On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:27:16AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
> take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
> was in this state:
> ```
> disable proxy09.fedoraproject.org
> disable
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:37:19PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 18:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > For an OTP generating app? I don't see why it would...
>
> No, for FIDO2 authentication.
https://github.com/ellerh/softfido
But not sure how usable it is. ;)
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 06:18:17PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > mobile device
>
> Requires proprietary Google services.
For an OTP generating app? I don't see why it would...
https://search.f-droid.org/?q=otp=en
are all open source,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:45:11AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
snip...
>
> I am wondering if some of these lists would be better using something like
> public inbox https://lwn.net/Articles/748184/ like sourceware is using
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/. Various announcement lists and
I messed up and didn't update eln signing at branching. ;(
This PR:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1185
should enable that and also allow me to re-sign existing builds.
+1s?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 09. 22 11:07, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership
> > would work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some
> > groups or pseudo-users, but in
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 08:32:47PM +1000, Frank Crawford wrote:
>
> The document I used
> was
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
>
> It was the only place I could find that really talked about side-tags,
> and wait-repo looks only
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 05:40:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Gadzooks, foiled by the old loophole bypass loophole defense again?!
No one expects the... :)
> No, seriously, I'm kinda assuming 'positive intent' here. It's not
> meant to catch someone trying to 'avoid' the check. More
Greetings.
Seems the latest rawhide build of libbpf bumps soname, breaking a number
of dependent packages. ;(
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2057060
According to the rawhide updates policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_rawhide
"When a
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 02:01:59PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 26/08/22 07:17, David Tardon ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >> On to, 25 elo 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> We use the python-maint pseudo-account to be the
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 08:51:13AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Given the lack of response, I tried to push the update anyway given the low
> risk of breakage due to it being header-only. Unfortunately, it turns out
> that my side-tag is gone. Documentation states:
>
> Side tags are cleaned up
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:24:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> So, I have a probably-controversial idea for a follow-up on this.
>
> Even after this sweep, we have 141 proven packagers. That's a lot of
> people who can build almost anything in Fedora.
>
> It should be possible to check
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 11:22:13AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220901.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220902.n.0
>
> = SUMMARY =
> Added images:0
> Dropped images: 7
> Added packages: 6
> Dropped packages:6
> Upgraded packages: 64
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 12:12:07PM -0500, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Troy Dawson wrote:
> > EPEL2RHEL is part of the RHEL 8 and 9 new package workflow. When a RHEL
> > maintainer wants to add a package to RHEL 8 or 9 they start a "new package
> > workflow".
So, last week I managed to break bkernel01 kernel builder (and we have
been using just 02 since then). There were 2 issues:
1. I switched rawhide to use systemd-nspawn for isolation instead of
chroot and this broke kernel builds due to (
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/140
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:16:03PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I am trying to deal with some crashing issues with the mailman. It is
> currently at 100% CPU usage with 4 cpus and about 12-16 waiting services at
> all times. I would like to increase the number of CPUs to 8. There does not
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 05:50:08PM -0400, Chris wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong, but for some reason I can no longer call
> "fedpkg -- update" on any of the repositories (el8, el7, fc36, etc).
>
> It prompts me for the password and then goes through the routine that it's
>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:50:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> I can think of I guess four options:
>
> 1. Broaden the definition of the "critical path" somehow. We could just
> write in that it includes FreeIPA functionality, I guess, though that
> seems special purpose. We
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:50:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> I can think of I guess four options:
>
> 1. Broaden the definition of the "critical path" somehow. We could just
> write in that it includes FreeIPA functionality, I guess, though that
> seems special purpose. We
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 07:38:31PM +1000, Frank Crawford wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-08-27 at 14:58 -0500, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote:
> > n 22/08/27 04:03PM, Frank Crawford wrote:
> > > While building two related new packages for EPEL9 with a
> > > chainbuild,
> > > the second one failed, however,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:30:35PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Following my comment in
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2856#comment-812870 I wrote a simple
> script to check how many users have commit rights onto some project in
> src.fp.o, but aren't (anymore) members of the `packager`
Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
'dnf clean all'.
It's not fully clear yet some of the events. ;(
The person who used to update this has moved to another group.
The SOP (standard operating procedure) for doing this update was
incorrect/out of
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:46:04AM -, Pedro Moura wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have been migrating those templates to erb files and was noticed some
> differences.
> people02.fedoraproject.org has templates for each sub-planet of fedora
> planet, but some of them are not being used in prod.
Just to chime in from a releng perspective here...
IMHO you should do builds for f38 now also (either by making a side tag
and bootstrapping them just like was done for f37, or tagging f37 builds
you need into the f38 sidetag).
While it's technically possible to push the f37 builds into
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:02:21AM -, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could I get +1s for the following Ansible patch?
> This adds the domain distro.builders (used for tiny.distro.builders for the
> Fedora Minimization Content Resolver) to the nameserver zones
Greetings.
We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 37
Beta release. This is a pre release freeze.
We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to
release the Fedora 37 Beta when it's available.
You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:07:26AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220822.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220823.n.0
...snip...
> = DROPPED IMAGES =
> Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64
> Path:
>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > > gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
> > > soversion
I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch
to nspawn.
If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this
change, please file a releng ticket and we will dig into it.
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to add a user [1] to the rpms/htslib [2] project as "admin" on
> the PACKAGE SOURCES (src.fedoraproject.org). But clicking the "Add"
> button on the "Add user" page, I got the error message below, even
> when the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:59:59PM -, Robert Weir wrote:
> I am having issues with knowing what exact URLs to use and also cannot get my
> SSO working for Fedora.
Hey Robert. Sorry to hear it.
Your subject mentions Fedora Forums... If you mean
https://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum.php
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:18:14PM -0400, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 09:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Since everyone seems postivie on this, I'll look at switching it on
> > monday and see what breaks.
>
> Does this apply just to package bu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:50:07PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Smoogen:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 05:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Kevin Fenzi:
> >
> > > Greetings everyone.
> > >
> > > Many years ago mock intr
Greetings everyone.
Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 09:51:06AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> There's been a report of queries long enough to cause a timeout in
> datagrepper:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/datagrepper/issues/467
> I don't think those queries should take so much time, and I'd like to
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 08:39:18PM -, Pedro Moura wrote:
> > The name of the blog/site? That's given by `item.feed.title`, see here:
> >
> > https://github.com/neurofedora/planet-neuroscientists/blob/master/neurosc...
> >
> > I remember we'd also looked into OpenSUSE's planet instance, which
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 08:07:52AM +, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Mark Fuller (FAS: fuller) a long-time (since 16/Verne) Fedora-user and
> packager.
> I recently made the move from being an engineering researcher who managed the
> group IT on the side to being a full-time devops
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:14:17AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/22 3:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Or just wait... I have been checking them a few times a day and
> > rebooting any that are locked up.
> How long do we have to wait? [1] has been stuck since
>
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 08:27:19PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on a package review for libphidget22 (rename of libphidget),
> but after typing in my bugzilla credentials I get the following:
>
> The method 'Bug.get' is not supported without using API keys and the the
>
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 12:10:44PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR: It seems like armv7hl koji builders are locking up, most often
> when running dnf to install the buildroot or to install dependencies.
Yeah. ;(
> I've seen many people getting hit by this issue:
>
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote:
> Hi EPEL folks,
>
> In the past couple EPEL SCo meetings, we have been discussing adding a
> new package retirement policy for EPEL packages.
That reads amusingly to me... to be clear 'new policy' not 'new packages'.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> I see 20-30% of steal time in the VM building webkit, which should mean
> the hypervisor's capacity is at/over limit :-( It would benefit from
> having more physical CPUs.
In the past, steal time has been caused by other lpars
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:55:15 +0200
> Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900
> > Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> >
> > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17:
> > > > Hmm,
> > > >
> > > > I am really sorry for this,
I'm happy to announce that We have approved several folks into the
sysadmin-main group:
nphilipp - Nils Philippsen
zlopez - Michal Konečný
ryanlerch - Ryan Lerch
This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most
everything in fedora infrastructure.
Nils is a long time
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 08:27:11AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:51 AM Tim via users
> wrote:
> >
> > This doesn't appear to lead anywhere useful
>
> There's an "Issues" tab across the top. I opened a request to update
> the link in the footer to be more direct:
>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 01:32:07PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > Could you please share a link to the existing script?
> >
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/mass_rebuild_file_bugs.py
I wonder if it's hitting a limit from bugzilla now, or perhaps a paging
issue? It definitely
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:43:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 25. 07. 22 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > 21713 builds have been tagged into f37, there is currently 1144 failed
> > > build
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 07. 22 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 21713 builds have been tagged into f37, there is currently 1144 failed
> > builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs
> >
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 05:36:03PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 17:25, Jonathan Steffan
> wrote:
>
> > Kevin & Team,
> >
> > Will there be an option to join virtually or review meeting notes?
> >
> >
> It's all virtual for Nest. You just need to register for Nest.
Yeah,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:07:54PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I put in for a 1/2 day mini hackfest for infra and releng at nest.
>
> See:
>
> https://pagure.io/flock/issue/393
>
> My thought was to collect ideas for cool things we could work on or do,
> vote on them
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 11:21:13AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> adamw noticed that we have two pages that claim to give information
> about setting up a public mirror: a wiki page[1] and a Quick Docs
> page[2] which is actually blank. This is one more than we need, so the
> question
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:45:31AM -, Pedro Moura wrote:
> Hi everyone. I was taking a look at this and trying to migrate Fedora Planet
> to pluto and have some questions.
>
> Some things in pluto are not done yet, for example getting the author is
> something marked as "to be done" in the
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Ah, It's a bit more tangled than I thought:
>
> I've somehow got an impression that the upstream release monitoring is
> not related to Fedora, but I expected the BZ bot should be.
> So I've looked for a place to report issues other
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora
37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved over to
f37. Failures can be seen
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora
37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved over to
f37. Failures can be seen
As a quick and dirty thing I took the f37-needs-rebuild list and the
f37-failed to build list and found things that were only on the
needs-rebuild list.
I then filtered out the ones we don't try and mass rebuild (shim,
kernel, grub2, etc) and the silly ones we have like Fedora-Live-Xfce
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 02:49:53PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
> >
> > Also, the signing queue is all caught up.
>
> Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:43:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Can confirm, looks all good now, thanks!
>
> BTW, I'd like to know whatever magic you did to fedora notifications.
> Because it apparently kept chugging on right through the mass rebuild,
> and is now caught up again. :)
Yeah,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
...snip...
>
> So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine.
The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
Also, the sign
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > We have had several issues in the last few days sadly.
> > I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after
> > I ha
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 04:26:28PM -, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to take over the orphaned package dnstracer.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstracer
>
> I submitted a ticket with releng for this as there was no "take" button
> present.
>
>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:21PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On 22/07/22 09:08AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure
> > on ppc64le:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
> >
> > The
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:30:14PM +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Dne 16. 07. 22 v 21:35 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > ...snip...
> > > For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a
> > > built-in tar-payload (so that the im
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:59:49AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89618509
>
> On ppc64le:
> FAIL: test-checkwrite.sh
>
> There should be a core dump associated with this failure. Is it
> possible someone with Koji access could look to
...snip...
>
> For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a
> built-in tar-payload (so that the image can work even without network
> access) based on the latest Anaconda upstream code.
What packages will be in this tar-payload?
And can you use the boot.iso to do
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> We recently did https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1840 for
> Fedora CoreOS (more background:
> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1244 ) and I'd like to
> consider applying this to all Fedora
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 08:13:23PM -, Frank R Dana Jr. wrote:
> Recently, after receiving an email notification regarding a pull request at
> src.fedoraproject.org, I attempted[1] to update the discussion via email
> reply to the notification email.
>
> That attempt was not successful.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 02:16:51AM +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 11:29 +, Allhdd Coumputer wrote:
> > Hi You can do a couple of things to solve that issue. You can check
> > the optical device cable. it may be a driver issue you can upgrade
> > your optical device's
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On 7/13/22 15:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >> Hi Fedora Devs,
> >>
> >> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Fedora Devs,
>
> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
> latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
>
> We need one for the Z13 & Z16 preload. We're waiting on one FW fix but
>
My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
to work with these large updates if at all possible.
Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
skips our CI and feedback testing area. Additionally, it's more work to
releng folks and more
I put in for a 1/2 day mini hackfest for infra and releng at nest.
See:
https://pagure.io/flock/issue/393
My thought was to collect ideas for cool things we could work on or do,
vote on them before the event and do them in most popular order.
(bar camp style).
Please do chime in here or in
crossposting to infra list to keep folks there in the loop...
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:53:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 15:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > That said, IRC is actually one of the fastest ones we can push to.
>
> Is
crossposting to infra list to keep folks there in the loop...
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:53:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 15:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > That said, IRC is actually one of the fastest ones we can push to.
>
> Is
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 09:22:48AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > [...] Let me know your thoughts. I didn't provide a link to the code
> > repository as it's currently private to Red Hat associates. But we
> > expect to opensource the project in the coming weeks. At that time
> >
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> >
> >> > That said, until then I can try and run things on
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends.
>
> Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom?
