Re: Examples directory

2007-04-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 4/28/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Matthias: I think you added the examples directory, and put the trinidad-demo in as an example. However - this means we currently have two copies of the trinidad-demo, one in examples and one at top level. Also, trinidad-examples is not built

Re: FastMessageFormat to public API?

2007-04-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
go ahead. -Matthias On 4/28/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trinidad has a FastMessageFormat class in the impl that is a partial replacement for MessageFormat - and, last I tested, far faster for the typical case of use-once-and- throw-away scenario that comes up in webapps a lot. Any

[SVN] clean ups

2007-04-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, please remove the branches you created which aren't used anymore. Thx, Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces - JIRA

2007-04-28 Thread Martin van den Bemt
The key cannot be renamed.. Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1224 -Matthias

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces

2007-04-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
thx, pinged [EMAIL PROTECTED] -M On 4/28/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have Manfred give his ok to this.. Infrastructure requests need to come from the PMC.. Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1223 Question,

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces

2007-04-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I agree that it would be good to run the details by the entire MyFaces PMC. However, my (possibly incorrect) understanding is that the PMC chair does not need to be the one making the request or giving the final ok -- it should be a PMC decision (or lazy concensus) and any PMC member can make

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces

2007-04-28 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Your impression is kind of correct... (see http://www.apache.org/dev/reporting-issues.html) Which states that the private list needs to be cc'ed, the problem with JIRA is that it is not a mail , so it's hard to cc the private list.. You can trigger response in a couple of ways : 1) add threads

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces - JIRA

2007-04-28 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Moving all tickets seems the best I think (you can do a mass update). Maybe infra has a nice trick for a key change and if so, I am very interested ;) Can we do this at Apachecon ? I am jira admin and can help out.. Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: :-( We need a new jira, and an

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces

2007-04-28 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Ah, ok. Thanks for pointing out the practical implications of infra needing validate the request in JIRA. I hadn't considered that. On 4/28/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your impression is kind of correct... (see http://www.apache.org/dev/reporting-issues.html) Which

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces

2007-04-28 Thread Manfred Geiler
Just confirmed the issue. Regards, Manfred On 4/28/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, ok. Thanks for pointing out the practical implications of infra needing validate the request in JIRA. I hadn't considered that. On 4/28/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Infrastructure] Moving to myfaces - JIRA

2007-04-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
great ! I arrive tomorrow :-) On 4/28/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moving all tickets seems the best I think (you can do a mass update). Maybe infra has a nice trick for a key change and if so, I am very interested ;) Can we do this at Apachecon ? I am jira admin and