Re: Thank you, all
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 1:53 PM David wrote: > > Before the official Beta was published, was there an in-house test-Beta and > also a rc-Beta ? > > Or were the published ISO’s today, the same as one of the above ? > The ISOs available on the website today are the same as Beta release candidate 3 (or 1.3, depending on where you look. That's not relevant here) built and tested last week. Release Engineering generates composes nightly, which get testing over the development cycle. As we approach a release milestone, QA requests a release candidate. These are what get the full set of validation testing. If blockers need to be fixed, we generate and re-test a new release candidate. If there are no blockers and the candidate is declared "go" for release, those RC artifacts are what get published. Does that help? -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora Linux 34 XPS 2-in-1 Tablet Mode
On 3/20/21 3:46 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > It is a regressing upstream bug from Mutter. > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1686#note_1052162 Ah, OK thanks for the info! I've noticed that if I switch to an Xorg session it works. But Xorg doesn't support a lot of the other tablet adjacent features like multitouch. I will keep updating and continue testing ad FL34 matures. Thanks again! Leander -- --- Leander Hutton lean...@one-button.org www.one-button.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Thank you, all
I am just re-phrasing my previous question here. Before the official Beta was published, was there an in-house test-Beta and also a rc-Beta ? Or were the published ISO’s today, the same as one of the above ? I am just curious how it all plays out. I think I am still a newbie when it comes to all things Fedora related. David Locklear ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: newbie question - Fedora 34
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:04:36AM -0500, David wrote: > or are the current Beta versions just "test-Betas" ?? or "rc-Betas" for > in-house use only ? It is released. You should see an official email on the announcements list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ and a post on Fedora Magazine: https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-34-beta/ > Seems confusing. Why not do an public Alpha release, or at least a quite > Alpha release ? I'm not sure how this would reduce confusion. In the past, we did Alpha releases, but we generally found that the usage of them was quite low compared to the amount of effort it takes to produce and test them as release artifacts. Instead, we decided to put efforts towards making Rawhide continuously be at the quality level we previously expected for Alpha releases. > Linux users who have never used Fedora or have little experience with > Fedora need a better explanation as to what is so exciting about the 34 > release. Phoronix is only covering the highlights, but a few YouTubers are > explaining it, but they only do it in a virtual-machine for a very brief > install review. This really gets out of the scope of testing and into Mindshare, so I've CC'd that list. In addition to the Beta announcement, we also run Magazine articles like https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-34-feature-focus-updated-activities-overview/, More would always be welcome, of course. > In my opinion, a good review would be to install on hardware and show > actual real-world work being done with Fedora 34, such as a drawing in > FreeCAD, and how the system differs from Manjaro Gnome 40, Gnome OS, Ubuntu > 20.10, etc. Yes, that would be great. I don't think we're going to do a comparative review as an official Fedora Project release — better to stand on our own merits and let others do the comparing — but I do always love to see videos and articles like this (at least, when some thought has been put into it rather than just being a listicle). -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: newbie question - Fedora 34
>In my opinion, a good review would be to install on hardware and show >actual real-world work being done with Fedora 34, such as a drawing in >FreeCAD, and how the system differs from Manjaro Gnome 40, Gnome OS, >Ubuntu 20.10, etc. Perhaps for the actual release, but this sounds premature for a Beta version, where significant changes are still possible. Of course, one might practice with a Beta in order to make creation of such material easier once the real product is available. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: newbie question - Fedora 34
Yes, I just saw the announcement via Phoronix. Ironically, I do not recall seeing it on the listserve, unless I overlooked it. David Locklear On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Luna Jernberg wrote: > https://distrowatch.com/?newsid=11192 > https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-34-beta/ > > The actual real Beta came out earlier today > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:04 PM David wrote: > >> Is the Fedora 34 Beta officially out in the wild ? >> >> or are the current Beta versions just "test-Betas" ?? or "rc-Betas" for >> in-house use only ? >> >> Seems confusing. Why not do an public Alpha release, or at least a >> quite Alpha release ? >> >> >> Linux users who have never used Fedora or have little experience with >> Fedora need a better explanation as to what is so exciting about the 34 >> release. Phoronix is only covering the highlights, but a few YouTubers are >> explaining it, but they only do it in a virtual-machine for a very brief >> install review. >> >> >> In my opinion, a good review would be to install on hardware and show >> actual real-world work being done with Fedora 34, such as a drawing in >> FreeCAD, and how the system differs from Manjaro Gnome 40, Gnome OS, Ubuntu >> 20.10, etc. >> >> Cheers, >> >> David Locklear >> >> >> ___ >> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >> > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: newbie question - Fedora 34
https://distrowatch.com/?newsid=11192 https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-34-beta/ The actual real Beta came out earlier today On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:04 PM David wrote: > Is the Fedora 34 Beta officially out in the wild ? > > or are the current Beta versions just "test-Betas" ?? or "rc-Betas" for > in-house use only ? > > Seems confusing. Why not do an public Alpha release, or at least a quite > Alpha release ? > > > Linux users who have never used Fedora or have little experience with > Fedora need a better explanation as to what is so exciting about the 34 > release. Phoronix is only covering the highlights, but a few YouTubers are > explaining it, but they only do it in a virtual-machine for a very brief > install review. > > > In my opinion, a good review would be to install on hardware and show > actual real-world work being done with Fedora 34, such as a drawing in > FreeCAD, and how the system differs from Manjaro Gnome 40, Gnome OS, Ubuntu > 20.10, etc. > > Cheers, > > David Locklear > > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
newbie question - Fedora 34
Is the Fedora 34 Beta officially out in the wild ? or are the current Beta versions just "test-Betas" ?? or "rc-Betas" for in-house use only ? Seems confusing. Why not do an public Alpha release, or at least a quite Alpha release ? Linux users who have never used Fedora or have little experience with Fedora need a better explanation as to what is so exciting about the 34 release. Phoronix is only covering the highlights, but a few YouTubers are explaining it, but they only do it in a virtual-machine for a very brief install review. In my opinion, a good review would be to install on hardware and show actual real-world work being done with Fedora 34, such as a drawing in FreeCAD, and how the system differs from Manjaro Gnome 40, Gnome OS, Ubuntu 20.10, etc. Cheers, David Locklear ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210323.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/187 (x86_64), 9/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0): ID: 826340 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826340 ID: 826346 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826346 ID: 826357 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826357 ID: 826360 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826360 ID: 826422 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826422 ID: 826431 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826431 ID: 826448 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826448 ID: 826549 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826549 ID: 826578 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826578 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0): ID: 826328 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826328 ID: 826341 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826341 ID: 826463 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826463 ID: 826464 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826464 ID: 826477 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826477 ID: 826486 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826486 ID: 826540 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826540 ID: 826541 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826541 ID: 826548 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826548 ID: 826552 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826552 Soft failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 6/126 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0): ID: 826290 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826290 ID: 826315 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826315 ID: 826338 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826338 ID: 826378 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826378 ID: 826379 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826379 ID: 826400 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826400 ID: 826426 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826426 ID: 826439 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826439 ID: 826458 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826458 ID: 826524 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826524 ID: 826575 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826575 Passed openQA tests: 172/187 (x86_64), 104/126 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0): ID: 826310 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826310 ID: 826344 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826344 ID: 826347 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826347 ID: 826348 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826348 ID: 826349 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826349 ID: 826350 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826350 ID: 826351 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux URL:
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210323.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210322.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210323.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 44 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 61.08 MiB Size of dropped packages:14.84 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 442.77 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -40.07 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: fcitx5-mozc-2.17.2102.102.1-1.20210319gitdf9f395.fc34 Summary: A wrapper of mozc for fcitx5 RPMs:fcitx5-mozc Size:56.92 MiB Package: golang-github-gdamore-tcell-2-2.2.0-1.fc34 Summary: Alternate terminal package RPMs:golang-github-gdamore-tcell-2 golang-github-gdamore-tcell-2-devel Size:3.80 MiB Package: human-theme-gtk-1.1.0-1.fc34 Summary: Human theme for GTK RPMs:human-theme-gtk Size:72.84 KiB Package: python-docs-theme-2020.12-1.fc34 Summary: The Sphinx theme for the CPython docs and related projects RPMs:python3-docs-theme Size:18.59 KiB Package: rubygem-pastel-0.8.0-1.fc34 Summary: Terminal strings styling with intuitive and clean API RPMs:rubygem-pastel rubygem-pastel-doc Size:259.00 KiB Package: rubygem-sugarjar-0.0.9-4.fc34 Summary: A git/github helper utility RPMs:sugarjar Size:26.68 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: libhandy1-1.1.90-1.fc34 Summary: Building blocks for modern adaptive GNOME apps RPMs:libhandy1 libhandy1-devel Size:4.04 MiB Package: plasma-pk-updates-0.3.2-9.fc34 Summary: Plasma applet for system updates using PackageKit RPMs:plasma-pk-updates Size:1.26 MiB Package: tracker3-3.1.0~rc-1.fc34 Summary: Desktop-neutral metadata database and search tool RPMs:libtracker-sparql3 tracker3 tracker3-devel tracker3-doc Size:5.04 MiB Package: tracker3-miners-3.1.0~rc-1.fc34 Summary: Tracker miners and metadata extractors RPMs:tracker3-miners Size:4.49 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CGAL-5.2.1-1.fc34 Old package: CGAL-5.2-2.fc34 Summary: Computational Geometry Algorithms Library RPMs: CGAL-demos-source CGAL-devel CGAL-qt5-devel Size: 119.85 MiB Size change: -62.08 KiB Changelog: * Wed Mar 17 2021 Laurent Rineau - 5.2.1-1 - New upstream release Package: bottles-3.1.0-1.fc34 Old package: bottles-3.0.6-1.fc34 Summary: Easily manage Wine prefix in a new way RPMs: bottles Size: 122.15 KiB Size change: 11.25 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 08 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 3.0.8-1 - build(update): 3.0.8 * Sat Mar 13 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 3.0.9-1 - build(update): 3.0.9 * Fri Mar 19 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 3.1.0-1 - build(update): 3.1.0 Package: clipit-1.4.5-1.fc34 Old package: clipit-1.4.4-9.fc34 Summary: A lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager RPMs: clipit Size: 443.90 KiB Size change: 22.31 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 19 2021 Mamoru TASAKA - 1.4.5-1 - 1.4.5 Package: cscope-15.9-10.fc34 Old package: cscope-15.9-9.fc34 Summary: C source code tree search and browse tool RPMs: cscope Size: 1.43 MiB Size change: 354.88 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Vladis Dronov - 15.9-10 - Bring in important patches from the upstream (39fb38..eaea31 in a git repo) - Fix the upstream tarball URL - Remove outdated patch files Package: dnf-4.6.1-1.fc34 Old package: dnf-4.6.0-1.fc34 Summary: Package manager RPMs: dnf dnf-automatic dnf-data python3-dnf yum Size: 999.93 KiB Size change: 3.94 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 02 2021 Nicola Sella - 4.6.1-1 - Update to 4.6.1 - Fix recreate script - Add unit test for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache (RhBug:1865803) - Add docs and examples for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache (RhBug:1865803) - [spec] remove python2 support - Remove problematic language - The noroot plugin no longer exists, remove mention - Run tests for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache in installroot (RhBug:1865803) - expand history to full term size when output is redirected (RhBug:1852577) (RhBug:1852577,1906970) - [doc] Fix: "sslcacert" contains path to the file - [doc] Added proxy ssl configuration options, increase libdnf require - Set persistdir and substitutions for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache tests (RhBug:1865803) - Update documentation for module_obsoletes and module_stream_switch - print additional information when verifying GPG key using DNS - Bugs fixed (RhBug:1897573) - Remove hardcoded logfile permissions (RhBug:1910084) - Enhanced detection of plugins removed in transaction (RhBug:1929163) Package: fedora-obsolete-packages-34-18 Old package: fedora-obsolete-packages-34-17 Summary: A package to obsolete retired packages RPMs: fedora-obsolete-packages Size: 34.99 KiB Size change: -59 B Changelog: * Fri M
Re: Self introduction : whoisanshul
Hi Anshul, I added more information to readme of QA Dashboard [1]. If anything is unclear, contact me via email lbra...@redhat.com [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/landingpage Lukas On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Anshul Sahai 4-Year B.Tech. Chemical Engineering via test wrote: > Hi! > This is Anshul Sahai. I'm an Outreachy applicant. I'm well-versed with > HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I'm also learning to work with React currently. > I'm excited to start contributing and be a part of this community. > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210323.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210322.0): ID: 826137 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826137 ID: 826144 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826144 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210323.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0): ID: 826126 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826126 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0): ID: 826123 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826123 ID: 826130 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826130 Passed openQA tests: 5/7 (aarch64), 6/7 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0): ID: 826125 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826125 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
