date:20240326

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Backman, Antti via Servercert-wg

Telia votes ‘Yes’ on ballot SC-72 

//Antti 


From: Servercert-wg  on behalf of Paul van 
Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg 
Date: Monday, 25. March 2024 at 14.01
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to 
policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED 

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align them with the 
Baseline Requirements (BRs). 


The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and 
endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo). 

--- Motion Begins --- 

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on 
version 1.8.1: 

MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following 
redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122
 

 

--- Motion Ends --- 

Discussion (at least 7 days): 
- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC 
- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC 

Vote for approval (7 days): 
- Start: 2024-03-25 12:00 UTC 
- End: 2024-04-01 12:00 UTC 
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system. 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

2024-03-26 Thread Ben Wilson via Servercert-wg

All,
I would like to help start up the patent advisory group. If you are
interested in participating or having your IP counsel involved, please
email me directly.
Thanks,
Ben

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:32 AM Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:

> During the review period one member has filled an exclusion notice and
> according to article 2.4, point 9 of the bylaws, the results of the initial
> vote are rescinded and deemed null and void.
>
> A Patent Advisory Group (PAG) will be formed, in accordance with Section
> 7 of the IPR Policy, to address the conflict.
>
>
>
> *De:* Servercert-wg  *En nombre de *Inigo
> Barreira via Servercert-wg
> *Enviado el:* viernes, 23 de febrero de 2024 19:06
> *Para:* CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <
> servercert-wg@cabforum.org>
> *Asunto:* [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify
> the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation
>
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> *NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD*
>
> This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser
> Forum’s Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.3). This Review Period of
> 30 days is for one Final Maintenance Guidelines. The complete Draft
> Maintenance Guideline that is the subject of this Review Notice is attached
> to this email, both in red-line and changes-accepted draft format, in Word
> and PDF versions.
>
>
>
> *Summary of Review*
>
> *Ballot for Review: *Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain
> Control Validation
>
>
>
> *Start of Review Period: 23 February 2024 at 18:00 UTC*
>
> *End of Review Period: 23 March 2024 at 18:00 UTC*
>
>
>
> Members with any Essential Claim(s) to exclude must forward a written
> Notice to Exclude Essential Claims to the Working Group Chair (email to
> Iñigo Barreira ) and also submit a copy to
> the CA/B Forum public mailing list (email to public at 
> cabforum.org at cabforum.org >) before the end of the
> Review Period.
>
> For details, please see the current version of the CA/Browser Forum
> Intellectual Property Rights Policy
> 
> .
>
> (An optional template for submitting an Exclusion Notice is available at
> https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Template-for-Exclusion-Notice.pdf
> 
> )
>
>
> ___
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
>
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Brittany Randall via Servercert-wg

GoDaddy votes "Yes" on ballot SC-72

Best,

Brittany Randall


From: Servercert-wg  on behalf of Paul van 
Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 5:00 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to 
policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 
Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.



This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align them with the 
Baseline Requirements (BRs).

The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and 
endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo).

--- Motion Begins ---

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on 
version 1.8.1:

MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following 
redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122

--- Motion Ends ---

Discussion (at least 7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC
- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-25 12:00 UTC
- End: 2024-04-01 12:00 UTC
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system.
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL]-Re: [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Pedro FUENTES via Servercert-wg

OISTE votes YES to SC-72

> 
> From: Servercert-wg  > On Behalf Of Paul van 
> Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:01 AM
> To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
> mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org>>
> Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to 
> policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED
>  
> This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
> the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align them with the 
> Baseline Requirements (BRs).As result, this ballot changes policyQualifiers 
> from MUST to NOT RECOMMENDED as stated in the TLS Baseline Requirements, 
> resolving a discrepancy introduced by Ballot SC-62v2 
>  
> between section 7.1.2.7.9 Subscriber Certificate Policies 
> 
>  of the BRs and the Additional Technical Requirements for EV Certificates 
> 
>  in the EVGs.
>  
> The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) 
> and endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo).
>  
> You can view and comment on the GitHub pull request representing this ballot 
> here: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/490 
>  
> --- Motion Begins ---
>  
> This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
> Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on 
> version 1.8.1:
>  
> MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following 
> redline: 
> https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122
>  
>  
> --- Motion Ends ---
>  
> Discussion (at least 7 days):
> - Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC
> - End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC
>  
> Vote for approval (7 days):
> - Start: TBD
> - End: TBD
>  
> Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for 
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this 
> message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or 
> disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately 
> and delete the message from your system.
> ___
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg@cabforum.org 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cabforum.org_mailman_listinfo_servercert-2Dwg=DwICAg=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM=-bX5hBm1IdRDykQ-dBR8tsFRCM4v1VXUyG7RZa2WqPY=MCIesXvHWSt_GaiVaRGV1xuvKzxGS-0LN_bizbZ-W_ABYqmEuXabN-sE6TLgKWhO=uG-wmitoWrwakKcTPolQnQtNtef9ywlJZE76E4mVnL4=


WISeKey SA
Pedro Fuentes
CSO - Trust Services Manager
Office: + 41 (0) 22 594 30 00
Mobile: + 41 (0) 791 274 790
Address: Avenue Louis-Casaï 58 | 1216 Cointrin | Switzerland
Stay connected with WISeKey 

THIS IS A TRUSTED MAIL: This message is digitally signed with a WISeKey 
identity. If you get a mail from WISeKey please check the signature to avoid 
security risks

CONFIDENTIALITY: This email and any files transmitted with it can be 
confidential and it’s intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to which they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. If you have received this email in 
error please notify the sender

DISCLAIMER: WISeKey does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of this 
message and does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions herein as 
this message has been transmitted over a public network. Internet 
communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information 
may be intercepted, corrupted, or contain viruses. Attachments to this e-mail 
are checked for viruses; however, we do not accept any liability for any damage 
sustained by viruses and therefore you are kindly requested to check for 
viruses upon receipt.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Adrian Mueller via Servercert-wg

SwissSign votes yes to Ballot SC-72.

 

Adrian Michael Mueller

Product Manager Certificate Services

 

+41 43 811 05 97

  adrian.muel...@swisssign.com

 

From: Servercert-wg  On Behalf Of Paul van 
Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:01 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to 
policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

 

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align them with the 
Baseline Requirements (BRs).As result, this ballot changes policyQualifiers 
from MUST to NOT RECOMMENDED as stated in the TLS Baseline Requirements, 
resolving a discrepancy introduced by Ballot SC-62v2 

  between section 7.1.2.7.9 Subscriber Certificate Policies of the BRs and the 
Additional Technical Requirements for EV Certificates in the EVGs.

 

The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and 
endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo).

 

You can view and comment on the GitHub pull request representing this ballot 
here: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/490 

  

 

--- Motion Begins ---

 

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on 
version 1.8.1:

 

MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following 
redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122
 

 

--- Motion Ends ---

 

Discussion (at least 7 days):

- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC

- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC

 

Vote for approval (7 days):

- Start: TBD

- End: TBD

 

Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system. 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Scott Rea via Servercert-wg

eMudhra votes "yes" to ballot SC-72

From: Servercert-wg  on behalf of Paul van 
Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg 
Date: Friday, 15 March 2024 at 4:01 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to 
policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED
CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not open 
the links or the attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align them with the 
Baseline Requirements (BRs).As result, this ballot changes policyQualifiers 
from MUST to NOT RECOMMENDED as stated in the TLS Baseline Requirements, 
resolving a discrepancy introduced by Ballot 
SC-62v2
 between section 7.1.2.7.9 Subscriber Certificate 
Policies
 of the BRs and the Additional Technical Requirements for EV 
Certificates
 in the EVGs.

The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and 
endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo).

You can view and comment on the GitHub pull request representing this ballot 
here: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/490

--- Motion Begins ---

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on 
version 1.8.1:

MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following 
redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122

--- Motion Ends ---

Discussion (at least 7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC
- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days):
- Start: TBD
- End: TBD

Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system.
Disclaimer: The email and its contents hold confidential information and are 
intended for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please note that any distribution or copying of this email 
is strictly prohibited as per Company Policy, you are requested to notify the 
sender and delete the email and associated attachments with it from your system.
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Antonis Eleftheriadis via Servercert-wg


HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC-72.

AE

On 25/3/24 14:00, Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg wrote:
This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by 
removing the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align 
them with the Baseline Requirements (BRs).


The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven 
(Entrust) and endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo 
Barreira (Sectigo).


--- Motion Begins ---

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management 
of Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, 
based on version 1.8.1:


MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the 
following redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122 
 



--- Motion Ends ---

Discussion (at least 7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC
- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-25 12:00 UTC
- End: 2024-04-01 12:00 UTC
/Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If this message has been sent to you in error, you must not 
copy, distribute or disclose of the information it contains. _Please 
notify Entrust immediately and delete the message from your system._/


___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Bruce Morton via Servercert-wg

Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC-72.

Bruce.

From: Servercert-wg  On Behalf Of Paul van 
Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 8:01 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete 
except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT 
RECOMMENDED

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9. 7, to align them with the 
Baseline Requirements (BRs). The following motion has been proposed by Paul van 
Brouwershaven

This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing 
the exceptions to policyQualifiers in section 9.7, to align them with the 
Baseline Requirements (BRs).

The following motion has been proposed by Paul van Brouwershaven (Entrust) and 
endorsed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and Iñigo Barreira (Sectigo).

--- Motion Begins ---

This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of 
Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on 
version 1.8.1:

MODIFY the Extended Validation Guidelines as specified in the following 
redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/8e7fc7d5cac0cc27c44fe2aa88cf45f5606f4b94...7b9bb1dbfd41b1d0459b8a985ed629ad841ce122

--- Motion Ends ---

Discussion (at least 7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-15 10:00 UTC
- End no earlier than 2024-03-22 10:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days):
- Start: 2024-03-25 12:00 UTC
- End: 2024-04-01 12:00 UTC
Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system.
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

2024-03-26 Thread Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg

During the review period one member has filled an exclusion notice and
according to article 2.4, point 9 of the bylaws, the results of the initial
vote are rescinded and deemed null and void.

A Patent Advisory Group (PAG) will be formed, in accordance with Section 7
of the IPR Policy, to address the conflict.

 

De: Servercert-wg  En nombre de Inigo
Barreira via Servercert-wg
Enviado el: viernes, 23 de febrero de 2024 19:06
Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List

Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the
use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.

 

NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD

This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser Forums
Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.3). This Review Period of 30 days is
for one Final Maintenance Guidelines. The complete Draft Maintenance
Guideline that is the subject of this Review Notice is attached to this
email, both in red-line and changes-accepted draft format, in Word and PDF
versions.

 

Summary of Review

Ballot for Review: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control
Validation

 

Start of Review Period: 23 February 2024 at 18:00 UTC

End of Review Period: 23 March 2024 at 18:00 UTC

 

Members with any Essential Claim(s) to exclude must forward a written Notice
to Exclude Essential Claims to the Working Group Chair (email to Iñigo
Barreira ) and also submit a copy to the CA/B
Forum public mailing list (email to public at cabforum.org<
 mailto:public at cabforum.org>) before
the end of the Review Period.

For details, please see the current version of the

CA/Browser Forum Intellectual Property Rights Policy.

(An optional template for submitting an Exclusion Notice is available at

https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Template-for-Exclusion-Notice.pdf)

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL]-Re: [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information