On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:37:00AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It's also been a long time since I've seen any benefit.
>
> Can anyone summarise quickly why delta RPMs don't work? It seems like
> they "obviously" should be possible, because there must be a lot of
> commonality in the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:18:23AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:48 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a
> > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...
> >
> >
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 05:13:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 04:44:31PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > So do we kill it for:
> >
> > F39/F40 and beyond?
> > F38 and beyond?
> > X-date and all releases?
>
> My normal response would be... well, I missed the F38
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:25:15AM -0600, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submitted a scratch build of Swift to Koji for EPEL 8 and it pretty much
> immediately failed, and looking at root.log I found:
>
> DEBUG util.py:443: error: line 71: Unknown tag: %dnl Source31:
>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 02:27:47PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:45:49AM +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 21-02-2023 21:04, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I hope you can make our next meeting (thursdays at 18UTC in
> > #fedora-meeting-3)
>
> The meeting is at 16:00 UTC. ;)
Oops. Sorry, you are of course correct.
kevin
sign
Greetings.
As some of you may know, our fedora_koji volume is hitting up against
some limits (namely the netapp 100TB per volume limit). If it hits 100TB
used, the netapp folks tell me it will go offline and we will need to do
special things to free up any space and get it working again.
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for +1s from sysadmin-main/releng for:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1329
basically this just re-enables the daily automated pushing that bodhi
normally does. We used to disable this during freezes because we didn't
want it to push the frozen
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:48:06PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a
> priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...
>
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 06:17:26PM +, Zee Ban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> irc handle: zeeb180
>
> I don't have much experience, as I've only been using Linux for the past
> month or so and would like to further better my skills. This is my first time
> working in an open-source community so this
Greetings.
We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 38
Beta release. This is a pre release freeze.
We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to
release the Fedora 38 Beta when it's available.
You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by
Greetings.
We are running into some anoying limits on koji builds of chromium.
First, since a long time ago, the koji.service file we are using has:
TasksMax=infinity
But yet, chromium was failing, seemingly hitting a task limit.
"ninja: fatal: posix_spawn: Resource temporarily unavailable"
in
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
> > build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
> >
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 01:33:33PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-02-19 12:30, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > > - You mention "over the course of two releases" but don't
> > mention what
> > > is done in each one?
> >
> > I don't know the specifics of how package
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:07:29PM +0200, David Sastre wrote:
> Hello and apologies for resurrecting an old thread.
And now I am posting to it again, so likewise appologies.
> I was looking for information regarding IMA in F37 and found it was asked
> but I could not see any replies.
> My
Thanks for working on this! Overall I like it and am in favor... just a
few questions:
- What Fedora release(es) are you targeting here?
- You mention "over the course of two releases" but don't mention what
is done in each one?
- If this was approved for say f39, couldn't we enable this now
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 06:30:39PM +0100, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> I reviviced a retired package (rpms/smide) by the process below.
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11281
>
> Then when I added a new commit to rebase on the rawhide branch, and
> build, I got the following error by `fedpkg
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
> > maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the ticket.
>
> As far as I know, you can't
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:04:05AM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> In Rawhide (fc39) and the beta branch (fc38), with all updates applied, I'm
> seeing all menu icons are gone in Xfce... both the system menu and
> right-click context menus.
>
> Seems the Settings Tab in Settings->Appearance now has
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:23:13PM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
>
> Yep. Lovely. Getting Microsoft and Google to fix this should be easy (ok,
> not really).
I read somewhere that google has already updated things internally, it's
just going thru some process to publish. (I can't recall where off
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 05:52:32PM +, Zee Ban wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
Hello.
> I'm currently looking to gain experience with linux, I'm a new user and have
> been using ubuntu for about a month.
>
> I would like to help with some projects and if possible, have a mentor guide
> me.
Welcome!
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:41:47AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38. Example attempts:
>
> $ sudo rpm --import https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub
> [sudo] password for scott:
> error:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 06:47:49PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 03:47 +, Reon Beon via users wrote:
> > Is it because of all the openqa testing on Rawhide?
>
> How long is a piece of string? Logically, there's two different roles,
> and therefore different sets of
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 02:19:15PM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> Way back in the day... :) livemedia-creator inherited an '--omit
> plymouth' from the boot.iso creation process. The boot.iso was changed a
> few years later, but lmc kept it. Fred noticed this and submitted
>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:01:34PM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> ssmoogen
> Current s390x status: Networking and storage on systems is not acting
> appropriately. Site admins are trying to figure out what is going on.
