Gentlements,
since there is this nice little guy ([1]), I'd like to come back to
this discussion.
Adam and I spoke about starting to solve this problem.
For JSF infrastructure things we'd like to give Shale a try.
For stuff like UIComponent / Rendere there might be JMock useful.
Btw. I checked
I do believe as well that jMock doesn't provide enough context for
writing proper tests of JSF-behaviour.
At leasts whatever tests I have written so far needed some more than
just a method to call and the information on whether this method has
been called.
regards,
Martin
On 5/13/06, Adam
On 5/13/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought more about this
On 5/13/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/13/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/06, Adam Winer
On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the surface, it would appear so, but IANAL and never played one on
TV.
I had to read that several times to figure it out - does IANAL mean I Am
Not A Laywer ? :-)
Right the first
committed to
the project. There is no learning curve for this stuff and it's in ibiblio.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 08:43 PM
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts about unit testing and mock
