Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: hy
Version : 0.9.11
Upstream Author : Paul Tagliamonte t...@pault.ag
* URL : http://hylang.opg
* License : MIT/Expat
Programming Lang: Python and Hy
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: hy
Version : 0.9.11
Upstream Author : Paul Tagliamonte t...@pault.ag
* URL : http://hylang.opg
* License : MIT/Expat
Programming Lang: Python and Hy
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: hy
Version : 0.9.11
Upstream Author : Paul Tagliamonte t...@pault.ag
* URL : http://hylang.opg
* License : MIT/Expat
Programming Lang: Python and Hy
Description
, exploring it for holes, and pushing
them, which is healthy. I'm sure if you poked hard enough, most systems
would show such bugs. (as has been already said, really)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
, exploring it for holes, and pushing
them, which is healthy. I'm sure if you poked hard enough, most systems
would show such bugs. (as has been already said, really)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
Sorry, I missed it. We're actually the same team, we just now have 2 WNPP
bugs. We can merge them. docker.io will be the binary name.
-T
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko y...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Hey gustavo and Tong
Hey hackers,
I'm seeing some behavior that confuses me a bit. I'm sure I'm doing
something wrong, but I can't tell.
Here's a minimal example:
/
| #include stdio.h
| #include nettle/rsa.h
|
| int main ( int argc, char ** argv ) {
| struct sha1_ctx hash_ctx;
| uint8_t headers[] = {
|
!
Regards,
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:47:21AM +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Paul Tagliamonte metat...@pault.ag wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: docker.io
Version : 0.6.x or 0.7.x
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:47:21AM +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Paul Tagliamonte metat...@pault.ag wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: docker.io
Version : 0.6.x or 0.7.x
, rather then me personally telling Norbert to not post more
emails. I don't mind.
I don't stand by the content of that mail, and I'm sorry, but I stand by
it's point, and the following line:
Please don't continue to defend such poor behavior.
Much love,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: docker.io
Version : 0.6.x or 0.7.x depending on how lazy I am
Upstream Author : dotCloud
* URL : http://docker.io
* License : apache2
Programming Lang: Go
Package: golang-go
Severity: normal
Please apply https://codereview.appspot.com/12561043/ to golang-go - this avoids
the need to package a tar library for docker.io
Thanks, folks!
Paul
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: docker.io
Version : 0.6.x or 0.7.x depending on how lazy I am
Upstream Author : dotCloud
* URL : http://docker.io
* License : apache2
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
* Package name: docker.io
Version : 0.6.x or 0.7.x depending on how lazy I am
Upstream Author : dotCloud
* URL : http://docker.io
* License : apache2
Programming Lang: Go
showing the type of
behavior that the CoC works to prevent. I can understand why you don't
like the idea of the CoC, but surely you can see the benefit of more
signal to noise?
(Or not?)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04
as an insult or to draw comparisons?
Please don't continue to defend such poor behavior.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
to do with my time.
As for the CoC, I'm happy to be a sponsor of any GR that looks similar
to it's current state. Please let me know when I can support it formally.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
Package: python-validictory
Version: 0.8.3-2
Severity: important
https://github.com/sunlightlabs/validictory/tree/0.9.3
do this, lazy maintainer
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: python-sunlight
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: important
upgrade it please
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.8.4-linode50 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
Package: python-validictory
Version: 0.8.3-2
Severity: important
https://github.com/sunlightlabs/validictory/tree/0.9.3
do this, lazy maintainer
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: python-sunlight
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: important
upgrade it please
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.8.4-linode50 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
)
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this from NEW to only rm
it a few short weeks later).
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This doesn't
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 09:44:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
I'd have to look at the RC bugs.
I'm looking for a hard commitment here
Hi Paul,
I think that if you focused on the compliance with the DFSG
this from NEW to only rm
it a few short weeks later).
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This doesn't
this from NEW to only rm
it a few short weeks later).
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
bugs?
By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This doesn't
Changed-By: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
Description:
dput-ng- next generation Debian package upload tool
dput-ng-doc - next generation Debian package upload tool (documentation)
python-dput - next generation Debian package upload tool (Python library)
Closes: 729280
Changes:
dput-ng
to the archive today.
I support his application 100%.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:00:04PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Hi Paul,
Hey Dmitry!
Thanks for perfect bug handling. :)
D'aw! Thanks! We aim to please!
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 04:24:42 Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I've commited a fix[1] to my GitHub while git.d.o is down. It'd be nice
Hey gustavo and Tong,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:20:14PM +0800, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
On 11/11/2013 08:36 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use
Docker. I've got it packaged and it'll be in Debian soon.
do you have a package
: /)
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
==-+-===
python | 2.7.5-5
python-dput(= 1.6) | 1.6
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 05:07:00PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
specific to someone: Well this is an unavoidable necessity in order to
Maybe, but specific clauses like
and it'll be in Debian soon.
Thanks for your interest! :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Package: python-selenium
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Please include why the package is in non-free. I quote § 12.5:
Packages in the contrib or non-free archive areas should state in the
copyright file that the package is not part of the Debian distribution
and briefly explain
.
Uploading [package] using ftp to mentors-ftp (host: mentors.debian.net;
directory: /)
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 05:07:00PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
specific to someone: Well this is an unavoidable necessity in order to
Maybe, but specific clauses like
, not satisfying OSD 3 5 (DFSG 3 and 5 as well) this will
*NOT* be fit for Debian main. You're free to try to get it into
non-free.
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http
at 06:03:35PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
You're free to try to get it into non-free.
Thanks!
Paul
How to apply for acceptance in non-free?
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C
to test more
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, not satisfying OSD 3 5 (DFSG 3 and 5 as well) this will
*NOT* be fit for Debian main. You're free to try to get it into
non-free.
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http
at 06:03:35PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
You're free to try to get it into non-free.
Thanks!
Paul
How to apply for acceptance in non-free?
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C
=7fcdf0d225c480b386c5a1f487e68dc39b57e771
[thinking about changing reply to curiosa@]
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:14:14PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[snip]
Some good points made all around, more for the ctte to consider. As
Jonathan says, it's in ctte's hands now, let's agree to disagree and let
the poor souls on the commitee do their job
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:53:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
Again, good points, but ones we've discussed. Perhaps we should end this
thread?
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
-- Frank Zappa
I believe this is a purely technical issue, and one that is near 100%
invisible to the user. Let us not delay the decision or implementation.
I'm left with more questions than answers after reading this mail :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
.
Please change your tone, this is not acceptable for Debian mailing
lists.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
The xchroot S-FSL v1.3.1 license would need some legal review. It was
especially designed for
distributions available free of charge like Debian. The license has been
revised thouroughly
this license and
attempt to figure out how it applies in different jursidictions, with
other licenses and how to properly comply.
Cheers,
Paul
Many Thanks for your Commitment,
Elmar
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.orgwrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Is it really a problem? If yes then I can add an exception for
distributors like Debian.
Perhaps you're interesting in reading our guidelines
with the GPL, so you
can't link it or integrate it with anything that is GPL'd.
Furthermore, DFSG#9: a license must not contaminate other, unrelated
software.
no just compliance with any OSS-license like f.i. GPL so that S-FSL is
'compatible' to other licenses; see for S-FSL v1.3.3
--
.''`. Paul
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
The xchroot S-FSL v1.3.1 license would need some legal review. It was
especially designed for
distributions available free of charge like Debian. The license has been
revised thouroughly
this license and
attempt to figure out how it applies in different jursidictions, with
other licenses and how to properly comply.
Cheers,
Paul
Many Thanks for your Commitment,
Elmar
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.orgwrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Is it really a problem? If yes then I can add an exception for
distributors like Debian.
Perhaps you're interesting in reading our guidelines
with the GPL, so you
can't link it or integrate it with anything that is GPL'd.
Furthermore, DFSG#9: a license must not contaminate other, unrelated
software.
no just compliance with any OSS-license like f.i. GPL so that S-FSL is
'compatible' to other licenses; see for S-FSL v1.3.3
--
.''`. Paul
with the GPL, so you
can't link it or integrate it with anything that is GPL'd.
Furthermore, DFSG#9: a license must not contaminate other, unrelated
software.
no just compliance with any OSS-license like f.i. GPL so that S-FSL is
'compatible' to other licenses; see for S-FSL v1.3.3
--
.''`. Paul
/ even says:
Our trademarks include, among others, the names Mozilla®, mozilla.org®,
Firefox®, Thunderbird®, Bugzilla™, Camino®, Sunbird®, SeaMonkey®, and
XUL™ [..]
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
Any news on this? I'd love an up-to-date ipython in sid
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Any news on this? I'd love an up-to-date ipython in sid
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
wrote:
That's almost jokingly ironic.
