On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:45:29PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Package: kdbg
Version: 2.5.1-1
Current version of kdbg in sid/quantal/raring is 2.5.1-1. However the
corresponding version of gdb is 7.5+.
As can be seen from the upstream changelog linked below, only kdbg
2.5.2 supports
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:35:03AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
tags 715297 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for empy (versioned as 3.3-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I would really like upload the
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:05:59AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/7/14 Ana Guerrero Lopez a...@debian.org:
I would really like upload the package with a full revamp,
not only this.
Sounds reasonable. I'm going to cancel the upload, then.
Can you provide an ETA for an empy upload? I'd
retitle 705770 O: units -- converts between different systems of units
noowner 705770
thanks
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:33:43PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
retitle 705770 O: units -- converts between different systems of units
owner 705770 !
thanks
To be maintained inside maint-collab. I'm
retitle 705770 O: units -- converts between different systems of units
noowner 705770
thanks
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:33:43PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
retitle 705770 O: units -- converts between different systems of units
owner 705770 !
thanks
To be maintained inside maint-collab. I'm
serverity 708797 grave
tags 708797 +patch
thanks
I'm upgrading the severity because getmail4 fails to work due to
this problem. The attached patch fixes the problem.
Ana
diff -Nru getmail4-4.40.3/debian/changelog getmail4-4.40.3/debian/changelog
--- getmail4-4.40.3/debian/changelog 2013-05-17
severity 708797 grave
thanks
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:02:07PM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
serverity 708797 grave
tags 708797 +patch
thanks
I'm upgrading the severity because getmail4 fails to work due to
this problem. The attached patch fixes the problem.
...
diff -Nru getmail4
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please, remove krazy2 from experimental. Besides being rc-buggy (license
problems), it's a specific KDE code checker tool that doesn't have releases
and it's probably better used from developers out of the git tree.
Thanks,
Ana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
screenie-qt needs a new maintainer. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
Also notice screenie-qt hasn't seen any code update
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
svn-all-fast-export needs a new maintainer. Therefore, I orphan this package
now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
screenie-qt needs a new maintainer. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
Also notice screenie-qt hasn't seen any code update
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
svn-all-fast-export needs a new maintainer. Therefore, I orphan this package
now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:38:30PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:20:09PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
I intend to orphan the bc package.
I use the dc program (from the same source package) rather frequently.
If someone would like to co-maintain this package, please let
retitle 705770 O: units -- converts between different systems of units
owner 705770 !
thanks
To be maintained inside maint-collab. I'm not planning to do an upload
before mid-May, after Wheezy's release.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:12:44PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:38:30PM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:20:09PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
I intend to orphan the bc package.
I use the dc program (from the same source package) rather frequently.
If someone would like to co-maintain this package, please let
retitle 705770 O: units -- converts between different systems of units
owner 705770 !
thanks
To be maintained inside maint-collab. I'm not planning to do an upload
before mid-May, after Wheezy's release.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:12:44PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But my main issue WRT hosting families is that... We don't yet know
how full will DebConf be, or how Debian people will be
distributed. Keep in mind we have relatively few such rooms - And, of
course, we should try to prioritize
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:16:38PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
On 17.04.2013 12:42, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Out of curiosity, what do you understand for a family here? I have
discovered recently that the definition of a family varies widely
and for some, the concept of family must include
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:19:12PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
Caveate: Everyone and every family is different, so please just
consider this a data point.
My opinion (as someone with a wife and 2 kids), feels that for those
in a situation where a family with kids wants to travel together to CH
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:18:35AM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
Ok, if anybody is against I take this responsibility, I can do it, but
before, let me expose some thoughts doubts:
* I understand that GSoC projects are those that are technical and
non-GSoc projects are the
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
(2) GSoC
admins are OK with asking mentors to direct the 500 USD per project to
the OPW earmark). Otherwise, I'll be happy to pre-approve covering up
what remains on general Debian funds.
The money is given to the mentoring
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:18:35AM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
Ok, if anybody is against I take this responsibility, I can do it, but
before, let me expose some thoughts doubts:
* I understand that GSoC projects are those that are technical and
non-GSoc projects are the
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:37:01AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
severity 704300 important
thanks
Hi,
Scuttle doesn't work in Wheezy, all you get are some lovely PHP messages:
Strict Standards: Non-static method ServiceFactory::getServiceInstance()
should not be called statically in
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:41:54AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Yes, but I'm making the point that strict standards messages would
normally and by default be logged, not output to the browser...
Cool, then the problem has an easy fix as hinted by Jan? :) (I can't
test that right now). In the
severity 704300 grave
thanks
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:06:48AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, April 1, 2013 09:59, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, April 1, 2013 09:55, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:41:54AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Yes, but I'm making
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:18:59AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've made attached fix which fixes it (imo) correctly: follow the local
admin's wishes with respect to error_reporting. This ensures that scuttle
works in default configurations and generally does whatever the admin
configures in
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:18:59AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've made attached fix which fixes it (imo) correctly: follow the local
admin's wishes with respect to error_reporting. This ensures that scuttle
works in default configurations and generally does whatever the admin
configures in
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 08:04:26PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Hi Ana, and others,
I will not have time to process this bug in the next two weeks, feel
free to NMU or RM.
I looked into it and after populating the database by hand and also fixing
manually the initial issue [1]. It doesn't
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:23:23PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
unarchive 659390
reopen 659390
found 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
severity 659390 grave
thanks
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 04:53:33PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
close 658295 0.98.4+dfsg-1
close 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
thanks
The bugs
unarchive 659390
reopen 659390
found 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
severity 659390 grave
thanks
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 04:53:33PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
close 658295 0.98.4+dfsg-1
close 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
thanks
The bugs have not been closed automatically because they were fixed in
version
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:23:23PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
unarchive 659390
reopen 659390
found 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
severity 659390 grave
thanks
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 04:53:33PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
close 658295 0.98.4+dfsg-1
close 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
thanks
The bugs
unarchive 659390
reopen 659390
found 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
severity 659390 grave
thanks
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 04:53:33PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
close 658295 0.98.4+dfsg-1
close 659390 0.98.4+dfsg-1
thanks
The bugs have not been closed automatically because they were fixed in
version
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 08:04:26PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Hi Ana, and others,
I will not have time to process this bug in the next two weeks, feel
free to NMU or RM.
I looked into it and after populating the database by hand and also fixing
manually the initial issue [1]. It doesn't
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:32:34PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
[CC'ing kxra, who isn't subscribed, please keep kxra on CC]
Heyya,
Anyone play with the linux-libre[1] project? Does the kernel team know
about this stuff? It seems like we're trying for the same sort of thing
(100% free
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:36:05PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
[Asking Patricio to write in English and look at the Debian mentors site]
He isn't interested in maintaining this software in Debian.
Hola Patricio,
Por favor, lee http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.es.html la parte de
petición de
Hi,
I haven't read the first answers to other questions (I didn't want to get
influenced) so sorry in advance for the overlap.
* List of organizers
The wikipage lists a bunch of people who would be organizing DebConf14. I know
a few names there, but some of the people listed as Debian
Hi,
I haven't read the first answers to other questions (I didn't want to get
influenced) so sorry in advance for the overlap.
* Airport / Transport
Portland International Airport doesn't have too many international connections
so some attendees might land in the USA via Seattle Airport or
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:43:33AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
- We should try to keep the meeting at a maximum of 1 hour. As it has
happened in the past, if we feel we cannot reach a decision, we
should suspend and call for another meeting in 1-2 weeks time, after
some more on-list
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:42:40AM -0430, Luis Alejandro Martínez Faneyth wrote:
Hi Moray,
El 01/03/13 18:09, Moray Allan escribió:
Both bid teams give a long list of team members on their wiki pages.
Do the main team members live in the proposed city? If not, how far
away are they? Are
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:41:05PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Tasks I am quite sure I will do are:
(...)
- investigate the localization of -mentors@ and #-mentors. Language is often
a barrier for new contributors. That sounds like a low-hanging fruit.
Could you elaborate more since you
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
At least for debian-devel-french@, I don't think that we advertise the
possibility to ask questions there.
Just start a discussion there, get a new wording and then ask listmasters
to change it.
Probably this update could benefit
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
But despite being a small group of people working a lot on it and the
Spanish
speaking community being big, it didn't last long.
[ after seeking clarification: it didn't last long because there were
not enough people
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:28:52AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
We will find unacceptable lines with each of the proposals. But it is
not the right time to get too much into the details on how and what
offers to make - Lets first decide on the bids. Stating the visa
problem is enough for now. We
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:16:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
[... a lot of stuff removed...]
Could you please re-read my email? I said it had nothing to do with the
on-going discussion w.r.t USA. I think Daniel got very sensible answers
and he should realize now it is time to stop.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:50:41PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Ignoring some stuff because you think they will be solved or workarounded
later is not a good idea at the choosing bid stage as we have seen this
year.
I didn't understand from Gunnar's mail that he is ignoring the
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:20:32AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Ana Guerrero dijo [Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:11:57PM +0100]:
My comment is meta to what Gunnar is saying:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:28:52AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
We will find unacceptable lines with each of the proposals
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:45:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I'm not sure it's the right place, time and thread to further debate that
subject, though.
No, it is not. But shouldn't we try to avoid future problems? That's what
I'm trying here.
As you might have noticed I stopped
[Dropped -vote]
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:48:33PM +, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
[...]
Would you mind elaborating on this? The background to this is that I am
currently considering mentoring the Leiningen Clojure packaging project
[0] and your comments make me think twice about commiting to
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
My own feeling: countries like the US and Australia shouldn't bother
holding major events like DebConf ...
The visas and border problems are not limited to US and Australia
and what we have to check every year is we have the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:21:22PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
This one is an easy one to answer, I hope. No trap here...
Being the DPS is for sure a very demanding job. So I would like to know
what your current activity is (what is your paid job). Please also
explain how much your activity
Hi Russ,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:03:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org writes:
- For some DDs in previous years, this seemed to be a way to have students
doing stuff from their TODO lists...
Just a quick note on this part: I don't think this is inherently
Hi Russ,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:03:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org writes:
- For some DDs in previous years, this seemed to be a way to have students
doing stuff from their TODO lists...
Just a quick note on this part: I don't think this is inherently
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:50:27PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 12/03/13 at 14:14 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
..
This kind of mentoring let's package this new software stack (and create
a team to maintain it, when it doesn't exist) doesn't need to happen inside
the GSoC, it can happen
[Some sort-of thread hijacking]
Hi folks,
I see this thread going nowhere and it's a pity because discussing new
ways to integrate contributors in Debian is a topic worth discussing.
I have been involved in GSoC in the editions 2011 and 2012 and in
Code-in 2011. Besides that, I mentored a now
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:19:16PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a python programmer. I just use some utilities that are written in
python. So, to me debug a problem is not very easy.
I have spent a lot of time with a problem in one utility and I didn't
understand
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:00:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 16:55:47 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 13:03:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:00:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 16:55:47 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 13:03:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:00:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 16:55:47 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 13:03:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20
Package: src:hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-9
Severity: serious
In Squeeze there are two virtual packages libhdf5-1.8 and libhdf5-1.8.4, that
allow to install either libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4,
libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4 or libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 to satisfy the dependency on
libhdf5-1.8.4. (Usually
Hi!
There are *two* problems with the upgrade of hdf5 from Squeeze to Wheezy
that are a consequence of the problem of the fix for #566541.
One of then, reported in (#667599, #667526), can be solved easily
as explained by marga at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667599#62
and
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details about that ABI incompatibility? I'm pretty
sure I looked through exported symbols and headers from hdf5 a year ago,
and didn't see anything that would break when building against the
serial version
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:36 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details about that ABI incompatibility? I'm pretty
sure I looked through
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 13:03:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:36 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details
Package: src:hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-9
Severity: serious
In Squeeze there are two virtual packages libhdf5-1.8 and libhdf5-1.8.4, that
allow to install either libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4,
libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4 or libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 to satisfy the dependency on
libhdf5-1.8.4. (Usually
Hi!
There are *two* problems with the upgrade of hdf5 from Squeeze to Wheezy
that are a consequence of the problem of the fix for #566541.
One of then, reported in (#667599, #667526), can be solved easily
as explained by marga at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667599#62
and
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details about that ABI incompatibility? I'm pretty
sure I looked through exported symbols and headers from hdf5 a year ago,
and didn't see anything that would break when building against the
serial version
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:36 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details about that ABI incompatibility? I'm pretty
sure I looked through
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 13:03:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:36 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details
Package: src:hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-9
Severity: serious
In Squeeze there are two virtual packages libhdf5-1.8 and libhdf5-1.8.4, that
allow to install either libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4,
libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4 or libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 to satisfy the dependency on
libhdf5-1.8.4. (Usually
Hi!
There are *two* problems with the upgrade of hdf5 from Squeeze to Wheezy
that are a consequence of the problem of the fix for #566541.
One of then, reported in (#667599, #667526), can be solved easily
as explained by marga at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667599#62
and
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details about that ABI incompatibility? I'm pretty
sure I looked through exported symbols and headers from hdf5 a year ago,
and didn't see anything that would break when building against the
serial version
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:36 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details about that ABI incompatibility? I'm pretty
sure I looked through
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 13:03:02 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:36 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
do you have pointers/details
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:12:51PM +, Tiana Rakotovao Andriamahefa wrote:
Hi all,
The build of an application using qt3 always fails into this
kind of error (with GCC-4.6) :
In file included from /usr/include/qt3/qmime.h:46:0,
from /usr/include/qt3/qevent.h:48,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:45:13AM -0600, Michael Janssen wrote:
Package: python-empy
Version: 3.3-6
Severity: normal
When working with some external software, I came across a problem
where the distutils / distribute infastructure would not notice
python-empy was installed (`pip freeze`
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:06:54PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 5 décembre 2012 15.37:32, Ana Guerrero a écrit :
I guess this wasn't very clear in my first email, but I'm also considering
the hostel as the venue for talks, hacklabs etc in the spirit of having
everything
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:08:28PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Hi Ana, hi all.
Le samedi, 1 décembre 2012 17.38:05, Ana Guerrero a écrit :
It has been said a few times that le camp have the same standars that a
youth hostel, so I went to see how a swiss youth hostel looks like [1
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:59:27AM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
could somebody please point to a wiki page (write first) that explains the
shower/toilets/bedrooms plan for women at le camp?
Is it possible to have mixed houses and still have different bedrooms,
showers
and
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:22:16AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
The discrimination part seems to me is a subjective opinion that is not
shared by everyone. At least that is the impression I get from the
discussions over the last weeks (please not that I've been following
debconf-team for
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:22:24PM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org [2012-12-03 11:43]:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:22:16AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
I haven't heard that this is the case, what I read on the list is that
there are buildings specifically
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 11:12:47AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
Have you not met Paul Sladen?
?
As I said long ago, Le Camp (when considered as a DebConf venue) is
family hostile, and for the same reasons is comfort-loving-corporate
hostile, and also for those other cases you mention.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:42:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Especially given the overwhelming impact of the discrimination effects of
_money_, which is an extremly great factor for any DebConf in Switzerland, I
think Le Camp is a very good choice. We will be more equal there than in most
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 06:18:28PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
Ana Guerrero:
It has been said a few times that le camp have the same standars that a
youth hostel, so I went to see how a swiss youth hostel looks like [1] and
what possibilities they offered. I evaluated quickly one
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 06:18:28PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
Ana Guerrero:
It has been said a few times that le camp have the same standars that a
youth hostel, so I went to see how a swiss youth hostel looks like [1] and
what possibilities they offered. I evaluated quickly one
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:01:05PM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
Hi,
since quite a lot of mails have been writte about evolution of Debconf
let me add my share.
I've attended the debconfs in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2011. For
me the all-time best was Porto Alegre in 2004. And that
Hi,
I have shared this for IRC, but I'm told if it is not in the list it doesn't
count.
And also not everybody has the time to follow by IRC.
It has been said a few times that le camp have the same standars that a youth
hostel,
so I went to see how a swiss youth hostel looks like [1] and what
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 05:38:05PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
There is also an airport with regular flights
to some cities for those who can afford going directly to the place.
The airport doesn't have regular flights, but indeed, if you can afford it,
you can flight there directly
Hi,
I have shared this for IRC, but I'm told if it is not in the list it doesn't
count.
And also not everybody has the time to follow by IRC.
It has been said a few times that le camp have the same standars that a youth
hostel,
so I went to see how a swiss youth hostel looks like [1] and what
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 05:38:05PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
There is also an airport with regular flights
to some cities for those who can afford going directly to the place.
The airport doesn't have regular flights, but indeed, if you can afford it,
you can flight there directly
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:22:26AM +, Moray Allan wrote:
On 2012-11-30 22:25, Moray Allan wrote:
Personally I find this a strong negative
I have been asked on IRC to clarify my position/thinking:
Personally I think Le Camp is a bad choice of venue. I am
influenced in that by how
Answering this email because I have been named.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:39:51PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
My general comment is, that I have not seen any new arguments in the last
seven days or so. (I also spoke with Ana on Sunday for more than an hour, and
while I learned several
Hi everybody,
I found a site with photos that together with the plans of le camp available at
their website,
allow to get a much better idea of what is being offered in terms of
accommodation at Le camp.
Le camp is the proposed venue for holding DebConf 13.
The venue contains several building,
what you call here a FUD.
Le lundi, 26 novembre 2012 12.22:13, Ana Guerrero a écrit :
The venue contains several building, let's see one of them.
You chose building 5. As you mention further down, this building has 25
sleeping places.
a
No, 28.
The camp itself recommends it for a group
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:44:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
tl;dr: not all LeCamp beds are like those shown by Ana.
[...]
I understand (and can share part of) your concerns. Yet, as mentionned (on -
team probably, sorry for that), Buildings 4 and 5 provide the most
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 08:55:45PM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote:
If someone disagrees with this course of action, they should say it now.
I do.
I feel the meeting was forced and the concensus was not a real concensus.
Some people were in the position: it is le camp or nothing and some people
Hi everybody,
I found a site with photos that together with the plans of le camp available at
their website,
allow to get a much better idea of what is being offered in terms of
accommodation at Le camp.
Le camp is the proposed venue for holding DebConf 13.
The venue contains several building,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:30:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Ana,
many thanks for your nice research.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:22:13PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
...
http://www.lecamp.ch/visite.php?lang=#
...
To my understanding, the accommodation on the remaining buildings
what you call here a FUD.
Le lundi, 26 novembre 2012 12.22:13, Ana Guerrero a écrit :
The venue contains several building, let's see one of them.
You chose building 5. As you mention further down, this building has 25
sleeping places.
a
No, 28.
The camp itself recommends it for a group
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:14:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
If you see debconf as some holidays, certainly. For debconf you need talk
rooms, hacklabs, internet, etc that are impossible to evaluate seeing those
photos.
With the exception of internet which was not visible on the plan
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:44:22PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
tl;dr: not all LeCamp beds are like those shown by Ana.
[...]
I understand (and can share part of) your concerns. Yet, as mentionned (on -
team probably, sorry for that), Buildings 4 and 5 provide the most
601 - 700 of 3492 matches
Mail list logo