Everything is back up now.
Sorry for the extended outage. We will will
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 09:30:53PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 10:54 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:37:08 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > > Affected Services:
> > > >
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > > Hello team,
> > >
> > > I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-ba
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
> writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
No, branching was all completed a while back.
Can you expand on why/what happens/what
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 06:42:51AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:13 AM John Reiser wrote:
>
> > On 2/10/23 19:57, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > So I know the s390x builders are down but I have an active BZ for tests
> > failing with s390x so I figured what the heck, maybe
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:42:35PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
Hey there.
> I filed an exemption[1] for f38-backgrounds packaging review[2] as
> suggestion from desktop team on discussion last year. The spec file remains
> virtually unchanged other than an updated default
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:21:06PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 06:44:03PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fedora Linux 38 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > --rebase to pick up the new branch
>
> I know this has been
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:03:13AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> I would like to ask you about Ipsilon and its documentation. I have
> made the last significant commits to it over the past few years
> (mostly during the AAA project development), and I might be one of the
> few
Greeting everyone
Thanks to darknao, we have just enabled monitoring by default for our
OpenShift applications. Note that it will not be active until the next
run of the playbook pushes it out. I will look at running playbooks over
the next few days for most projects, but if you are an appowner
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:03:27AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:55:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I just got a VF2 as well (as in, yesterday). I'm still waiting on
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:07:16PM +, Zee Ban wrote:
> My email is zee_...@hotmail.com
ok. Can we help you with something?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says:
>
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing OS X installation, install and configure a bootloader that will
> boot Fedora."
>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:27:06PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> Thanks, but no go:
>
> bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2023-96ebcd6f4d
> Login successful!
> Traceback (most recent call last):
This may well be because those updates are in a updates push right now
and the updates are
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> It's a 1:1 copy of the update "notes" from bodhi (except re-flowed to
> fit into however many columns plain-text emails support).
> So it's "markdown", not "awful", but sometimes it's hard to see the
> difference ;)
> Not sure
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:21:03PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/31/23 11:03, Maxwell G wrote:
> > On Tue Jan 31, 2023 at 15:01 +0200, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > Hi, Orion
> > > Thanks for raising this question.
> >
> > Indeed!
> >
> > > I wonder if it's possible to
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:43:18PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 3:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > I've been working on migrating things to rhel9 of late.
> > I reinstalled a staging virthost or two and found th
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a query for an opinion and a best-practice experience for a
> case when a package needs to change its internal database format
> between versions, in an environment, which does not allow real
> migration, aka the app
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:06:25PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/31/23 11:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems that Koji supports this, but it need some configuration change.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:39:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
...snip...
>
> So, I'm wondering what folks think we should do with these. We could,
> of course, just get rid of them. But perhaps they are still of value to
> someone? Is anyone still "package shopping" via
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 06:03:48PM +, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Jan 31, 2023 at 15:01 +0200, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> Hi all,
Note that some folks cc'ed are not subscribed to epel-devel, so it
probibly rejected their posts. :(
>
> > Hi, Orion
> > Thanks for raising this question.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:19:09AM +0100, Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added the package perl-generators-epel to EPEL 7/8/9. The package is
> adding the behavior provided in perl-generators-1.16.
>
> I created pull requests for epel-rpm-macros to add perl-generators-epel
> to EPEL
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> It seems that Koji supports this, but it need some configuration change. I
> have opened followup ticket here:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11254
Yeah, my first thought about this was that it might be too broad, but it
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > I found more 5 with
> > > https://koj
Greetings everyone.
I've been working on migrating things to rhel9 of late.
I reinstalled a staging virthost or two and found that while rhel8 would
allow /boot and /boot/efi to be on raid, rhel9 does not all this at all.
So, what do people do for this?
1. Just put /boot | /boot/efi on a
Planned Outage - pagure.io network devices upgrade - 2023-01-31 13:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2023-01-31 13:00 UTC
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation scheme.
Is it though? I'm probibly reading this too quickly and missing
something, but isn't the underlying problem here that nghttp2 changed
abi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:49:10PM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> TL;DR; Check if you have correct e-mail in Red Hat Bugzilla Mail field in
> Fedora Accounts [0]. Empty mail is also OK.
>
> the Red Hat Bugzilla Email field in Fedora Accounts [0] was till now ignored
> by most
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, as seen by the lenght of the packages listed in my emails,
> thsi is not always the case.
Yeah. ;(
> Some packagers do set the bugzillas to ASSIGNED to get rid of the reminders
> and then they forget to actually
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> > > packages
> > > should be retired from Fedora 38
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:45:35PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result.
> > > Nevertheless,
> > > given this would be used just
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
...snip...
> Alternately, why does an older build block a push to stable? Won't
> the old build simply be ignored if there's a higher NVR version
> around?
Nope, koji and pungi have no idea about 'older' or 'newer', they only
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:36:41PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > >
> > > I initially thought about:
> > > release bump
> >
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
> I initially thought about:
> release bump
> $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> build
> handle circular dep
> $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -r %_with_bootstrap
> build
>
> But I haven't tried it yet because I didn't
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> I found more 5 with
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
>
> 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
>
> 96474133 build
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> FYI:
>
> memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:
>
> This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
> ago (01/13)
>
> ---8<---
>
> EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n #
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
We untagged it in december, but looks like no one followed up to get
dependent packages rebuilt:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:05AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>
> Can somebody cancel the bigloo build? It's been running for several
> days and is obviously off in the weeds. I'll investigate.
Done.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:09:34AM -, Gerard Ryan wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
Hello.
> I have been helping Pedro a little with this (and will try to continue to do
> so, if I can).
Great!
> > I finally got around to trying this... and I couldn't quite get it
> > working.
> >
> > It built ok,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 08:54:54PM -, Reon Beon wrote:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
>
> If people are interested in working on it.
Always. :)
Did you have anything specific to mention, or just wanted to raise
awareness of the issue tracker?
kevin
signature.asc
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 03:25:48PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 15:54 -0600, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 22:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > My Rawhide Bodhi updates are stuck in pending, so I've checked
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 04:47:05PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 3:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > I think in practical terms that makes sense but our tools don't really help.
>
> I agree, and that seems to be an artifact of
> the single Fedora component in RHBZ, which
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:32:24AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-01-19 09:48, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The idea is that an application will put a dep on the
> > specific libvirt-daemon-driver-XXX that its functionality
> > requires. If Boxes requires storage APIs, then add a
> >
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 03:53:25AM -0700, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> Fedora Infra Team,
Hey!
> I was looking into some delays/failures on the main web properties and
> noticed a couple nodes are likely the cause. Please see
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11097 for details.
Yeah,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:04:41PM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
...snip
>
> So, what does the community think? Should we continue as is, or should
> we move to a more typical model where both debug and non-debug kernels
> are build with every build?
So yeah, I used to reboot pretty much daily
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:36:35PM -0600, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 17:13 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > all the remaining issues were solved and the bot is now processing
> > tickets as it should. I will watch the SCM request
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:36:35PM -0600, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 17:13 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > all the remaining issues were solved and the bot is now processing
> > tickets as it should. I will watch the SCM request
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 05:44:19AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 17/01/23 01:07, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > Hey folks, just a heads up that bodhi has been updated to 7.0.1 now.
> >
> Thanks for that! (and sorry for the double announce in devel-announce,
> my filters
Hey folks, just a heads up that bodhi has been updated to 7.0.1 now.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
See:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases
for a full list of bugs fixed/enhancements.
Note that this adds the concept of 'frozen' releases, which will:
* show a warning / note for
Hey folks, just a heads up that bodhi has been updated to 7.0.1 now.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
See:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases
for a full list of bugs fixed/enhancements.
Note that this adds the concept of 'frozen' releases, which will:
* show a warning / note for
Hey folks, just a heads up that bodhi has been updated to 7.0.1 now.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
See:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases
for a full list of bugs fixed/enhancements.
Note that this adds the concept of 'frozen' releases, which will:
* show a warning / note for
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 07:14:33PM +0100, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> > > > 1.
> > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/Z2RR2OE5TAQH5CVJ5VB5T3R7OM5ULYPQ/#QZUTH6DSULKYBMGPPYNZMPX7YSYKOBTT
> > > > 2.
> > > >
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:41:20AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 11:34, Jun Aruga (he / him)
> wrote:
>
> > I see one issue on HyperKitty on the Fedora project.
> >
> > Below is thread 1 and 2 for the actual thread: "RISC-V -- are we ready
> > for more, and what do we
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 04:35:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> We have thousands of systemd services in Fedora. To "just add timeouts
> to things that take too long" would mean updating them individually.
> (Or maybe only some, but we don't really know which ones.)
Sure,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:15:41PM -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
...snip...
>
> Finally, another voting member commented, this time on the re-vote
> ticket[1], again indicating that the reason for the revote is the
> misdirection in the _FORTIFY_SOURCE proposal discussion.
Just to set the
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 06:00:59PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10 2023 at 03:19:10 PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi
> wrote:
> > Is there something wrong with that approach that I am not understanding?
>
> No, I don't think you're missing anything. That should work fin
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:45:43PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> The current default is mostly arbitrary. It was just selected as a nice round
> value, in the spirit of "let's pick something large enough to be larger than
> any
> realistic process will ever need".
>
> I think
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:49:10PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 2023 topic bump. Anyone have any insight here? Are there _supposed_ to be
> message bus notifications for group remove?
I would think so, it just doesn't seem to be implemented yet.
> And is "sponsor" the right trigger for
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:31:16PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 29. 12. 22 v 10:41 Casper napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > COPR is awesome and provides online repositories, with a perfect
> > integration in dnf.
> >
> > How about to close"https://repos.fedorapeople.org/; ? It seems very
> >
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:31:55PM -, Pedro Moura wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We had help to migrate those venus templates to pluto. :)
> The container is similar to what we have in production,
> but some blogs are responding with 404 while building pluto.
> You can check how it is here
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:11:32AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> Seems to be breaking LaTeXML's tests:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/LaTeXML?collection=f38
>
> Unfortunately koschei's query to see what else might be affected hits a
> gateway timeout:
>
>
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:11:57PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 9:09 PM Derrik Walker wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I’d like an ISO of the Latest Xfce spin for Arm64 to install under UTM on
> > Arm based Macs.
> >
>
> I guess this would mean enabling AArch64 builds for the
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 03:37:34PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 13:40, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autochangelog.html#changelog-entries-generated-from-commit-messages
> >
> > All in all a very complicated and error-prone
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:15:10PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I've been using an old review_pr.py script produced by the Fedora
> Stewardship SIG to rebuild the depedencies of a package in COPR to test
> changes/updates to packages. It's been incredibly useful. However, it
> seems that the
Hello.
(one of) the Fedora spamassassin maintainers here. I thought I'd chime
in with some information...
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:48:13AM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> On 12/19/2022 7:59 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154501
> >
> >
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:58:14AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> As you may have read in the announcement on the devel mailing list, I've
> started a change proposal about bumping Pyramid to version 2.0 for F38.
> I cross-announce here because Pyramid and its dependencies are mostly
> maintained by
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 02:37:57AM -, Benyamin Limanto wrote:
> Hello, I'm new to XFCE Fedora Spins... I'm interested in joining the SIG,
Welcome!
> is there any specific reqs that required for folk like me to joining?
There's no complex process. :) Just join the mailing list, put your
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:17:22PM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> In testing and playing with Rawhide 20221217.n.0 I found I was unable to
> install the 3rd party program bcompare (Beyond Compare) for which I am
> licensed.
>
> With their repo installed "sudo dnf install bcompare" produces the error:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:47:52PM +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
> > On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote:
> >>
> >> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
> >> I am also the upstream maintainer.
> >
> >
Just a gentle reminder that the holiday season is coming up.
Many contributors have more time to work on things,
others are spending time away with friends and family.
When you push changes during the holidays be extra aware
of anything that might cause outages or breakage that might
pull
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:38:16AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Looking at the most recent list of orphaned packages, I see there are a
> few with infra-sig listed as co-maintainer:
Thanks for looking at these.
> - python-cornice-sphinx: it was once required by Bodhi to generate docs
> about
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:59:28PM -, Ivan Font wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I go about deleting another account that is not used? I do not see any
> delete, disable or similar button. Please advise.
>
> To clarify specifically, I'm looking to delete a different account for the
> mailing lists
On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 12:04:18PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 02/12/2022 22:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 1. Packages that have been pushed stable since the last time a compose
> > succeeded (for Rawhide that's a Rawhide compose, for Branched it's a
> > Branched compose, for
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:51:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 13:21 +0800, yanq...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It seems update fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 from [1] somehow did not make
> > it to stable repository while other package in same update did. This
>
There will be an outage starting at 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-11-30 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and
There will be an outage starting at 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-11-30 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and
There will be an outage starting at 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-11-30 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and
501 - 600 of 10463 matches
Mail list logo
