Hi,
Well, curently there is an operationalState specified into the subnets in
IFA005/IFA006, but it was not specified what should happen when a subnet is
disabled. This is what was commented in the joint meeting between ETSI NFV and
OpenStack in Denver. During the discussions to resolve this issue we considered
the suggestion to remove the state completly and decided for the removal.
By he way I use the api-ref [1] more, than the wiki. I believe it contains
better information and for me it looks better.
[1]: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/#show-subnet-details
Br,
Gerg0
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets
Hi,
Can you please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet
Thanks
Gary
From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)"
<gergely.csat...@nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack List
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:13 PM
To: OpenStack List
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets
Hi,
During the discussions in NFV#20 about the subnet state we argeed, that we
should remove the state from the specification of subnets in IFA005 and IFA006.
This invalidates [GAP-09] in [1].
Br,
Gerg0
[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-denver-etsi-nfv-tst003-gaps-explained
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev