Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

2024-02-19 Thread Mario Loffredo
nd that's fine.)" Best, Mario Il 05/02/2024 15:35, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto: Hi All, After some prolonged discussion, the chairs will now close this working group last call that should have ended 11 December 2023. We have had comments and approval during WGLC from 4 workin

[weewx-user] Re: Since I upgrade to the 5.0.1 version : NO_PUBKEY E788768B9CB16E10

2024-02-19 Thread Mario Wesolek
https://weewx.com/docs/4.10/debian.htm Reimport the Key Valerian Mezieres schrieb am Montag, 19. Februar 2024 um 11:07:34 UTC+1: > Hello > I Have been using Weewx on a raspberry pi 3 model B rev 1.2 for several > years, and it works well for me. > But since I upgraded to version 5.0.1, I got

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1977660] Re: Power settings have no effect and offer nonexisting options

2024-02-18 Thread Mario Limonciello
This should be fixed in Noble in power-profiles-daemon 0.20. ** Changed in: power-profiles-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to power-profiles-daemon in Ubuntu.

Refine the firmware-updates exception

2024-02-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
and delete the new page. Thanks! -- Mario Limonciello supe...@ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2036737] Re: Enable dynamic boost control in ccp kernel driver

2024-02-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Changed in: linux-oem-6.5 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036737 Title: Enable dynamic boost control in ccp kernel

Re: How to send a bhyve vm totally in background,suppressing any message produced by the bhyve script that I use.

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Marietto
,virtio-9p,sharename=/ \ -s 30,xhci,tablet \ -s 31,lpc \ -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI_CODE.fd \ vm0:19/dev/null 2>&1 & if test -f nohup.out; then rm -r nohup.out fi very thanks for your help. On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:46 AM Mario Marietto wrote: > Errata c

Re: How to send a bhyve vm totally in background,suppressing any message produced by the bhyve script that I use.

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Marietto
o suppress it ? thanks. On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:36 AM Mario Marietto wrote: > This is how looks mine script after having applied your suggestions : > > nohup /usr/bin/bhyve -S -c sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2 -m 8G -w -H -A \ > -s 0,hostbridge \ > -s > 1,virtio-blk,/mnt/zroot2/zroot

Re: How to send a bhyve vm totally in background,suppressing any message produced by the bhyve script that I use.

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Marietto
arietto:/bhyve # ps ax | grep bhyve 20220 1 S+ 0:00.00 grep bhyve On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:18 AM Aryeh Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 7:05 PM Mario Marietto > wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > I want to boot a bhyve vm that does not produce any erro

How to send a bhyve vm totally in background,suppressing any message produced by the bhyve script that I use.

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Marietto
n't want it. Someone can help me to refine the script ? thanks. -- Mario.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053207] Re: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
It's marked failed to upload on all architectures right now: INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0-dev_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 I guess that

[Bug 2053207] Re: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
It's marked failed to upload on all architectures right now: INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0-dev_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 I guess that

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2053207] Re: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
It's marked failed to upload on all architectures right now: INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0-dev_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 I guess that

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: add panel_power_savings sysfs entry to eDP connectors

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
ready are? I think the intention is for the PPD to be that daemon. Mario can elaborate. Some more details and screenshots on how the PPD is expected to work and look: https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-manage-power-profiles-over-d-bus-with-power-profiles-daemon-on-linux Right, thanks! The most

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: add panel_power_savings sysfs entry to eDP connectors

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
ready are? I think the intention is for the PPD to be that daemon. Mario can elaborate. Some more details and screenshots on how the PPD is expected to work and look: https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-manage-power-profiles-over-d-bus-with-power-profiles-daemon-on-linux Right, thanks! The most

[PATCH] drm/amd: Drop abm_level property

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
Suggested-by: Harry Wentland Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello -- Cc: Hamza Mahfooz Cc: Sun peng (Leo) Li --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 8 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 14 ---

[PATCH] drm/amd: Drop abm_level property

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
Suggested-by: Harry Wentland Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello -- Cc: Hamza Mahfooz Cc: Sun peng (Leo) Li --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 8 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 14 ---

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/16/2024 09:41, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 16:12 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/16/2024 09:05, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2024-02-16 09:47, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:42 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/16/2024 08:38, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:07

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/16/2024 09:41, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 16:12 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/16/2024 09:05, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2024-02-16 09:47, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:42 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/16/2024 08:38, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:07

Key usage of ECC keys on PKCS#15 smartcards doesn't allow decryption?

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Haustein via Gnupg-devel
for decryption, too. Is it likely that the `derive` check was just forgotten at this place? I cannot judge the consequences of this change, which is the reason for asking here in advance. Many thanks in advance for reviewing my thoughts. Kind regards -- Mario Haustein Facharbeit

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/16/2024 09:05, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2024-02-16 09:47, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:42 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/16/2024 08:38, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:07 schrieb Mario Limonciello: By exporting ABM to sysfs it's possible that DRM master

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/16/2024 09:05, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2024-02-16 09:47, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:42 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/16/2024 08:38, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:07 schrieb Mario Limonciello: By exporting ABM to sysfs it's possible that DRM master

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/16/2024 08:38, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:07 schrieb Mario Limonciello: By exporting ABM to sysfs it's possible that DRM master and software controlling the sysfs file fight over the value programmed for ABM. Adjust the module parameter behavior to control who control ABM

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/16/2024 08:38, Christian König wrote: Am 16.02.24 um 15:07 schrieb Mario Limonciello: By exporting ABM to sysfs it's possible that DRM master and software controlling the sysfs file fight over the value programmed for ABM. Adjust the module parameter behavior to control who control ABM

[PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
introduce a Kconfig option that allows distributions to choose the default policy that is appropriate for them. Fixes: f97e4303da16 ("drm/amd/display: add panel_power_savings sysfs entry to eDP connectors") Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- Cc: Hamza Mahfooz Cc: Harry Wentland Cc

[PATCH] drm/amd: Only allow one entity to control ABM

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
introduce a Kconfig option that allows distributions to choose the default policy that is appropriate for them. Fixes: f97e4303da16 ("drm/amd/display: add panel_power_savings sysfs entry to eDP connectors") Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- Cc: Hamza Mahfooz Cc: Harry Wentland Cc

scd: ambiguous certificate IDs for pkcs#15 certificates

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Haustein via Gnupg-devel
STRING (2 bytes): 10 30 SEQUENCE (6 bytes) 04 OCTET STRING (1 byte): 02 . 01 BOOLEAN (1 byte): true A1 Context 1 (12 bytes) 30 SEQUENCE (10 bytes) 30 SEQUENCE (8 bytes) 04 OCTET STRING (6 bytes): 3F 00 01 03 02 03 ?. ``` Kind regards -- Mario Haustein

[regext] jscontact-tools

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Loffredo
those features. Any feedback is appreciated. Best, Mario -- Dott. Mario Loffredo Senior Technologist Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Web:http

Re: Bug#1062678: amd64-microcode: Package upstream's amdtee dir in amd64-microcode?

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 12:39, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: While adding linux-firmware's amdtee/ directory to the Debian amd64-microcode package, I have noticed that the linux-firmware WHENCE file mentions a symbolic link that is not present in the git repository. The missing symlink is:

[PATCH] drm/amd: Change `jpeg_v4_0_5_start_dpg_mode()` to void

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
eg: add support for jpeg DPG mode") Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_5.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_5.c index 3602738874ee.

[weewx-user] Re: Repository Error

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Wesolek
https://weewx.com/docs/4.10/debian.htm Reimport the Key Dave McCreath schrieb am Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2024 um 22:16:53 UTC+1: > Hi > > Weewx installed on a RPI 4 (Debian - Bullseye), version 5.0.1, working > fine, no issues. > > Just tried to update to version 5.0.2 via sudo apt update &&

Re: files/edd962f76ea4b5869f3c6f8ee5438fb9750b802d02bb8035fe1b7bd0a8ba7401.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Marietto
Hello. What's the correct port tree for FreeBSD 12.04 for arm 32 bit ? A or B ? A) https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/snapshot/ports-12.4-eol.tar.gz B) https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/snapshot/ports-release/12.4.0.tar.gz thanks. On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:34 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Ma

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] fbcon: Defer console takeover for splash screens to first switch

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
e Kconfig. Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970069 Cc: Mario Limonciello Signed-off-by: Daniel van Vugt --- drivers/video/console/Kconfig| 12 + drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c | 44 +--- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff -

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 12:47, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:20:56PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 12:47, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:20:56PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 12:47, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:20:56PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 12:47, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:20:56PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID

Bug#1062678: amd64-microcode: Package upstream's amdtee dir in amd64-microcode?

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 12:39, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: While adding linux-firmware's amdtee/ directory to the Debian amd64-microcode package, I have noticed that the linux-firmware WHENCE file mentions a symbolic link that is not present in the git repository. The missing symlink is:

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector

Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/14/2024 17:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:57:54PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: add panel_power_savings sysfs entry to eDP connectors

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 11:54, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2024-02-02 11:20, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/2/2024 09:28, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: We want programs besides the compositor to be able to enable or disable panel power saving features. However, since they are currently only configurable through DRM

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: add panel_power_savings sysfs entry to eDP connectors

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 11:54, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2024-02-02 11:20, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/2/2024 09:28, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: We want programs besides the compositor to be able to enable or disable panel power saving features. However, since they are currently only configurable through DRM

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 08:01, Jani Nikula wrote: On Sat, 10 Feb 2024, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector to indicate

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/15/2024 08:01, Jani Nikula wrote: On Sat, 10 Feb 2024, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector to indicate

Re: [Flying-squirrel-members] Buying kitchen equipment from Anyone's

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Savastano
This sounds doable to me, but as I have officially been the treasurer for less than three weeks, I’d like people’s approval/input regarding this issue prior to handing over the check. Are we all onboard with this? Anything I need to be aware of and/or deal with? Mario On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049758] Re: DP connection swap to break eDP behavior on AMD 7735U

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
Internal team at AMD has tested an OEM RMB that doesn't need the DP swap change to check for any potential regression. They tested using OEM 6.5-1014 kernel. This testing well. Anson will confirm results on the system needing DP swap after he's back from holiday. -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051636] Re: AMD phoenix/phoenix2 platforms facing amdgpu(PHX) hangs during stress loading

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
Internal team at AMD has tested across a number of different OEM PHX systems using OEM 6.5-1014 kernel. This is testing well. ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-firmware in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2046853] Re: Power Profiles daemon should change multiple drivers

2024-02-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/power-profiles-daemon/0.20-1 ** Changed in: power-profiles-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to power-profiles-daemon in Ubuntu.

files/edd962f76ea4b5869f3c6f8ee5438fb9750b802d02bb8035fe1b7bd0a8ba7401.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Marietto
not found -- snapshot corrupt. I repeated the "portsnap fetch extract" command,but I always get the same error. -- Mario.

files/edd962f76ea4b5869f3c6f8ee5438fb9750b802d02bb8035fe1b7bd0a8ba7401.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Marietto
not found -- snapshot corrupt. I repeated the "portsnap fetch extract" command,but I always get the same error. -- Mario.

[PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amd: Fetch the EDID from _DDC if available for eDP

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
disable this. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_connectors.c| 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 8 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm

[PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amd: Fetch the EDID from _DDC if available for eDP

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
disable this. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_connectors.c| 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 8 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm

[PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amd: Fetch the EDID from _DDC if available for eDP

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
disable this. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_connectors.c| 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 8 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm

[PATCH v6 5/5] drm/nouveau: Use drm_edid_read_acpi() helper

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
drm_edid at the same time. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 27 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 35 + 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50

[PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amd: Fetch the EDID from _DDC if available for eDP

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
disable this. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_connectors.c| 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 8 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm

[PATCH v6 1/5] drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all drivers

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many DRM drivers (ab)use `select ACPI_VIDEO` and to avoid problems will then select all the dependencies for ACPI_VIDEO. This creates a soft dependency, but makes it very hard to use ACPI_VIDEO in DRM core. Switch everything else over to use `depends on ACPI_VIDEO` instead. Signed-off-by: Mario

[PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 109 +--- include/drm/drm_connector.h | 6 ++ include/drm/drm_edid.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b

[PATCH v6 5/5] drm/nouveau: Use drm_edid_read_acpi() helper

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
drm_edid at the same time. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 27 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 35 + 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50

[PATCH v6 2/5] drm: Stop using `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many drivers ab(use) `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to avoid dependency problems. This however makes it impossible for DRM core to be able to add a dependency on ACPI_VIDEO. Switch users of `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to `depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello

[PATCH v6 2/5] drm: Stop using `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many drivers ab(use) `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to avoid dependency problems. This however makes it impossible for DRM core to be able to add a dependency on ACPI_VIDEO. Switch users of `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to `depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello

[PATCH v6 1/5] drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all drivers

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many DRM drivers (ab)use `select ACPI_VIDEO` and to avoid problems will then select all the dependencies for ACPI_VIDEO. This creates a soft dependency, but makes it very hard to use ACPI_VIDEO in DRM core. Switch everything else over to use `depends on ACPI_VIDEO` instead. Signed-off-by: Mario

[PATCH v6 5/5] drm/nouveau: Use drm_edid_read_acpi() helper

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
drm_edid at the same time. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 27 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 35 + 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50

[PATCH v6 5/5] drm/nouveau: Use drm_edid_read_acpi() helper

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
drm_edid at the same time. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 27 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 35 + 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50

[PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 109 +--- include/drm/drm_connector.h | 6 ++ include/drm/drm_edid.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b

[PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 109 +--- include/drm/drm_connector.h | 6 ++ include/drm/drm_edid.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b

[PATCH v6 2/5] drm: Stop using `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many drivers ab(use) `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to avoid dependency problems. This however makes it impossible for DRM core to be able to add a dependency on ACPI_VIDEO. Switch users of `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to `depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello

[PATCH v6 3/5] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 109 +--- include/drm/drm_connector.h | 6 ++ include/drm/drm_edid.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b

[PATCH v6 1/5] drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all drivers

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many DRM drivers (ab)use `select ACPI_VIDEO` and to avoid problems will then select all the dependencies for ACPI_VIDEO. This creates a soft dependency, but makes it very hard to use ACPI_VIDEO in DRM core. Switch everything else over to use `depends on ACPI_VIDEO` instead. Signed-off-by: Mario

[PATCH v6 2/5] drm: Stop using `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many drivers ab(use) `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to avoid dependency problems. This however makes it impossible for DRM core to be able to add a dependency on ACPI_VIDEO. Switch users of `select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE` to `depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE`. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello

[PATCH v6 1/5] drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all drivers

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Many DRM drivers (ab)use `select ACPI_VIDEO` and to avoid problems will then select all the dependencies for ACPI_VIDEO. This creates a soft dependency, but makes it very hard to use ACPI_VIDEO in DRM core. Switch everything else over to use `depends on ACPI_VIDEO` instead. Signed-off-by: Mario

[PATCH v6 0/5] Add support for getting EDID over ACPI to DRM

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
This series adds the ability to fetch the EDID through ACPI for laptop panels. Drivers need to opt into the behavior. In this series it's enabled by default for all eDP or LVDS panels with AMDGPU and certain panels for Nouveau. Mario Limonciello (5): drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all

