mini-dinstall: Successfully installed aspectj 1.6.5-1 to unstable

2009-07-28 Thread Mini-Dinstall
Package: aspectj
Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers 
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@drazzib.com
Architecture: source all
Changes:
  [ Thomas Girard ]
  * Move to main. Closes: #480132.
  * Build-depend on openjdk-6.

  [ Damien Raude-Morvan ]
  * Add myself to Uploaders
  * Updated Standards-Version to 3.8.2:
- Describe quilt patch system in README.source
- Move aspectj package to java section
  * Switch to quilt to manage patches:
- Use patchsys-quilt.mk in debian/rules
- Build-Depends on quilt
- Refresh all patches
  * Extends bootstrap.xml script:
- Rebuild jdtcore-for-aspectj.jar from jdtcore-for-aspectj-src.zip
  Build-Depends on eclipse-platform
- Bootstrap using aspectj itself for modules/lib/aspectj/lib/*.jar
  Build-Depends on aspectj
- Rebuild and overwrite build.jar
  * New 05_build_classpath patch to build AJDT
  * Add Build-Depends on libasm3-java, eclipse-platform, gjdoc and lynx-cur

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#539016: eclipse: Software Updates do not work in 3.4

2009-07-28 Thread linden_site
Subject: eclipse: Software Updates do not work in 3.4
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: important

*** Please type your report below this line ***

After upgrade to 3.4 launching 'HelpSoftware Updates' doesn't work anymore. 
It displays the message 'Cannot launch
the Update UI. This installation has not been configured properly for Software 
Updates.'


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-3.slh.1-sidux-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages eclipse depends on:
ii  eclipse-jdt   3.4.1-1Java Development Tools plug-ins 
fo
ii  eclipse-pde   3.4.1-1Plug-in Development Environment 
to
ii  eclipse-source3.4.1-1Eclipse source code plug-ins
ii  libc6 2.9-23 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  zenity2.26.0-1   Display graphical dialog boxes 
fro

Versions of packages eclipse recommends:
pn  eclipse-gcj   none (no description available)

eclipse suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information










___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Processing of ecj_3.5-1_i386.changes

2009-07-28 Thread Archive Administrator
ecj_3.5-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ecj_3.5-1.dsc
  ecj_3.5.orig.tar.gz
  ecj_3.5-1.diff.gz
  libecj-java_3.5-1_all.deb
  ecj_3.5-1_i386.deb
  libecj-java-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb
  ecj-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


ecj override disparity

2009-07-28 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

ecj-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says java.
ecj_3.5-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says java.
libecj-java_3.5-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says java.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.
Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able
to deal with your mail due to missing information.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


ecj_3.5-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-28 Thread Archive Administrator

Accepted:
ecj-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb
ecj_3.5-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.5-1.diff.gz
ecj_3.5-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.5-1.dsc
ecj_3.5-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.5-1_i386.deb
ecj_3.5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj_3.5.orig.tar.gz
libecj-java-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/libecj-java-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb
libecj-java_3.5-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecj/libecj-java_3.5-1_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
ecj-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb - optional java
ecj_3.5-1.dsc - source java
ecj_3.5-1_i386.deb - optional java
libecj-java-gcj_3.5-1_i386.deb - optional libs
libecj-java_3.5-1_all.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#538913: libjaudiotagger-java: Please switch Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk

2009-07-28 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 23:59:25, Max Bowsher a écrit :
 Hi,

Hi Max,

Thanks for your bug report.

 As your package does not build GCJ native code, please amend your
 Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk.

 This will allow GCJ to not be pulled in at build-time on architectures
 or distros where GCJ is not the default-jdk.

I've seen your mail [1] on debian-java regarding choice between default-jdk-
builddep and default-jdk. To my knownledge, your position haven't reached
consensus and is not reflected in Debian Java Policy.

In Debian, default-jdk-builddep package [2] as exactly the same dependency 
chain as default-jdk [3] : (gcj-jdk).
On Ubuntu, default-jdk is openjdk-6-jdk and default-jdk-builddep is default-
jdk + gcj-jdk

At the moment, your issue is more a disagrement on Java Policy between Debian  
and Ubuntu.

I would prefer to :
- wait for a new Debian Java Policy (after Debconf9 ?)
- resync Debian and Ubuntu Java Policy about default-* packages
- fix Build-Depends on all packages [4]

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2009/07/msg00013.html
[2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk-builddep
[3] http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk
[4] 31 packages use default-jdk-builddep in unstable

Cheers,
-- 
Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#538913: libjaudiotagger-java: Please switch Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk

2009-07-28 Thread Max Bowsher
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
 Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 23:59:25, Max Bowsher a écrit :
 Hi,
 
 Hi Max,
 
 Thanks for your bug report.
 
 As your package does not build GCJ native code, please amend your
 Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk.

 This will allow GCJ to not be pulled in at build-time on architectures
 or distros where GCJ is not the default-jdk.
 
 I've seen your mail [1] on debian-java regarding choice between default-jdk-
 builddep and default-jdk. To my knownledge, your position haven't reached
 consensus and is not reflected in Debian Java Policy.
 
 In Debian, default-jdk-builddep package [2] as exactly the same dependency 
 chain as default-jdk [3] : (gcj-jdk).
 On Ubuntu, default-jdk is openjdk-6-jdk and default-jdk-builddep is default-
 jdk + gcj-jdk
 
 At the moment, your issue is more a disagrement on Java Policy between Debian 
  
 and Ubuntu.
 
 I would prefer to :
 - wait for a new Debian Java Policy (after Debconf9 ?)
 - resync Debian and Ubuntu Java Policy about default-* packages
 - fix Build-Depends on all packages [4]
 
 [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2009/07/msg00013.html
 [2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk-builddep
 [3] http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk
 [4] 31 packages use default-jdk-builddep in unstable

You are correct that this issue is sadly undocumented in Debian Java Policy.

However, I feel that comments by Matthias Klose, as uploader of the
java-common source in Debian, in bugs such as
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526273 - specifically
default-jdk-builddep should be used if the package builds
native code built with gcj. provide adequate justification of the
intent of default-jdk-builddep vs. default-jdk in Debian.

Note that the bug referenced above was part of a mass bug filing:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-j...@lists.debian.orgtag=jgc-vdep

Also, the changelog of the java-common version which introduced
default-* packages says: Build-depending on default-jdk-builddep
ensures a dependency on java-gcj-compat-dev even if the default jdk is
another than java-gcj-compat-dev.

Thanks,
Max.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Processing of classpath_0.98-1_amd64.changes

2009-07-28 Thread Archive Administrator
classpath_0.98-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  classpath_0.98-1.dsc
  classpath_0.98.orig.tar.gz
  classpath_0.98-1.diff.gz
  classpath-common_0.98-1_all.deb
  classpath-common-unzipped_0.98-1_all.deb
  classpath-doc_0.98-1_all.deb
  jikes-classpath_0.98-1_all.deb
  classpath_0.98-1_amd64.deb
  classpath-gtkpeer_0.98-1_amd64.deb
  classpath-qtpeer_0.98-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers