install the SMTP security patch but since then there seems to have been a huge amount of viruses gettting through the system. Most are contained in zip files (but some aren't - e.g. file extensions ending in .scr). The definitions are all up to date. Any idea what might have happened or how to fix this? Clients are NOT too happy. Thanks Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa Fusio.net To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.21/511 - Release Date: 11/1/2006 9:40 AM -- No virus found
RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22
In 2006, I believe it's on the smtp properties page. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:57 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 Bill, Where is the setting to set it to 15? Thanks for the aid. Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:14 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 Well, that's up to you. I have it set to 15 because I prefer people use mailing lists since this is what they were intended for. Your users may squawk at that but it's really up to your own preferences. I would put something in there though. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian T. Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:07 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 Ok. Found it. It was set at 3. I assume 3 was the default, is it safe to sent it to 0 (unlimited) or not? Brian T. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:55 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 How about the max recipient setting? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian T. Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Sending Issue after upgrade to 8.22 We have several customers who send out mass mailing to hundreds of people. Since upgrading to Imail 8.22, they lost the abilty to send out to more than 5. Is there a setting somewhere that would be blocking customers from sending an email to more than 5 email addresses? I looked thru the admin settings but I didn't see anything. Thanks in advance, Brian T. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Asp error
Title: Asp error 2006 is filled with permission problems so this wouldn't surprise me. Since this is a 2003 server .net 1.1 came on it but it is patched. I was thinking of removing the Iadmin app pool and recreating it but am not sure. I'm leaning more towards the if it isn't broken don't fix it methodology. I hate this because a smoking engine is usually an indicator of bigger problems. :) Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:29 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Asp error Bill, Could not create a Disk Cache Sub-directory for the Application Pool. This is similar to an error I used to see occasionally in the early days of .NET 1.0. As I recall, it was a permissions error that was extremely hard to solve because the error message didn't describe what was actually happening. Installing .NET Framework 1.1 over 1.0 solved the problem, as I remember it. -d - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:57 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Asp error This isn't a fire but I have one of these in my application events: Error: The Template Persistent Cache initialization failed for Application Pool 'IAdmin' because of the following error: Could not create a Disk Cache Sub-directory for the Application Pool. The data may have additional error codes.. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
[IMail Forum] 2006.1 login changes?
Title: 2006.1 login changes? Were there any changes to the login pages from 2006.04a to 2006.1? One of our clients uses an extranet that logs users into imail from a link. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrading version problem
I would say you should apply 2006.1 since that is the only version of 2006 that is safe from the latest smtp problem. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Upgrading version problem Hi, I have been called in to do an emergency upgrade on an iMail 2006 server that I have seen only once before. It seems to be running 9.01 (according to the services menu in the administrator console) which I am assuming is iMail 2006.01. Now I have downloaded the upgrades IMail 2006.03, and .04 and .1 just in case. When I go to run any of these updates the first message I get is Setup has determined that a later version is already installed. This setup installs an earlier version. So I looked at the files and a lot of them are dated Dec 19, 2005 which makes me believe that I am right that they are running 9.01 / 2006.01 Is there another place to confirm from within IMail Administrator or should I just ignore the upgrade message and proceed? Thank you Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions
RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
Tripp, I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the plan? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue No difference as far as browsers go on login, Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueWe went back to the originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test server?-d- Original Message -----From: "Matrosity Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <IMAIL_FORUM@LIST.IPSWITCH.COM>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue There must be something that .2 changes that isn't reversed by downgrading. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, but we're getting close. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Dare I try .2? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 and reproduced the problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on that machine to a development 2006.2 build and the problem went away. We then downgraded the box back to 2006.1 and the problem did not return. Since then we've been unable to duplicate again on that box. I've tried three other machines with your registry and could not duplicate. Still looking... Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We could live without the disk indicator if that improves login speed. It seems to me that there must be something in the registry that is causing this since you guys were able to reproduce on your end? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:20 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue The code that generates the control is compiled "code behind" for the site. So far I haven't found anything that we can comment out in the .js or .aspx pages that would make a difference. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:39 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Can we temporarily disable the disk indicator by commenting out some code? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:29 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Is there any difference in the login delay if they are using FF or IE? Is the disk space indicator displayed during the delay? Tripp To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive:
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
ok, thanks. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We're still looking at it but don't have anything to report right now. Tripp From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Tripp, I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the plan? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue No difference as far as browsers go on login, Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueWe went back to the originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test server?-d- Original Message -----From: "Matrosity Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <IMAIL_FORUM@LIST.IPSWITCH.COM>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue There must be something that .2 changes that isn't reversed by downgrading. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, but we're getting close. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Dare I try .2? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 and reproduced the problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on that machine to a development 2006.2 build and the problem went away. We then downgraded the box back to 2006.1 and the problem did not return. Since then we've been unable to duplicate again on that box. I've tried three other machines with your registry and could not duplicate. Still looking... Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue We could live without the disk indicator if that improves login speed. It seems to me that there must be something in the registry that is causing this since you guys were able to reproduce on your end? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:20 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue The code that generates the control is compiled "code behind" for the site. So far I haven't found anything that we can comment out in the .js or .aspx pages that would make a difference. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:39 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue Can