[PATCH v6 0/5] Add support for getting EDID over ACPI to DRM

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
This series adds the ability to fetch the EDID through ACPI for laptop panels. Drivers need to opt into the behavior. In this series it's enabled by default for all eDP or LVDS panels with AMDGPU and certain panels for Nouveau. Mario Limonciello (5): drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all

[PATCH v6 0/5] Add support for getting EDID over ACPI to DRM

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
This series adds the ability to fetch the EDID through ACPI for laptop panels. Drivers need to opt into the behavior. In this series it's enabled by default for all eDP or LVDS panels with AMDGPU and certain panels for Nouveau. Mario Limonciello (5): drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all

[PATCH v6 0/5] Add support for getting EDID over ACPI to DRM

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
This series adds the ability to fetch the EDID through ACPI for laptop panels. Drivers need to opt into the behavior. In this series it's enabled by default for all eDP or LVDS panels with AMDGPU and certain panels for Nouveau. Mario Limonciello (5): drm: Stop using `select ACPI_VIDEO` in all

[apache/incubator-teaclave] Is DCAP actually supported? (Issue #726)

2024-02-14 Thread Mario López
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave/issues/726 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: VNC Viewer on Windows: Unable to access VMs GUI

2024-02-14 Thread Mario Marietto
> Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. > "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) > [How to ask smart questions: > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] > -- Mario.

Re: Bug#1062678: amd64-microcode: Package upstream's amdtee dir in amd64-microcode?

2024-02-13 Thread Mario Limonciello
'amdtee' is the one thing right now, but soon (TM) the IPU/NPU binaries will go to linux-firmware.git and then where do those go? My (current) thinking is to have 2 categories: - AMD CPU related - AMD GPU/graphics related Current products only put the IPU/NPU in APU chips, but who is to stay;

Bug#1062678: amd64-microcode: Package upstream's amdtee dir in amd64-microcode?

2024-02-13 Thread Mario Limonciello
'amdtee' is the one thing right now, but soon (TM) the IPU/NPU binaries will go to linux-firmware.git and then where do those go? My (current) thinking is to have 2 categories: - AMD CPU related - AMD GPU/graphics related Current products only put the IPU/NPU in APU chips, but who is to stay;

Re: [Metamath] Re: Proof generation

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Carneiro
I think mmj2 only ever uses wceq, because it "parses" formulas and using weq introduces an ambiguity into the resulting grammar. However metamath-exe's MINIMIZE will find shorter proofs using lemmas, and it treats syntax lemmas just like real lemmas, so it will "optimize" the proof to use weq. I

Re: [Metamath] Re: Proof generation

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Carneiro
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 8:40 AM Glauco wrote: > The proofs produced by mmj2 are not exactly the same, because (in my > opinion) mmj2 has a small bug in the knapsack algorithm > > IMHO, metamath.exe and mmj2 don't produce the same compressed proofs (I've > shown several examples, in the past) >

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/12/2024 10:31, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/10/2024 23:50, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops.  Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector to indicate

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/12/2024 10:31, Mario Limonciello wrote: On 2/10/2024 23:50, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops.  Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector to indicate

Re: Bug#1062678: amd64-microcode: Package upstream's amdtee dir in amd64-microcode?

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
mdtee' dir and was wondering what (best) to do with that, hence this bug. And I need to know what I should do about it on the backport branches and security update branches. I don't know/understand what you mean by this. Can you clarify? On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:38:30 -0600 Mario Limoncie

Bug#1062678: amd64-microcode: Package upstream's amdtee dir in amd64-microcode?

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
mdtee' dir and was wondering what (best) to do with that, hence this bug. And I need to know what I should do about it on the backport branches and security update branches. I don't know/understand what you mean by this. Can you clarify? On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:38:30 -0600 Mario Limoncie

Re: [PATCH] fix file-select

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:02:55 +0100 felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > Attached a patch fixing a wrong timeout-calculation/check, discovered by > "dzoe". Thanks, Felix. Pushed. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

[DONE] man://manpages-l10n/lsclocks.1.po

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Blättermann
Für den Robot

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/10/2024 23:50, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector to indicate that the DRM EDID helpers should try to fetch

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 2/10/2024 23:50, Mario Limonciello wrote: Some manufacturers have intentionally put an EDID that differs from the EDID on the internal panel on laptops. Drivers that prefer to fetch this EDID can set a bit on the drm_connector to indicate that the DRM EDID helpers should try to fetch

Re: Postgresql 15 scram y java

2024-02-12 Thread Mario González Troncoso
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 23:37, Nahum Castro wrote: > > Hola a tod@s > > Tengo el problema del scram y la autenticación con mis apps en tomcat usando > el jdbc. Todas las apps fallan, ninguna se puede conectar a la base de datos > a pesar de que ya force que la autenticación fuera usando md5 en

Re: OpenBSD vm troubles

2024-02-12 Thread Mario Marietto
Nairobi,KE > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. > "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) > [How to ask smart questions: > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] > -- Mario.

Re: [Metamath] Proof generation

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Carneiro
The specification for metamath checking in general is given in the Metamath Book: https://us.metamath.org/downloads/metamath.pdf The proof blocks are written in "compressed proof format", which is specified in Appendix B of the metamath book. (Although, metamath-exe, mmj2 and metamath-knife

Re: How to use the L4 Microkernel with a FreeBSD userland.

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Marietto
microkernel itself on "top" of it. Do you know if something like this exists ? On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 9:01 PM Mark Millard wrote: > [Only replying to what I've subscribed to --and I dropped > Warner as well.] > > On Feb 11, 2024, at 11:43, Mario Marietto wrote: > > &

Re: How to use the L4 Microkernel with a FreeBSD userland.

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Marietto
ok. But what does this mean ? That I can use whatever Linux distro I want ? Or even the FreeBSD world ? On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 7:59 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2024, at 05:44, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > I'm trying to understand how to use the L4 Microker

[PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
-by: Mario Limonciello --- v1->v2: * Split code from previous amdgpu specific helper to generic drm helper. v2->v3: * Add an extra select to fix a variety of randconfig errors found from LKP robot. v3->v4: * Return struct drm_edid v4->v5: * Rename to drm_edid_read_acpi *

[PATCH v5 3/3] drm/nouveau: Use drm_edid_read_acpi() helper

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
drm_edid at the same time. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- v1->v2: * New patch v3->v4: * Rebase on v4 changes v4->v5: * Rebase on v5 changes --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 27 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/dr

[PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
-by: Mario Limonciello --- v1->v2: * Split code from previous amdgpu specific helper to generic drm helper. v2->v3: * Add an extra select to fix a variety of randconfig errors found from LKP robot. v3->v4: * Return struct drm_edid v4->v5: * Rename to drm_edid_read_acpi *

[PATCH v5 2/3] drm/amd: Fetch the EDID from _DDC if available for eDP

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
disable this. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- v4->v5: * rebase on v5 changes --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_connectors.c| 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 8 driv

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for getting EDID over ACPI to DRM

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
This series adds the ability to fetch the EDID through ACPI for laptop panels. Drivers need to opt into the behavior. In this series it's enabled by default for all eDP or LVDS panels with AMDGPU and certain panels for Nouveau. Mario Limonciello (3): drm: Add support to get EDID from ACPI

[PATCH v5 3/3] drm/nouveau: Use drm_edid_read_acpi() helper

2024-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
drm_edid at the same time. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- v1->v2: * New patch v3->v4: * Rebase on v4 changes v4->v5: * Rebase on v5 changes --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 27 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 2 -- drivers/gpu/dr

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >