We upgraded our CentOS 6 build yesterday and managed to break our 389DS
service. We have isolated the problem to a package: nss-3.21.0-0.3. When we
role back the update to a previous version the 389ds service works fine. Has
anyone else experienced this?
Paul M. Whitney
E-mail:
On 08/05/2011 12:36 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
Rich,
Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1 x86_64 and
getting:
$ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction
Rich,
Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1 x86_64 and getting:
$ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package 389-ds-base.x86_64
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
Fixed.
Fixed.
Amazingly, finally, it all seems to have installed.
EL6 support is . . . tricky.
Rich, thank you for straightening this out so quickly, and the
clearest explanation thus far of the issues involved.
On 08/03/2011 02:30 PM, Brett Dikeman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
Fixed.
Fixed.
Amazingly, finally, it all seems to have installed.
EL6 support is . . . tricky.
Rich, thank you for straightening this out so quickly, and the
clearest
On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:
On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
stick to FOSS
On 07/29/2011 03:49 PM, Brett Dikeman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Leo Pleimanlplei...@salsalabs.com wrote:
Rumor has it there has been a mass exodus from Centos and the ports may be
a little behind. You might want to look at Scientific Linux.
I just tried SL 6.1. I did a 'basic
...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Rich Megginson
[rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2011 11:17 a.m.
To: Brett Dikeman
Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Centos 6?
On 07/29/2011 03:49 PM, Brett Dikeman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:02
...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Rich Megginson
[rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2011 11:17 a.m.
To: Brett Dikeman
Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Centos 6?
On 07/29/2011 03:49 PM, Brett
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 01:31 +, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
www.freeipa.org
At present I am going to evaluate FreeIPA, Openldap and AD as possible
solutions for us.
For freeipa my understanding is its released in 6.2 which is about November
time so looking at it now seems a good
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Penedo pen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2011 09:17, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
So, to summarize, if you want the full 389 ds/admin/console on EL6:
1) you must use EL 6.1 or later
2) you must use 389-ds-base from the fedorapeople.org repo
Hi,
It has come a long way in 2 years, IMHO. It maybe a little fresh still for
production in some ways, hence we will look at it and kick it tyres in a POC
(proof of concept), but I have huge pressures to put something in. There are
several aspects to consider, from our perspective our admin
On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
On 2 August 2011 09:17, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
So, to summarize, if you want the full 389 ds/admin/console on EL6:
1) you must use EL 6.1 or later
2) you must use 389-ds-base from the fedorapeople.org repo
3) you must use EPEL6 for the
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 02:31 +, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
It has come a long way in 2 years, IMHO. It maybe a little fresh still for
production in some ways, hence we will look at it and kick it tyres in a POC
(proof of concept), but I have huge pressures to put something in. There are
On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or
Anyone know if this has been fixed yet?
---
Steven Santos
Director
P: 617-527-0667
F: 617-934-1870
E: ste...@simplycircus.com
Simply Circus, Inc.
86 Los Angeles Street
Newton, MA 02462
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com wrote:
Brett Dikeman wrote:
On Fri,
On Jul 29, 2011, at 12:10 AM, solarflow99 wrote:
Just try and locate the repo with those missing packages, unless centos6
hasn't built them or something wierd like that.
2011/7/28 夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp
On 07/29/2011 05:14 AM, Brett Dikeman wrote:
Greetings,
I'm
Brett Dikeman wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to install 389 on Centos 6, following this:
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Install_Guide#New_Install
The guide makes it out to be as simple as configure EPEL, then
execute yum install 389-ds.
Instead, the install dies with yum not able
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Leo Pleiman lplei...@salsalabs.com wrote:
Rumor has it there has been a mass exodus from Centos and the ports may be
a little behind. You might want to look at Scientific Linux.
I just tried SL 6.1. I did a 'basic server' clean install.
The epel-389-ds-base
Brett Dikeman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Leo Pleimanlplei...@salsalabs.com wrote:
Rumor has it there has been a mass exodus from Centos and the ports may be
a little behind. You might want to look at Scientific Linux.
I just tried SL 6.1. I did a 'basic server' clean install.
20 matches
Mail list logo
