Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-09-01 Thread Markku Kolkka
1.9.2011 16:12, Tim kirjoitti:
 I've often wondered how such languages are typed.  Whether the keys
 pressed to construct a character relate to drawing certain shaped lines
 in certain places (a stroke here, a stroke there), some sort spelling
 out the word that the character represents,

Both of these are in common use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_input_methods_for_computers

-- 
Markku Kolkka
markku.kol...@iki.fi
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-31 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 04:17:00PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
 I don't think I've hit the freezing-emacs bug.  What triggers it?
 What's the BZ #?

In my case it happens whenever the Emacs window is minimized and then
reopened. I have to maximize it and then select a buffer each time to
get it back to normal.

I've not filed a BZ for it personally.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/



pgpgYWZyFcXGK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-31 Thread Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
 I have FC15 on three machines with different hardware - different CPUs,
 different graphics hardware. As installed, all three were kinda OK.
 After recent updates all three now take about 5 seconds to change
 windows. A warning box popping up is a minimum 10s activity - 5 seconds
 to appear, and 5 to dismiss it. I find it hardware to believe I have
 three special case machines which all hit the same obscure bug. How can
 you call this a productive environment?

Are you serving the user folders over NFS, by any chance?

- Mike

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-31 Thread Steve Underwood
On 08/31/2011 09:02 PM, Tim wrote:
 On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:36 -0600, Julius Smith wrote:
 using the mouse is slow, so we need to be able to define a shortcut
 for everything.
 And how are you going to remember them all?  Or have enough keys to give
 everything a unique hotkey.

 I can only ever remember a few from a few applications, never all of the
 functions I might want to use.  Years ago, I did add hotkeys to run
 programs, and only ever ended up remembering about five.
Maybe he'd like to type Chinese on a keyboard with 15,000 keys. :-\

Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-31 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:19 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: 
 On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 04:17:00PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
  I don't think I've hit the freezing-emacs bug.  What triggers it?
  What's the BZ #?
 
 In my case it happens whenever the Emacs window is minimized and then
 reopened. I have to maximize it and then select a buffer each time to
 get it back to normal.
 
 I've not filed a BZ for it personally.

Interesting.  I don't seem to be able to reproduce it.  But I'll keep an
eye out.

If it isn't working for you, you should file a bug.

 

-- 
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Mathematical Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Dave Cross
On 29 August 2011 14:39, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 09:36 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:46:35AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 On 29/08/11 11:38, Dave Cross wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?

 You have two ways to go, either learn to love gnome or quit gnome :-(

 Not quite the open source way: someone can always fork Gnome 2 and start
 a new project around it.


 Third way would be to go with CentOS.

Surely, that's just delaying the inevitable?

Dave...

-- 
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread gpe

On 08/29/2011 05:23 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

I still remember the times when KDE4 was born. It was terrible comparing 
to 3.5. After a while it was started to evolved, it became more stable 
and more user friendly.


 Seems nobody likes it (me included). Frankly, Gnome3 is broken by design and
 a f*cking piece of cr*p :-)

Everybody have the right to hate gnome3, but in my opinion hating won't 
help. You have couple of options:
1. start to contribute and make it better.
2. wait until someone else makes it better.
3. Jump to different DE.
If you choose option 3 then you have several alternatives (in no 
particular order) : E17, KDE, LXDE, XFCE, gnome2-fork etc. But keep in 
mind that none of them is perfect, nor suits everybody's needs.

-- 
gpe
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Mike Wright
On 08/30/2011 06:05 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
 On 08/30/2011 08:24 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 05:08 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
 What makes you say its designed for tablets? Its design seems far less
 suitable for a tablet than a desktop.
 The basic layout, the loss of the second panel and the dependence on
 gestures all sounds like something designed for a tablet, or at least,
 inspired by a tablet.
 You could certainly interpret the look as being inspired by a tablet,
 but the total inability to use it without a very steady hand makes
 totally unsuitable for portable devices. Its clearly inspired by the
 Marquis de Sade.

