Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: SO == Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com writes: SO I believe you forgot to set whenisgood to use timezones :-) My understanding is that you have to log in in order to set your timezone, or that choosing a timezone was something the

Re: boost 1.47.0

2011-07-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hi there, in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost 1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the packaging, so it is ready for scratch builds, smoke testing, and related fun.

Re: Thunderbird F15 Update

2011-07-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 07/21/2011 04:33 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Seems like this is still broken though. I still see 3.1.11 in updates. I think it is due to the fact that there hasn't been a push for a few days. I'll wait for a push before raising hell. What he said. It's been retagged, but without a push

Re: Google Earth

2011-07-19 Thread Jon Ciesla
Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth. It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it: /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin:

Re: on /etc/sysconfig

2011-07-18 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, 2011/7/18 Neal Becker

Re: nonresponsive package maintainer (gget)

2011-07-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes: Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629 Is there any one interested in taking over this package? If not, what is the procedure for dealing with it? (The

Re: rpm builds failing with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found

2011-07-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Rex Dieter wrote: Panu Matilainen wrote: FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which causes legitimate specs to fail with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found errors. This happens when recursively included directories in %files are marked with trailing /, eg

Re: rpm builds failing with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found

2011-07-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: Panu Matilainen wrote: FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which causes legitimate specs to fail with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found errors. This happens when recursively included directories in %files

Re: Roundcube Webmail

2011-07-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Daniel Devine wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:51:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: It's a matter of PHP versions. However, I'll check and see if the php53 stack has enough of the proper packages available to make the new version work. Just thought I'd let you know that Roundcube 0.5 works

Re: Roundcube Webmail

2011-07-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
that it is actually well maintained in Fedora by the same maintainer - Jon Ciesla. Is there a reason the package is so old? If it is a matter of testing then I am happy to help! It's a matter of PHP versions. However, I'll check and see if the php53 stack has enough of the proper packages

Re: Orphaning gnet2

2011-06-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
I orphaned the gnet2 package as workrave does not depend on it anymore. Feel free to take it - especially if your package depends on it. Even better would be to drop it as upstream is dead and GIO should be used instead. However these packages still depend on it in Rawhide:

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Lun 27 juin 2011 15:12, Miloslav Trmač a écrit : Placing trust in the manufacturer of the hardware puts the user in no worse position than they were before. I don't call placing absolute vetting power in bios writer hands no

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote: I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote viewer's perspective. Also

Re: Any takers for package stardict...

2011-06-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
i want to relinquish ownership. Any takers for package stardict. Though not offically a comaintainer, Jens has been active on it recently and might be a good candidate. -J Thanks regards Naveen Kumar -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 06/22/2011 03:01 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: Outside that, is there any other impact? Does tboot perform any verification of the kernels, and if so how is that configured? Is the expectation that an install configured with TXT will only boot trusted kernels, and if so what mechanism is used

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
Miloslav Trmač mitr at volny.cz writes: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:21 PM, JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com wrote: ... Will the TPM allow a third party remote access to the machine ? Absolutely not. You are wrong here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module ... Overview ...

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:30 PM, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote: Miloslav Trmač mitr at volny.cz writes: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:21 PM, JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com wrote: ... Will the TPM allow a third party remote access to the machine ? Absolutely not. You are wrong here.

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
xcowsay I'll take this too. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading of binary code that ran on the host CPU, but it seems that there'll shortly be systems

Re: [OT] numpy 1.6 on fedora 15

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
A little OT perhaps, but would installation of numpy1.6 onto fedora15 be expected to break anything? Hard to say. Lots of things depend on it, but most things have an unversioned requires. You'd probably want to rebuild the SRPM on F15 to minimize breakage. -J -- devel mailing list

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. To try and minimize the problems this could

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
I'll take atop too. -J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 07:12:56 AM Paul Howarth wrote: I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer ownership. Think carefully before

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer ownership. Think carefully before you act though! Dead Upstream: == Well, not

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 06/15/2011 01:37 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer ownership. Think carefully before you act though

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
15.06.2011, 21:37, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net: My only concern is that there be a command-line replacement available. šI currently fetch my ISOs with bittorrent-curses and screen. šCan someone with experience with any of them offer a recommendation? šPython, C and C++ clients especially

Re: Review Swaps

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy gnome-shell theme This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name. ~tom

Re: OpenBUGS program has a pre-compiled )S library from MS Windows. Any possibility to package it?

2011-06-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined person, it is worth knowing that Bayesian Updating with Gibbs Sampling (BUGS) has

Re: Request for removal of package from Fedora repositories: dasher.x86_64

2011-06-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
nodata wrote: Hello, dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12. The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed. dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go fullscreen. What's the procedure to get the package removed? Thanks. Ref:

Re: Orphaning my packages...

2011-06-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
Truch, Matthew wrote: I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them and I'll release them to you. kst -- A data viewing program for KDE A great program for plotting data (especially live

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Lubomir Rintel

2011-05-31 Thread Jon Ciesla
Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:

Re: orphaning 20

2011-05-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Orcan Ogetbil wrote: - frescobaldi: lilypond editor. - rumor: Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR. required by frescobaldi. has 1 open FTBFS bug #704535. I proposed a patch for the bug in the bugzilla. I took these, since I maintain lilypond. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in

Re: without selinux

2011-05-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
cornel panceac wrote: hello, can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux. I don't know. I'm not sure why you'd want to, what do you have in mind? Why Disabled or Permissive insufficient? -J -- in

Re: without selinux

2011-05-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Michael Cronenworth wrote: cornel panceac wrote: can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux. Define remove. If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to Disabled. If

Re: without selinux

2011-05-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Michael Cronenworth wrote: cornel panceac wrote: ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove selinux\* policy\*. one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.

Re: without selinux

2011-05-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
cornel panceac wrote: 2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com mailto:m...@cchtml.com cornel panceac wrote: ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove selinux\* policy\*. one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the

Re: How to undo a build

2011-05-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I made a build with a wrong spec file (shame on me) and I've untagged the builds but when I wan to run fedpkg build, it outputs: Could not initiate build: UpTools-8.5.5-1.fc16 has already been built Is there a way to undo or drop the build and do it again? Thanks

Re: Review Request/Review Swaps Request for writetype, pyttsx, python-timelib

2011-05-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Prabin Kumar Datta wrote: Hi! Currently, more then 3 of my packages are under review request. And 4+ packages are already packaged but not submitted for review since the dependency packages are not reviewed till now (or some other issues). My packages under review: 1. python-timelib [1] -

Re: Orphaned python-alsa

2011-05-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
Ok, thanks! Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: I just means anybody who would like to take this package should recognize that it is such a minor package that few people would ever install it. Robin On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote: Without doing any research

Re: Orphaned python-alsa

2011-05-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Without doing any research (since it's Sunday and I'm tired) does this mean it is no longer needed, or that you won't be maintaining it and someone else probably should if they're so inclined? -J On 05/15/2011 02:33 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: Not required by any package other than

Re: Thunderbird updates mixed up in F14

2011-05-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Rather find and fix the bug that is the cause of this. There have been a few updates like that recently, again. The 3.1.10-1.fc14 package is tagged dist-f14-updates already: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=241265 So,

Re: Retiring perl-Text-Aspell

2011-04-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jerry James wrote: I would like to invoke the EOL process for perl-Text-Aspell in Rawhide. I will continue to maintain it in Fedora through the F-15 lifecycle, and in EPEL through the EPEL 6 lifecycle. The package is already semi-crippled in EPEL 6, since only the aspell-en and aspell-sk

Re: A whatuses command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jeff Garzik wrote: A humble, basic question for you experts... Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? Must be able to find packages which are not installed on the current system. Thanks,

Re: The future of FTBFS?

2011-04-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Matt Domsch wrote: As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a see, it _can_ be done lark. I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the process,

Re: The future of FTBFS?

2011-04-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote: I think FTBFS has been valuable. But of course! Sure, I get the occasional why are you filling my mailbox with this message, [...] Wow. Unbelievable. How dare you provide me with helpful

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

2011-04-06 Thread Jon Ciesla
Petr Machata wrote: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.

Re: Orphaning Package

2011-04-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
Mike McGrath wrote: Hey all, I'm doing a horrible horrible job of maintaining my packagegs, some of which people actually use. Please pick up what you can if you're interested. Here's the list: cacti I've taken cacti. perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 perl-Date-Pcalc perl-File-RsyncP

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: nucleo wrote: There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj: e_dbus ecore edje eet efreet embryo enlightenment epeg epsilon evas ewl freeciv Took freeciv. Also, if none of the co-maintainers of SDL_(net,ttf,image,mixer) want to own

Wordpress(-mu): Big changes coming

2011-03-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hi, Wordpress maintainer here. In order to protect against two CVEs*, I'm upgrading Wordpress in all releases to 3.1. In addition, this will obsolete wordpress-mu, since this functionality has been migrated to the main wordpress release as of wordpress 3.0, and wordpress-mu has been

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
nucleo wrote: There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj: e_dbus ecore edje eet efreet embryo enlightenment epeg epsilon evas ewl freeciv Took freeciv. Also, if none of the co-maintainers of SDL_(net,ttf,image,mixer) want to own them, I'll take them. -J

Re: Guile 2.0.0

2011-03-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said: Suggestions? Do we want to keep this in a special rawhide koji target for now? GnuCash, at least, does not support Guile 2.0 out of the box. We'd have to run a patched version. (Not sure why it didn't show up in

Re: best practices packaging web applications

2011-03-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
? I'm considering zarafa, xinha and wordpress. Thanks. -- Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org mailto:ism...@olea.org Planeta OLEA Hi, I'm Jon Ciesla, I maintain a number of web application packages for Fedora, including drupal, moodle, gallery2, and wordpress. First off, zarafa, zinha

Re: best practices packaging web applications

2011-03-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:34 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: And, what «best practices» would you recommend to review, at least in the form of current packages? I'm considering zarafa, xinha and wordpress. Thanks. Hi, I'm Jon Ciesla, I maintain a number of web

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal

2011-02-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 02/23/2011 04:26 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: libsigc++ TnL requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 TnL requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 asc requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 asc requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 libasync requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 qtel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers don't want them. Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead. Bill If he wants to orphan it, I will. -J -- in your fear

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Orion Poplawski wrote: On 02/07/2011 02:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: 38K snipped I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers don't want them. -J Please trim the quoted messages in your replies. Noted, sorry. I noticed right after hitting send. -J

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As you can see, there

Re: packing an rpm without source code?

2011-01-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
Erik Blankinship wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com mailto:athma...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/24/2011 05:36 AM, Erik Blankinship wrote: Can someone point me at an example of how to package a fedora python rpm without the source code

Re: packing an rpm without source code?

2011-01-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
Erik Blankinship wrote: You can't, it's against packaging guidelines See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Source_files While I appreciate and would like to respect the guidelines, is it technically possible to create a python rpm

Re: Updating waf to 1.6

2011-01-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
-- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, speak only love -d. bowie On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Thomas Moschny wrote: Hi, just to let you know that I am going to update waf to 1.6.2 in rawhide and el-6. waf 1.6 is not fully compatible with 1.5. A migration guide is available here [1]. The

Re: Updating waf to 1.6

2011-01-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
-- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, speak only love -d. bowie On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Thomas Moschny wrote: Hi, just to let you know that I am going to update waf to 1.6.2 in rawhide and el-6. waf 1.6 is not fully compatible with 1.5. A migration guide is available here [1].

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

2011-01-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:47 PM, susmit shannigrahi thinklinux@gmail.com mailto:thinklinux@gmail.com Nice, thanks. Given the size of the wiki, I am surprised that there is no documentation in this regard. I have started one:

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

2011-01-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
-- in your fear, seek only peace in your fera, speak only love -d. bowie On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 05:57:52PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:31:07AM -0700, susmit shannigrahi wrote: This software (gnumed-server, which is not yet

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

2011-01-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
-- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, speak only love -d. bowie On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: JC == Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes: JC I can't recall at the moment where this stems from, but the JC rationale, as I recall, was that we can never be sure

Re: [HEADS-UP] MySQL 5.5 coming soon to rawhide

2011-01-06 Thread Jon Ciesla
Tom Lane wrote: Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes: So should simply patching to call mysql_thread_end instead should do the trick? Right. regards, tom lane I'll give that a whirl, thanks! J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only

Re: [HEADS-UP] MySQL 5.5 coming soon to rawhide

2011-01-06 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes: So should simply patching to call mysql_thread_end instead should do the trick? Right. regards, tom lane I'll give that a whirl, thanks! J That did

Re: [HEADS-UP] MySQL 5.5 coming soon to rawhide

2011-01-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
Tom Lane wrote: Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net writes: Tom Lane wrote: I got tired of the amount of visible churn in exported-symbols-you're- not-supposed-to-use. The new release will use a linker --version-script to hide everything except the documented API functions. This might

Re: [HEADS-UP] MySQL 5.5 coming soon to rawhide

2011-01-03 Thread Jon Ciesla
Tom Lane wrote: Since MySQL AB^W^WSun^WOracle has now declared the mysql 5.5.x release series to be GA status, I'm planning to push it into rawhide shortly to replace the 5.1.x series. Theoretically, this will go pretty smoothly. I'm aware of a couple of ABI-level issues: 1.

Re: Orphaning packages

2010-12-30 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 12/30/2010 5:31 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 12/29/2010 08:04 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: Johan Cwiklinski wrote: Hi, I'm going to orphan following packages: - BackupPC ([1], [2], [3], [4]) - childsplay ([5], [6]) - gcompris (several open bugs, see [7]) - homebank ([8], [9]) - php-pear

Re: Orphaning packages

2010-12-29 Thread Jon Ciesla
Johan Cwiklinski wrote: Hi, I'm going to orphan following packages: - BackupPC ([1], [2], [3], [4]) - childsplay ([5], [6]) - gcompris (several open bugs, see [7]) - homebank ([8], [9]) - php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli (no open bugs) - php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql (no open bugs) -

Re: Broken dependency for RHEL6

2010-12-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com mailto:ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200 Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com mailto:pro...@gmail.com wrote: That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for

Re: orphaning packages

2010-12-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
LinuxDonald wrote: I?m orphaning this packages because i don?t use fedora since months and i don?t will come back to fedora: bullet cycle openal-soft teeworlds I grabbed teeworlds and cycle, it looks like bullet is owned by someone rmattes. Does one of the openal-soft comaintainers want

Re: Broken dependency for RHEL6

2010-12-19 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, I am receiving the following email from Koji: fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6. noarch requires

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Matt Domsch wrote: I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. The lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3 exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as well, so they

Re: Questions about Fusion Linux

2010-10-19 Thread Jon Ciesla
TK009 wrote: I got an email this morning from the Fusion Linux group. In it, the group lead suggested this to one of his users - Fusion 14 betais based on Fedora 14 which isn't released yet so there could be number of bugs that haven't been fixed yet. I suggest you report the bug via fedora

Re: process to use when missed a patch addition

2010-10-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
David Timms wrote: Hi, new to git, and while following the conversion guide [1], I missed the fact that I had added a new patch, but not added it to git. So the build failed. I have now: git add x.patch I'm not sure what is correct procedure to attempt rebuild with the included patch: 1.

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/23/2010 02:21 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jon Mastersjonat...@jonmasters.org wrote: On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieterrdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I know its

Re: Bundle a newer version of a python library for a point release?

2010-08-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/20/2010 01:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:58:24 -0700 Jesse Keatingjkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote: Here is the situation. In EPEL6 we'd like to ship Trac 0.12. This is the latest upstream release and since upstream tends to do db format changes between releases we'd

Re: Staying close to upstream

2010-08-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/13/2010 10:47 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: No. No SIG's have any authority whatsoever over individual package maintainers outside the packages the team maintains. No one needs to comply with your requirements. That's exactly Fedora's organizational problem. KDE

Re: Staying close to upstream

2010-08-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/13/2010 12:05 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jon Ciesla wrote: My understanding of the SIG concept was that they were groups of people who were self-organizing around a particular theme to further that theme in Fedora, i.e. Games, Live Upgrade, KDE, etc. Right, but that makes them naturally

Re: Staying close to upstream

2010-08-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/13/2010 12:23 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On Friday, August 13, 2010, 1:05:16 PM, Kevin wrote: Jon Ciesla wrote: My understanding of the SIG concept was that they were groups of people who were self-organizing around a particular theme to further that theme in Fedora, i.e. Games, Live

Re: Staying close to upstream

2010-08-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/13/2010 12:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: The current approach of trying to force maintainers to accept patches simply does not work. The only reason it doesn't work is that our organizational structure is not built to make this work. Kevin Kofler I've

Re: Staying close to upstream

2010-08-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/13/2010 01:10 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Al Dunsmuir wrote: The FireFox maintainer might well be viewed as best qualified to determine which (if any) distribution-specific patches they want to support over the life of the package. If you say no, then put that maintainer in a

Re: New bodhi release in production

2010-08-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/13/2010 01:23 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: Doing so would have changed behavior and broken software that relied upon that behavior. Sounds like a great way to run the distro With that attitude, how would we ever change gcc versions in a stable release? eyeroll ;) headdesk -J

Re: Orphaning all my packages

2010-08-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/12/2010 02:25 AM, Jan Kaluza wrote: On Thursday, August 12, 2010 04:19:25 am Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Mike McGrath wrote: Luckily Remi got a list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html Unfortunately, Remi's

Re: The slip down memory lane

2010-08-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/12/2010 01:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: BN == Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com writes: BN I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we BN started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We BN

Re: The slip down memory lane

2010-08-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/12/2010 01:51 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: MM == Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com writes: MM Possibly also stop changing earlier? Not necessarily. We should certainly try to get the earth shattering changes done as early as possible (i.e. soon after branch) but I recognize that

Re: The slip down memory lane

2010-08-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/12/2010 02:14 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: On 08/12/2010 03:08 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 08/12/2010 01:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: BN == Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com writes: BN I can't help but note that the slips have

Re: The slip down memory lane

2010-08-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/12/2010 02:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: I disagree that a clockwork release schedule is required for quality, or even perceived quality. If that's the sort of metric being looked at, the user is probably best suited to RHEL, CentOS, etc. It would

Re: Orphaning all my packages

2010-08-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/11/2010 01:23 PM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 11/08/2010 19:28, Jon Ciesla a écrit : php-Smarty I'll take php-Smarty. All ownership taken, except this one. + Taken. -J -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (???) wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net mailto:l...@jcomserv.net wrote: On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/8/3 Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net mailto:l...@jcomserv.net: Also I think

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Also I think that with wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? Well, yes, probably

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Also I think that with wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged into mainline. So wouldn't it be better

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/04/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Also I think that with wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-03 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/8/3 Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net: Also I think that with wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? Well, yes, probably. That might even help with

Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds. If someone familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to make sure the changes don't break anything and let me know, what would be wonderful and

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

2010-08-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:  In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds.  If someone familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to make sure

Re: The move to git!

2010-07-30 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 7/29/2010 10:55 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using for our package specs, patches, and source files. This has

Re: The move to git!

2010-07-30 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 07/30/2010 03:02 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 7/29/2010 10:55 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using for our package

Re: I am not available

2010-07-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 07/21/2010 01:35 AM, Till Maas wrote: Hi, I want to thank everyone for their get well wishes. I am already a lot better than I was when I wrote the initial mail and have full internet access again. The mail might have been a little premature, but this is what happens if one has access to

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >