sent out a RETRY
and mentioned the point of obfuscating.
On 3/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Adam,
yes, I know. I haven't heard anything back regarding the obfuscated files.
Perhaps it is ok.
Anyway, that was the only *real* issue. Rest was like, using old
got feedback from Noel,
vote is closed. no release yet.
Robert found some issues
(almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here).
The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers.
Waiting on feedback from Robert.
Thx,
Matthias
On 3/16/07, Matthias
vote closed, because of the 72 hours are already over
;-)
On 3/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
got feedback from Noel,
vote is closed. no release yet.
Robert found some issues
(almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here).
The other one is the obfuscated JS
On 3/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
got feedback from Noel,
vote is closed. no release yet.
Robert found some issues
(almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here).
The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers.
Waiting on
Hi Adam,
yes, I know. I haven't heard anything back regarding the obfuscated files.
Perhaps it is ok.
Anyway, that was the only *real* issue. Rest was like, using old
remote-resource-plugin, so that the tests.jar don't contain LICENSE,
NOTICE and DISCLAIMER.
Last week, the two broken plugins
sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval
-M
On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result:
binding +1:
-Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member)
-Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC
+1 :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hey Martin,
I just did an upload of those checksum files to:
http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/
so, now I would count your vote as a +1
The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next
release, ok?
Thx,
On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry people for the late response..
-1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core).
If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1..
haha! you got me :-)
Thanks!
Maybe wise to add a text that the binary
Hey Martin,
I just did an upload of those checksum files to:
http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/
so, now I would count your vote as a +1
The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok?
Thx,
Matthias
On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 binding
On 3/9/07, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
On 3/9/2007 4:31 AM,
Hi,
I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage
repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is
a distribution available at [2].
Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we
should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
-M
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members
[ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[ ]
In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits...
I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit...
-- Adam
On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
Hey Adam,
It's open source. You're not obligated to be involved in everything
and every decision :-)
On 3/9/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits...
I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit...
-- Adam
On
phew! :)
-- Adam
On 3/9/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Adam,
It's open source. You're not obligated to be involved in everything
and every decision :-)
On 3/9/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits...
I'd
:-)
the vote goes at least 72 hours;
the time can be used to check the bits and bytes.
-M
On 3/9/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits...
I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit...
-- Adam
On 3/9/07, Bernd
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
On 3/9/2007 4:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I managed to get some release artifacts
19 matches
Mail list logo
