On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 10:42:26 UTC, FairEnough wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 08:00:32 UTC, Jordan Wilson
wrote:
...
I suspect the proportion of users that really care about
explicit class privacy and find the workaround of putting a
class that needs such privacy into a
On Friday, 26 January 2024 at 23:41:51 UTC, FairEnough wrote:
On Thursday, 25 January 2024 at 00:19:54 UTC, Jordan Wilson
wrote:
...
That wasn't what was said. What was said was "causing US
problems". I.e. on the whole, the lack of class-level privacy
does not appear to be causing widespread
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 05:14:18 UTC, FairEnough wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 04:35:11 UTC, Jordan Wilson
wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 02:18:29 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 02:12:25 UTC, FairEnough
wrote:
`module private and no class private`
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 02:18:29 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Saturday, 27 January 2024 at 02:12:25 UTC, FairEnough wrote:
`module private and no class private` goes against the
`consistency, integrity, encapsulation, and redundancy` pursued
by D, just to maintain the uniqueness between `D
On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 22:32:12 UTC, FairEnough wrote:
On Monday, 22 January 2024 at 23:28:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
...
but it's not a feature that has actually been causing us
problems, and it really doesn't make sense at this point to
change how it works.
But the argument
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:36:31 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:11:50 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
I think it's fair to say most
people where happy (or neutral) with the status quo, and were
not convinced by the pro-class-level arguments.
So there are very few people
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 22:53:15 UTC, privateWHAT wrote:
On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 07:19:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* establish support for fleshing out ideas before a DIP is
even written
It's 2024. That should have been the principle a decade ago
Remember how the so called
On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 at 02:54:51 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
1: Would you be interested in participating in a D game jam?
Sadly, being time poor means participating is unlikely.
2: Why did you started using D for developing games?
It's the language I'm most comfortable with.
3: What
On Saturday, 11 June 2022 at 14:28:02 UTC, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2022 at 08:04:14 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
If it's any consolation, there's yet another person trying to
use the library that I'm currently disapointing ;^)
Are you disappointed with jcli? Why? It's pretty
On Friday, 7 May 2021 at 16:19:21 UTC, lempiji wrote:
I have created a tool that executes the code blocks included in
Markdown.
http://github.com/lempiji/md
I'm sure some of everyone have experienced that the code
examples in the documentation don't work.
With this tool, you can execute
On Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 15:19:34 UTC, bauss wrote:
Novelate is a visual novel engine written in D.
It officially binds to SFML but the engine itself has no direct
dependencies on SFML as there's plans for supporting libraries
such as SDL etc. in the future too.
It's still a
On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 at 20:30:03 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
And i finally took the time to change the documentation on the
website from candydoc to one generated by Adam's adrdox.
https://api.gtkd.org
Great stuff, thanks for your work.
Jordan
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 14:27:36 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 13:26:58 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote:
I am very much interested in qualitative feedback on spasm's
internals and its design. It is the main reason I announced the
project. I am completely willing to
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 20:58:08 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Thanks for all the kind words, guys.
Yeah, dub is a sticking point for me and I'm gonna have to get
past it. I just have so much on my plate ATM that I don't wanna
take the time to dig into it again for fear of falling behind
on
On Thursday, 26 July 2018 at 12:13:01 UTC, Joakim Brännström
wrote:
https://github.com/joakim-brannstrom/blog/blob/master/posts/2018-07-24.md
Enjoyed getting some insight about your thought process, thanks
for writing.
Jordan
On Thursday, 14 June 2018 at 11:39:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/14/2018 4:19 AM, jmh530 wrote:
I found myself getting in trouble when I was texting and being
sarcastic. I always add the little winky face now. People
don't get mad anymore, but instead just say I'm not funny.
Good
On Friday, 20 January 2017 at 15:23:51 UTC, Heromyth wrote:
Iup4D is a D binding library for IUP with OOP style. Its API is
similar to WinForms.
This software is licensed under the Boost Software License,
Version 1.0.
It's still under active development and is only tested on
Windows X86.
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 06:32:09 UTC, mogu wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/iupd
http://code.dlang.org/packages/nukleard
iupd removes all deprecated items in IUP, current version is
IUP 3.18.
nukleard may have some bugs in name mangling. Does a struct's
field name like `null`,
i
18 matches
Mail list logo
