Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Hi, On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:22:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: openjpa failed to build (see #706176) [...] Will upload the new version after wheezy release[1] as announced in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670902#17 Done. Regards, Rene __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
block 670902 by 706176 thanks Hi, since the release is next week I did a testbuild of the r-deps - except hsqldb itself of course :-) - now (in a clean sid chroot + libhsqldb-java from experimental pre-installed): $ grep-available -FDepends libhsqldb-java -sPackagePackage: hsqldb-server Package: eucalyptus-java-common Package: libbiojava1.7-java Package: libbiojava3.0-java Package: entagged Package: libreoffice-base Package: libopenjpa-java Package: hsqldb-utils Package: pixelmed-java Package: biomaj Package: paros openjpa failed to build (see #706176) The rest did build - so it actually isn't as as bad as I feared (that of course doesn't say whether it needs other steps to work like upgrade/re-create whatever db file, but... - at least the biojavas ran tests which worked, too) Will upload the new version after wheezy release[1] as announced in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670902#17 Regards, Rene [1] together with LO to make that one not uninstallable __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 670902 by 706176 Bug #670902 [release.debian.org] transition: hsqldb 670902 was not blocked by any bugs. 670902 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 670902: 706176 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 670902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670902 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Hi, On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:09:41AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Or is this silent agreement? (If so then please do not complain if a upgrade of libhsqldb-java from 1.8.0.10 to libhsqldb-java 2.2.8 breaks anything - you had advance warning. This is the LAST ping. When there will be no reply (well, -med and Sebastien[1] answered, this targets -java..) I *will* take this as a silent agreement and do it immediately when the freeze ends (and libreoffice will directly switch to libhsqldb1.8.0-java). Quoting IRC with Niels (2013-01-07): 11:01 _rene_ ping? 11:06 nthykier yes 11:06 _rene_ http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2012/04/msg00227.html etc 11:07 _rene_ no pkg-java answer since February 2011 11:07 _rene_ I will send a last ping and if there's no reply just do it(tm) once we unfreeze 11:07 _rene_ see also http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hsqldb/news/20130107T011735Z.html and http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/hsqldb1.8.0_1.8.0.10-15.html 11:08 _rene_ will also send a mail ping 11:09 _rene_ but here jfyi ;) 11:09 nthykier perhaps not the day we unfreeze, but yeah - I think silence is acceptance is a good approach for the Java team atm, which is generally not very active anymore 11:10 _rene_ mail sent Nothing happened by now, so I *will* take this as silent consensus and not ask any further. Will upload the new hsqldb after the freeze[1] and make LO use either the internal hsqldb 1.8.0 or libhsqldb1.8.0-java[2].. Regards, Rene [1] Now that 698943 is fixed the new libhsqldb-java now is visible in experimentals Packages files [2] right now in NEW (http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/hsqldb1.8.0_1.8.0.10-15.html)) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Hi, Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Now - *8* months later (yes, I let it slip but it was not very likely to fit the freeze anyway with the non-reaction of the r-dep maintainers) - we are long inside the freeze - so another Debian release with a completely obosolete default libhsqldb-java :/ (And http://bugs.debian.org/670902 got wheezy-ignore.) But we should fix it asap in jeesie. Or is this silent agreement? (If so then please do not complain if a upgrade of libhsqldb-java from 1.8.0.10 to libhsqldb-java 2.2.8 breaks anything - you had advance warning. This is the LAST ping. When there will be no reply (well, -med and Sebastien[1] answered, this targets -java..) I *will* take this as a silent agreement and do it immediately when the freeze ends (and libreoffice will directly switch to libhsqldb1.8.0-java). (See http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2012/04/msg00408.html and it's References for the context, I _am not_ going to cut'n'paste it here again.) I *will* do this change - and ake LO use libhsqldb1.8-java *for sure* in the next weeks and libsqldb-java will become 2.2.8. I seem to be too nice (or lazy) and actually didn't do it. First part of this is now done, though: - http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hsqldb/news/20130107T011735Z.html - hsqldb1.8.0 is in NEW: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/hsqldb1.8.0_1.8.0.10-15.html If hsqldb1.8.0 won't get accepted I still can use internal hsqldb in LibreOffice, so... If one of you still need it, too fine. Just change your packages :) That way is not ideal, but better than carrying oround this hsqldb mess longer without a reply from the r-dep maintainers.) And that upload will directly orphan the package. This isn't yet done, but it will be done when this is in unstable. Regards, Rene [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2012/04/msg00410.html __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
On Apr/30, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: so I'd like to upload that to unstable (and adapt libreoffice) if it happens. But this problem makes me ask Q1) does anyone of your programs using libhsqldb-java have the same problem? Do we need to wait for them to be patches to upload 1.8.1.x? As you probably noticed, libhsqldb-java is 1.8.x while we have a libhsqldb2.0-java in experimental (and there's a 2.2.8 released, which I packaged some days ago and is ready to upload here now that I long neglected because I didn't care as OOo and LibO *do* need 1.8.x.) Q2) Would you agree that renaming libhsqldb-java to libhsqldb1.8-java would be worthwile? We then can upload 2.2.8 as libhsqldb-java. This needs source uploads of all the above packages, though. Q3) Does anyone want to overtake libhsqldb-java (2.x) then? I am only interested in 1.8.x for OOo/LO. Q4) does anyone need 2.0 *and* 2.2 be different? Anything working with 2.0 and not 2.2? (Doubt that, but better safe than sorry) - in that case we need to have libhsqldb1.8-java, libhsqldb2.0-java and the new libhsqldb-java) And noone except tillea (for debian-med)[1] answered here. pkg-java, Sebastien? Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Sorry for the lag, real life has been a bit hectic lately. I'm fine with your upload plan, and will make my paros package depend on libhsqldb1.8-java once you upload it. paros is not maintained upstream anymore, but I will be able to take care of its patching to ensure 1.8.1.x compatibility, if need be. Cheers, --Seb __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Hi, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: so I'd like to upload that to unstable (and adapt libreoffice) if it happens. But this problem makes me ask Q1) does anyone of your programs using libhsqldb-java have the same problem? Do we need to wait for them to be patches to upload 1.8.1.x? As you probably noticed, libhsqldb-java is 1.8.x while we have a libhsqldb2.0-java in experimental (and there's a 2.2.8 released, which I packaged some days ago and is ready to upload here now that I long neglected because I didn't care as OOo and LibO *do* need 1.8.x.) Q2) Would you agree that renaming libhsqldb-java to libhsqldb1.8-java would be worthwile? We then can upload 2.2.8 as libhsqldb-java. This needs source uploads of all the above packages, though. Q3) Does anyone want to overtake libhsqldb-java (2.x) then? I am only interested in 1.8.x for OOo/LO. Q4) does anyone need 2.0 *and* 2.2 be different? Anything working with 2.0 and not 2.2? (Doubt that, but better safe than sorry) - in that case we need to have libhsqldb1.8-java, libhsqldb2.0-java and the new libhsqldb-java) And noone except tillea (for debian-med)[1] answered here. pkg-java, Sebastien? Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Or is this silent agreement? (If so then please do not complain if a upgrade of libhsqldb-java from 1.8.0.10 to libhsqldb-java 2.2.8 breaks anything - you had advance warning. I *will* do this change - and ake LO use libhsqldb1.8-java *for sure* in the next weeks and libsqldb-java will become 2.2.8. And that upload will directly orphan the package. UNLESS you object) Regards, Rene __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
