On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:05:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
(Please note: this response is based mostly on the information included in
your message. I only looked cursorily at the actual license of Pale Moon
to confirm that it looks very non-free by our definitions.)
I /believe/ that the
The netinstall links to download the distro are still forwarding towards the
older version, 7.7 of Debian. I had to manually adjust the links to 7.8,
otherwise I could not download the image.
Hi there,
These have now been updated, and should be live on the site in the next
couple of hours.
The Debian Project https://www.debian.org/
Marvell donation accelerates Debian ARM package builds pr...@debian.org
January 8th, 2015 https://www.debian.org/News/2015/20150108
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Control: tags 773041 security
Control: severity 773041 grave
Justification: causes remote denial of service
For info, I saw this a few days ago and reported it to the security
team. It is indeed available in the wild,
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Control: tags 773041 security
Control: severity 773041 grave
Justification: causes remote denial of service
For info, I saw this a few days ago and reported it to the security
team. It is indeed available in the wild,
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Control: tags 773041 security
Control: severity 773041 grave
Justification: causes remote denial of service
For info, I saw this a few days ago and reported it to the security
team. It is indeed available in the wild,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
10th / 11th - Fine for me
17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
afternoon to Sunday afternoon
31st / 1st - Fine for me
All fine.
24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from early
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
10th / 11th - Fine for me
17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
afternoon to Sunday afternoon
31st / 1st - Fine for me
All fine.
24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from early
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
10th / 11th - Fine for me
17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
afternoon to Sunday afternoon
31st / 1st - Fine for me
All fine.
24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from early
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
No, the ctte did not say that. We had a flamewar about that
interpretation before.
That was almost word by word from
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
No, the ctte did not say that. We had a flamewar about that
interpretation before.
That was almost word by word from
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
No, the ctte did not say that. We had a flamewar about that
interpretation before.
That was almost word by word from
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
wheezy/etc to jessie will give you systemd as init system and inform
about the apt pinning solution.
3) Heavily advertise (again in release notes?) that you
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:46 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
wheezy/etc to jessie will give
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:06:41AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
I saw you apply for write access. I happily accepted you.
Thanks :)
I have no problem you to update anything but just curious what you are
intending to do since you are kind of new to documentation.
Mostly release notes
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
wheezy/etc to jessie will give you systemd as init system and inform
about the apt pinning solution.
3) Heavily advertise (again in release notes?) that you
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:46 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
wheezy/etc to jessie will give
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
wheezy/etc to jessie will give you systemd as init system and inform
about the apt pinning solution.
3) Heavily advertise (again in release notes?) that you
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:46 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
wheezy/etc to jessie will give
Even if it were as ready, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have a
separate GR. Voting once instead of twice is nice for everyone, but
conflating two separate decisions in a single GR has been proven to be
unwise in the past. And I'm especially wary of doing so with a
constitutional
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:52PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Neil McGovern dijo [Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:31:35PM +]:
I have a half-written series to make it cope with lettered, rather
than numbered, options. Would it be worth my while finishing that off
(in my CFT) ?
I
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Andrey Rahmatullin:
I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few hours,
that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO.
Nothing about delays wasn't mentioned in your previous email
Moderating (some) emails
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:13:20PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 11. November 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
I'd be willing to help out.
So would I.
me too, should this road be chosen.
Excellent. In that case, my position is now meh :)
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:10:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:53:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
57dd4d7c-3e92
announcement?
See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil
McGovern, the code name shall be zurg.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html
While that was in no way official, at the time it kindof struck a chord,
so I'd like us to just go
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Neil McGovern writes (Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
coupling):
Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
would be nice to try and work out a way of avoiding having to do this
manual
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:33:13PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Hi,
Le 09/10/2014 19:41, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:45 AM, David Prévot wrote:
Anyway, if we were to endorse such service, I believe
debian-project@l.d.o would be the right place to have this conversation,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:43:13PM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote:
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
Whelp, that wasn't meant to happen. Apologies for the
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:53:36PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
[ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
[ ] Choice 2: Support alternative init
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:52:39PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
Sune == Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
Sune I read the logs from the tech-ctte meeting, and my impression
Sune was that - people in tech-ctte thinks that maximum terms are a
Sune good idea - that they should
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:43:13PM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote:
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
Whelp, that wasn't meant to happen. Apologies for the
This is the first call for votes on the above GR. PLEASE NOTE: voting is
not yet open.
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Wednesday, November 5th, 2014
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Tuesday, November 18th, 2014
The following ballot is for voting on init system
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:53:36PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
[ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
[ ] Choice 2: Support alternative init
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Neil,
On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
[ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:11:45PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think this is still possible. It's a shame that this slightly odd
pre-CFV (CFV posted before voting period opens) wasn't explicitly a
draft, and posted only to -vote.
This vote has currently used up about 15 hours of my time,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:17:51PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I cannot parse the last bullet point, sorry (and any the release
team?). Also, the proposal does not mention the release team.
Reasonable changes to preserve or improve sysvinit support should be
accepted through the jessie
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 01:30:18PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
[ ] Choice 1
Note: this is a re-issued CfV, please use the ballot below or your vote
will be rejected. Voting is now open.
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Wednesday, November 5th, 2014
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Tuesday, November 18th, 2014
The following ballot is for
Hi Sam,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:00:46PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
This seems to have stalled and I'm disappointed to see that because I
think this is an important issue.
My recommendation is that you propose a resolution based on the comments
you received.
nontrivial ongoing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear lovely release team,
TL;DR:
# CVE-2014-4887
unblock wget/1.16-1
age-days 2 wget/1.16-1
wget 1.16 in unstable currently fixes CVE-2014-4887:
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 06:31:43PM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
On 28 October 2014 18:20, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
With all of those facilities, we've taken different approaches; with the
mail transport agent, for example, we've defined an interface that all
mail transport
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 02:16:14PM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
On 29 October 2014 13:40, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
* if we go the MTA/sh route, then we define lowest common denominator
interface of an init system and only init systems providing that
(possibly with a systemd
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:27:40PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Neil McGovern writes (Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional
decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]):
As far as I'm aware, we don't actually say that anywhere. Applications can
only /rely
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear lovely release team,
TL;DR:
# CVE-2014-4887
unblock wget/1.16-1
age-days 2 wget/1.16-1
wget 1.16 in unstable currently fixes CVE-2014-4887:
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in
reassign #765069 nautilus
retitle #765069 nautilus: Displays svg pixmaps as giant icons
thanks
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:12:29PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
On Oct 23, 2014 1:33 PM, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:13:50PM +0200, Niklas Fiekas wrote:
a huge
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:56:25AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
This essentially is a reintroduction of the package runit-run, which
was added to Debian end of 2002, and removed on request of the release
team end of 2010, with the package name changed. Since then, a backward
compatibility
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:56:25AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
This essentially is a reintroduction of the package runit-run, which
was added to Debian end of 2002, and removed on request of the release
team end of 2010, with the package name changed. Since then, a backward
compatibility
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:56:25AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
This essentially is a reintroduction of the package runit-run, which
was added to Debian end of 2002, and removed on request of the release
team end of 2010, with the package name changed. Since then, a backward
compatibility
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:45:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Indeed, you are right: by definition, not all questions have been answered.
The existing wording of the amendement is therefore logically inconsistent.
I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
Hi Sergey,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:38:49PM +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
Seconded. I say no to systemd dependency. I want to be able to choose
myself what init system to use in my Debian setup.
This mail isn't signed, nor do I seem to be able to find you in
db.debian.org. Unfortunately,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:14:44AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le lundi, 20 octobre 2014, 12.17:14 Neil McGovern a écrit :
Ian's: make each package support all alternative init systems
This is actively misleading in a least four ways:
Yup, I wouldn't count that as neutral
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:21:18PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Dear fellow Developers,
I would like to propose the following amendment proposal,
and I hereby call for seconds.
All received and valid.
Thanks,
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Anyway, whichever the name I call for seconds (or comments: if this proposed
amendment is considered harmful, let me know).
Received (well, found in the middle of a mail thread, thanks for
changing the subject though :P) and
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum writes (Re: GR option text on ballots):
I'd like to propose:
I would like to reiterate my view that these summaries should be
positive, and written by the proponent of each version, so long as
they are not
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 02:59:16PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
(CC secretary@ to avoid this getting overlooked in the mail flood.)
I hereby formally propose the amendment below (Constitution A.1(1)
`directly by proposer'), and, then, immediately accept it (A.1(2)).
This resets the minimum
The Debian Project https://www.debian.org/
Debian Project mourns the loss of Peter Miller pr...@debian.org
October 20th, 2014 https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20141020
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I am therefore bringing forward an alternative proposal
Recieved, and verified. Note, this has been proposed by the current
Project Leader, and thus does not require seconds, but will record those
seconding anyway.
Neil
--
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/10/14 at 11:38 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
For the jessie release, all software that currently supports being run
under sysvinit should continue to
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:25:03PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/10/14 at 13:59 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/10/14 at 11:38 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:12:35PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Dear Kurt,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
debian-devel-announce.
This is
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:46:57PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
This isn't something that's happened in the past, what's announced is a)
that a GR process has started, b) the various CfVs, and c) the results.
I'd be wary
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:05:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call
for seconds.
Your proposal has been received and is signed correctly.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Seconded.
I'm getting a bad signature from you, can you try again, perhaps with a
clearsigned mail?
Thanks,
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:14:59PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 13 October 2014 22:51, Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:46:48PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On lun., 2014-10-13 at 19:30 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, a
The Debian Projecthttps://www.debian.org/
Debian Project chooses LeaseWeb to provide global snapshot archive
pr...@debian.org
October 14th, 2014
tags 681501 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If anyone reading this mail has the details already and can commit to
the website CVS repository, please add Debian France there.
ENOTIME sorry
Patch attached, I'll commit this later if there's no
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:33:55PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If anyone reading this mail has the details already and can commit to
the website CVS repository, please add
tags 681501 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If anyone reading this mail has the details already and can commit to
the website CVS repository, please add Debian France there.
ENOTIME sorry
Patch attached, I'll commit this later if there's no
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:33:55PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If anyone reading this mail has the details already and can commit to
the website CVS repository, please add
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:03:05PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Yeah, but Md is an arsehole anyway and requires printf to be
a /bin/sh builtin instead of just adding /usr/bin to $PATH,
especially now that the initrd mounts /usr already anyway,
and CTTE decided to rather offend me than Md
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
All of these are still good for me.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
All of these are still good for me.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
All of these are still good for me.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
All of these are still good for me.
The Debian Projecthttps://www.debian.org/
FSF and Debian join forces to help free software users find the
hardware they need pr...@debian.org
September
I have tried not to reply to this, but there's some bits in here I don't
think should go unchallenged, but I'll stick to the major points rather
than replying to each comment.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:15:33AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 9/4/14, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
The Debian Projecthttps://www.debian.org/
DebConf 14 closes in Portland and DebConf 15 dates announced
pr...@debian.org https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140831
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 03:15:17PM +0400, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
I'm not a Debian developer, just a Debian user, and I want to say that I was
happy to see XFCE being the default DE. Just because it's small, classic and
neutral DE - which GNOME 3 definitely isn't. I think XFCE is a better
Hi all,
I'll be sending out a number of press items/announcements
before/during/after DebConf 14, but I need your help. If you're giving a
particularly newsworthy[0] talk, please let me know and then catch up
during DebConf, so we can coordinate sending these out!
Thanks,
Neil
[0] newsworthy has
Neil
McGovern
-The state of the bootstrap Wookey
-Upstream Guide BoF Paul Wise
-use Perl; # Annual meeting of the Debian Perl Group gregor
herrmann
-Validation and Continuous
Neil
McGovern
-The state of the bootstrap Wookey
-Upstream Guide BoF Paul Wise
-use Perl; # Annual meeting of the Debian Perl Group gregor
herrmann
-Validation and Continuous
The Debian Projecthttp://www.debian.org/
Updated Debian 6.0: 6.0.10 released pr...@debian.org
July 19th, 2014 http://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140719
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:43:15AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Sune Vuorela wrote:
The way is to put your time/money where your mouth is and provide the
code. Asking others to do all the work is not the way forward in OSS.
I highly doubt you can call _me_ someone who does not do work in
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:00:36PM +0200, Martin Lutz wrote:
after upgrading blt to version 2.4z-9 the package python-matplotlib becomes
unusable.
Ditto the package 'look' and presumeably quite a bit of stuff that uses
python-tk.
It seems that the lastest upload of blt ships
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:49:52AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, do I understand well that it's your view that just linking with
AGPLv3 make it mandatory to re-license using AGPLv3? Is there such a
clause in the AGPLv3 license?
No, it's required to re-licence it to AGPLv3, or an AGPLv3
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:00:36PM +0200, Martin Lutz wrote:
after upgrading blt to version 2.4z-9 the package python-matplotlib becomes
unusable.
Ditto the package 'look' and presumeably quite a bit of stuff that uses
python-tk.
It seems that the lastest upload of blt ships
The Debian Projecthttp://www.debian.org/
Debian 6 debuts its long term support periodpr...@debian.org
June 16th, 2014 http://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140616
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested
dates would be:
- June 28/29
If it's early on the 29th, that's ok. Otherwise I'll be away. I could do
it at a push though
- July 5/6
Running a half
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested
dates would be:
- June 28/29
If it's early on the 29th, that's ok. Otherwise I'll be away. I could do
it at a push though
- July 5/6
Running a half
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested
dates would be:
- June 28/29
If it's early on the 29th, that's ok. Otherwise I'll be away. I could do
it at a push though
- July 5/6
Running a half
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested
dates would be:
- June 28/29
If it's early on the 29th, that's ok. Otherwise I'll be away. I could do
it at a push though
- July 5/6
Running a half
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:51:28AM -0700, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
We are assembling this year's Bursaries Team to help us rate the
travel sponsorship and food/accommodation requests for DebConf14.
We will follow most of the past years' procedures, always trying
to improve on,
Tags: +patch
Thanks
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:36:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 06 mai 14, 13:45:11, Brian Gupta wrote:
All kidding aside, is there a plan to post the CoC, and make it easy
to find from www.d.o? (Perhaps either in the About section, or on
the about Debian page?)
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
pDebian, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted […]
Looks very odd to me. “The Debian Project” maybe?
I copied that from the social contract, but that does sound better.
Missing final dot.
-i :)
Both updated
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:57:29PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
pDebian, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted a code of
conduct
for paticipants to its mailinglists, IRC channels and other modes of
communication within
Tags: +patch
Thanks
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:36:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 06 mai 14, 13:45:11, Brian Gupta wrote:
All kidding aside, is there a plan to post the CoC, and make it easy
to find from www.d.o? (Perhaps either in the About section, or on
the about Debian page?)
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
pDebian, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted […]
Looks very odd to me. “The Debian Project” maybe?
I copied that from the social contract, but that does sound better.
Missing final dot.
-i :)
Both updated
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:57:29PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
pDebian, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted a code of
conduct
for paticipants to its mailinglists, IRC channels and other modes of
communication within
Tags: +patch
Thanks
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:36:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 06 mai 14, 13:45:11, Brian Gupta wrote:
All kidding aside, is there a plan to post the CoC, and make it easy
to find from www.d.o? (Perhaps either in the About section, or on
the about Debian page?)
201 - 300 of 1882 matches
Mail list logo
