Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-21):
> I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb
> is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of
> `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies
> would be sufficient (and might ha
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-21):
> I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb
> is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of
> `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies
> would be sufficient (and might ha
Hi,
Roland Clobus (2024-03-21):
> On 21/03/2024 15:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[…]
> The diagram shows nicely that the t64-transition is affecting the
> installer, with currently 1 major bottleneck, libpng16-16t64-udeb:
> https://d-i.debian.org/dose/graph-unstable-amd64.png
G
tever
they are) built against old udebs would break if newer udebs are pulled
from the network.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1057549 in crowdsec reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Paul,
Paul Mars (2024-01-16):
> Here is a patch to fix the issue.
Sorry, I didn't spot this bug report right away (its metadata got
adjusted along the way). Thanks for the bug report and the patch,
on their way to unstable!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBA
Hi Paul,
Paul Mars (2024-01-16):
> Here is a patch to fix the issue.
Sorry, I didn't spot this bug report right away (its metadata got
adjusted along the way). Thanks for the bug report and the patch,
on their way to unstable!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBA
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno (2024-03-13):
> The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
> please have a look at this?
Sorry, lost track of that one. Feel free to upload.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I rel
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno (2024-03-13):
> The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
> please have a look at this?
Sorry, lost track of that one. Feel free to upload.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I rel
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno (2024-03-13):
> The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
> please have a look at this?
Sorry, lost track of that one. Feel free to upload.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I rel
ges
between runs:
https://d-i.debian.org/dose/
That should help us stay on top of changes affecting udeb installability,
shortening the feedback loop for people doing the actual work of patching
many packages. (Some packages were uploaded 10+ days ago.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.
= 2.37), fuse3-udeb
I'll leave it up to the 64-bit time_t transition drivers to choose how
to address this issue (add t64 on the SONAME line, or just in the
dh_makeshlibs override, or something else), and to track down packages
that might have been rebuilt against the broken library.
Cheers,
--
= 2.37), fuse3-udeb
I'll leave it up to the 64-bit time_t transition drivers to choose how
to address this issue (add t64 on the SONAME line, or just in the
dh_makeshlibs override, or something else), and to track down packages
that might have been rebuilt against the broken library.
Cheers,
--
= 2.37), fuse3-udeb
I'll leave it up to the 64-bit time_t transition drivers to choose how
to address this issue (add t64 on the SONAME line, or just in the
dh_makeshlibs override, or something else), and to track down packages
that might have been rebuilt against the broken library.
Cheers,
--
,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
diff -Nru wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog
wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog
--- wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog 2024-02-29
,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
diff -Nru wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog
wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog
--- wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog 2024-02-29
,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
diff -Nru wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog
wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog
--- wireless-tools-30~pre9/debian/changelog 2024-02-29
libmtdev1t64
At the moment, at least the following package is broken:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libinput10-udeb : Depends: libmtdev1t64 but it is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- R
libmtdev1t64
At the moment, at least the following package is broken:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libinput10-udeb : Depends: libmtdev1t64 but it is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- R
libmtdev1t64
At the moment, at least the following package is broken:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libinput10-udeb : Depends: libmtdev1t64 but it is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- R
bpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libfreetype6-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it
is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
bpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libfreetype6-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it
is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
bpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libfreetype6-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it
is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
bpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libfreetype6-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it
is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
bpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libfreetype6-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it
is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
bpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libfreetype6-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it is not
installable
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0-udeb : Depends: libpng16-16t64-udeb (>= 1.6.2) but it
is not installable
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (
ctions on how to check that on my own the next
time around.
Thanks already!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
so I'll probably lump up
both uploads together. :)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
so I'll probably lump up
both uploads together. :)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Cyril Brulebois (2024-02-15):
> Is that problem still current? I cannot reproduce it with a brand new
> sid environment, freshly created via either `pbuilder --create` or
> `sbuild-createchroot`.
For the record, I did receive a proposal to get access to such a system
back then (thanks
Cyril Brulebois (2024-02-15):
> Is that problem still current? I cannot reproduce it with a brand new
> sid environment, freshly created via either `pbuilder --create` or
> `sbuild-createchroot`.
For the record, I did receive a proposal to get access to such a system
back then (thanks
before
getting that translated? Contrary to a lot of not-so-critical l10n
material, that particular screen is crucial, and I'd hate it if we
wasted translator efforts due to a missed typo or obvious improvement.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
before
getting that translated? Contrary to a lot of not-so-critical l10n
material, that particular screen is crucial, and I'd hate it if we
wasted translator efforts due to a missed typo or obvious improvement.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
Bastian Blank (2024-03-04):
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> > cleaned up? (The “disabli
Bastian Blank (2024-03-04):
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> > cleaned up? (The “disabli
y fitting to try and get a d-i release out any
day soon.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y fitting to try and get a d-i release out any
day soon.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y fitting to try and get a d-i release out any
day soon.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y fitting to try and get a d-i release out any
day soon.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
For some reason, PATH wasn't set in the d-i user's crontab, missing
/usr/local/bin for dd-schroot-cmd. (Dates back all the way to December
when the eller → eberlin switch happened…)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release m
and get around to testing this soon-ish, then merge and upload
if that goes fine.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-01-17):
> Santiago Vila (2023-12-05):
> > […]
>
> Thanks for the report. The relevant part didn't appear in the excerpt
> so I'm quoting the full build log below:
>
> > === RUN TestOneShot/permission_denied
> > file_test.go:
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-01-17):
> Santiago Vila (2023-12-05):
> > […]
>
> Thanks for the report. The relevant part didn't appear in the excerpt
> so I'm quoting the full build log below:
>
> > === RUN TestOneShot/permission_denied
> > file_test.go:
on/off, and be accustomed to have that first. Do we really want to break
finger memory? Being able to disable standard to save a little space has
never looked like a bad idea to me, but having that be the first entry
on that list feels very weird.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debi
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12):
> 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for:
>
> 6 April
> 13 April
> 20 April
Any of those should work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12):
> 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for:
>
> 6 April
> 13 April
> 20 April
Any of those should work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12):
> 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for:
>
> 6 April
> 13 April
> 20 April
Any of those should work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -
in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00089.html ?
> My gut feeling from what was discussed is that nobody will ever use
> the d-i on armel.
I'm not sure how much time armel will stick around (for existing
systems), but it looks to me that d-i/armel is no longer relevant.
Cheers
in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00089.html ?
> My gut feeling from what was discussed is that nobody will ever use
> the d-i on armel.
I'm not sure how much time armel will stick around (for existing
systems), but it looks to me that d-i/armel is no longer relevant.
Cheers
in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00089.html ?
> My gut feeling from what was discussed is that nobody will ever use
> the d-i on armel.
I'm not sure how much time armel will stick around (for existing
systems), but it looks to me that d-i/armel is no longer relevant.
Cheers
hilh/debian-installer/-/commit/f5044026b07d8dbf938394193708b33ea811ae2e
Both solutions (and others in the same vein) sound specific enough that
they shouldn't affect stable releases so feel free to pick whatever you
like best.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://
hat sorted out now, and not on the way to the first point
release, which is usually quite busy already.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ned
> [arm64],
> linux-image-6.6.13-686 [i386] | linux-image-6.6.13-686-unsigned [i386],
> linux-image-6.6.13-686-pae [i386] | linux-image-6.6.13-686-pae-unsigned
> [i386],
>
> ?
udebs are built from the linux-signed-* packages, so that doesn't help
at all.
Che
eShot/no_matching_files (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/test.log (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/test.log.gz (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/unexpected_end_of_gzip_stream (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/deleted_file (0.00s)
I'll investigate shortly.
Cheers,
--
eShot/no_matching_files (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/test.log (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/test.log.gz (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/unexpected_end_of_gzip_stream (0.00s)
> --- PASS: TestOneShot/deleted_file (0.00s)
I'll investigate shortly.
Cheers,
--
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/01/msg00046.html
and #1060134.
I haven't made up my mind yet.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I suppose it could be some fallout from the kmod upload
which included some changes of yours, hence the ping.
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1491892/accepted-kmod-31-1-source-into-unstable/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager
re.
> >
> > The list of affected services are:
> > - eller.d.o (mips*el porterbox)
>
> eberlin.d.o has been setup as a mips*el porterbox to replace eller.d.o.
d-i daily builds just set up there, and dillon's configuration updated
accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debi
Steve McIntyre (2023-12-26):
> Any of those *should* be OK for me.
Ditto.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Steve McIntyre (2023-12-26):
> Any of those *should* be OK for me.
Ditto.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Steve McIntyre (2023-12-26):
> Any of those *should* be OK for me.
Ditto.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
stumbled upon this again while re-testing various things,
and was merely wondering whether things were.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
stumbled upon this again while re-testing various things,
and was merely wondering whether things were.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
stumbled upon this again while re-testing various things,
and was merely wondering whether things were.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n easier to track if debian-boot@ had been put
(and kept) in the loop all along.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n easier to track if debian-boot@ had been put
(and kept) in the loop all along.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n easier to track if debian-boot@ had been put
(and kept) in the loop all along.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bastian Blank (2023-12-24):
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 08:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > - kernel-image-* packages are now shipping /boot/vmlinuz-* (or
> > /boot/vmlinux-* depending on the arch), instead of just /boot/vmlinuz
> > (respectively /boot/vmlinux
Bastian Blank (2023-12-24):
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 08:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > - kernel-image-* packages are now shipping /boot/vmlinuz-* (or
> > /boot/vmlinux-* depending on the arch), instead of just /boot/vmlinuz
> > (respectively /boot/vmlinux
Bastian Blank (2023-12-24):
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 08:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > - kernel-image-* packages are now shipping /boot/vmlinuz-* (or
> > /boot/vmlinux-* depending on the arch), instead of just /boot/vmlinuz
> > (respectively /boot/vmlinux
Cyril Brulebois (2023-12-24):
> Feel free to reply to this thread if you spot other fallouts.
Another FYI: one thing that I spotted early on (before realizing module
support was entirely broken), when I first diffed the list of files
available in the initramfs, building against testin
Cyril Brulebois (2023-12-24):
> Feel free to reply to this thread if you spot other fallouts.
Another FYI: one thing that I spotted early on (before realizing module
support was entirely broken), when I first diffed the list of files
available in the initramfs, building against testin
free to reply to this thread if you spot other fallouts. Of course,
as usual, the best way to report installer bugs is to file them against
the relevant component, X-Debbugs-Cc-ing this list; but leaving an
explicit reference in this thread wouldn't hurt.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k
free to reply to this thread if you spot other fallouts. Of course,
as usual, the best way to report installer bugs is to file them against
the relevant component, X-Debbugs-Cc-ing this list; but leaving an
explicit reference in this thread wouldn't hurt.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k
free to reply to this thread if you spot other fallouts. Of course,
as usual, the best way to report installer bugs is to file them against
the relevant component, X-Debbugs-Cc-ing this list; but leaving an
explicit reference in this thread wouldn't hurt.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k
etails
>
> Thanks for confirming, perhaps then you can add your tested-by in the
> respective patches upstream.
>
> BTW, another handy way to test if this works is via grub-mount.
Any chance we could have an updated grub2 package to fix this?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
etails
>
> Thanks for confirming, perhaps then you can add your tested-by in the
> respective patches upstream.
>
> BTW, another handy way to test if this works is via grub-mount.
Any chance we could have an updated grub2 package to fix this?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
etails
>
> Thanks for confirming, perhaps then you can add your tested-by in the
> respective patches upstream.
>
> BTW, another handy way to test if this works is via grub-mount.
Any chance we could have an updated grub2 package to fix this?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ikeys and the like, but also HSMs that might be on the
critical path to sign things like GRUB, linux (at least for now), etc.
Even if we end up with a brand new gnupg release on the relevant signing
host(s), I fear hardware devices might not feature all the bits that are
needed for those new f
ikeys and the like, but also HSMs that might be on the
critical path to sign things like GRUB, linux (at least for now), etc.
Even if we end up with a brand new gnupg release on the relevant signing
host(s), I fear hardware devices might not feature all the bits that are
needed for those new f
s. If that's enough to guarantee that I
won't actually be generating another problem down the line, I'm happy to
implement this change.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I know mixed stuff isn't too nice, and unifying might be appealing, but
that makes cherry-picking stuff harder, so I tend to only unify things
when I'm actually changing code… Others might feel differently.
Well spotted, for the typo.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<
I know mixed stuff isn't too nice, and unifying might be appealing, but
that makes cherry-picking stuff harder, so I tend to only unify things
when I'm actually changing code… Others might feel differently.
Well spotted, for the typo.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<
ething.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ething.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
wifi,
and adding a modprobe -r theotherone beforehand.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
wifi,
and adding a modprobe -r theotherone beforehand.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
after? Looks like it could easily double or
triple the size of each binary package?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
bject line from last week didn't seem encouraging:
Subject: Pause /usr-merge moves
See https://lists.debian.org/20231201210412.ga1344...@subdivi.de
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
p.debian.org and ftp.fr.debian.org and whatever
is happening is clearly not a problem on the mirror side…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e8704a63e54a93e84b985ccd4a and does
exhibit the problem you're mentioning (and it's normal for older images
to behave that way).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it here for now:
>
> $ cat /etc/default/raspi-extra-cmdline
> TZ=:Europe/Berlin nofb nomodeset cma=0
If you don't want to verify a proposed solution to the needs you
expressed, I suppose this bug report can be closed?
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://deb
et this instead:
>
> [0.00] Memory: 479104K/507904K available (8192K kernel code, 990K
> rwdata
> , 2024K rodata, 1024K init, 252K bss, 28800K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
Sounds like you want CMA=0M then?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
sig
Control: severity -1 important
Cyril Brulebois (2023-10-31):
> Nilesh Patra (2023-10-31):
> > Since this means it is a flaky test and a recurring problem, would it
> > make sense to skip those tests to save some cycles for debci?
>
> I didn't say I was certain, quite the o
Control: severity -1 important
Cyril Brulebois (2023-10-31):
> Nilesh Patra (2023-10-31):
> > Since this means it is a flaky test and a recurring problem, would it
> > make sense to skip those tests to save some cycles for debci?
>
> I didn't say I was certain, quite the o
installer,
and/or the installed system.
Anyway, a copy of installer logs is available under /var/log/installer/
in the installed system.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.
installer,
and/or the installed system.
Anyway, a copy of installer logs is available under /var/log/installer/
in the installed system.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.
package:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/amd64/list-cd/debian-12.2.0-amd64-netinst.list.gz
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
package:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current/amd64/list-cd/debian-12.2.0-amd64-netinst.list.gz
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
101 - 200 of 30769 matches
Mail list logo
