version control wiki
Hi Everyone I am not sure if I should mail this only to linux-il. I apology if you gets this mail twice. I would like to here your advice I am the administrator or the System Software Development Laboratory (SSDL) in the computer science department at the Technion. I have a RHEL 4 application server. The server can be accesses via ssh from everywhere (meaning outside of the Technion). We would like to add 2 additional services to our users: version control (including web interface) wiki. The access to the new services can be from everywhere. Some of the data will have anonymous read access but most of it will require authentication for read write. 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) 2.. From a security point of view, what is the risk of installing the version control wiki on the application server? Do you recommend to install the wiki on a separate machine and expose (maybe for read only) the files from the version control to the wiki machine? Do you have any better system architecture? 3.. Can you recommend on raid controller for Linux. I will probably use 2-3 SATA disks Thanks Shahar Dag System Software Development Laboratory (SSDL) Computer Science Department Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa, Israel Tel. 972-4-8294880 Fax 972-4-8293900 _ I am looking for old Vinyl record. If you have any that you don’t need please send me mail Thanks Shahar
Re: version control wiki
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Shahar Dag wrote about version control wiki: 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) I am not aware of a version control + wiki combination (but maybe someone can correct me?), so you will have to choose each one separately. For version control, I would recommend Subversion. It is very similar in its basic philosophy to CVS, but it's simply better in many ways (I'm sure that Google can return heaps of comparisons of Subversion to every other version control system under the sun). For Wiki, I don't have any experiance of actually *installing* such a system, but from a user's perspective, I'd recommend MediaWiki, because it has the most familar syntax (at least to the hundreds of thousands of people which contribute to Wikipedia). -- Nadav Har'El|Wednesday, Jan 24 2007, 5 Shevat 5767 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |What's tiny, yellow and very dangerous? A http://nadav.harel.org.il |canary with the super-user password. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version control wiki
2007/1/24, Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Shahar Dag wrote about version control wiki: 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) I am not aware of a version control + wiki combination (but maybe someone can correct me?), so you will have to choose each one separately. I did not work with it myself, but trac is both a wiki and a project management tool that interfaces to subversion. I did see it used in various sites I stumbled upon, have read a bit about it, and it seems interesting. -- Didi
Re: [Haifux] Re: version control wiki
TRAC, only trac. It integrates bugzilla(like)+svn+wiki in one tight nice integration. When you start using it, everything else just stinks. ביום רביעי 24 ינואר 2007, 11:27, נכתב על ידי Nadav Har'El: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Shahar Dag wrote about version control wiki: 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) I am not aware of a version control + wiki combination (but maybe someone can correct me?), so you will have to choose each one separately. For version control, I would recommend Subversion. It is very similar in its basic philosophy to CVS, but it's simply better in many ways (I'm sure that Google can return heaps of comparisons of Subversion to every other version control system under the sun). For Wiki, I don't have any experiance of actually *installing* such a system, but from a user's perspective, I'd recommend MediaWiki, because it has the most familar syntax (at least to the hundreds of thousands of people which contribute to Wikipedia). To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Haifux] Re: version control wiki
I second that one, TRAC! This suite is just brilliant: wiki,svn,project management, bugtask management, extendable and pluggable, not bloated.. Go with TRAC and you'll never look back. On 1/24/07, Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TRAC, only trac. It integrates bugzilla(like)+svn+wiki in one tight nice integration. When you start using it, everything else just stinks. ביום רביעי 24 ינואר 2007, 11:27, נכתב על ידי Nadav Har'El: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Shahar Dag wrote about version control wiki: 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) I am not aware of a version control + wiki combination (but maybe someone can correct me?), so you will have to choose each one separately. For version control, I would recommend Subversion. It is very similar in its basic philosophy to CVS, but it's simply better in many ways (I'm sure that Google can return heaps of comparisons of Subversion to every other version control system under the sun). For Wiki, I don't have any experiance of actually *installing* such a system, but from a user's perspective, I'd recommend MediaWiki, because it has the most familar syntax (at least to the hundreds of thousands of people which contribute to Wikipedia). To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Not gonna be king of the world if you're slave to the grind - Skid Row
Re: version control wiki
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:04:58AM +0200, Shahar Dag wrote: Hi Everyone I am not sure if I should mail this only to linux-il. I apology if you gets this mail twice. I would like to here your advice I am the administrator or the System Software Development Laboratory (SSDL) in the computer science department at the Technion. I have a RHEL 4 application server. The server can be accesses via ssh from everywhere (meaning outside of the Technion). We would like to add 2 additional services to our users: version control (including web interface) wiki. The access to the new services can be from everywhere. Some of the data will have anonymous read access but most of it will require authentication for read write. 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) Subversion is a safe choice, as everybody is familiar with it and it is well-supported. However consider arguments such as: http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html As for a read-only web interface to subversion: trac is nice, intuitive and powerful. However I would not use it for read-write access. It is also limited for a single repository. One very intuitive, very simple and very limited interface is the one provided by subversion itself. Take a look at http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/ http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/ Its main atvantage is that it allows trivial downloads of files and quick browsings of the latest versions of every branch/tag. In the above example, it is a handy complement to http://svn.digium.com/view/ Digium uses viewcvs. People somehow seem to prefer websvn. See: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-apache . I find websvn more limited. viewcvs nd websvn were trivial to install from Debian. Trac took more work, but maybe it has improved. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] || best ICQ# 16849755 || friend t = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: version control wiki
On 24/01/07, Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Shahar Dag wrote about version control wiki: 1.. Can you recommend a good implementation of version control wiki (we would like to use free software) I am not aware of a version control + wiki combination (but maybe someone can correct me?), so you will have to choose each one separately. For version control, I would recommend Subversion. It is very similar in its basic philosophy to CVS, but it's simply better in many ways (I'm sure that Google can return heaps of comparisons of Subversion to every other version control system under the sun). For Wiki, I don't have any experiance of actually *installing* such a system, but from a user's perspective, I'd recommend MediaWiki, because it has the most familar syntax (at least to the hundreds of thousands of people which contribute to Wikipedia). I agree on both counts. While I personally prefer CVS because I am familiar with it, I understand that those in the know prefer subversion. Also, the only wiki I'd recommend is MediaWiki. Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com/what_is/malware.html http://dugry.com = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