But only beloved by fans of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch ;D
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/30/2011 06:05 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
 You could certainly interpret the look as being inspired by a tablet,
 but the total inability to use it without a very steady hand makes
 totally unsuitable for portable devices. Its clearly inspired by the
 Marquis de Sade.

Not having actually used it, I wouldn't know.  Just the idea of being 
forced to use gestures whether I wanted to or not was enough to make me 
jump ship.  (Among other things, I always hated the way moving the mouse 
to the top right corner would show the desktop, and I disabled that 
obnoxious mis-feature as fast as I could.  Whoever thought that 
everybody would want it was an idiot IMAO.)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/30/2011 11:36 AM, Julius Smith wrote:
 I found alacarte, gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu,
 etc., to recover lost functionality.

Right now, I'm running XFCE 4.6 on my desktop, but I've used a 
third-party repo to upgrade my laptop to 4.8.  (I'm always a tad more 
careful with my main box; among other things, when it's time to upgrade 
Fedora, the laptop always goes first.)  The first time I logged in after 
the upgrade, XFCE asked if I wanted the default desktop or if I 
preferred copying over my old settings.  Naturally, I picked the latter 
because I'd already gotten things the way I wanted them and saw no 
reason to repeat the experience.

I think it would be a Good Thing for Gnome 3 to do something similar 
after upgrading from Gnome 2.x.  Yes, I realize that there are things, 
such as desktop icons and the placement of buttons on the bottom panel 
that can't be carried over but you should at least have the option of 
having your menus copied over with whatever customizations are still 
appropriate.  Also, if somebody were to write a utility that could look 
at your old settings and help you get the most important ones working 
(or, at least, something equivalent working) it would make the 
transition much easier.

Please note: I may not run Gnome any more, or even want to, but that 
doesn't mean that I'm not willing to make suggestions on how to make it 
easier for users to adapt to it.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
On 08/29/2011 09:23 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
 On 29.08.2011, Dave Cross wrote: 

 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].
 Seems nobody likes it (me included). Frankly, Gnome3 is broken by design and
 a f*cking piece of cr*p :-)
 All the students at my college who use(d) Linux/Gnome2 before have switched, 
 and
 guess how many are using Gnome3 now? Yes, you're right: zero.

 Just get over it, and use one of the fine alternatives: XFCE has
 always been great, LXDE is slightly buggy but great too, and there
 are various other good wm. I personally like ratpoison, awesome and 
 fluxbox a lot. It hurts a couple of weeks, but then you're done.
I tried both LXDE  XFCE, but Desktop/panel (re)configuration
options/features seems limited:

XFCE:
1) Does XFCE allow creation of new panels, left/right/top(or bottom)
with features such as hiding panels which appears only when the
mouse is moved into the screen edges?

I cannot figure out how to add new panels; they appear collapsed,
and only expands with addition of new icons? How can I change the
panel properties to expand these new panels 100%, vertically and/or
horizontally?

2) Since I like to rearrange the icons within my main panel(1),
 the workspace being 'centered', the icons adjusted to the
 left and/or right of the workspace, the open desktop apps icons
 moved to other panels (left/right/{top|bottom} instead of main,
 with locks, and the notifications panel to the left of screen and so
 on, so do I have this flexibility as Gnome provides? I don't see it.

3) Can I move/drag-drop the icons from one panel into another?

LXDE:

1) I haven't figured out how to shrink the desktop icons, how  can
I do this?


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
On 08/30/2011 05:30 AM, gpe wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 05:23 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].
 I still remember the times when KDE4 was born. It was terrible comparing 
 to 3.5. After a while it was started to evolved, it became more stable 
 and more user friendly.

 Seems nobody likes it (me included). Frankly, Gnome3 is broken by design and
 a f*cking piece of cr*p :-)
 Everybody have the right to hate gnome3, but in my opinion hating won't 
 help. You have couple of options:
 1. start to contribute and make it better.
 2. wait until someone else makes it better.
 3. Jump to different DE.
 If you choose option 3 then you have several alternatives (in no 
 particular order) : E17, KDE, LXDE, XFCE, gnome2-fork etc. But keep in 
 mind that none of them is perfect, nor suits everybody's needs.
There are another options: ;)
4. Multi-boot or Virtual: Keep F13/14  install F15 or greater.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


9. Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15 (Julius Smith)

2011-08-30 Thread Jorge Rivera
I like to know , that its the function of the gnome with fedora 15

 

Jorge J.Rivera

Tech Support Analyst

T. + 52 55 21229114
M. +52 5514526200
Mexico D.F., Mexico

e-mail: jriv...@tpmex.com

 

 http://www.teleperformance.com/ cid:image007.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0
http://teleperformance.com teleperformance.com | 

 http://www.facebook.com/Teleperformanceglobal
cid:image008.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0
http://facebook.com/Teleperformanceglobal%20
facebook.com/teleperformanceglobal  |
http://www.twitter.com/teleperformance cid:image009.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0
http://twitter.com/teleperformance%20 twitter.com/teleperformance  |
http://www.youtube.com/Teleperformance cid:image010.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0
http://www.youtube.com/teleperformance%20 youtube.com/teleperformance 

 


Logo.jpg
La información contenida en esta comunicación es Privilegiada y
Confidencial.  El contenido se ha elaborado solamente para el uso de los
individuos o entidades listadas arriba.  Si el lector de este mensaje no es
el destinatario correcto, se le notifica que cualquier comunicación,
distribucion o copia de este comunicado está estrictamente prohibido.  Si ha
recibido este comunicado por error, por favor notifíqueme inmediatamente por
vía telefónica, o por e-mail y borre este mensaje de su equipo.

Por favor considere el impacto ambiental de imprimir este e-mail antes de
hacerlo innecesariamente.

 

image001.pngimage002.pngimage003.pngimage004.pngimage005.jpg-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/30/2011 12:30 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
 XFCE:
 1) Does XFCE allow creation of new panels, left/right/top(or bottom)
  with features such as hiding panels which appears only when the
  mouse is moved into the screen edges?

Yes, it does.  From the Main Menu, go to Preference, Panel.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
On 08/30/2011 12:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
 On 08/30/2011 11:36 AM, Julius Smith wrote:
 I found alacarte, gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu,
 etc., to recover lost functionality.
 Right now, I'm running XFCE 4.6 on my desktop, but I've used a 
 third-party repo to upgrade my laptop to 4.8.  (I'm always a tad more 
 careful with my main box; among other things, when it's time to upgrade 
 Fedora, the laptop always goes first.)  The first time I logged in after 
 the upgrade, XFCE asked if I wanted the default desktop or if I 
 preferred copying over my old settings.  Naturally, I picked the latter 
 because I'd already gotten things the way I wanted them and saw no 
 reason to repeat the experience.

 I think it would be a Good Thing for Gnome 3 to do something similar 
 after upgrading from Gnome 2.x.  Yes, I realize that there are things, 
 such as desktop icons and the placement of buttons on the bottom panel 
 that can't be carried over but you should at least have the option of 
 having your menus copied over with whatever customizations are still 
 appropriate.  Also, if somebody were to write a utility that could look 
 at your old settings and help you get the most important ones working 
 (or, at least, something equivalent working) it would make the 
 transition much easier.

 Please note: I may not run Gnome any more, or even want to, but that 
 doesn't mean that I'm not willing to make suggestions on how to make it 
 easier for users to adapt to it.
Good idea, a Gnome-2 to Gnome-3 migration tool? This might work if
done as an upgrade, but can this tool be smart enough to ask if one
wishes to import after a fresh install, be it a partition or virtual
space?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/30/2011 12:48 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
 Good idea, a Gnome-2 to Gnome-3 migration tool? This might work if
 done as an upgrade, but can this tool be smart enough to ask if one
 wishes to import after a fresh install, be it a partition or virtual
 space?