I take issue with this. I find this attitude really crappy. I'd strongly
invite you to reconsider this tone and belief.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 08:27:03AM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
I take issue with this. I find this attitude really crappy. I'd strongly
invite you to reconsider this tone and belief.
I invite you to jump back down
,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
you're well, and thanks for your work,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) subject on,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
you're well, and thanks for your work,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) subject on,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:01:05PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Could this problem be explained. As long as they are in separate
directories and called explicitly does that matter?
Please see the nodejs vs node thread(s).
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
of respect to your peers on this list.
Change your tone.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is not LGPL2.1+
lttng-ust-2.3.0\doc\examples\demo\ust* is not LGPL2.1+
as well as most of the files in doc/examples
lttng-ust-2.3.0\include\lttng\* has the same problem
Thanks for your work!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04
is not LGPL2.1+
lttng-ust-2.3.0\doc\examples\demo\ust* is not LGPL2.1+
as well as most of the files in doc/examples
lttng-ust-2.3.0\include\lttng\* has the same problem
Thanks for your work!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04
Can this be taken off-list? I don't care either way, I'd still take his
points even if he wasn't.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 10/26/2013 09:17 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:02:00AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I'm fed up
\static\jquery.min.js
and link in jQuery from the .deb in your package (if you even ship it, I
hadn't checked)
Thank you!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http
\static\jquery.min.js
and link in jQuery from the .deb in your package (if you even ship it, I
hadn't checked)
Thank you!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http
folks (such as
myself, who didn't even know there was a ban) might continue to think
that listmasters would turn a blind eye so such emails.
Happy to hear of the ban, happy to hear of this discussion; +1
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:03:38PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Christoph Anton Mitterer calestyo at scientia.net writes:
Let’s GR it.
Let's tech committee it :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:27:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paultag at debian.org writes:
Let’s GR it.
Let's tech committee it :)
I’d ask them to solve the situation of gnome/xfce depending on systemd,
or something like that, but not a decision whether we want
in lots of fragmentation, since the process in which a
daemon is brought up will depend on what DE you have installed (???)
should go away since it’s also Poetteringware and thus not better),
This is FUD and ad hominem.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
judgement
calls for Debian, we've got bigger problems.
This is seriously disturbing to read.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:02:55PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paultag at debian.org writes:
Decide any technical matter where Developers' jurisdictions overlap.
This is more or less a political question (and one of trust and one to
FINALLY decide what package
find that developers care quite a bit (in both
directions), and dependencies / conflicts are only going to become more
common and serious for our users.
Thank you!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:40:15PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
please vote on and decide on the default init system for Debian.
It’s not (just) about the _default_ but also on whether we will
force this default init system onto *all* our users, or whether
we
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:53:52PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
It may be, but it's not for the project. Let's let this bug be, and
have the tech cttie decide on *the* init system for Debian. If you want
No, this must really really be decided first.
Moving bug off
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of systemd, or patching software to use systemd)
I believe this is within the ctte's jurisdiction, given 6.1 section 2.
Thanks for your consideration,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:40:48PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
Yo, Holger!
On Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Supporting two different init systems is something I don't think
*anyone* wants to get into.
are you sure *so* many people are against *reality*? I
with facts, that has a
Debian-ish argument behind it.
Much love,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
find that developers care quite a bit (in both
directions), and dependencies / conflicts are only going to become more
common and serious for our users.
Thank you!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:40:15PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
please vote on and decide on the default init system for Debian.
It’s not (just) about the _default_ but also on whether we will
force this default init system onto *all* our users, or whether
we
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:53:52PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
It may be, but it's not for the project. Let's let this bug be, and
have the tech cttie decide on *the* init system for Debian. If you want
No, this must really really be decided first.
Moving bug off
of systemd, or patching software to use systemd)
I believe this is within the ctte's jurisdiction, given 6.1 section 2.
Thanks for your consideration,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30
find that developers care quite a bit (in both
directions), and dependencies / conflicts are only going to become more
common and serious for our users.
Thank you!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:40:15PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
please vote on and decide on the default init system for Debian.
It’s not (just) about the _default_ but also on whether we will
force this default init system onto *all* our users, or whether
we
of systemd, or patching software to use systemd)
I believe this is within the ctte's jurisdiction, given 6.1 section 2.
Thanks for your consideration,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30
suit,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
801 - 900 of 2490 matches
Mail list logo
