Bug#749659: audacity: Systematic check for Printf/Format mismatches
Hi all, sorry for reacting too lazy. Am Montag, den 06.10.2014, 02:33 +0100 schrieb Olly Betts: On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:42:07PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote: Find attached the (hopefully) final debdiff from my side. It's big, but relatively easy to review because most of the changes can be interpreted independently. Thanks for all your work on this, Martin. Is someone looking at this with an eye to getting an updated version of audacity actually uploaded? This is now the last package waiting for an upload in the wxwidgets3.0 transition, and the latest upload date to make it to testing before the release freeze is now less than 3 weeks away (the freeze is November 5th, but an upload would need to age for 10 days). I can NMU with this patch if need be, but if the package maintainers are already on the case there's no point me duplicating their efforts. I finally found time to import the upstream release 2.0.6, backport the preliminary upstream changes for wxWidgets 3.0.1 from r13403, and pushed everything to our git repository. Your patch needs to be forward ported, which I will try to do when I have some spare time (knowing that it should be done ASAP due to the nearing freeze). I would be happy to get help forward porting the patch. PS: I was reluctant to upload the debdiff because I liked to see the patch for 2.0.6 (which has autoreconf fixed). Upstream want to get wx3.0 support in for 2.0.7 and is actively working on getting it in the svn repository. So you could provide the missing bits and we will get upstream to test your proposed changes (when I commit them to the upstream repository). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#749659: audacity + wxWidgets 3.0 — Proposing patch
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2014, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Olly Betts: The maintainers should also decide if they want to accept the configure script patch or if they want to modify the package so autoconf automatically recreates them. Bottom-line: The main work is done, but in order to move forward we need some attention from the maintainers. If the maintainers aren't actively working on this, we should NMU. Getting the updated package uploaded soon means there's time for shaking out any resulting issues before the freeze. After the release freeze, any fixes will have to get an explicit OK from the release team. The 2.0.6 upstream release is coming. Various freezes are in effect and only severe bugs will be fixed before the release. The upcoming release includes the autotools changes which make dh-autoreconf work. I like to either package an svn snapshot or wait for the release and then apply the wx3.0 patch. Sadly the wx3.0 patch needs adjustment to apply to svn head. Can you update the patch to apply cleanly to svn head? Upstream will be happy for this contribution after the 2.0.6 release. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#749659: audacity + wxWidgets 3.0 — Proposing patch
Am Sonntag, den 31.08.2014, 00:05 +0200 schrieb Martin Steghöfer: Hi Olly! El 30/08/14 a les 18:58, Olly Betts ha escrit: The amended code here assumes sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(long long) - that's not true on all architectures (both i386 and armel have 4 vs 8, for example). True that. I should have kept that in mind, I've seen the problem several times in other contexts: There is no printf format specifier that matches the size of the size_t type on all platforms. So casting it to something more C-standard is the only way to go, like you propose. The C99 standard allows printing size_t with %zu, but Microsoft Visual Studio needs %Iu instead [1]. [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/tcxf1dw6.aspx -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Comments regarding vlc_2.2.0~pre2-3_amd64.changes
Am Montag, den 25.08.2014, 22:49 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: Hi Thorsten On 2014-08-25 20:32:49, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: can you please explain where I can find libdvdcss2? It's not in the archive. I think deb-multmedia.org has a copy and there is a installer package at [1] which hasn't been finished yet. As it is not in the archive, vlc-nox should only Suggest: and not Recommend: it. I'll lower that to a Suggests and upload -4 in a minute. (Apparently the Recommends has been added in 2.1.0-1 without a changelog entry.) It was requested in bug #642187. I think we should get libdvd-pkg [1] into the archive and recommend this package instead. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/libdvd-pkg.git -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Select provider of libav* libraries
Hi, there was a discussion on the debian-devel mailing list about reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian [1]. The security team made clear [2] that they will only support one provider of the libav* libraries. So either libav or FFmpeg could go in the release and the other library has to stay in experimental (or unstable with a RC bug). The maintainer of libav is the Debian Multimedia team and therefore it is up to us to decide whether we want libav or FFmpeg in Debian 8 (jessie). So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a consensus on this topic? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg01010.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00668.html -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vlc/vlc-nox distinction
Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2014, 02:13 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: (Dropping J-B from CC. I think this is purely Debian related now.) On 2014-08-18 22:37:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: On 2014-08-17 23:22:02, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: On 16 Aug, Reinhard Tartler wrote : I believe that upstream doesn't care that much about this, because I remember the idea. Basically, the idea was to split so that servers using VLC to do streaming wouldn't need libX11 and all the rest. otherwise I'd expect the Makefiles to be a bit more helpful with determining this. J-B, I'd like you to confirm if I'm right here. This idea indeed failed, because libavcodec, one of the main codec library, can depend on vdpau/vaapi, and both of those acceleration libraries thought it was cool to use libX11... Therefore, a vlc-noX wouldn't have avcodec plugin... Some other distributions split the VLC free-stack (Xiph formats) from the rest, for patent reasons. For 3rd party programs using libvlc, an idea was to do a vlc-plugins splitted from vlc, so that they don't get libQt in. So, something like: - libvlccore - libvlc - vlc-core-plugins - vlc I'll see if I can come up with something here and prototype a possible split. As soon as I've got something, I'll post a link to a branch. I've pushed a work-in-progress feature/vlc-plugins branch [1]. vlc-nox has been left alive. Looking at the popcon data there seems to be interest in the package (vlc: 51349 installs vs. vlc-nox: 53687 installs). I've done the following instead: - Improved the check if plugins in vlc-nox link against libX11 or libxcb. - Moved the RDP plugin to vlc as it is linked to libX11 via libfreerdp1. - Killed vlc-plugin-pulse and moved the PulseAudio plugins to vlc. Xfce, KDE and Gnome all pull in libpulse0 anyway, so I think there is no need for the split. - Added vlc-plugin-samba package and moved the Samba plugin there. I think it makes much more sense to split this from vlc-nox (~50 MiB of extra dependencies) and it's been requested. The vlc-plugin-samba and vlc-plugin-pulse changes can be reverted of course if they are to controversial. The other changes should make it possible to handle the plugin split a bit better for the time being. I think it's better to revisit this after the jessie release and get vlc ready for the libav transition for now. Let me know what you think. For the record: +1 for moving vlc-plugin-pulse into vlc and splitting Samba into vlc-plugin-samba. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#756329: vlc: Fix usage of AVFrame to avoid crashes
Am Montag, den 28.07.2014, 22:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: Package: vlc Version: 2.1.4-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, in modules/codec/avcodec/audio.c one finds: AVFrame frame; memset( frame, 0, sizeof( frame ) ); According to the documentation of libavutil this is wrong: sizeof(AVFrame) is not a part of the public ABI, so new fields may be added to the end with a minor bump. This code will crash, when used with a different AVFrame at runtime than was available at compile-time. The attached patch fixes this problem. Thanks for the patch. This is clearly an upstream issue. Can you forward your patch to upstream to get it integrated into VLC? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#756329: vlc: Fix usage of AVFrame to avoid crashes
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2014, 23:17 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: Control: tag -1 upstream Hi Benjamin, On 29.07.2014 21:58, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Montag, den 28.07.2014, 22:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: The attached patch fixes this problem. Thanks for the patch. This is clearly an upstream issue. Can you forward your patch to upstream to get it integrated into VLC? I have no account in VLC's bug tracker, so if you have one, it would be easier if you could forward the patch. Okay, I can forward the patch. I tried to apply the patch for upstream's master branch from git://git.videolan.org/vlc.git, but it fails. Can you refresh for the master branch? A git am-able patch would be nice to have. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#749746: libsoundtouch-dev: Do not define PACKAGE* and VERSION in headers
Package: libsoundtouch-dev Version: 1.7.1-5 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, The macros PACKAGE, PACKAGE_*, and VERSION are defined by soundtouch_config.h when including soundtouch/SoundTouch.h in your source code (in this case Audacity). These macros should not exposed to users of the soundtouch library, because they conflict with the macros of the application. Please do not install soundtouch_config.h (which is generated by configure) as public header. Instead, just install a config header that defines SOUNDTOUCH_FLOAT_SAMPLES/SOUNDTOUCH_INTEGER_SAMPLES. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#747703: bpo60 vlc should not pull samba4 from bpo too
Am Sonntag, den 11.05.2014, 16:43 +0400 schrieb Michael Tokarev: 11.05.2014 16:21, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] It looks like just adding SMBCLIENT_CFLAGS= SMBCLIENT_LIBS=-lsmbclient environment variables to ./configure invocation fixes this issue. (SMBCLIENT_CFLAGS should not be empty or else it won't be recognized). http://www.corpit.ru/debian/tls/vlc/ , and in particular, http://www.corpit.ru/debian/tls/vlc/vlc_2.1.2-2~bpo70+3.debdiff I can just upload it now. +1 from me for this sane patch. Please go ahead and upload 2.1.4-1~pbo70 +1 with your patch. Do you want to become a co-maintainer of vlc? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#744412: audacity: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub, guess} and {libtool, aclocal}.m4
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2014, 16:42 + schrieb Matthias Klose:
Package: src:audacity
Version: 2.0.5-1
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
The package fails to build on arm64 (aarch64-linux-gnu), because the
config.{guess,sub} files are out of date, and are not updated during
the build. If possible, please do not update these files directly,
but build-depend on autotools-dev instead, and use the tools provided
by autotools-dev to update these files.