I don't see why not.  All it has to do is run the first time you log in 
using Gnome 3 and check to see if ~/.gnome2 exists.  If so, it pops up 
and offers to help with your migration; if not, it exits.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread stan
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:38:16 +0100
Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?
 
 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?

An someone else mentioned, the fallback mode of Gnome 3 is similar to
Gnome 2.  The most helpful page I found was this one:

http://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2011/04/13/gnome-panel-is-dead%2C-long-live-gnome-panel!
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:36 -0600, Julius Smith wrote: 
 I disliked the decision to simplify things in GNOME 3, but on the
 whole I find it more productive than GNOME 2.  Things got better once
 I found alacarte, gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu,
 etc., to recover lost functionality.  In my opinion, Fedora should be
 aimed at power users not newbies.  That said, I like throwing
 windows to the left and right to fill half the screen, cycling through
 windows of a given app (Alt-`) as easily as cycling through apps
 (Alt-Tab), and generally saving screen space.  Once I got my Custom
 Shortcuts in place, I have few complaints (other than the
 freezing-emacs bug).  In general, using the mouse is slow, so we need
 to be able to define a shortcut for everything. - jos
 

I don't think I've hit the freezing-emacs bug.  What triggers it?
What's the BZ #?

-- 
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Mathematical Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
On 08/30/2011 12:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
 On 08/30/2011 12:30 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
 XFCE:
 1) Does XFCE allow creation of new panels, left/right/top(or bottom)
  with features such as hiding panels which appears only when the
  mouse is moved into the screen edges?
 Yes, it does.  From the Main Menu, go to Preference, Panel.
I finally figured it out, and it works by chosing the 'fixed' mode.
The tricky part was getting the workspace 'centered' with help
of the spacer, expanded option.  I was able to get Firefox and
Thunderbird around the workspacer.

One other issue though, how can I get more workspaces given
only 4 x 1 by default - the only option I have is to add more rows,
not more columns...  I prefer a 10 x 1 format.

Thanks!

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
On 08/30/2011 12:59 PM, stan wrote:
 On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:38:16 +0100
 Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?
 An someone else mentioned, the fallback mode of Gnome 3 is similar to
 Gnome 2.  The most helpful page I found was this one:

 http://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2011/04/13/gnome-panel-is-dead%2C-long-live-gnome-panel!

Uh, the link says: Document not found...

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: 9. Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15 (Julius Smith)

2011-08-30 Thread stan
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:45:26 -0500
Jorge Rivera jriv...@tpmex.com wrote:

 I like to know , that its the function of the gnome with fedora 15
 
Your question renders as without meaning, not clear, in English.  So you
probably won't get any responses.  I think there is a Spanish list for
Fedora.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help/es
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Steve Underwood
On 08/31/2011 02:36 AM, Julius Smith wrote:
 I disliked the decision to simplify things in GNOME 3, but on the
 whole I find it more productive than GNOME 2.  Things got better once
I have FC15 on three machines with different hardware - different CPUs, 
different graphics hardware. As installed, all three were kinda OK. 
After recent updates all three now take about 5 seconds to change 
windows. A warning box popping up is a minimum 10s activity - 5 seconds 
to appear, and 5 to dismiss it. I find it hardware to believe I have 
three special case machines which all hit the same obscure bug. How can 
you call this a productive environment?
 I found alacarte, gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu,
 etc., to recover lost functionality.  In my opinion, Fedora should be
 aimed at power users not newbies.  That said, I like throwing
Aiming a desktop at one group of users, rather than the general case, is 
a weird choice. Its like stating clearly that you wish to remain in 
obscurity, and never build the critical mass momentum to really get 
anywhere. A successful platform needs to install in a usable state for 
everyone, and be adaptable from there to particular needs.
 windows to the left and right to fill half the screen, cycling through
While there is some value in the windows to the left and right 
functionality, as implemented right now you just get windows jumping 
around in size and place pretty wildly whenever you try to simply move 
something aside to check what's underneath. Its bizarre.
 windows of a given app (Alt-`) as easily as cycling through apps
 (Alt-Tab), and generally saving screen space.  Once I got my Custom
 Shortcuts in place, I have few complaints (other than the
 freezing-emacs bug).  In general, using the mouse is slow, so we need
 to be able to define a shortcut for everything. - jos
They broke the mouse, so the answer is more shortcuts? What about fixing 
what was broken as a better alternative?

Steve


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-30 Thread Julius Smith
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org wrote:
 I have FC15 on three machines with different hardware - different CPUs,
 different graphics hardware. As installed, all three were kinda OK.
 After recent updates all three now take about 5 seconds to change
 windows. A warning box popping up is a minimum 10s activity - 5 seconds
 to appear, and 5 to dismiss it. I find it hardware to believe I have
 three special case machines which all hit the same obscure bug. How can
 you call this a productive environment?

I don't see anything like this at all.  (I don't see bizarre jumping
windows either.)  Have you tried logging in as a new user to make sure
there's nothing in your config affecting things?   It definitely
sounds like a bug to chase down.

 In my opinion, Fedora should be aimed at power users
 not newbies.

 Aiming a desktop at one group of users, rather than the general case, is
 a weird choice. Its like stating clearly that you wish to remain in
 obscurity, and never build the critical mass momentum to really get
 anywhere.

I'm talking about all Fedora users and developers, who should know
their way around Linux already.  Let the newbies run CentOS, and give
_them_ a stripped down version of GNOME 3 if that's what they prefer.
(However, I think even they should be offered a complete and visible
learning curve.)

 They broke the mouse, so the answer is more shortcuts? What about fixing
 what was broken as a better alternative?

I'm not talking about shortcuts to work around a mouse bug (missed
that part of the thread).  I'm talking about eliminating mouse use
completely.  I want to do everything from within emacs and its shells,
because it's so much faster than GUI-based machinations.  That said,
nice GUIs are fun, pretty, great for newbies, and they can provide a
nicely graduated learning curve, eventually getting out of the way
when done right.

Bugs should simply be fixed.

- jos

-- 
Anybody who knows all about nothing knows everything -- Leonard Susskind
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: 9. Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15 (Julius Smith)

2011-08-30 Thread Julius Smith
If you are referring to my general comments re. GNOME 3, then yes, that's on
Fedora 15. - jos

2011/8/30 Jorge Rivera jriv...@tpmex.com

  I like to know , that its the function of the gnome with fedora 15

 ** **

 *Jorge J.Rivera*

 Tech Support Analyst

 T. + 52 55 21229114
 M. +52 5514526200
 Mexico D.F., Mexico

 e-mail: jriv...@tpmex.com

 ** **

 [image: cid:image007.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0]http://www.teleperformance.com/
   teleperformance.com | 

 [image: 
 cid:image008.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0]http://www.facebook.com/Teleperformanceglobal
   facebook.com/teleperformanceglobal
 http://facebook.com/Teleperformanceglobal%20 | [image:
 cid:image009.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0]http://www.twitter.com/teleperformance
   twitter.com/teleperformance http://twitter.com/teleperformance%20 | 
 [image:
 cid:image010.png@01CBEE17.5B058CE0]http://www.youtube.com/Teleperformance
   youtube.com/teleperformance http://www.youtube.com/teleperformance%20*
 ***

 ** **


 *[image: Logo.jpg]*
 La información contenida en esta comunicación es Privilegiada y
 Confidencial.  El contenido se ha elaborado solamente para el uso de los
 individuos o entidades listadas arriba.  Si el lector de este mensaje no es
 el destinatario correcto, se le notifica que cualquier comunicación,
 distribucion o copia de este comunicado está estrictamente prohibido.  Si ha
 recibido este comunicado por error, por favor notifíqueme inmediatamente por
 vía telefónica, o por e-mail y borre este mensaje de su equipo.

 Por favor considere el impacto ambiental de imprimir este e-mail antes de
 hacerlo innecesariamente.

 ** **

 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines




-- 
Anybody who knows all about nothing knows everything -- Leonard Susskind
image001.pngimage004.pngimage003.pngimage002.pngimage005.jpg-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Dave Cross
I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
available for F15?

Cheers,

Dave...

[1] http://blog.dave.org.uk/2011/08/hating-gnome-3.html

-- 
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/29/2011 03:08 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?

http://k3rnel.net/2011/06/15/bluebubble-faq/

Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
releases.   

Rahul
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 29/08/11 11:38, Dave Cross wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?

You have two ways to go, either learn to love gnome or quit gnome :-(

-- 
Erik
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 On 29/08/11 11:38, Dave Cross wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?
 
 You have two ways to go, either learn to love gnome or quit gnome :-(

Maybe there is more ways, maybe Gnome developers will make sense of
Gnome3 is miscarrieed.

Maybe Gnome 2 will continue in previous accomplishments as another
project(s). There is another one:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=121162

Personally I'm now using XFCE.

Franta
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:38:16 +0100,
  Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].
 
 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?
 
 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?

In the short run you can use fallback mode, which has a very similar feel
to gnome 2. In the long run, no one has started a gnome 2 fork, so
the future is not going to include it.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:46:35AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 On 29/08/11 11:38, Dave Cross wrote:
  I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].
 
  Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
  F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?
 
  Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
  available for F15?
 
 You have two ways to go, either learn to love gnome or quit gnome :-(

Not quite the open source way: someone can always fork Gnome 2 and start
a new project around it.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/



pgpsoVPtIno6o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Tim Evans
On 08/29/2011 09:36 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:46:35AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 On 29/08/11 11:38, Dave Cross wrote:
 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

 Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the
 F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system?

 Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNOME 2
 available for F15?

 You have two ways to go, either learn to love gnome or quit gnome :-(

 Not quite the open source way: someone can always fork Gnome 2 and start
 a new project around it.


Third way would be to go with CentOS.

-- 
Tim Evans, TKEvans.com, Inc.|   5 Chestnut Court
UNIX System Admin Consulting|   Owings Mills, MD 21117
http://www.tkevans.com/ |   443-394-3864
http://www.come-here.com/News/  |   tkev...@tkevans.com
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
 something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
 Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
 releases.

One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 29.08.2011, Dave Cross wrote: 

 I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1].

Seems nobody likes it (me included). Frankly, Gnome3 is broken by design and
a f*cking piece of cr*p :-)
All the students at my college who use(d) Linux/Gnome2 before have switched, and
guess how many are using Gnome3 now? Yes, you're right: zero.

Just get over it, and use one of the fine alternatives: XFCE has
always been great, LXDE is slightly buggy but great too, and there
are various other good wm. I personally like ratpoison, awesome and 
fluxbox a lot. It hurts a couple of weeks, but then you're done.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/29/2011 09:32 PM, Tim wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
 something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
 Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
 releases.
 One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
 where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
 changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
 run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.

Those distros all have maintainers who will backport fixes.   
Commercial enterprise distros don't depend on upstream maintainers.   
That's part of the value of paying them. 

Rahul
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/29/2011 03:36 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
 Personally I'm now using XFCE.

As am I.  I  wonder how many people are walking away from Gnome because 
they don't want to use a UI designed for a tablet on their desktop or 
laptop?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:46:46 -0700
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:

 On 08/29/2011 03:36 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
  Personally I'm now using XFCE.
 
 As am I.  I  wonder how many people are walking away from Gnome because 
 they don't want to use a UI designed for a tablet on their desktop or 
 laptop?

I switched mostly to XFCE some time back - originally because it was so
much faster on small boxes and later because Gnome 2.x was near unusable
on a netbook.

Gnome 3.0 I did give a spin and wasn't very impressed as basic stuff
didn't seem to work, performance of the compositor was awful and simple
configuration tasks now seemed to involve writing custom extensions which
seemed rather backward for what Gnome claims it wants.

I shall see what 3.2 is like as hopefully that will have fixed some of
the biggest catastrophes. KDE 4.0 was also pretty bad.

Alan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/29/2011 06:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 09:32 PM, Tim wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
 something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
 Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
 releases.
 One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
 where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
 changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
 run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.

 Those distros all have maintainers who will backport fixes.
It's opensource - Everybody has the liberty to take these $$$-OSes 
source packages and to adopt them for ones needs, rsp. to submit these 
packages back into Fedora.

 Commercial enterprise distros don't depend on upstream maintainers.
It's opensource - Nothing prevents forkers to take these people's works 
and harvest them for free forks.

Ralf

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/29/2011 10:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

 It's opensource - Everybody has the liberty to take these $$$-OSes 
 source packages and to adopt them for ones needs, rsp. to submit these 
 packages back into Fedora.

In theory, yes.  In practise,  not many people are typically interested
in doing such backporting work and since Fedora often uses much newer
versions,  those patches don't necessarily apply. 

Rahul

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:02:14 -0500 Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
wrote:

 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
  something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
  Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
  releases.
 
 One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
 where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
 changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
 run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.
 

I wonder if it would make sense for the Fedora developers to consider
not tying the base distribution to Gnome (or anything that is so
widely-panned), but to something else. It is a question of choice, but
from what I have been reading, Gnome-users has really had some very bad
experiences.

The new user always gets the base distribution -- the one that is
called Fedora in the Download segment. Most people would run away from
using the spins, thinking that it is something more advanced (when in
reality, it is not).

Not to mention, there are several rpms needlessly tied up with gnome,
because some developers work off this, and just assume that it is
needed in their packaging.  

Best wishes,
Ranjan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Chris Kloiber
On 08/29/2011 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 09:32 PM, Tim wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
 something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
 Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
 releases.
 One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
 where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
 changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
 run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.
 Those distros all have maintainers who will backport fixes.
 Commercial enterprise distros don't depend on upstream maintainers.
 That's part of the value of paying them.

 Rahul
There is nothing to backport, as those changes are taken from upstream, 
which no longer exists.

-- 
Chris Kloiber
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/29/2011 11:53 PM, Chris Kloiber wrote:
 There is nothing to backport, as those changes are taken from upstream, 
 which no longer exists.

That depends.  Nautilus exists.  Metacity bug fixes probably are common
to Mutter and sometimes patches will have to be written from scratch as well

Rahul
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 29.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Chris Kloiber:
 On 08/29/2011 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 09:32 PM, Tim wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
 something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
 Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
 releases.
 One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
 where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
 changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
 run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.
 Those distros all have maintainers who will backport fixes.
 Commercial enterprise distros don't depend on upstream maintainers.
 That's part of the value of paying them.

 Rahul
 There is nothing to backport, as those changes are taken from upstream, 
 which no longer exists.

maybe fedora should switch to KDE as primary desktop since
GNOME2 was bad enough and GNOME3 is losing even users who
loved GNOME2 for whatever reason

a desktop which NEEDS 3D-Support is a epic fail



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:28:25 -0500 Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:

 
 
 Am 29.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Chris Kloiber:
  On 08/29/2011 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  On 08/29/2011 09:32 PM, Tim wrote:
  On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  Note that GNOME 2.x won't get any security updates which might be
  something you need to keep in mind.   This is part of the reason that
  Fedora along with other distros will have to move to follow GNOME 3.x
  releases.
  One wonders how this will impact on the various long life distributions,
  where you're expected to keep using Linux version x(not changing).y(not
  changing).z(only part that changes), then?  Because they're supposed to
  run for years, *with* security updates, but no large version changes.
  Those distros all have maintainers who will backport fixes.
  Commercial enterprise distros don't depend on upstream maintainers.
  That's part of the value of paying them.
 
  Rahul
  There is nothing to backport, as those changes are taken from upstream, 
  which no longer exists.
 
 maybe fedora should switch to KDE as primary desktop since
 GNOME2 was bad enough and GNOME3 is losing even users who
 loved GNOME2 for whatever reason
 
 a desktop which NEEDS 3D-Support is a epic fail

I guess the developers will decide in their wisdom. If it were up to
me, I think it would make more sense to get something that has good
functionality and is light on resources. Perhaps XFCE?

I use LXDE, but I don't know if it could be considered to have
functionality.

Ranjan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:02, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
 In the short run you can use fallback mode, which has a very similar feel
 to gnome 2. In the long run, no one has started a gnome 2 fork

Oh  really? ;-)

A Fork Of GNOME 2: The Mate Desktop
Posted by Michael Larabel on August 17, 2011

A lot of people hate Canonical's Unity desktop, but a lot of people
also hate the current state of the GNOME 3.0 Shell too. For those that
are still fond of the GNOME 2.x environment, there is a fork of GNOME2
that's been little talked about up to this point. This fork is called
the Mate Desktop Environment.

The Mate Desktop Environment fork of GNOME2 was started by an Arch
Linux user back in June, but it hasn't yet gained too much traction
and is mostly just talked about on various forums around the web. It
also hasn't been picked up by any distribution repositories at this
point, but there is an AUR repository available for Arch Linux users.

The project overview is just: MATE Desktop Environment, a
non-intuitive and unattractive desktop for users, using traditional
computing desktop metaphor. Also known as the GNOME2 fork.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=OTgxMA

FC
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 16:12, Ranjan Maitra mai...@iastate.edu wrote:
 Perhaps XFCE?

 I use LXDE, but I don't know if it could be considered to have
 functionality.

I've pulled my hair trying to tweak LXDE. I've found XFCE is much
better, with similiar low memory requirements but without the
annoyance.

Power and memory requirements of KDE, Gnome, XFCE and LXDE compared
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_desktop_vitalsnum=1

FC
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/29/2011 12:58 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
 Power and memory requirements of KDE, Gnome, XFCE and LXDE compared
 http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_desktop_vitalsnum=1

This is with Gnome 2.29.1 and XFCE 4.6.  I'd like to see Gnome 3 and 
XFCE 4.8 compared this way.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 16:50:01 -0300,
  Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 A Fork Of GNOME 2: The Mate Desktop

I usually read Phoronix, but I missed that article.

That provides an opportunity for someone to package it for Fedora.
There still could be issues with doing so, but at least there is
an upstream.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Steve Underwood
On 08/30/2011 12:46 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
 On 08/29/2011 03:36 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
 Personally I'm now using XFCE.
 As am I.  I  wonder how many people are walking away from Gnome because
 they don't want to use a UI designed for a tablet on their desktop or
 laptop?
What makes you say its designed for tablets? Its design seems far less 
suitable for a tablet than a desktop. The need to grab an exact pixel 
row, for example, is very hard to do unless you are sitting at a desk 
with a good quality mouse.

Gnome 3 throws out every ergonomics design guideline I've ever seen. Its 
like an exercise in what not to do. Its bizarre.

Steve

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

2011-08-29 Thread Joe Zeff
On 08/29/2011 05:08 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
 What makes you say its designed for tablets? Its design seems far less
 suitable for a tablet than a desktop.

The basic layout, the loss of the second panel and the dependence on 
gestures all sounds like something designed for a tablet, or at least, 
inspired by a tablet.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines