Re: postil.com not working in FF or Konqueror

2008-08-24 Thread Dotan Cohen
2008/8/18 Arie Skliarouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 If you would tell us what specific features did not work for you then I
 will:

 Start with  טופס הצטרפות on
 https://bank.postil.com/BMeida.html


Sorry for the delay, I am in the middle of exams and I could not take
care of this.

I would have no problem testing the tofes htzarfut however I have no
account with the postal bank to sign up with. Are you in Haifa? If you
can get to the Technion then I would like to sit with you, try to sign
up with the form, and then write a long, detailed letter to Postil. In
fact, I just wrote one today to Clalit complete with screenshots.

-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת

ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü


Re: postil.com not working in FF or Konqueror

2008-08-24 Thread Dotan Cohen
I see now, the submit button does not work in Firefox. I wrote to them this:

אני צריך להירשם לשירות המקוון של postil אבל הטופס הצטרפות אינו עובד.
אני לוחץ על כפתור שלח ושוב דבר לא קורה. נא לתקן את האתר ולהודיע לי
כשהעיניין מתופל. בתודה מראש.

However, I got this message upon submitting the form:
Error- This page can't be displayed due to a security violation or
typing not allowed characters.Contact support for additional
information 02-6290370

Did my message get received? Did it go to /dev/null? So I called the
number and the man asked Which internet do you have? The site does
not work with Firefox. before I even told him what browser. These
were his exact, confidence-inspiring words:
איזה אינטרנט יש לך?
Some technician! As I am calling at 18:45 he suggested that I call
back in the morning to speak to a senior tech. I will.

Another bit of stupidity: I put my phone number in as 054-7881700 and
I got a JavaScript popup complaining about nonnumerical characters in
the phone field. What an idiot programmer: phone fields should accept
[0-9():space:\-\.] because those are the common deliminators used.

-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת

ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü


Preferred video card for Linux dual-head?

2008-08-24 Thread Amos Shapira
Hello,

My boss bought second-hand extra monitors for all of us and I now need
to buy graphics cards which can support dual-head for Debian/Ubuntu
(and Windows XP and Vista).

Since there are always swings around about best linux support which
I didn't follow, what's the order of the day? Should go with nVidia,
AMD or maybe Intel? Any specific card families/models?

The computers are a mix of older (2-3 years?) to new (2 months old),
so the system bus might be a bit limited too.

I don't need to run games or anything too fancy - just plain
programming/surfing and remote desktop, though support for Compiz
would be a nice bonus.

Thanks,

--Amos

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preferred video card for Linux dual-head?

2008-08-24 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi,

I'll go with NVidia if you don't care about open source drivers. They
have excellent support in dual screen support.
Intel... not very good support. good drivers, but I had my share of a
garbage cursor on the 2nd screen.
ATI/AMD - Pretty good but PRAY that your card is supported in their
latest drivers or else if you find a bug on an older drivers
(discontinued card), then that's your problem :)

Good luck
Hetz

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 My boss bought second-hand extra monitors for all of us and I now need
 to buy graphics cards which can support dual-head for Debian/Ubuntu
 (and Windows XP and Vista).

 Since there are always swings around about best linux support which
 I didn't follow, what's the order of the day? Should go with nVidia,
 AMD or maybe Intel? Any specific card families/models?

 The computers are a mix of older (2-3 years?) to new (2 months old),
 so the system bus might be a bit limited too.

 I don't need to run games or anything too fancy - just plain
 programming/surfing and remote desktop, though support for Compiz
 would be a nice bonus.

 Thanks,

 --Amos

 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preferred video card for Linux dual-head?

2008-08-24 Thread Omer Zak
In my PC I have two nVidia GeForce FX 5200 video cards.  One with AGP
form factor, and the other - with PCI form factor.
This was the cheapest way to add a second display to my PC, and worked
because my PC had unused PCI slots.

Software:  Debian Etch, with Xorg version 7.1.0-19.
The driver being used is 'nv', for both video cards.

The following /etc/X11/xorg.conf section specifies how both screens are
combined.

Section ServerLayout
Identifier  DualHead Default Layout
Screen  2nd Screen RightOf Default Screen
Screen  Default Screen
Option  Xinerama
InputDevice Generic Keyboard
InputDevice Configured Mouse
EndSection

I hope this helps.
  --- Omer

On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:51 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
 Hello,
 
 My boss bought second-hand extra monitors for all of us and I now need
 to buy graphics cards which can support dual-head for Debian/Ubuntu
 (and Windows XP and Vista).
 
 Since there are always swings around about best linux support which
 I didn't follow, what's the order of the day? Should go with nVidia,
 AMD or maybe Intel? Any specific card families/models?
 
 The computers are a mix of older (2-3 years?) to new (2 months old),
 so the system bus might be a bit limited too.
 
 I don't need to run games or anything too fancy - just plain
 programming/surfing and remote desktop, though support for Compiz
 would be a nice bonus.
-- 
MCSE - acronym for Minesweeper Consultant  Solitaire Expert. (Unknown)
My own blog is at http://www.zak.co.il/tddpirate/

My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
They do not represent the official policy of any organization with which
I may be affiliated in any way.
WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preferred video card for Linux dual-head?

2008-08-24 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Monday 25 August 2008, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
 Hi,

 I'll go with NVidia if you don't care about open source drivers. 

I would recommend against Nvidia:

http://www.petitiononline.com/nvfoss/

They are completely apathetic towards open-source and Linux, and I have 
encountered (or heard of people encountering) many problems with them. They 
don't have their own free drivers or have released SPECs for their cards 
(the nv driver is written in hex.). I have recently bought a new ATI HD 
2600 Pro card to replace my old Nvidia GeForce 4 MX card (whose fan died and 
that was on the virge of being no longer supported) and am very happy.

I wouldn't want to support such a company with my wallet.

Regards,

Shlomi Fish

-
Shlomi Fish   http://www.shlomifish.org/
The Human Hacking Field Guide - http://xrl.us/bjn8q

Shlomi, so what are you working on? Working on a new wiki about unit testing 
fortunes in freecell? -- Ran Eilam

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preferred video card for Linux dual-head?

2008-08-24 Thread Moshe Gorohovsky
Hi,

I had bought ATI Sapphire HD 2400 PRO for a developer workstation.
The card was in mass sales two months ago. The card is working
perfect with Debian lenny - July 2008 and with Knoppix 5.3.1.
Graphics display and video processing seems fine with
xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd video driver.

- Moshe.

Amos Shapira wrote:
 Hello,
 
 My boss bought second-hand extra monitors for all of us and I now need
 to buy graphics cards which can support dual-head for Debian/Ubuntu
 (and Windows XP and Vista).
 
 Since there are always swings around about best linux support which
 I didn't follow, what's the order of the day? Should go with nVidia,
 AMD or maybe Intel? Any specific card families/models?
 
 The computers are a mix of older (2-3 years?) to new (2 months old),
 so the system bus might be a bit limited too.
 
 I don't need to run games or anything too fancy - just plain
 programming/surfing and remote desktop, though support for Compiz
 would be a nice bonus.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --Amos
 
 =
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
Moshe Gorohovsky

A6 CC A7 E1 C2 BD 8C 1B  30 8E A4 C3 4C 09 88 47   Tk Open Systems Ltd.
---
 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preferred video card for Linux dual-head?

2008-08-24 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 02:06 +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'll go with NVidia if you don't care about open source drivers. They
 have excellent support in dual screen support.
 Intel... not very good support. good drivers, but I had my share of a
 garbage cursor on the 2nd screen.
 ATI/AMD - Pretty good but PRAY that your card is supported in their
 latest drivers or else if you find a bug on an older drivers
 (discontinued card), then that's your problem :)
 
 Good luck
 Hetz

While I'm using nVidia (on a large number of machines) I'm thinking
about switching to AMD/ATI.
A couple of reasons.

A. Having an OSS driver is big plus. While it may or may not use the OSS
driver, having the -option- to use an OSS drivers when the binary driver
fails and/or you're trying to use unsupported software/OS combo * should
be taken into account. If you use nVidia, you're limited to what-ever
OS/arch/etc nVidia chose for you.

B. The current driver family (16x.xx and 17x.xx) has miserable 2D
performance. In nVidia's defense, they are working hard to solve these
problems, but as it stands, my 11 y/o PII233/MAC64 laptop, with it's
patched DRI driver, literally run circles around my 2xE5335/GF9800GTX
workstation in 2D.

C. nVidia is a -very- annoying tendency to kill the support for older
cards unexpectedly - switching to very problematic legacy drivers. And
as you're limited to binary drivers, once nVidia drops to the support
for your card, you're screwed.


As it stand, if you only require 2D with limited 3D (Read: compiz and
friends) an older ATI card (r300/r400-based **) should suite you best.
Make sure you do some digging (@google) on the target card before buying
it.

- Gilboa
* Xen under both Linux and Solaris, FreeBSD/AMD64, PPC/PPC64/SPARC/etc.
** 9800*, X300/600/800.



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]