- For dh, call dh --with autoreconf.
- For cdbs based build systems, include
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/autoreconf.mk
- For other rules files, call dh_autoreconf before calling
configure (in the build or configure target), and call
dh_autoreconf_clean before dh_clean in the clean target.
For combining autoreconf and autotools_dev, see bug #698765.
After the build on any architecture, and before a clean, a grep for
aarch64 in the config.sub file(s) should print some lines.
The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/arm64-20140414/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-arm64.audacity_2.0.5-1ubuntu3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
Please note that these builds were done in an Ubuntu development,
environment there may be a few false positives in these bug reports.
See https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS for a guide how to
address these.
audacity already uses dh_autoreconf, but not everything might be
correctly updated. I made upstream changes to use automake (and not just
autoconf) in the next release. Can you test if the latest svn checkout
builds on arm64? You can grab a package from [1] and try to build it on
arm64.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~audacity-team/+archive/daily
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
SPAM on list
Hi, there are too many SPAM mails on this pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Please manually filter the mails from non-subscribers (excluding white-listing known good addresses). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#735108: libdvdnav-dev: arch-dependent files in Multi-Arch: same package
Am Sonntag, den 12.01.2014, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Jakub Wilk: Package: libdvdnav-dev Version: 4.2.1-1 Severity: important User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: multiarch libdvdnav-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but the following files are architecture-dependent: /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/examples/Makefile.gz /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/examples/menus.gz /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/html/dvdnavissues.html /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/html/firstprog.html /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/html/pages.html /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/html/tutorial.html /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/examples/menus.o.gz /usr/share/doc/libdvdnav-dev/html/nav_g.png An example diff between i386 and amd64 (after ungzipping) is attached. Thanks for reporting this issue. The solution is to split the documentation (html and examples) from the -dev package and put it into a -doc package. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#731513: vlc: FTBFS: freetype/ftsynth.h: No such file or directory
forwarded 731513 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/10019
tags 731513 + pending
thanks
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 09:41 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
vlc FTBFS with new freetype 2.5.1-1 like this:
...
../../doltlibtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I../.. -DMODULE_NAME=$(p=libfreetype_plugin_la-freetype.lo;
p=${p##*/}; p=${p#lib}; echo ${p%_plugin*})
-DMODULE_NAME_IS_$(p=libfreetype_plugin_la-freetype.lo; p=${p##*/};
p=${p#lib}; echo ${p%_plugin*})
-DMODULE_STRING=\$(p=libfreetype_plugin_la-freetype.lo; p=${p##*/};
p=${p#lib}; echo ${p%_plugin*})\ -D__PLUGIN__ -I/usr/include/freetype2
-DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -I/usr/include/fribidi -DHAVE_FRIBIDI -I../../include
-I../../include -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -mtune=8548 -Wall
-Wextra -Wsign-compare -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast
-Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -Wvolatile-register-var
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -ffast-math
-funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -c -o libfreetype_plugin_la-freetype.lo
`test -f 'freetype.c' || echo './'`freetype.c
freetype.c:93:30: fatal error: freetype/ftsynth.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[5]: *** [libfreetype_plugin_la-freetype.lo] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/modules/text_renderer'
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/modules/text_renderer'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/modules'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
make: *** [build-arch] Error 2
...
Attaching a patch that fixes this by considering the new location of a header
file.
I detected this issue a while ago and filed an upstream bug:
https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/10019
I probably will wait until the next upstream release is shipped with the
patch included, unless it's urgent to fix the build failure sooner?!
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#731596: vlc: VLC skipping on some FLAC files
forwarded 731596 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/9863 tags 731596 + pending thanks On Sa, 2013-12-07 at 11:56 +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote: Package: vlc Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch VLC produces an audible skipping on some FLAC files. See upstream Bug 9863 for an example and patch. Applying commit a5a87c3c662a3f733d1b7a49b8cf5c5f595aed41 which should be included in VLC 2.1.2 fixes this problem. Bug: https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/9863 Fix: http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc.git;a=commitdiff;h=a5a87c3c662a3f733d1b7a49b8cf5c5f595aed41 Would it be sufficient to wait for the next upstream release to ship this fix? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Introduction
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 06:52 +1100, Jackson Doak wrote: I'm already on the list. I'd like to help with gmusicbrowser and vlc especially, but i'll work on anything that i can. Hi and welcome. Speaking of VLC, it may need security updates in the stable release. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Adopting libdvdnav and libdvdread
On So, 2013-11-24 at 18:26 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Hi, I'm considering to adopt these two packages: - http://packages.qa.debian.org/libd/libdvdnav.html - http://packages.qa.debian.org/libd/libdvdread.html Would anyone support that? Please let me know. I am +1 for having these packages in our team. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#730108: vamp-plugin-sdk: Unnecessarily shipped libtool archive (.la) files are invalid
Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The libtool archive files /usr/lib/libvamp-hostsdk.la and
/usr/lib/libvamp-sdk.la are
invalid and break building packages with libtool. Please remove these files
from the
package in stable. They are already removed in testing and unstable.
Steps to reproduce:
$ echo main() { return 0; } main.c
$ libtool --mode=link g++ main.c -o main $(pkg-config vamp-hostsdk --libs)
libtool: link: `/usr/lib//libvamp-hostsdk.la' is not a valid libtool archive
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vlc-data - Bug #703750
On So, 2013-11-17 at 13:04 +0100, Jean-Marc wrote: Hi everybody, Today, I updated one of my PC's running Debian Jessie but vlc-data upgrade partially failed returning this message : dpkg : avertissement : impossible de supprimer l'ancien répertoire « /etc/vlc/lua/http/dialogs » : Le dossier n'est pas vide dpkg : avertissement : impossible de supprimer l'ancien répertoire « /etc/vlc/lua/http » : Le dossier n'est pas vide dpkg : avertissement : impossible de supprimer l'ancien répertoire « /etc/vlc/lua » : Le dossier n'est pas vide dpkg : avertissement : impossible de supprimer l'ancien répertoire « /etc/vlc » : Le dossier n'est pas vide I checked vlc-data's bugs and found the mentioned one opened since March 2013. I have a simple question: do you want some help to solve this ? While preparing 2.1.1, I looked at the bug and fixed it (after several iterations trying to get rid of the empty directories, too). Thanks for your offer to help. We have enough other open bug reports that could need help, especially bug #725057. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Bug 1240227] Re: Sync csound 1:6.00.1~dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
On Fr, 2013-11-08 at 11:55 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: Hi team, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote: This unfortunately fails to build on trusty amd64: [ 2%] Building C object CMakeFiles/csound64.dir/Engine/envvar.c.o /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DCS_DEFAULT_PLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/csound/plugins64-6.0\ -DHAVE_STRTOD_L -DHAVE_STRTOK_R -DLINUX -DPIPES -DUSE_DOUBLE -DUSE_LRINT -D_CSOUND_RELEASE_ -D_GNU_SOURCE -Dcsound64_EXPORTS -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DHAVE_ATOMIC_BUILTIN -fPIC -I/tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/./H -I/tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/./include -I/tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/./Engine -I/tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/. -I/tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu -ftree-vectorize -ffast-math -O3 -mtune=generic -fvisibility=hidden -Wno-format -D__BUILDING_LIBCSOUND -DHAVE_PTHREAD_SPIN_LOCK -DHAVE_PTHREAD_BARRIER_INIT -DPARCS -DGNU_GETTEXT -DHAVE_DIRENT_H -DHAVE_FCNTL_H -DHAVE_UNISTD_H -DHAVE_STDINT_H -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H -DHAVE_TERMIOS_H -DHAVE_VALUES_H -o CMakeFiles/csound64.dir/Engine/envvar.c.o -c /tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/Engine/envvar.c /tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/Engine/envvar.c: In function 'csoundParseEnv': /tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/Engine/envvar.c:383:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] csoundMessage(csound, Str(msg)); ^ /tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/Engine/envvar.c: In function 'csoundGetDirectoryForPath': /tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/Engine/envvar.c:720:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] csoundDie(csound, Str(Current directory path name too long\n)); ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/csound64.dir/Engine/envvar.c.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/csound-6.00.1~dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/csound64.dir/all] Error 2 ** Changed in: csound (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete I'm trying to get csound synced into Ubuntu, but the build is failing due to -Werror=format-security. Interestingly, I can't reproduce this in debian, even if I force add said flag. Possibly some misconfiguration on my part? Can any in the team that use Ubuntu help me fix this issue? I'm currently very low on disk space so am Ubuntu chroot is out of the question for me. The fix is simple (just insert a %s as second argument in csoundMessage or CsoundDie). However, since I can't reproduce the failure, more instances of the problem are likely to be missed. Can you fix those that you see in git? I will have time on Monday to test build it and fix the remaining instances. Please ping me via mail or IRC on Monday. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#728826: vamp-plugin-sdk: broken pkg-config file
Hi,
you probably want to replace the first four lines in every .pc.in file
with:
prefix=@prefix@
exec_prefix=@exec_prefix@
libdir=@libdir@
includedir=@includedir@
When running configure, these variables will be correctly set.
Cheers,
Benjamin
On Mi, 2013-11-06 at 10:04 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hi,
thank you for reporting.
