Bug#804910: systemd: Invisible fsck, looked like a hanging system

2015-11-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.11.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Manuel Bilderbeek:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 227-2
> Followup-For: Bug #804910
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Strangely enough, today it happened again:
> 
> [4.582220] input: HDA Intel Line Out Side as 
> /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.
> 0/sound/card0/input17
> [4.582280] input: HDA Intel Front Headphone as 
> /devices/pci:00/:00:1
> b.0/sound/card0/input18
> [  576.473983] EXT4-fs (sda6): warning: maximal mount count reached, running 
> e2f
> sck is recommended
> [  576.476387] EXT4-fs (sda6): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. 
> Opts: 
> (null)
> 
> This is what I saw on the screen for these 472 seconds:
> 
> http://imgur.com/UnXFeC2
> 

Please keep in mind, that fsck for / and /usr is run in the initramfs
nowadays and systemd is not yet involved.
Can you boot and removing "quiet" from the kernel command line.
This should give you more log messages from systemd.

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers

Bug#804910: systemd: Invisible fsck, looked like a hanging system

2015-11-14 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek

Hi,

On 14-11-15 14:09, Michael Biebl wrote:

And alternative could be, to attach the output of systemd-analyze and
"systemd-analyze blame" when such a long fsck happens.


I thought I had already done that, but here it is again in full.

$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 3.802s (kernel) + 9min 50.031s (userspace) = 9min 
53.833s


and blame:

9min 32.488s systemd-fsck@dev-sda1.service
9min 31.695s systemd-fsck@dev-sda6.service
 16.290s rc-local.service
  1.528s apache2.service
  1.065s nmbd.service
  1.024s samba-ad-dc.service
   649ms shorewall.service
   544ms media-olddisk6.mount
   331ms dev-sdg1.device
   325ms ModemManager.service
   271ms systemd-localed.service
   252ms NetworkManager.service
   201ms systemd-hostnamed.service
   175ms smbd.service
   171ms accounts-daemon.service
   168ms home-manuel-photos.mount
   149ms home-manuel-Documents.mount
   116ms systemd-timesyncd.service
   116ms home-manuel-Pictures.mount
   109ms udisks2.service
   107ms systemd-modules-load.service
98ms exim4.service
81ms iio-sensor-proxy.service
80ms console-setup.service
79ms keyboard-setup.service
68ms systemd-udevd.service
65ms polkitd.service
65ms rsyslog.service
64ms timidity.service
62ms alsa-restore.service
55ms minissdpd.service
53ms systemd-udev-trigger.service
47ms home-manuel-Music.mount
39ms networking.service
38ms wpa_supplicant.service
36ms home-manuel-Videos.mount
35ms systemd-journald.service
35ms packagekit.service
33ms irqbalance.service
31ms systemd-logind.service
30ms avahi-daemon.service
29ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service
27ms media-olddisk1.mount
25ms user@1000.service
23ms kbd.service
21ms systemd-setup-dgram-qlen.service
21ms home-manuel-msx\x2dsoft.mount
20ms user@116.service
20ms speech-dispatcher.service
16ms pppd-dns.service
15ms systemd-user-sessions.service
15ms dev-hugepages.mount
15ms dev-mqueue.mount
14ms gdomap.service
13ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
12ms gdm.service
12ms upower.service
10ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
10ms colord.service
 9ms 
dev-disk-by\x2duuid-0a3f3e1b\x2d1141\x2d4033\x2db619\x2dec2f6d6

 5ms rtkit-daemon.service
 5ms systemd-random-seed.service
 5ms systemd-journal-flush.service
 5ms systemd-update-utmp.service
 4ms home-manuel-docs.mount
 4ms systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service
 4ms kmod-static-nodes.service
 4ms systemd-remount-fs.service
 3ms systemd-sysctl.service
 3ms systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service

See my first bug report where I already included the top of the blame 
output.
My conclusion was that it was in systemd, so that's why I filed to bug 
against systemd. But I might be wrong :) Your opinion, please! :)


--
Kind regards,

Manuel

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


Bug#804910: systemd: Invisible fsck, looked like a hanging system

2015-11-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.11.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Manuel Bilderbeek:
> Hi,
> 
> On 14-11-15 13:49, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Please keep in mind, that fsck for / and /usr is run in the initramfs
>> nowadays and systemd is not yet involved.
>> Can you boot and removing "quiet" from the kernel command line.
>> This should give you more log messages from systemd.
> 
> OK, I'll try that.
> 
> If this is the cause, then please reassign the bug to the proper package.

We don't know yet if the time is spent in the initramfs or systemd.
That's why I asked for removing the quiet flag. This will give you an
indication when systemd starts.
And alternative could be, to attach the output of systemd-analyze and
"systemd-analyze blame" when such a long fsck happens.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers

Bug#804910: systemd: Invisible fsck, looked like a hanging system

2015-11-14 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek

Hi,

On 14-11-15 13:49, Michael Biebl wrote:

Please keep in mind, that fsck for / and /usr is run in the initramfs
nowadays and systemd is not yet involved.
Can you boot and removing "quiet" from the kernel command line.
This should give you more log messages from systemd.


OK, I'll try that.

If this is the cause, then please reassign the bug to the proper package.

These kernel options were the defaults so the point is still valid: you 
don't have a clue what's going on as you get no feedback. This should 
not be the case in a default Debian install, IMHO.
So, IMHO: either fsck progress info is NOT something that should be 
suppressed in 'quiet' mode, or mode should not be 'quiet'.


--
Kind regards,

Manuel

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers