RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 7 vs. IMS 2 by CoolFusion

2001-08-14 Thread Ramiro Barreca \(Datamasters\)

Len:
What do you mean by then iMS is about it, apart from open source hacking.
(excuses for my poor english).
On the other hand, could I add some links/buttons to any IMail template that
call some '.cfm' on a Cold Fusion Server to integrate it further with the
application we have developed?

Ramiro Barreca
Datamasters (de OM Ingeniería S.R.L.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: +54 (342) 455-7841
San Gerónimo 4098
S3002FBL (Santa Fe)
República Argentina

- Mensaje original -
De: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado: Lunes, 13 de Agosto de 2001 15:12
Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 7 vs. IMS 2 by CoolFusion



CoolFusion IMS 2.0.

I just had a real bad experience with iMS and Howie couldn´t fix and the
iMS (and my boxes) got thrown out.  In fact I had to show Howie how iMS was
screwing up the SMTP protocol, but that fix wasn´t enoough the save the deal.

That said, it certainly has it strengths as programmable SMTP server.

We, as Cold Fusion Apps developers, want to consider a mail server
solution that will allow as to modify and add features to it using CF
templates (.cfm).

then iMS is about your only choice.

Does IMail 7.0 allow this?

no

In fact, What is the right solution for us?  What are the features because we
have to choice IMail instead of IMS?

If you want a programmable SMTP server, ie, a toolkit, then iMS is about
it, apart from open source hacking.

If you want a complete, turnkey mail solution, then Imail fits.

Len

http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4  W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com  : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/




Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/



Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 7 vs. IMS 2 by CoolFusion

2001-08-14 Thread Guy Isabel

 I don´t know.  The imail web CGI is quite closed.  I can´t see how it´s
 webserver could co-exist on the same machine with the IIS web server
 requied by CF.

 Len

You are quite right in that IMail's webserver component is proprietary and
closed (and somewhat lacking) but it will happily coexist with IIS as long
as the two use different TCP ports. Case in point: Ron's suggestion to use
IIS (or Apache or whatever) to serve the darn .GIFs that often fail to
display properly in IMail's Web Messaging.

Guy
--
Guy Isabel [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/



RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 7 vs. IMS 2 by CoolFusion

2001-08-14 Thread David Stavert

The two web servers (IMail and IIS/CF) would need to answer on different
ports. Every reference tag would need to be reference-able like
HTTP://localhost/blabla It works for an image because you reference a
location. A tag is not a location. It might be possible to use frames with
seperate frames drawn from the seperate web servers. I am guessing you would
get into performance issues.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Guy Isabel
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 7 vs. IMS 2 by CoolFusion


 I don´t know.  The imail web CGI is quite closed.  I can´t see how it´s
 webserver could co-exist on the same machine with the IIS web server
 requied by CF.

 Len

You are quite right in that IMail's webserver component is proprietary and
closed (and somewhat lacking) but it will happily coexist with IIS as long
as the two use different TCP ports. Case in point: Ron's suggestion to use
IIS (or Apache or whatever) to serve the darn .GIFs that often fail to
display properly in IMail's Web Messaging.

Guy
--
Guy Isabel [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/



Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 7 vs. IMS 2 by CoolFusion

2001-08-13 Thread Len Conrad


CoolFusion IMS 2.0.

I just had a real bad experience with iMS and Howie couldn´t fix and the 
iMS (and my boxes) got thrown out.  In fact I had to show Howie how iMS was 
screwing up the SMTP protocol, but that fix wasn´t enoough the save the deal.

That said, it certainly has it strengths as programmable SMTP server.

We, as Cold Fusion Apps developers, want to consider a mail server 
solution that will allow as to modify and add features to it using CF 
templates (.cfm).

then iMS is about your only choice.

Does IMail 7.0 allow this?

no

In fact, What is the right solution for us?  What are the features because we
have to choice IMail instead of IMS?

If you want a programmable SMTP server, ie, a toolkit, then iMS is about 
it, apart from open source hacking.

If you want a complete, turnkey mail solution, then Imail fits.

Len

http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4  W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com  : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/