Bug#334012: eclipse - kaffe issue

2005-10-15 Thread Wolfgang Baer

Hi Carsten,

Carsten Hey wrote:

Hi.

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 10:47:41AM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:

Also I am missing the version of eclipse ? I think you mean eclipse 3.1.1-X
from unofficial place or do you refere to eclipse 2.1 in the archive ?



Sorry, I should have included this information in the bugreport. It is
from http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/unstable/.  I already talked with
mkoch about that an he thinks it is a bug in kaffe (although he did not
test it afaik).


OK, there are currently newer eclipse packages in NEW queue. When they
show up in unstable I will give it a test run. If it works for me with
kaffe I will close that bug and otherwise I will forwared it upstream.

However jit internals is unlikely to be a small fix. So I don't think
we can backport it to 1.1.6. But we will see.


After the user had installed gcj-4.0 and eclipse.*-gcj and purged
kaffe.* eclipse started as expected.


Yeah, thats the free vm Michael has used for packaging most the time
I think. There are still quite a bit differences between the free vm's
atm.

Thanks,
Wolfgang


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#334012: eclipse - kaffe issue

2005-10-15 Thread Carsten Hey
Hi.

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 10:47:41AM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
 Carsten Hey wrote:
 someone on irc had a problem with eclipse and kaffe. this is probably
 a bug in kaffe. (please ignore lines 5 and 7)
 
 So you are not the one with the problem ?

Exactly. :) Btw, after deleting the user config file of
gtk2-engines-gtk-qt lines 5 and 7 did not appear anymore.

 Why does not the person with the problem files the bug report - this
 would help in tracking the problem down if something is to test.

Because he did not understand what I meant with report a bug against... ;)

 Also I am missing the version of eclipse ? I think you mean eclipse 3.1.1-X
 from unofficial place or do you refere to eclipse 2.1 in the archive ?

Sorry, I should have included this information in the bugreport. It is
from http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/unstable/.  I already talked with
mkoch about that an he thinks it is a bug in kaffe (although he did not
test it afaik).

After the user had installed gcj-4.0 and eclipse.*-gcj and purged
kaffe.* eclipse started as expected.

 Wolfgang

Regards
Carsten


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


lucene_1.4.3-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lucene/liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-6_all.deb
liblucene-java_1.4.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lucene/liblucene-java_1.4.3-6_all.deb
lucene_1.4.3-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-6.diff.gz
lucene_1.4.3-6.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-6.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 272295 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers