[qmailtoaster] simscanmk -g throws LibClamAV error
Hello folks! I recently upgraded from an ancient QmailToaster to the latest version, migrating to a new machine in the process. qtp-backup, qtp- newmodel, and qtp-restore are *wonderful*. :) Unfortunately, I now see an error every time I run simscanmk -g: 'LibClamAV Error: cl_cvdhead: Can't open file /usr/share/clamav/ daily.cvd'. I checked, and indeed that file is not present on my system. I did some research and got the impression that as of a recent version, ClamAV no longer downloads all its daily upgrades as one big daily.cvd, but instead downloads individual patches into daily.inc; is that correct? There is, apparently, a patch that resolves this issue: http://qmail.jms1.net/simscan/ And more information here: http://www.antagonism.org/mail/simscan.shtml Is this fix already in QmailToaster? Are other people seeing this problem? thanks, -Steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm currently running qmail on an old compaq dl 380 1st generation server. It's for a small factory with about 20 email accounts and runs basically everything except the MS-SQL server. I was looking at getting a used Dell Power Edge 2650 or 2850. Does anyone have any experience with these servers? Or any better suggestions? I want to spend about $1000 - $1500, and have dual cpu's (or maybe 1 dual-core? idk why i'm stuck on thinking I need 2 chips), about 2-4GB ram, and about 50-100gb storage. Is anyone else running qmail for small companys? And if so.. what kind of hardware are you using? IMO, dual CPUs won't help much. You'd be spending your money more wisely by getting a good P4 (3G) and as much RAM as you can. Drives are cheap - 1TB drives are down to less than $300 now, and I've been buying 400G'ers for ~$100 for a while now. But RAM is the key, if you ask me (rhyme strictly coincidental). I agree with Jake, I am running P4, 2GB RAM and 300GB hard drive for University students email. I have 12000+ accounts on the system and It runs without hiccups. ALex - Uganda Christian University. Celebrating 10 years of Excellence (1997-2007). Enter His gates with Thanksgiving http://www.ucu.ac.ug/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions
Hmmm.. maybe I don't need a new server. But I want one! My current server specs are 2 x 800mhz P3, 2gb RAM, 4x18gb RAID5 scsi2. The I/O throughput on the RAID isn't the fastest. Backups take a long time, because we use IMAP and use the server for mail storage. Backup Start Time: Thu-03/27/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:08-EDT Backup End Time: Thu-03/27/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:54:56-EDT I have 2 more DL 380's with similar specs. One we filled with 4 x 500gb SATA drives, RAID5. The other has 2 x 500gb IDE drives, RAID0 and 4 DLT 7000 drives connected. 4 years ago, when I started here, they were running Win NT 4.0 and having problems. I installed redhat, and the problems went away. Now I feel like the Maytag repair man in the commercials. Thank you for the feedback! -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:29 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm currently running qmail on an old compaq dl 380 1st generation server. It's for a small factory with about 20 email accounts and runs basically everything except the MS-SQL server. I was looking at getting a used Dell Power Edge 2650 or 2850. Does anyone have any experience with these servers? Or any better suggestions? I want to spend about $1000 - $1500, and have dual cpu's (or maybe 1 dual-core? idk why i'm stuck on thinking I need 2 chips), about 2-4GB ram, and about 50-100gb storage. Is anyone else running qmail for small companys? And if so.. what kind of hardware are you using? IMO, dual CPUs won't help much. You'd be spending your money more wisely by getting a good P4 (3G) and as much RAM as you can. Drives are cheap - 1TB drives are down to less than $300 now, and I've been buying 400G'ers for ~$100 for a while now. But RAM is the key, if you ask me (rhyme strictly coincidental). I agree with Jake, I am running P4, 2GB RAM and 300GB hard drive for University students email. I have 12000+ accounts on the system and It runs without hiccups. ALex - Uganda Christian University. Celebrating 10 years of Excellence (1997-2007). Enter His gates with Thanksgiving http://www.ucu.ac.ug/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
I attempted an update (via qtp-newmodel) last night, which errored out on the spamassassin package (per earlier messages on the list). I didn't think this would be a problem and had no reason to believe this would affect the server. There were a few other packages that were updated via yum, including a kernel update. So I rebooted the server. Everything seems to be fine on the surface. But something is significantly wrong. None of my users can send email with any consistency. Most are being soft-rejected, despite being authorized users connecting on the submission port with proper credentials. This appears to also be affecting, somehow, incoming email as well, as several users have reported phone calls from folks outside who have sent email and not received responses - because the emails in question were never received. I need help to troubleshoot and correct this. Where can I find details on /why/ an attempt to send a message is soft-rejected? qmlog submission shows the following: 03-28 09:25:17 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt : sender accepted 03-28 09:25:17 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 03-28 09:25:17 connect(): No such file or directory 03-28 09:25:17 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-28 09:25:17 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt : sender accepted 03-28 09:25:17 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 03-28 09:25:17 connect(): No such file or directory 03-28 09:25:17 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-28 09:25:20 tcpserver: end 9699 status 0 03-28 09:25:20 tcpserver: status: 0/100 03-28 09:26:18 tcpserver: status: 1/100 03-28 09:26:18 tcpserver: pid 9758 from company-firewall-external-ip 03-28 09:26:18 tcpserver: ok 9758 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip: 587 :company-firewall-external-ip::2424 03-28 09:26:18 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt : sender accepted 03-28 09:26:18 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 03-28 09:26:18 connect(): No such file or directory 03-28 09:26:18 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-28 09:26:18 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt : sender accepted 03-28 09:26:18 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 03-28 09:26:18 connect(): No such file or directory 03-28 09:26:18 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-28 09:26:21 tcpserver: end 9758 status 0 03-28 09:26:21 tcpserver: status: 0/100 03-28 09:27:19 tcpserver: status: 1/100 03-28 09:27:19 tcpserver: pid 9830 from company-firewall-external-ip 03-28 09:27:19 tcpserver: ok 9830 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip: 587 :company-firewall-external-ip::2448 03-28 09:27:19 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt : sender accepted 03-28 09:27:19 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 03-28 09:27:19 connect(): No such file or directory 03-28 09:27:19 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-28 09:27:19 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt : sender accepted 03-28 09:27:19 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote jgxhl91:unknown:company-firewall-external-ip rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 03-28 09:27:19 connect(): No such file or directory 03-28 09:27:19 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-28 09:27:21 tcpserver: end
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Quoting Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I need help to troubleshoot and correct this. Where can I find details on /why/ an attempt to send a message is soft-rejected? qmlog submission shows the following: 03-28 09:27:19 connect(): No such file or directory There's your repetative problem. What does the qmail logs say? such as /var/log/qmail/send /var/log/qmail/smtp and such... - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions
I would suggest: http://outlet.us.dell.com/ Pick up a refurbished Dell 1950. They have dual hot-swappable power supplies and hot-swappable RAID1 (make sure you get one with a RAID controller) drives. If happen to find dual-CPUs, or even quad-core CPUs in your price range, don't be afraid to install VMware Server and run your toaster as a VM. I have found that RAM and Disk I/O are the highest point of contention on my toaster, which hosts thousands of addresses. Sincerely, -- Joseph Lundgren Systems Engineer Peak Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mark Burlingame [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:47 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions Hmmm.. maybe I don't need a new server. But I want one! My current server specs are 2 x 800mhz P3, 2gb RAM, 4x18gb RAID5 scsi2. The I/O throughput on the RAID isn't the fastest. Backups take a long time, because we use IMAP and use the server for mail storage. Backup Start Time: Thu-03/27/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:08-EDT Backup End Time: Thu-03/27/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:54:56-EDT I have 2 more DL 380's with similar specs. One we filled with 4 x 500gb SATA drives, RAID5. The other has 2 x 500gb IDE drives, RAID0 and 4 DLT 7000 drives connected. 4 years ago, when I started here, they were running Win NT 4.0 and having problems. I installed redhat, and the problems went away. Now I feel like the Maytag repair man in the commercials. Thank you for the feedback! -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:29 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm currently running qmail on an old compaq dl 380 1st generation server. It's for a small factory with about 20 email accounts and runs basically everything except the MS-SQL server. I was looking at getting a used Dell Power Edge 2650 or 2850. Does anyone have any experience with these servers? Or any better suggestions? I want to spend about $1000 - $1500, and have dual cpu's (or maybe 1 dual-core? idk why i'm stuck on thinking I need 2 chips), about 2-4GB ram, and about 50-100gb storage. Is anyone else running qmail for small companys? And if so.. what kind of hardware are you using? IMO, dual CPUs won't help much. You'd be spending your money more wisely by getting a good P4 (3G) and as much RAM as you can. Drives are cheap - 1TB drives are down to less than $300 now, and I've been buying 400G'ers for ~$100 for a while now. But RAM is the key, if you ask me (rhyme strictly coincidental). I agree with Jake, I am running P4, 2GB RAM and 300GB hard drive for University students email. I have 12000+ accounts on the system and It runs without hiccups. ALex - Uganda Christian University. Celebrating 10 years of Excellence (1997-2007). Enter His gates with Thanksgiving http://www.ucu.ac.ug/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Server Suggestions
Mark Burlingame wrote: Hmmm.. maybe I don't need a new server. But I want one! Quite a bit of truth here. ;) My current server specs are 2 x 800mhz P3, 2gb RAM, 4x18gb RAID5 scsi2. The I/O throughput on the RAID isn't the fastest. Backups take a long time, because we use IMAP and use the server for mail storage. Backup Start Time: Thu-03/27/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:08-EDT Backup End Time: Thu-03/27/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:54:56-EDT What sort of backup? rsync should do a whole lot better than that. I have 2 more DL 380's with similar specs. One we filled with 4 x 500gb SATA drives, RAID5. The other has 2 x 500gb IDE drives, RAID0 and 4 DLT 7000 drives connected. I enjoy reprovisioning older hardware. What you have for 20 users really should be adequate. I've run a small businesses on PII 1x266. As Jake said though, ram is key. 512M runs nicely. Much more than that is overkill for a small standalone toaster. Also, I like using software raid1 with 2 drives (KISS). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
The problem seems to come and go, with no rhyme or reason I can figure out thus far. There is nothing in qmlog send between 09:08 and 09:31, so nothing to correspond with the connect() error below. The SMTP log for the same approximate timeframe shows the following: 2008-03-28 09:27:01.659026500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote fn2jgp72r8kbhx:unknown: 189.15.81.77 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:02.460895500 tcpserver: end 9806 status 0 2008-03-28 09:27:02.460898500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:03.873137500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote fn2jgp72r8kbhx:unknown: 189.15.81.77 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302445500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302721500 tcpserver: pid 9808 from 202.75.38.217 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302875500 tcpserver: ok 9808 mail-server- fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :202.75.38.217::44831 2008-03-28 09:27:05.350733500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail-server-fqdn:unknown: 202.75.38.217 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:06.324836500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail-server-fqdn:unknown: 202.75.38.217 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:06.367093500 tcpserver: end 9804 status 256 2008-03-28 09:27:06.367097500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:06.739201500 simscan: connect error 2 2008-03-28 09:27:07.105913500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:07.123352500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.124561500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.125154500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.126189500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.127233500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.128255500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.129236500 simscan: connect error 2 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409522500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409823500 tcpserver: pid 9813 from 209.160.65.89 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409976500 tcpserver: ok 9813 mail-server- fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :209.160.65.89::35720 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471277500 tcpserver: status: 7/100 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471281500 tcpserver: pid 9814 from 124.121.217.42 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471282500 tcpserver: ok 9814 mail-server- fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :124.121.217.42::12952 2008-03-28 09:27:07.535047500 CHKUSER accepted null sender: from :: remote sls-gb11p6.fanhome.com:unknown:209.160.65.89 rcpt : accepted null sender always 2008-03-28 09:27:07.541436500 connect(): No such file or directory 2008-03-28 09:27:07.542542500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 09:27:07.552286500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from :: remote sls-gb11p6.fanhome.com:unknown:209.160.65.89 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.954205500 tcpserver: end 9808 status 256 2008-03-28 09:27:07.954209500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:08.578988500 tcpserver: end 9813 status 0 2008-03-28 09:27:08.578992500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:08.860510500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote D1M3JC1S:unknown:124.121.217.42 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:09.338059500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote D1M3JC1S:unknown:124.121.217.42 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:09.619347500 connect(): No such file or directory 2008-03-28 09:27:09.620479500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 09:27:10.033699500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:10.033983500 tcpserver: pid 9821 from 221.201.112.112 2008-03-28 09:27:10.034151500 tcpserver: ok 9821 mail-server- fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :221.201.112.112::26627 2008-03-28 09:27:11.135359500 tcpserver: end 9814 status 0 2008-03-28 09:27:11.135363500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:11.346953500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from muryou- [EMAIL
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Yes, you need it for more recent toaster versions (I don't recall when it first came into play). I don't think it would hurt with older versions. Put it in every line in your tcp.smtp file, rebuild the cdb, and see if that doesn't fix things up. Roxanne Sandesara wrote: No. What I have is: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private ip_of_secondary_mailserver_list-sender:allow,RBLSMTPD=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private 64.94.119.23:allow,RBLSMTPD=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private former_firewall_external_ip:allow,RBLSMTP=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private current_firewall_external_ip:allow,RBLSMTP=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKVERIFY=DEGIJKfh,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private Do I need to add 'NOP0FCHECK=1' ? On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Do you have NOP0FCHECK=1 in your tcp.smtp entries? E.g.: :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1 Roxanne Sandesara wrote: The problem seems to come and go, with no rhyme or reason I can figure out thus far. There is nothing in qmlog send between 09:08 and 09:31, so nothing to correspond with the connect() error below. The SMTP log for the same approximate timeframe shows the following: 2008-03-28 09:27:01.659026500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote fn2jgp72r8kbhx:unknown:189.15.81.77 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:02.460895500 tcpserver: end 9806 status 0 2008-03-28 09:27:02.460898500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:03.873137500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote fn2jgp72r8kbhx:unknown:189.15.81.77 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302445500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302721500 tcpserver: pid 9808 from 202.75.38.217 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302875500 tcpserver: ok 9808 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :202.75.38.217::44831 2008-03-28 09:27:05.350733500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail-server-fqdn:unknown:202.75.38.217 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:06.324836500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail-server-fqdn:unknown:202.75.38.217 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:06.367093500 tcpserver: end 9804 status 256 2008-03-28 09:27:06.367097500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:06.739201500 simscan: connect error 2 2008-03-28 09:27:07.105913500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:07.123352500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.124561500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.125154500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.126189500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.127233500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.128255500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown:79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.129236500 simscan: connect error 2 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409522500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409823500 tcpserver: pid 9813 from 209.160.65.89 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409976500 tcpserver: ok 9813 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :209.160.65.89::35720 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471277500 tcpserver: status: 7/100 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471281500 tcpserver: pid 9814 from 124.121.217.42 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471282500 tcpserver: ok 9814 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :124.121.217.42::12952 2008-03-28 09:27:07.535047500 CHKUSER accepted null sender: from :: remote sls-gb11p6.fanhome.com:unknown:209.160.65.89 rcpt : accepted null sender always 2008-03-28 09:27:07.541436500 connect(): No such file or directory 2008-03-28 09:27:07.542542500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 09:27:07.552286500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from :: remote
[qmailtoaster] 5.5.4 invalid message content Error?
Hi All, Just got a complaint from a client--someone tried to send them an email and they got a 5.5.4 (5.5.3) invalid message content error. Was this a SPAM or virus hit from SPAMD or CLAMD? TIA, --Duncan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem or an actual honest-to-goodness solution. On my own, personal toaster server, which I only installed a month ago, fresh, this value was not added to the tcp.smtp line. If this is something one needs to have, shouldn't the packages add that to the files as they are created? On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Yes, you need it for more recent toaster versions (I don't recall when it first came into play). I don't think it would hurt with older versions. Put it in every line in your tcp.smtp file, rebuild the cdb, and see if that doesn't fix things up. Roxanne Sandesara wrote: No. What I have is: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/ private ip_of_secondary_mailserver_list- sender:allow,RBLSMTPD=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/ private 64.94.119.23:allow,RBLSMTPD=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/ domainkeys/%/private former_firewall_external_ip:allow,RBLSMTP=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/ control/domainkeys/%/private current_firewall_external_ip:allow,RBLSMTP=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/ control/domainkeys/%/private :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSE R_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKVERIFY=DEGIJKfh,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/ bin/simscan,DKQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig,DKSIGN=/ var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private Do I need to add 'NOP0FCHECK=1' ? On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Do you have NOP0FCHECK=1 in your tcp.smtp entries? E.g.: :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUS ER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/ simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/ private,NOP0FCHECK=1 Roxanne Sandesara wrote: The problem seems to come and go, with no rhyme or reason I can figure out thus far. There is nothing in qmlog send between 09:08 and 09:31, so nothing to correspond with the connect() error below. The SMTP log for the same approximate timeframe shows the following: 2008-03-28 09:27:01.659026500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote fn2jgp72r8kbhx:unknown:189.15.81.77 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:02.460895500 tcpserver: end 9806 status 0 2008-03-28 09:27:02.460898500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:03.873137500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote fn2jgp72r8kbhx:unknown:189.15.81.77 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : not existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302445500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302721500 tcpserver: pid 9808 from 202.75.38.217 2008-03-28 09:27:04.302875500 tcpserver: ok 9808 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :202.75.38.217::44831 2008-03-28 09:27:05.350733500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail-server-fqdn:unknown:202.75.38.217 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:06.324836500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail-server-fqdn:unknown:202.75.38.217 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] name : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:06.367093500 tcpserver: end 9804 status 256 2008-03-28 09:27:06.367097500 tcpserver: status: 5/100 2008-03-28 09:27:06.739201500 simscan: connect error 2 2008-03-28 09:27:07.105913500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 09:27:07.123352500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.124561500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.125154500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.126189500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.127233500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.128255500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote kneilizq:unknown: 79.23.163.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 09:27:07.129236500 simscan: connect error 2 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409522500 tcpserver: status: 6/100 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409823500 tcpserver: pid 9813 from 209.160.65.89 2008-03-28 09:27:07.409976500 tcpserver: ok 9813 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :209.160.65.89::35720 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471277500 tcpserver: status: 7/100 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471281500 tcpserver: pid 9814 from 124.121.217.42 2008-03-28 09:27:07.471282500 tcpserver: ok 9814 mail-server-fqdn:mail-server-ip:25 :124.121.217.42::12952
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Roxanne Sandesara wrote: OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem or an actual honest-to-goodness solution. The later. IIRC the reason it appeared to be intermittent would be that it only applies to mail that originated on windoze clients (which is probably the majority, but not all). On my own, personal toaster server, which I only installed a month ago, fresh, this value was not added to the tcp.smtp line. If this is something one needs to have, shouldn't the packages add that to the files as they are created? I'm surprised that a fresh install wouldn't have it. Did you start with the latest, or did you upgrade to the latest after installing a previous version first? On an upgrade, you should see a .rpmnew file that contains the change. The upgrade process (rpm) isn't sophisticated enough to make changes to configuration files, so in the event that there's a change, the new configuration file is tagged with the .rpmnew extension (sometimes it's replaced, and the previous file is tagged .rpmold). You should always examine .rpmnew files for changes from the version you used before any customization. This is SOP for rpm. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
I've had to remove that rule, whatever it may apply do. No one was able to send email. Not one of the email clients in-house (Outlook, Entourage, or Mac Mail) could send with that enabled. Once I removed it, everyone was fine. But now I'm getting reports from users of emails that are not coming through. The queue is empty. The messages are not ending up in their Spam boxes on the server. Let me get my questions in order, here: 1) My personal mail server was a fresh, clean install, and it does not have this rule. What is this rule? Why is it required? Can it be set to 0 instead of 1? To what effect? 2) I tried to improve the spam condition here, by using the QTP-Menu option qtp-extraclam. How do I reverse that action? 3) Spamassassin is set to mark the headers. It shouldn't be deleting email, or chucking it back to sender. Where could the missing emails be going? On Mar 28, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Roxanne Sandesara wrote: OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem or an actual honest-to-goodness solution. The later. IIRC the reason it appeared to be intermittent would be that it only applies to mail that originated on windoze clients (which is probably the majority, but not all). On my own, personal toaster server, which I only installed a month ago, fresh, this value was not added to the tcp.smtp line. If this is something one needs to have, shouldn't the packages add that to the files as they are created? I'm surprised that a fresh install wouldn't have it. Did you start with the latest, or did you upgrade to the latest after installing a previous version first? On an upgrade, you should see a .rpmnew file that contains the change. The upgrade process (rpm) isn't sophisticated enough to make changes to configuration files, so in the event that there's a change, the new configuration file is tagged with the .rpmnew extension (sometimes it's replaced, and the previous file is tagged .rpmold). You should always examine .rpmnew files for changes from the version you used before any customization. This is SOP for rpm. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail server(s) and ours: cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | tai64nlocal | grep senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | more 2008-03-28 14:52:12.420736500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.228 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 14:52:12.481703500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.228 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 14:52:12.557343500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 14:58:29.973702500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.233 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 14:58:30.018130500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.233 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 14:58:30.093115500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 15:19:19.568116500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.234 rcpt : sender accepted 2008-03-28 15:19:19.622001500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown: 66.249.82.234 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2008-03-28 15:19:19.702765500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:senders- [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's my mail server that is soft-rejecting these messages and creating this havok. What's going on? (And this is why there are times when I think it would be best to never, ever, ever upgrade or touch a server that is working properly.) On Mar 28, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Roxanne Sandesara wrote: OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem or an actual honest-to-goodness solution. The later. IIRC the reason it appeared to be intermittent would be that it only applies to mail that originated on windoze clients (which is probably the majority, but not all). On my own, personal toaster server, which I only installed a month ago, fresh, this value was not added to the tcp.smtp line. If this is something one needs to have, shouldn't the packages add that to the files as they are created? I'm surprised that a fresh install wouldn't have it. Did you start with the latest, or did you upgrade to the latest after installing a previous version first? On an upgrade, you should see a .rpmnew file that contains the change. The upgrade process (rpm) isn't sophisticated enough to make changes to configuration files, so in the event that there's a change, the new configuration file is tagged with the .rpmnew extension (sometimes it's replaced, and the previous file is tagged .rpmold). You should always examine .rpmnew files for changes from the version you used before any customization. This is SOP for rpm. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Roxanne Sandesara wrote: The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail server(s) and ours: What does top show during these times? Is clam taking all the CPU? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying there. On Mar 28, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: Roxanne Sandesara wrote: The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail server(s) and ours: What does top show during these times? Is clam taking all the CPU? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Roxanne Sandesara wrote: It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying there. Are you getting any errors in the clam or spamd logs? For giggles, try manually rebuilding and reinstalling clamav, then do the same with your older version of spamassassin. Lastly, rebuild and reinstall simscan to see if that clears anything up. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Jake -- Is there a way that I can poke and prod at the sandbox functions of qtp such that it would agree to rebuild each of the relevant packages and then apply them? Or is that wishful thinking on my part? Roxanne FYI: No errors in either clamd or spamd logs. But a lot more positive results on spamd than I've seen previously. On Mar 28, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: Roxanne Sandesara wrote: It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa- learn and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying there. Are you getting any errors in the clam or spamd logs? For giggles, try manually rebuilding and reinstalling clamav, then do the same with your older version of spamassassin. Lastly, rebuild and reinstall simscan to see if that clears anything up. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
You can run the qtp-build-sandbox command from the command line. This will build the old style sandbox, not unionfs. Then you can chroot to the sandbox and do whatever trips your trigger (for the most part). ;) Whatever you do inside of the chroot'd tree will not touch the running server. You can build/install rpms there (which is what qtp-newmodel does). I don't think you can actually run qmail in the sandbox though, especially since the sandbox has been trimmed down. Roxanne Sandesara wrote: Jake -- Is there a way that I can poke and prod at the sandbox functions of qtp such that it would agree to rebuild each of the relevant packages and then apply them? Or is that wishful thinking on my part? Roxanne FYI: No errors in either clamd or spamd logs. But a lot more positive results on spamd than I've seen previously. On Mar 28, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: Roxanne Sandesara wrote: It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying there. Are you getting any errors in the clam or spamd logs? For giggles, try manually rebuilding and reinstalling clamav, then do the same with your older version of spamassassin. Lastly, rebuild and reinstall simscan to see if that clears anything up. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