Would be some thing like this solution?
libdir=${prefix}/$(LIBDIR)
mira
2013/11/5 Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
vamp-hostsdk.cp and vamp-sdk.pc contain:
libdir=${prefix}%LIBDIR%
This leads to a wrong include directory: /usr\%LIBDIR\%
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#728826: vamp-plugin-sdk: broken pkg-config file
Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
vamp-hostsdk.cp and vamp-sdk.pc contain:
libdir=${prefix}%LIBDIR%
This leads to a wrong include directory: /usr\%LIBDIR\%
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#727324: audacity: update config.{sub,guess} for the AArch64 port
On Do, 2013-10-24 at 09:25 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 01:40 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung:
We use dh-autoreconf to regenerate the autotool files and update
config.{sub,guess}. The man page says that dh-autoreconf and
autotools_dev shouldn't be used in conjunction. The problem is that
autoreconf -f -i does not update the config.{sub,guess} files and I
haven't found out why. Help is appreciated.
I think this is because autoreconf detects that audacity is not using
automake, see the output of autoreconf -f -i -v.
Good to know that these files come from automake. I am working upstream
to make audacity use automake instead of custom Makefile.ins. The next
upstream release will hopefully update config.{sub,guess} when running
autoreconf -f -i.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7
On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 16:44 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2013-10-30 15:48, Benjamin Drung wrote: On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 13:08 +0100, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: Hello, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 2013-10-28 6:46, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: recently vlc source package has been updated and it now builds libvlccore7 instead of libvlccore5. [...] phonon-backend-vlc isn't the only package affected; CCing the maintainers - what's the plan here? [...] I concur with upstream. These packages should be fixed to use the stable API from libvlc instead of using libvlccore. Looking at the other package, they all just depend on libvlc, but not on libvlccore. Just phonon-backend-vlc requires libvlccore. Mea culpa, I obviously had a moment and missed that only libvlccore had changed SONAME (can I blame jetlag?). No problem. You could blame whatever you want or be honest. ;) However, it's not just phonon-backend-vlc - goldencheetah depends on both libvlc and libvlccore. The vlc dependency is quite new (not in wheezy). May I ask you to report a bug against goldencheetah? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Please binNMU phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7
On Mi, 2013-10-30 at 13:08 +0100, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: Hello, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:29 +, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 2013-10-28 6:46, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: recently vlc source package has been updated and it now builds libvlccore7 instead of libvlccore5. It is possible to build phonon-backend-vlc against the new libvlccore7. Now phonon-backend-vlc have broken depends on i386 and amd64. On others architectures new version is not avaitable now, see #727831. phonon-backend-vlc isn't the only package affected; CCing the maintainers - what's the plan here? I don't know but this looks like a bug in phonon-backend-vlc to me, in upstream and/or in Debian. The external interface to libvlc is libvlc, not libvlccore. libvlccore is explicitly not stable and MUST ONLY be used by VLC plugins. In other words, unless a package installs something in /usr/lib/vlc/plugins, it has ZERO business linking against libvlccore directly. None of the packages below seem to pass that condition, and definitely not phonon-backend-vlc nor browser-plugin-vlc. I concur with upstream. These packages should be fixed to use the stable API from libvlc instead of using libvlccore. Looking at the other package, they all just depend on libvlc, but not on libvlccore. Just phonon-backend-vlc requires libvlccore. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#720563: libav: Doesn't decode opus while opus support is compiled in?
On Di, 2013-10-29 at 20:00 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Did you ever noticed this bugreport? We should know whether libav supports opus. Moc i.e. uses at the moment libav. If libav doesn't support opus in the future then we have to find another way though. BTW how does vlc decodes opus files? FYI, vlc uses libopus directly. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#727831: vlc: FTBFS on architectures built with --disable-mmx
On So, 2013-10-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Source: vlc
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build (but built successfully in the past)
vlc fails to build on armhf, ia64, mips{,el}, s390x and sparc with:
| # Install stuff
| dh_install --fail-missing
| cp: cannot stat
'debian/tmp/usr/lib/vlc/plugins/mmx/libi420_rgb_mmx_plugin.so': No such file
or directory
| dh_install: cp -a
debian/tmp/usr/lib/vlc/plugins/mmx/libi420_rgb_mmx_plugin.so
debian/vlc-nox//usr/lib/vlc/plugins/mmx/ returned exit code 1
(I presume it will FTBFS on armel for the same reason, but it has not
been tried there yet.)
vlc is built with --disable-mmx on these architectures which would
explain the absence of this plugin.
Build logs are available at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vlc.
I fixed this kind of build failure four days ago in our git repository:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d8ff1171
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=commitdiff;h=799db4f9
kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} and powerpc seem to have a different reason to
fail to build.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#727324: audacity: update config.{sub,guess} for the AArch64 port
On Mi, 2013-10-23 at 23:10 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
The package fails to build on arm64 (aarch64-linux-gnu), because the
config.{guess,sub} files are out of date, and are not updated during
the build. If possible, please do not update these files directly,
but build-depend on autotools-dev instead, and use the tools provided
by autotools-dev to update these files.
- For dh, call dh --with autotools_dev (yes, underscore).
- For other rules files, call dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig before
calling configure (in the build or configure target), and call
dh_autotools-dev_restoreconfig before calling dh_clean in the clean
target.
After the build on any architecture, and before a clean, a grep for
aarch64 in the config.sub file(s) should print some lines.
We use dh-autoreconf to regenerate the autotool files and update
config.{sub,guess}. The man page says that dh-autoreconf and
autotools_dev shouldn't be used in conjunction. The problem is that
autoreconf -f -i does not update the config.{sub,guess} files and I
haven't found out why. Help is appreciated.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Introduce Ross Gammon to Debian Multimedia Team
Hi Ross, On Fr, 2013-10-18 at 12:36 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: Hi All, I would like to introduce myself to the team. It is a couple of months ago that I created an alioth account (ross-guest), and started reading the pkg-multimedia-maintainers and -commits mailing lists. Welcome in the team! It has been a little bit hard to find things to work on with the livav 9 transition going on! So please point me at anything I can help with. Audacity needs to be ported to libav 9. I haven't found time to dive into that, because the required changes to support libav 9 are not trivial. I offer my help to forward any patches to upstream and get them integrated there. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#710062: RFS: FLAC 1.3.0 has been released
Am Freitag, den 07.06.2013, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2013, 10:48 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: - Disable 3DNow and Altivec (conditionally?) Addressed: Disable 3DNow! optimizations, enable SSE only on amd64, enable Altivec only on ppc64, disable ASM optimizations elsewhere. Does FLAC have NEON support that could be enabled on ARM? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
2nd maintainer for libsoxr
Hi, I violated the 2nd maintainer rule for libsoxr. libsoxr is a new build dependency of Audacity. Who wants to be my co-maintainer? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: 2nd maintainer for libsoxr
Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2013, 00:20 +0100 schrieb Alessio Treglia: On 5 June 2013 22:55, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I violated the 2nd maintainer rule for libsoxr. libsoxr is a new build dependency of Audacity. Who wants to be my co-maintainer? You found it! ;) Thanks. BTW, I prefer the formatting from wrap-and-sort without parameters (guess who decided the default behavior of wrap-and-sort ;). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#710190: vlc: Segfault when opening a playlist containing rtsp urls
Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2013, 17:20 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net wrote: I am not familiar with libproxy internals. Due to the swarm of crash reports, I have made VLC 2.1 execute /usr/bin/proxy from proxy-tools in a separate process instead of calling libproxy directly. (This also weakens the run-time dependency on libproxy.) At least, VLC will not crash anymore. Given the maturity consideration of libproxy, this seems reasonable. Thanks for this! Also, reading bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604934 makes me feel sad and wonder, if there was some way to disable the usage of libproxy in vlc altogether? For VLC 2.0, either `./configure --disable-libproxy' or build-time conflict with libproxy-dev ought to do. Then the plain old $http_proxy will be used. That makes sense to me. Benjamin, I suggest to do so in both Debian and Ubuntu. What do you think? Am Freitag, den 31.05.2013, 03:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Bernable: Ok, so I updated libproxy0 to the latest version (0.3.1-6/stable,testing,unstable) and the bug is gone ! Currently the vlc-nox package depends on libproxy0 = 0.2.3 Maybe should it be updated to depend on libproxy0 = 0.3.1 ? The bug is fixed in libproxy0 0.3.1-6 (or earlier). The Ubuntu bug #1038578 is linked to number one VLC crash [1], but I think that link is wrong. The backtrace of the number one VLC crash has no libproxy in it. If Ubuntu bug #1038578 was more widespread, it would probably have one reporter collecting all needed crash information, wouldn't it? What would we loose when we switch from libproxy to the plain old $http_proxy? I tend to think that we should just keep libproxy enabled and wait for the 2.1 release (that will come soon!?). What do you recommend, Rémi? @Jules: I don't think that it makes sense to bump the version of a dependency for every bug in the dependency, unless the bug renders the package useless for every user. [1] https://errors.ubuntu.com/?package=vlc -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#708137: H.264 playback problems: `main decoder error: no suitable decoder module for fourcc `h264'.` (works with Totem and MPlayer)
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 12:04 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 15:20 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung: Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: (By the way, is the above a mediathekview bug to not use `cvlc`? I think that you want the full VLC player with all the controls. Should I install another package or VLC fall back to use the FFmpeg codecs too? Have you installed the vlc package that ships the libavcodec plugin? Looking at mediathekview it recommends the package `vlc` and therefore it should have been installed. Installing the package `vlc` manually fixes the problem and I can play the videos just fine. Not sure how I ended up with `vlc-nox`. I’ll check when I have access to the system again. So `vlc-nox` was installed already due to the package `k3b`. Does `vlc-nox` provide `vlc` in any way? No. vlc is a superset of vlc-nox. I only could find Replaces: vlc ( 1.1.0) which should not have to do anything with it, right? Yes, it's unrelated. The Replaces is for a file move from vlc to vlc-nox. PS: Yes, the libavcodec plugin should be in vlc-nox (see bug #671407). Good to know. So either this bug is about mediathekview for some reason just pulling in `vlc-nox` instead of `vlc` or about the issue you referenced. I’ll report back in the next days. So, I would make this bug about the problem, that `vlc` is not installed, when `vlc-nox` is already installed. Looking at the recommends again, I see `mplayer` in there. I also have the MPlayer package installed. Might that be the reason? Yes. vlc was not installed because you had mplayer installed, which satisfied the alternative recommendation vlc | mplayer | mplayer2. Then the bug is about, that when `vlc-nox` and `mplayer` is installed, mediatheview does not use MPlayer but VLC. Then this bug should be reassigned to mediathekview. Yes or you call it a misconfiguration by the user. The user installed vlc-nox, but not all needed video codec plugins of VLC that are needed. Some solutions might be, to try MPlayer before VLC by default or just recommend the package `vlc` and demote `mplayer` and `mplayer2` as suggests(?), so mediathekview works out of the box. I came to different solution suggestions: 1) Mediathekview should show a proper error message instead of garbage in the terminal. The user should see main decoder error: VLC does not support the audio or video format h264. Unfortunately there is no way for you to fix this. error message from VLC. 2) VLC should be better integrated into the system and know that the h264 decoder is in the vlc package. Then VLC should tell the users to install vlc when they try to play a h264 video. 3) The h264 video decoder should be moved back to vlc-nox (bug #671407). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#708137: H.264 playback problems: `main decoder error: no suitable decoder module for fourcc `h264'.` (works with Totem and MPlayer)
Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: (By the way, is the above a mediathekview bug to not use `cvlc`? I think that you want the full VLC player with all the controls. Should I install another package or VLC fall back to use the FFmpeg codecs too? Have you installed the vlc package that ships the libavcodec plugin? PS: Yes, the libavcodec plugin should be in vlc-nox (see bug #671407). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#704941: vlc: Clicking the Playlist-Internet-Icecast pick causes Lua error messages
Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2013, 20:45 -0400 schrieb Michael O'Donnell: Package: vlc Version: 2.0.5-2 [...] VLC media player 2.0.3 Twoflower (revision 2.0.2-93-g77aa89e) Are you really using vlc 2.0.5-2? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: CVE-2013-1868
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Henri Salo: Hello, Could you check if Debian packages of VLC are affected of CVE-2013-1868, thank you. VLC 2.0.3-5 from testing is (probably) affected and VLC 2.0.5-1 from unstable is not affected. References: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-1868 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/03/17/1 http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b0414dc7f5c18ff2951175cf076779c444efd70 This git commit is not the correct commit. http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1301.html I can submit bug if needed. At least I can't find that file, which was changed. I would appreciate a bug report with an attached and tested patch. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: CVE-2013-1868
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 13:56 +0200 schrieb Henri Salo: VLC 2.0.3-5 from testing is (probably) affected and VLC 2.0.5-1 from unstable is not affected. Could you submit this information to security tracker after you have verified it? It's fixed in VLC 2.0.5 according to upstream. http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b0414dc7f5c18ff2951175cf076779c444efd70 This git commit is not the correct commit. Removed from security tracker. Do you know what is the correct commitdiff? No. The commits between 2.0.4 and 2.0.5 needs to be checked. I found two commits: http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commitdiff;h=74ff87cc141bc1b88a38ee90f95b3d935c938a56 http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commitdiff;h=8e8b02ff1720eb46dabe2864e79d47b40a2792d5 I would appreciate a bug report with an attached and tested patch. I can submit a bug to BTS, but I don't have knowledge/skills to test this issue and currently no time to create patch for it. This is the reason I contacted you via email. Please note that the commitdiff-link was in the CVE-request in oss-security mailing list. I also prefer not to report the bug with unclear details. Is there test case / file that triggers this bug? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: CVE-2013-1868
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 23:03 +0200 schrieb Henri Salo: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:54:30PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: Is there test case / file that triggers this bug? I don't have any. You can request such from upstream if you want or I can do it. It would be nice if you could request it. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#701830: vlc: FTBFS on powerpcspe (illegal insns due to -mtune=G4)
Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2013, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge: As you can see above, -mtune=G4 is used by default, leading to the above illegal instructions. The attached patch fixes this by enabling altivec only on powerpc _except_ powerpcspe, and doing confflags += --with-tuning=8548 which is propagated to gcc as -mtune=8548 on powerpcspe. Your patch logic looks complicated (multiple filters). What are the values of DEB_HOST_ARCH DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU on powerpc and powerpcspe? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#701830: vlc: FTBFS on powerpcspe (illegal insns due to -mtune=G4)
Am Freitag, den 01.03.2013, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge: Hi, On 03/01/2013 03:43 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2013, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge: As you can see above, -mtune=G4 is used by default, leading to the above illegal instructions. The attached patch fixes this by enabling altivec only on powerpc _except_ powerpcspe, and doing confflags += --with-tuning=8548 which is propagated to gcc as -mtune=8548 on powerpcspe. Your patch logic looks complicated (multiple filters). What are the values of DEB_HOST_ARCH DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU on powerpc and powerpcspe? On powerpcspe, we have the following settings: DEB_HOST_ARCH=powerpc DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU=powerpcspe Isn't it the other way around? The two filters on the patch are just used to detect the case of powerpc in general, but excluding the powerpcspe case (a special case of powerpc). Resulting in powerpc- for the case with altivec. In all other cases (including powerpcspe and non-powerpc), we disable altivec. What do you think about the alternative attached patch? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 4d3c5dc..3203434 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -193,14 +193,19 @@ confflags += --disable-neon removeplugins += neon endif -# PowerPC specific optimizations -ifneq ($(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU),powerpc),) +# PowerPC specific optimizations (excluding powerpcspe) +ifeq (,$(filter-out powerpc,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU))$(filter powerpcspe,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) confflags += --enable-altivec else confflags += --disable-altivec removeplugins += altivec endif +# PowerPCSPE specific optimizations +ifeq (,$(filter-out powerpcspe,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)) +confflags += --with-tuning=8548 +endif + %: dh $@ --parallel --with autoreconf ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#685243: vlc-nox: breaks squeeze-wheezy upgrade into very bad state
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2013, 22:47 +0100 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
This problem is also seen in the chroot upgrade testing for a full
[...]
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/678848 describe a workaround using
Breaks. Perhaps it could be used here too?
Please test the attached patch if it really works around the bug.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian Ubuntu Developer
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e5b32e2..fd38507 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+vlc (2.0.3-5) testing; urgency=low
+
+ * vlc-plugin-*: Break vlc-nox ( 2.0.0) to workaround running an outdated
+vlc-cache-gen. (Closes: #685243)
+
+ -- Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:10:06 +0100
+
vlc (2.0.3-4) testing; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: denial of service via crafted PNG file (Closes: #692130)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index ba58d9f..123e647 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ Depends: fluid-soundfont-gm | musescore-soundfont-gm,
vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}),
${misc:Depends},
${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: FluidSynth plugin for VLC
This plugin adds support for playing MIDI file via the FluidSynth software
synthesizer to the VLC media player.
@@ -267,6 +268,7 @@ Package: vlc-plugin-jack
Architecture: any
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6~)
Depends: vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: Jack audio plugins for VLC
These plugins add support for JACK to the VLC media player. To
activate the audio output module, use the `--aout jack' flag or
@@ -281,8 +283,8 @@ Package: vlc-plugin-notify
Architecture: any
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6~)
Depends: vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
-Breaks: vlc-nox ( 1.1.2)
-Replaces: vlc-nox ( 1.1.2)
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
+Replaces: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: LibNotify plugin for VLC
This plugin adds support for libnotify track change notification to the
VLC media player.
@@ -295,6 +297,7 @@ Package: vlc-plugin-pulse
Architecture: any
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6~)
Depends: vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: PulseAudio plugin for VLC
This plugin adds support for PulseAudio to the VLC media player. To
activate the audio output module, use the `--aout pulse' flag or
@@ -308,6 +311,7 @@ Package: vlc-plugin-sdl
Architecture: any
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6~)
Depends: vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: SDL video and audio output plugin for VLC
This plugin adds support for the Simple DirectMedia Layer library to
the VLC media player. To activate it, use the `--vout sdl' or
@@ -322,6 +326,7 @@ Package: vlc-plugin-svg
Architecture: any
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6~)
Depends: vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: SVG plugin for VLC
This plugin allows you to render SVG graphics on top of the video. It is a text
renderer, and must be activated through the '--text-renderer svg' option. When
@@ -336,6 +341,7 @@ Package: vlc-plugin-zvbi
Architecture: any
Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.6~)
Depends: vlc-nox (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: vlc-nox ( 2.0.0)
Description: VBI teletext plugin for VLC
This plugin adds support for VBI teletext to the VLC media player.
.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#697778: Please install vlc ctypes python bindings vlc.py
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 16:59 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Rossi: Upstream provides python bindings for liblvc. It would be nice to have them provided with the library. http://wiki.videolan.org/Python_bindings Not sur in which binary package though. Feel free to reassign or provide guidelines of what's needed for this. The Python binding is not part of the vlc source tarball. I think it makes sense to put the Python binding in a separate source tarball instead of adding it to the vlc source tarball. If upstream agrees, you can change this bug into a RFP or ITP bug. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Comments regarding liblivemedia_2013.01.05-1_amd64.changes
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 17:03 + schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: Hi, please consider moving the source code example from the shared library package to the -dev package: ./usr/share/doc/libbasicusageenvironment0/examples/ Having the example code in the libbasicusageenvironment0 package was a mistake. I fixed it in the git commit [1] and it will be part of the next upload. Thanks for spotting it. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/liblivemedia.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bb777017b874315c532cd61f6090c673a4fc877 -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#662774: shared library
Hi, we like to have a shared library of liblivemedia in Debian and Ubuntu [1]. This requires two things: First adjust the build system to create a shared library and second take care of proper SONAME, ABI/API changes management. I would be willing to help changing the build system to create a shared library. Would it make sense to change the build system from custom Makefiles to CMake or autotools? Taking care of a proper SONAME should be done upstream by the people developing the code, because they know when they add features or break the API or ABI. Are you interested supporting a shared library by taking care of a proper SONAME version? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/662774 -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: DM Team uploads
Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2012, 15:19 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: Hi! I think I'll upload another jackd2 package to fix #682792 in unstable, too. Since the DMUA flags are no longer active, I'd need the magic described in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html I guess other DMs in our team are affected, too. (unless I've missed a team-wide action on this issue) So for me, it would look like this: Archive: ftp.debian.org Uploader: A Developer adevelo...@example.com (optional) Action: dm Fingerprint: A7830CCABA4AFF02E50213FE8F32B4422F52107F Allow: jackd-defaults jack-audio-connection-kit jackd2 ardour calf libffado midisport-firmware kmidimon libdrumstick a2jmidid qjackctl Could any of the DDs step up and take the appropriate action? ;) Done (and hopefully correctly uploaded). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#689525: marked as done (vlc loses audio if I play, pause and play)
Am Donnerstag, den 25.10.2012, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: This bug was discussed on our mailing list [1]. The problem was that vlc was configured to use the alsa output plugin. The solution is to install vlc-plugin-pulse and to use the Pulseaudio output plugin (Tools - Preferences - Audio - Output module: Pulseaudio audio output). But doesn't this indicate a bug in the ALSA output plugin then? The problem is that pulseaudio and VLC both try to access the hardware, but not every audio hardware support that. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vlc after pausing and replaying doesn't play audio
Am Mittwoch, den 24.10.2012, 15:42 +0530 schrieb shirish शिरीष: at bottom :- On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am 24.10.2012 00:41, schrieb shirish शिरीष: I think till the time I can't get to the bottom as to why it seems I have vlc 2.0.1 when dpkg shows otherwise :- Seems you have installed an additional local copy. What does which vlc tell you? Thank you Fabian for replying. This is what it tells when I run that command :- $ which vlc /usr/bin/vlc Then I tried to find the source :- $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/vlc vlc-nox: /usr/bin/vlc and then see which version of vlc-nox is installed at my end. $ dpkg -l vlc-nox Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersion Architecture Description +++-===---=== ii vlc-nox 2.0.4-1 amd64 multimedia player and streamer (without X support) Any more or other ideas are welcome. Can you run dpkg -l *vlc* to see if all vlc binary packages are at version 2.0.4-1? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vlc after pausing and replaying doesn't play audio
Am Mittwoch, den 24.10.2012, 19:49 +0530 schrieb shirish शिरीष: Don't know what's causing it but it's still there in vlc 2.0.4. There is a similar bug in Launchpad. Can you check that you are using the pulseaudio output plugin (Tools - Preferences - Audio - Output module: Pulseaudio audio output)? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vlc after pausing and replaying doesn't play audio
Am Mittwoch, den 10.10.2012, 12:04 +0530 schrieb shirish शिरीष: Hi all, I filed a bug for the above issue #689525 . Could somebody take a look at that and direct me as to what do I need to figure out in order to see/understand why it's behaving like that. All the other media players do NOT behave at all in the above manner. I like vlc for it's UI and other things. If possible please help me in nailing down the issue. If it's already reported or is a known issue or reported somewhere upstream a bug number of that would help in understanding the issue as well and see what else I can dig out. Looking forward to guidance. Is your problem reproducible? Which sound API do you use (pulseaudio, alsa)? What audio hardware do you have? Can you try VLC 2.0.4 or upstreams master branch? Can you run vlc with -vvv? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vlc after pausing and replaying doesn't play audio
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2012, 21:40 +0530 schrieb shirish शिरीष: Which sound API do you use (pulseaudio, alsa)? I dunno, this is what I get when I look for packages which have pulseaudio and alsa in their names. You can check if pulseaudio is running: ps -C pulseaudio Can you try VLC 2.0.4 or upstreams master branch? I have not yet tried VLC 2.0.4, dunno if vlc-plugin-pulse (I think this plugin is/was required to interface with pulseaudio) is required or no longer required. You need vlc-plugin-pulse if you want to use pulseaudio as sound output. $ sudo aptitude install vlc=2.0.4-1 vlc-nox=2.0.4-1 vlc-plugin-svg=2.0.4-1 [...] Those two packages are removed if I try to install the update from unstable/sid. Just add vlc-plugin-pulse=2.0.4-1 to your aptitude command. Can you run vlc with -vvv? Yup, did, this is the result :- $ vlc -vvv VLC media player 2.0.1 Twoflower (revision 2.0.1-0-gf432547) Are you really using version 2.0.3-2, because VLC claims to be in version 2.0.1? [0x224b408] main audio output warning: not synchronized (190364 us), resampling [0x224b408] main audio output warning: buffer way too late (190364), dropping buffer [0x224b408] main audio output warning: buffer too late (169030), up-sampling [0x224b408] main audio output warning: not synchronized (359399 us), resampling [0x224b408] main audio output warning: buffer way too late (528263), dropping buffer [0x224b408] main audio output warning: buffer way too late (506929), [...] As can be seen it says something about buffer being too late and starts dropping it. I don't know what is happening here but do know that VLC doesn't have audio after the video is paused and then unpaused. The asynchronism between the audio and video is probably the reason for your missing audio after unpause. Upstream fixes some synchronization issues in 2.0.4 and after that. So I recommend to test 2.0.4. If 2.0.4 is still affected, I suggest to test their latest commit from their stable git branch [1]. If this version is still affected, I recommend to report a bug upstream. [1] You could grab the Debian source package from https://launchpad.net/~videolan/+archive/stable-daily and build it on Debian. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Fwd: [Bug 1062039] [NEW] vlc : Depends: fonts-freefont-ttf but it is not installable
Am Freitag, den 05.10.2012, 10:07 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am 05.10.2012 09:41, schrieb Jiann-Ming Su: Not sure if you're the ppa maintainer, but the Depends line should probably include: Depends: fonts-freefont-ttf | ttf-freefont No, I am not the PPA maintainer, I am just reading this list. The Debian package has just got changed to *not* have this alternative dependency anymore: and I decided to use a different build recipe for the precise PPA that ships Depends: ttf-freefont instead of Depends: fonts-freefont-ttf. I wrote a longer response to the bug report [1]. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1062039/comments/4 -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Handbrake repackaging
Am Freitag, den 05.10.2012, 00:58 -0700 schrieb Marc J. Driftmeyer: Well that's too bad the licensing restrictions the way they are with faac and mp4v2. One can only assume Debian wants to shield itself against possible patent infringement. All the issues seems to be with licensing, not with obscure patent issues. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#687657: vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze-wheezy upgrade
Hi, Am 29.09.2012 04:08, schrieb David Prévot: OK, thanks, I was looking in the wrong place (well in the vlc package, not the vlc-nox one ;). The proposed patch indeed fixes the issue (it took me some time to setup a test environment to dist-upgrade from squeeze to wheezy including my package), so I'm in the process of uploading it to DELAYED/2 (it will take some time with my bandwidth), please let me know if I should delay it any longer. I am currently on vacation and will be back next week. Then I will look at the patch and integrate it. So please delay the upload for one week. Feel free to ping me next Wednesday on IRC. Cheers, Benjamin ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683836: src:vlc: please use xz compression
tags 683836 pending thanks Am Samstag, den 04.08.2012, 18:39 +0200 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: Please use xz compression for the binary packages (patch attached). We are trying to fit a few more packages on the first CDs to get a usable desktop install with it, see [1] for more details. I will request a freeze exception once the package is uploaded; please keep in mind to not include additional changes. Thanks for the patch. I applied it in our git repository [1]. I will upload 2.0.3-2 once 2.0.3-1 migrated to testing. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=commitdiff;h=29b6fb5108949fc9d16f6108204447c4e4149054 -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#662628: Reported upstream
severity 660700 grave tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream merge 662628 660700 thanks Am Montag, den 30.07.2012, 19:23 +0200 schrieb gregor herrmann: The upstream trac instance claims that the bug is fixed since yesterday including a commit (actually a revert): http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commit;h=e89f4296febf218a5669a8ceb09ee79d9def0f25 Yes, this bug is fixed in the upstream branch. I will wait for the 2.0.4 bug-fix release to fix this RC bug. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#679108: Typo in package description
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 14:27 +0200 schrieb Martin Eberhard Schauer: Description: documentation for the VideoLAN streaming solution This package contains useful documentation for the VideoLAN streaming solution: the VLC Play HOWTO (a complete guide to using VLC as a media player), the VLC Streaming HOWTO (a guide to using VLC as a streaming solution), the VLS user guide and the VideoLAN FAQ. I think you meant VLC user guide or even VLC User Guide. No, VLS user guide is correct. VLS stands for VideoLAN Server. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] audacious/master: Update symbols file.
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2012, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Alessio Treglia: Hi all, On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:59 AM, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 322b98da86e0c17fd5e31d3f712f3935a1d00fe1 Author: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Date: Sat Apr 21 10:54:45 2012 +0200 Update symbols file. Although many symbols have been removed from the public interface, upstream refuses to change libaudcore's SONAME [1]. Before going on patching it, I'd like to hear other opinions on that. Can you rebuild all revert dependencies and check if one of it uses one of the removed function? According to upstream there should be none. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] audacious/master: Update symbols file.
Am Samstag, den 21.04.2012, 11:15 +0200 schrieb Alessio Treglia: On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: Can you rebuild all revert dependencies and check if one of it uses one of the removed function? According to upstream there should be none. I've been thinking we could upload it to experimental and then testbuild all the reverse dependencies. Testbuilding it locally is enough. It does not have so many reverse dependencies. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: debian-multimedia.org considered harmful - redux
On Do, 2012-04-12 at 14:26 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is: Hi Alessio et al., thank you for this answer and to Andres for having pointed me to past exchanges on this subject. I've drafted a message that I'd like to send to Christian publicly Cc:-ing this list. Thanks for your draft. I'd appreciate your feedback on it. As stated by others, we should ask him to add a clear statement/disclaimer on his homepage that his repository is not part of Debian and that the donations are not targeting Debian. In case he don't want to increase the cooperation with us, he should also make the distinction between pkg-multimedia and d-m.o clear. In particular, I'd like to know what exactly you'd like to ask d-m.o to do: I've speculated a request as part of my point (1), but it'd be better if you could comment on that, to transform my speculation in something you approve of. Point (1) is nicely phrased and I support it. The agreement should (at least) cover all binary package that are also available the official Debian archive. I will be happy to work with him to get his changes to the packages into Debian. He could be invited to join pkg-multimedia-maintainers and work on the package inside Debian. Bumping the epoch for binary packages that are available in Debian is a no-go for us. He either needs to revert the epoch-bump changes or rename the binary packages if he decides to go way (1). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Update Wiki FAQ
Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2012, 21:07 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia: Just updated the FAQ in the wiki. See http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ These are updates about dmo. In particular, they answer the common questions of do we coordinate with dmo (no) do we support packages from dmo (no) and is dmo a part of Debian (no). Improvements are welcome. Wouldn't it be better to always write the full name instead of using 'dmo'? It's clear to us, what dmo stands for, but that's not clear to everyone. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: debian-multimedia.org considered harmful - redux
Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2012, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is: Yes, we consider debian-multimedia.org more harmful than useful to the Debian Project and its users. Thanks Alessio. If there are other voices on this matter, please speak up. I'd be glad to volunteer to contact, again, Christian to come to an amicable solution if possible. But I don't want to discover half-way through that the team opinions on this matter are more diverse than what it seems from the complaint threads. I'll postpone the issue for a week more or so, before contacting Christian. Please speak up before then if you feel any differently than Alessio's quote above. Similarly, if you object to me contacting Christian on behalf of the Project and this team: please speak up. I agree with Alessio, and here are my reasons: 1) Some users think that debian-multimedia.org is part of Debian, but it is not. 2) Some users think that the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team is responsible for/maintains debian-multimedia.org. The Debian Multimedia Maintainers team is a team within Debian, but debian-multimedia.org is run by Christian. 3) Christian doesn't seem to want to collaborate with the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team. He packaged libdvbcsa 1.1.0 in his archive. Alessio packaged it too and uploaded it to Debian unstable yesterday. Instead of removing libdvbcsa and using the one from Debian, Christian bumped the epoch of his package for no obvious reasons[2]. Point one and two led to angry user bug reports against the vlc package in Debian, which were caused by debian-multimedia.org. One user failed to see that the vlc package from debian-multimedia.org has bumped the epoch, which prevents updating vlc from 1:1.1.13-0.0 to 2.0.0-1 [3]. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2012-April/025861.html [2] The changelog entry only says Hop, hop hop. [3] http://bugs.debian.org/660924 -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#625536: audacity: remove artificial limits
tags 625536 - patch thanks Hi Jamie, the upstream developers rejected your patch as stated in [1]. Your patch doesn't apply any more in Audacity 2.0.0. Can you address upstream's comments and supply an updated patch? [1] http://bugzilla.audacityteam.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192 -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Duplicate Packages from Debian archive in DMO
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 07:46 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia: FYI to all, here was Christian's response. Don't have time yet to fully respond, but I think keeping some packages there because they're not uploaded in Debian as quickly is not really a good reason to upload them or keep them uploaded at DMO. He's a DD and he could help to keep these packages updated in Debian instead (though this would mean he would have to work with the team). On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr wrote: Also some pakcages like vlc or xine are in my repository because Debian added a conflicts against libavutil51 from my repository. I checked debian/control of the vlc source package and found no such conflict. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: libdvdcss-installer - Package to install libdvdcss
Am Samstag, den 17.03.2012, 19:42 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The branch, master has been created at c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb2e4 (commit) - Shortlog commit c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb2e4 Author: Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com Date: Sat Mar 17 19:29:40 2012 -0400 Create new package for libdvdcss-installer. --- -- libdvdcss-installer packaging ___ pkg-multimedia-commits mailing list pkg-multimedia-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-commits Ok, here was my idea of an installer for libdvdcss. This is it's very own package that can be installed via apt (i.e. apt-get install libdvdcss-installer). Through maintainer scripts, it can install, remove, and purge libdvdcss whenever the installer is installed, removed, and purged. I got this idea from a package I use to maintain long ago (nvidia-cg-toolkit) which works in similar fashion. My idea was to upload this to Debian contrib. If it failed to get accepted still, the script itself can be installed and used along with libdvdread instead. Maintainer scripts could be setup for libdvdread to automatically install/remove/purge libdvdcss, though the issue here is that libdvdread is in main. libdvdread must not depend on libdvdcss being available at all. libdvdcss-installer can be found at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libdvdcss-installer.git Any comments/concerns? Are we allowed to distribute the source code of libdvdcss? Then we could put the source code into a binary package and build it on installation. I would prefer a builder instead of distributing a downloader + builder. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: npapi-vlc_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Am Freitag, den 16.03.2012, 15:51 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: For the curious: Why was the NPAPI plugin spinned off into a separate source tarball? It was an upstream decision to decouple the release of VLC from it's NPAPI plugin. The NPAPI plugin cannot block a release of VLC this way. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Alioth Team Admins
Hi, I remember the discussion about who should be Alioth Team Admin. IMHO having everyone as admin is an overkill. It is enough to have a bunch of active members who accept (or decline) join request. I don't need or want to be Admin. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Alioth Team Admins
I did this some time ago. Either I failed in changing my privileges back then or someone else made me Admin again. Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2012, 20:12 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: If you do not want to be an admin, just grant yourself lowered privileges in the team page. I surely hope we didn't decide everyone was forced to be an admin. What we did decide is that anyone who wants to be an admin, can be one (that is, we trust every team member to be an admin by default). On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 20:04, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I remember the discussion about who should be Alioth Team Admin. IMHO having everyone as admin is an overkill. It is enough to have a bunch of active members who accept (or decline) join request. I don't need or want to be Admin. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Alioth Team Admins
Yes, because I removed my Admin role just now. Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2012, 20:30 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: Well, you are listed as a senior developer in the admin page... On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 20:23, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: I did this some time ago. Either I failed in changing my privileges back then or someone else made me Admin again. Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2012, 20:12 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: If you do not want to be an admin, just grant yourself lowered privileges in the team page. I surely hope we didn't decide everyone was forced to be an admin. What we did decide is that anyone who wants to be an admin, can be one (that is, we trust every team member to be an admin by default). On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 20:04, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I remember the discussion about who should be Alioth Team Admin. IMHO having everyone as admin is an overkill. It is enough to have a bunch of active members who accept (or decline) join request. I don't need or want to be Admin. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#662774: liblivemedia-dev: Why no shared lib?
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2012, 09:09 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am 07.03.2012 00:15, schrieb Christophe Mutricy: And take care of proper SONAME, ABI/API changes management Sure. Are we going to change this or isn't it worth the effort? I think it worth the effort. We probably want upstream to take care of using a proper SONAME. So we should get upstream accept the change. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#593735: don't exclusively depend on ttf-freefont
Am Montag, den 05.03.2012, 13:53 +0100 schrieb Andrea Iacovitti: Hello, I see no way for having alternative default fonts. Is this true even with the actual sid/wheezy version of vlc (2.0.0-6) ? I did 'sudo dpkg -P --force-all ttf-freefont' and vlc seems to work fine. We have two symlinks in /usr/share/vlc/skins2/fonts/ pointing to the fonts of the ttf-freefont package. Removing this package could break this skin. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#661819: vlc: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 16:24 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Hi Benjamin and others, as you know I have been spending countless hours trying to get vlc to build on kfreebsd to unfuck some transitions. Thanks for this work. I was finally getting at a working patch (part of it *from upstream*), while you uploaded the (upstream) patch with another change which basically reverts its effect. (Hint: --as-needed) I wasn't aware that --as-needed breaks the patch. As part of enabling hardening flags I moved the --as-needed flag, but wasn't aware, that the flag previously didn't work as expected. You'll find attached the patch I prepared and which has been tested both on kfreebsd and on linux. (On a personal note, next time, please don't blame me for: Sorry for being suggestive of blaming you. I didn't intend to blame you. I only wanted to notify you. - your failure to attribute the patch to its actual author; - your failure to wait for the patch I said I was polishing, and actually testing on a porter box; I modified the Makefiles manually and ran a test, but I wasn't carefully enough. - your basically reverting the patch through an extra link flag. I realize I'm probably sounding angry. But that's the current state of affairs.) I fixed the package and doing a testbuild. Once it succeeds, I will do another upload and hopefully it will build on all arch then. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: VLC 2.0 --enable-oss for Open Sound System
Am Dienstag, den 28.02.2012, 22:13 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Stachowski: I'm using PPA for VLC maintained by Nate Muench and I've got the 2.0.0-1 and 2.0.0-3 update, but unfortunately I can't get audio output right. I'm using OSSv4 (oss v4.2 build 2006) and the older versions of VideoLAN had OSS UNIX option in the sound output configuration, but in this version there is no such option. I've checked the git repository of VLC 2.0 and in the commit titled Update NEWS for 2.0.0 I've found that: * OSS support is not compiled on Linux by default, pass --enable-oss to the configure script if you use OSSv4 or really want to use OSS emulation. I've asked Nate about that and he responded that his packaging comes directly from Debian (the only thing he is changing is the debian/changelog entry). I hope that when the VLC 2.0.1 comes out you will pass that flag to build the OSSv4 support (not everyone likes PulseAudio and ALSA). Thank you in advance of the hopefull update and for all the work you are doing. I have enable OSS now and will upload it as 2.0.0-4. Sorry for accidentally dropping OSS support in 2.0.0-1. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Altivec
Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2012, 15:50 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Hi, I notice in recent changelog of VLC that apparently it is now built with altivec on PowerPC, as a fix for bug#660936. No, the bug was, that -maltivec wasn't passed to one plugin. I checked the log of 1.1.13 and it was build the same way (with -maltivec). Is that ok? I mean, do we no longer support non-altivec PowerPC machines, or is it somehow ensured that only an Altivec plugin is affected, not all code? Only a few plugins are build with Altivec. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#661284: vlc: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in testing
Am Samstag, den 25.02.2012, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Source: vlc Version: 1.1.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, since vlc already FTBFSes in sid, we tried to binNMU it in testing to get rid of the dependency on the old libx264-118 packages. Unfortunately, due to the new zlibg1-dev package, it FTBFSes there as well: | src/theme_loader.cpp: In function 'int gzclose_frontend(int)': | src/theme_loader.cpp:771:33: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'gzFile' [-fpermissive] | /usr/include/zlib.h:1488:24: error: initializing argument 1 of 'int gzclose(gzFile)' [-fpermissive] | src/theme_loader.cpp: In function 'int gzread_frontend(int, void*, size_t)': | src/theme_loader.cpp:780:56: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'gzFile' [-fpermissive] | /usr/include/zlib.h:1290:21: error: initializing argument 1 of 'int gzread(gzFile, voidp, unsigned int)' [-fpermissive] | src/theme_loader.cpp: In function 'int gzwrite_frontend(int, const void*, size_t)': | src/theme_loader.cpp:789:76: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'gzFile' [-fpermissive] | /usr/include/zlib.h:1318:21: error: initializing argument 1 of 'int gzwrite(gzFile, voidpc, unsigned int)' [-fpermissive] | make[7]: *** [libskins2_plugin_la-theme_loader.lo] Error 1 https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vlcsuite=wheezy A fix through wheezy-proposed-updates would be appreciated. Cc-ing -bsd@ for advice, and -release@ for information. (Thinking of it a bit more, versioning will be fun…) I am going to upload vlc 2.0.0-2 that will fix the build failures on kfreebsd-*. It should also fix the build failure on powerpc. Do we then still need to get vlc 1.1.13-1 fixed? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2012, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am 23.02.2012 23:01, schrieb Benjamin Drung: Are VLC 2.0.0 and Audacity 2.0.0~rc4 (soon 2.0.0) worth mentioning? Sure! Can someone with time do this (or ping me in two weeks)? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Am Montag, den 20.02.2012, 11:32 +0100 schrieb Alessio Treglia: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: o_O Where does this come from? The project page still lists 1.3.14 as current version. As far as I can see, it comes from here: http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list Yes, it comes from Google Code. It was announces on the upstream mailing list, that the RC version are available for testing. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Am Montag, den 20.02.2012, 13:28 +0100 schrieb Alessio Treglia: Bump :) Are VLC 2.0.0 and Audacity 2.0.0~rc4 (soon 2.0.0) worth mentioning? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [ubuntu/precise] vlc 2.0.0~unix-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)
Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 10:47 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Hi Benjamin, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote: vlc (2.0.0~unix-0ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * New upstream release (Closes: #499381, #573064, #624027, LP: #455825, #573775, #695882, #705151, #708448, #738381, #743581, #747757, #817924, #931083). * Remove dropped mozilla-plugin-vlc, vlc-plugin-ggi, and vlc-plugin-svgalib. The Mozilla browser plug-in is now provided by a separate source tarball. * Add new plugins to and remove dropped plugins from vlc-nox. * Add new and remove dropped build dependencies: + libbluray-dev (for Blu-ray support) + libresid-builder-dev + libsamplerate0-dev + libsidplay2-dev + lbspeexdsp-dev + libxcb-composite0-dev - libgtk2.0-dev - xulrunner-dev * vlc-plugin-fluidsynth depends on fluid-soundfont-gm or musescore-soundfont-gm for having a sound font for playing MIDI files. * Drop all patches (they were either backported or accepted by upstream). * Update symbols for libvlc5. * Install plugins.dat instead of running vlc-cache-gen in postinst. * Update minimum version of build dependencies. * Change Build-Dependency from libupnp3-dev to unversioned libupnp-dev. (Closes: #656831) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:34:02 +0100 Changed-By: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/vlc/2.0.0~unix-0ubuntu1 -- Precise-changes mailing list precise-chan...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/precise-changes I'm curious, could you elaborate what's the deal with this '2.0.0~unix' version? http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=tag;h=f3aa9ae33fe8c62cd696adfeb21d5c22308bc44e There is still one blocking bug for Windows. This (pre) release was made especially for Ubuntu to not miss the Feature Freeze. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Decent DVD rippers?
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 11:00 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Dear team, what DVD rippers do we currently have in Debian? Apart from avconv, mencoder and VLC - which all somehow allow to transcode a DVD into a file - I only know of thoggen. While I like the latter very much for its straight interface, it seems dead upstream and does currently only allow to transcode to Theora/Ogg, so no xvid, x264, schroedinger, VP8 and whatever codecs are supported by gstreamer nowadays. I have seen that dmo has: - dvd::rip, which is a frontend for transcode, which in turn is not in Debian (I know we have once discussed this in the past, but what were the reasons this is not in Debian?) - handbrake, which seems to be exactly what I am looking for. Does anyone know reasons not to include this in Debian? - ogmrip, which also seems to come close to my expectations. Again, are there reasons for not having this in Debian? There are also some command line tools like xvidenc, h264enc or lxdvdrip which might be easier to package but only provide limited use. What di you think of the packages I mentioned above? Did I miss one importand DVD ripper? Maybe not important, but you missed dvdbackup. It's in the Debian archive, but not under the hood of pkg-multimedia (yet). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#639374: New upstream 3.0.1 release
Am Freitag, den 20.01.2012, 22:51 +0100 schrieb Cyril Lavier: On 01/20/2012 09:24 PM, John Lindgren wrote: retitle 639374 audacious: New upstream release (3.2) unblock 639374 by 590064 forcemerge 639374 653173 thanks Dear Debian maintainers of Audacious, The Audacious packages in Debian are (still) sorely out of date. Please package Audacious 3.2. Waiting for a newer version of libmowgli is no longer necessary as Audacious 3.2 does not depend on the library any more. -- John Lindgren Hi. As I did it for the alpha, I just did it for the beta. It builds fine under unstable and testing, I uploaded them to mentors. - http://mentors.debian.net/package/audacious - http://mentors.debian.net/package/audacious-plugins Later this weekend, I will try to do extended tests on my debian testing laptop, to see if there's no big issue with this version. I hope my work will help the maintaining team updating audacious/audacious-plugins packages. Do you want to join the Debian Multimedia team and become an co-maintainer of audacious? The audacious package lacks an maintainer with enough time. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#652661: liblivemedia: New upstream release 2011.12.02
Package: liblivemedia Version: 2011.09.02-1 Severity: wishlist A new upstream release 2011.12.02 is available. Please package the new version, because VLC 1.2 trunks need the newer version and I want to keep daily builds of VLC running. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#648090: vls: FTBFS(kfreebsd): dh_install: usr/lib/vlc/plugins/access/libv4l2_plugin.so exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere
Am Donnerstag, den 10.11.2011, 18:09 +0100 schrieb Didier Raboud: Le mercredi, 9 novembre 2011 07.45:05, Robert Millan a écrit : Hi, 2011/11/8 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org: # Install stuff dh_install --fail-missing dh_install: usr/lib/vlc/plugins/access/libv4l2_plugin.so exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere This is likely due to introduction of V4L support in kfreebsd-kernel-headers. Sorry about breaking things! In case you're wondering, just go ahead and install that file ;-) Dear vlc maintainers, the attached patch should fix that. I launched a build of vlc with the attached patch and will upload that new NMU to DELAYED/7. Please comment on both the patch and the proposed delay. Didier, do you want to become an uploader of vlc? I have applied your patch and added the configure flag for it. VLC currently fails with xulrunner 8.0: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/vlc-1.1.12/projects/mozilla' \ # source='vlcshell.cpp' object='libvlcplugin_la-vlcshell.lo' libtool=yes /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../include -DSYS_LINUX `top_srcdir=../.. top_builddir=../.. ../../vlc-config --cxxflags mozilla` -DDATA_PATH=\/usr/share/vlc\ -g -O2 -c -o libvlcplugin_la-vlcshell.lo `test -f 'vlcshell.cpp' || echo './'`vlcshell.cpp libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../include -DSYS_LINUX -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D__USE_UNIX98 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -DXP_UNIX -DMOZ_X11 -DSYS_LINUX -DXP_UNIX -I/usr/include/xulrunner-8.0 -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -mtune=athlon64 -fomit-frame-pointer -DDATA_PATH=\/usr/share/vlc\ -g -O2 -c vlcshell.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libvlcplugin_la-vlcshell.o In file included from vlcshell.cpp:40:0: vlcshell.h:27:37: error: new declaration 'char* NPP_GetMIMEDescription()' /usr/include/xulrunner-8.0/npapi.h:792:13: error: ambiguates old declaration 'const char* NPP_GetMIMEDescription()' vlcshell.cpp: In function 'char* NPP_GetMIMEDescription()': vlcshell.cpp:74:37: error: new declaration 'char* NPP_GetMIMEDescription()' /usr/include/xulrunner-8.0/npapi.h:792:13: error: ambiguates old declaration 'const char* NPP_GetMIMEDescription()' make[3]: *** [libvlcplugin_la-vlcshell.lo] Error 1 I have currently not enough time to investigate it further. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: lame_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Am Freitag, den 29.07.2011, 12:04 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:32:11 (CEST), Debian FTP Masters wrote: Accepted: lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb to main/l/lame/lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb lame_3.98.4+repack2-1.debian.tar.gz to main/l/lame/lame_3.98.4+repack2-1.debian.tar.gz lame_3.98.4+repack2-1.dsc to main/l/lame/lame_3.98.4+repack2-1.dsc lame_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lame/lame_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb lame_3.98.4+repack2.orig.tar.gz to main/l/lame/lame_3.98.4+repack2.orig.tar.gz libmp3lame-dev_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lame/libmp3lame-dev_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb libmp3lame0_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lame/libmp3lame0_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb - optional doc lame_3.98.4+repack2-1.dsc - optional sound lame_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb - optional sound libmp3lame-dev_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libmp3lame0_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 90091 Whoohoo, finally! Kudos to everyone involved. \o/ Audacity with LAME enabled is on the way. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Accepted x264 2:0.116.2037+gitf8ebd4a-1 (source amd64)
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:49:18 (CEST), Maia Kozheva wrote: I'm pleasantly surprised. It's about time! Awesome! Thanks for Debian Multimedia Maintainers' persistence in getting this in the archive! Indeed, I'm totally ethusiastic about this. Let's stage another 'Bits from' message with our next steps! I'd like to work on getting media players such as mplayer2 and vlc that make use of these extra packages into squeeze-backports, and maybe others might be enthusiastic about this as well. \o/ Finally we can merge the last outstanding Ubuntu change into the Debian VLC package! -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: where is irc
Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2011, 18:29 -0500 schrieb kev: where is the pkg-multimedia irc channel? We have #debian-multimedia on OFTC. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
[Fwd: fatal error: audacious/util.h: No such file or directory]
Audacious is now under the hood of the Debian Multimedia Maintainers. Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org An: audaci...@packages.debian.org Betreff: fatal error: audacious/util.h: No such file or directory Datum: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:56:27 +0200 Hi. It seems that audacious 2.4.4-1 misses some files in audacious-dev. Specifically, I don't see audacious/util.h and audacious/output.h, although they are present in the source package. Maybe this was intended, but it's causing some packages to FTBFS (see list below). I didn't try to bring them back in the package to see it's enough to let other packages build... but can you please tell me if those are part of a deprecated API thrown away by upstream (and that's why they are not installed), or simply because they were forgotten at some point? This change introduced this list of FTBFSes: http://bugs.debian.org/620915 http://bugs.debian.org/620917 http://bugs.debian.org/620918 http://bugs.debian.org/620919 Those failures are preventing audacious and libmowgli from migrating to testing. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] audacity/master: Change order of patches.
Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 12:07 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:52:30 (CET), bdr...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 153897f900e0400d826f11dde539ecfbac0e0605 Author: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com Date: Thu Mar 10 11:52:24 2011 +0100 Change order of patches. change description does not match the change Why? I changed the order of two patches that were depending on each other. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] audacity/master: Change order of patches.
Am Freitag, den 11.03.2011, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:21:50 (CET), Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 12:07 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:52:30 (CET), bdr...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 153897f900e0400d826f11dde539ecfbac0e0605 Author: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com Date: Thu Mar 10 11:52:24 2011 +0100 Change order of patches. change description does not match the change Why? I changed the order of two patches that were depending on each other. that would be a change to debian/patches/series only. it seems that the patches itself were changed as well. Yes, I have refreshed them. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#615269: audacity: Dependency conflict on installation on libsoundtouch
reassign 615269 libsoundtouch0 1.5.0-3 thanks Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 17:07 +0100 schrieb Daniel Andersson: I don't know if it's Pidgin, Audacity or libsoundtouch that should be contacted, but I asked on #debian and someone suggested Audacity. The problem lies in soundtouch. libsoundtouch0 conflicts with libsoundtouch1c2, but these two package should be installable side-by-side. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5
Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 00:04 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental to sid within the new few days. ETA? I have uploaded audacity 1.3.12-11 which makes the experimental version useless. Uploaded to unstable. Thanks. libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1c2 could be installed side by side and shouldn't conflict with each other. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Am Sonntag, den 06.02.2011, 14:29 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: FYI: I just accepted mehdis offer from debconf 10 to upload ffmpeg just after the squeeze release. I've got a lot of pings and flames that this wasn't included in squeeze, we discussed this to death in NYC, and therefore just went ahead. The following source packages are affected by this upload: [...] You forgot audacity in this list. I will do an upload containing other changes too. Most of them should be dealt with a binNMU, but for some (mplayer, vlc, etc.) new upstream releases are already in the pipe. I'd suggest to wait a few days before firing binNMUs. I would like to upload vlc from experimental to unstable, but this depends on iceweasel 3.6, which is in experimental. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? The changelog in http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html says: * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore. - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as mentioned in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004. So looks like a transition to me, and we probably need to readjust ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of this if agreed upon. It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev exist? -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multi-distro support
Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 16:07 +0100 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig: otoh, i think it would be nice to be able to handle such things in a centralized repository (like pkg-multimedia), in order to keep duplicate afforts at a minimum. You can use a separate git branches for the every distribution. git will help you with merges. That's what we do if we have to keep changes for Ubuntu (for example, add lame to the build dependencies). -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multi-distro support
Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Alessio Treglia: Take a look at these, you may find them very useful: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/27/different-dependencies-between-debian-and-ubuntu-but-common-source-package/ http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/05/managing-distribution-specific-patches-with-a-common-source-package/ This doesn't work for Build-Depends. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
RFS: audacious-plugins 2.3+dfsg-1 (fixing the RC bug)
Hi, Can someone sponsor audacious-plugins 2.3+dfsg-1 from our git repository [1]. It has an updated copyright file and the DFSG incompatible psf plugin is removed. That requires a repack of the source tarball. Make sure that the repacked tarball is generated from the upstream/2.3+dfsg tag (in the upstream-squeeze branch). [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/audacious-plugins.git;a=summary -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Audacious
Am Mittwoch, den 24.11.2010, 17:35 -0800 schrieb Chris Taylor: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Team! I was curious about possibly bringing Audacious maintenance under the umbrella of the Multimedia Maintainers team. I feel that it would greatly benefit from being a part of a team effort, and I feel that it fits nicely into the scope of this team. What do you guys think? +1 -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#374270: vlc does not manage correctly DV files type 1
tags 374270 moreinfo thanks Do you still have problem to play DV files type 1 with VLC 1.1.3-1 (in Debian squeeze)? Please provide an example file if so. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#434369: vlc: segfaults when transcoding/streaming to ogg(theora+vorbis)
reopen 434369 tags 434369 fixed-upstream thanks Am Sonntag, den 14.11.2010, 16:59 +0100 schrieb Julien BLACHE: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: Hi, Version: 1.1.3-1 You used v4l, which is not in VLC anymore. Therefore I am closing this bug. Uh? I still have v4l available in the capture device pane in vlc 1.1.3-1. Looks like it's still there. Yes, it's not gone in 1.1.3, but it will be gone in 1.2.0. Can you test the v4l2 plugin? -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#599314: files in /usr/share/doc/vlc-nox are symlinks to themselves
Am Mittwoch, den 06.10.2010, 11:50 -0400 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: Just noticed that /usr/share/doc/vlc-nox/NEWS.gz is a symlink to ../vlc-nox/NEWS.gz. There's no file to read. I checked vlc 1.1.3-1 and 1.1.4-1. In both packages (amd64) /usr/share/doc/vlc-nox/NEWS.gz is a real file and not a symlink. Therefore this part of the bug is invalid. Just noticed because the news submitted by apt-listchanges mentions that file (though it contains a typo -- it says /usr/share/vlc-nox instead of /usr/share/doc/vlc-nox) This typo will be fixed with the next upload. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