Yes. Basically
Now that everything is moved off it as far as I can tell, I am going to
take down the openshift3 cluster tomorrow. If there's something you need
it for still, please let me know asap.
It's served long and well... we installed it back in Aug of 2017, almost
5 years ago now. It's run countless
Sorry, just realized I didn't reply to this...
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 07:25:04AM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 02/07/22 21:51, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > * Are you a packager already (ie, in the packager group) and would like
> > to help us out by maintaining infra-sig packag
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 02:18:45PM +0100, David Kirwan wrote:
> I've added Prakash
> https://accounts.stg.fedoraproject.org/user/prakashmishra1598/ to the
> `sysadmin-openshift`, I'm not a sponsor for `sysadmin`, Kevin would you
> mind adding him there on staging please!
Sure. Done.
kevin
Greetings.
We were having some issues with the management interface on our primary
signing vault. The server was power cycled, but the management is still
not functioning, and now the server isn't processing signing requests
further.
Due to the US holidays there's no one on site right now, but
Greetings.
We were having some issues with the management interface on our primary
signing vault. The server was power cycled, but the management is still
not functioning, and now the server isn't processing signing requests
further.
Due to the US holidays there's no one on site right now, but
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 05:36:52PM -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Saturday, July 2, 2022 2:51:02 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * Are you a packager already (ie, in the packager group) and would like
> > to help us out by maintaining infra-sig packages? Let me know if so!
>
>
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 11:36 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >
> > Am 03.07.22 um 10:46 schrieb Benson Muite:
> > > Maybe there are contributors where the working week is Sunday-Thursday?
> >
> > I feel, Fedora's leadership has
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 03.07.22 um 04:02 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> > On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 8:52 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> > wrote:
> > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > > > The e-mail address reaches nowhere
> > > or actually, does it still work?
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 05:31:13PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Saturday, July 2, 2022 3:11:44 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 11:54:17AM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 2, 2022 10:01:18 AM CDT Micha
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 11:54:17AM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Saturday, July 2, 2022 10:01:18 AM CDT Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > This is an extremely common problem in Fedora: the de facto maintainer
> > is not the main admin, and so the bugs are assigned to the wrong
> > person.
Hello everyone.
As a bit of background, we setup a packaging group a long time back
called 'infra-sig'. This group was so we could collectively maintain
packages that are needed/used in Fedora Infrastructure and make sure
that packages we use aren't maintained by one team member who may move
on
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:10:17PM +0100, David Kirwan wrote:
> haha looks like we've been living under a rock the pair of us.. the
> migration is fully complete, including the data? aha!
Yes, we are all done now. ;)
I even scaled fas2 / old accounts down to 0 yesterday and so far nothing
as
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 04:48:38PM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 28/06/22 01:59, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > review-stats
> >
> > ^ just cronjobs, fedora:36
> >
> Should I change the Dockerfile to use 'platform:f36' as base image?
Naw. Thats just the output f
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:03:24AM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote:
>
>
> On 28. 06. 22 1:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > ...snip...
> > toddlers
> > PRETTY_NAME="Alpine Linux v3.16"
> >
> >
> Not sure where this is coming from. The Dockerfile[0]
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 03:36:58PM +0100, lejeczek via users wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> Where do we report missing "components" in Bugzilla.
>
> I'm looking to file a BZ for R-core but there is no "R" nor "R-core" neither
> in Fedora nor in EPEL.
>
> many thanks, L.
There is a R component, just
I whipped up a brute force little script and ran it on our staging
openshift 4 cluster. It just gets all running pods and does oc rsh into
each and looks at /etc/os-release. For a few of these that aren't
running yet in stg, I looked at prod (like toddlers).
Here's the results and some comments
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:19:51AM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote:
> Is the automatic deployment from GitHub by webhook still an issue or was
> this solved?
You mean https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10603 ?
Not yet, but I will try and do that this week...
kevin
signature.asc
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 08:52 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:47:33PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 20, 2022 10:02:00 AM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 05:45:49PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ok. So we are down to:
>
> elections - moved in stg, but it crashes there. Bcotton was going to
> look, but he's dealing with a family emergency. Is anyone else able to
> take a look at it? It looks like it jus
ok. So we are down to:
elections - moved in stg, but it crashes there. Bcotton was going to
look, but he's dealing with a family emergency. Is anyone else able to
take a look at it? It looks like it just doesn't start processing fast
enough and openshift kills it.
fedocal - moved in stg, but
701 - 800 of 10463 matches
Mail list logo
