What format should Origin and Label be set to for Release files on
people.debian.org? It seems to me there should be some best common
practice for Debian developers publishing extra-experimental packages.
I thought the two labels should be set to some selection of...
Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
On 4/17/06, A. Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:44:37 -0600
Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although it's an admirable goal to have the timestamps of the
documents represent their most recent change, I'm not sure it's
feasible without a gross ammount of effort
Thanks, Sebastian. I'll look at this next time I'm preparing an upload
of libnjb. Aren't device permissions handled by udev? They are on my
system. Why is HAL involved?
Are you a Debian developer, in addition to being an Ubuntu developer?
I'm looking for someone to adopt my NJB packages.
Cheers,
On 4/17/06, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
* The package built fine using debuild the first time, but the second
time was missing monotone.html. I don't know why. Very strange.
* monotone --version reports (base revision: unknown), which should be
fixed before uploading.
Both
On 4/17/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for my previous bug report, is that I consider it a
requirement that Azureus not depend on either Gnome or Mozilla.
how can you avoid this? it depends on /usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so
What exactly depends on gtkembedmoz?
.
-- Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:55:10 -0600
On 4/4/06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if there's a way to figure out what the status of the
monotone package is. The current Debian package is 0.24-1+b1,
while the upstreams
On 4/17/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for my previous bug report, is that I consider it a
requirement that Azureus not depend on either Gnome or Mozilla.
how can you avoid this? it depends on /usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so
What exactly depends on gtkembedmoz?
.
-- Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:55:10 -0600
On 4/4/06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if there's a way to figure out what the status of the
monotone package is. The current Debian package is 0.24-1+b1,
while the upstreams
Monotone's debian/ directory is out of sync with the source
distributed by Debian. Please apply this patch, which was authored by
Tomas Fasth [EMAIL PROTECTED]. This patch is against monotone 0.24;
the changelog will need to be merged by hand.
On 4/17/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for my previous bug report, is that I consider it a
requirement that Azureus not depend on either Gnome or Mozilla.
how can you avoid this? it depends on /usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so
What exactly depends on gtkembedmoz?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:30:54 -0600
Source: azureus
Binary: azureus
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: xmltv-util
Version: 0.5.42-4
`tv_grab_na_icons --help' is out of date. `man tv_grab_na_icons' is correct.
Cheers,
Shaun
$ tv_grab_na_icons --help
tv_grab_na_icons [--images]
$ man tv_grab_na_icons
...
SYNOPSIS
tv_grab_na_icons [--links] [--share dir]
...
Cheers,
Shaun
On 4/15/06, Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
Indeed, I think that I spoke too soon: I had Azureus 2.4.0.2 up, but the
connections to other peers were always dying (with null pointer
exceptions).
Which gij version did you use? I've seen that problem with
Although it's an admirable goal to have the timestamps of the
documents represent their most recent change, I'm not sure it's
feasible without a gross ammount of effort. The thirteen files with
the time stamp of 2006-04-13 13:48 are all upstream documentation. The
time stamps are munged by any
On 4/15/06, Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
I remembered Azureus working with an experimental version of GIJ 4.1,
but now that I have gij-4.1 4.1.0-1 installed from testing/unstable,
it doesn't seem to work. It doesn't get past the splash screen showing
On 4/15/06, Philipp Klaus Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
I remembered Azureus working with an experimental version of GIJ 4.1,
but now that I have gij-4.1 4.1.0-1 installed from testing/unstable,
it doesn't seem to work. It doesn't get past the splash screen showing
On 4/14/06, Stephan Michels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention.
It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things
won't occur.
Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package?
Can we resolve the
On 4/14/06, Stephan Michels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/4/9, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please put the Gnome and Mozilla shared libraries into their own
binary packages to reduce the coarseness of libswt3.1-gtk-jni's
dependencies.
If I put the jni libraries into separate packages
On 4/14/06, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Philipp, Shaun and others that may be interested.
On Jan 30 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
Great news, Philipp! Thanks for the note. As soon as I have some time
for Debian, I'll update the package and push Azureus into main
On 4/14/06, Stephan Michels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention.
It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things
won't occur.
Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package?
Can we resolve the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:41:05 -0600
Source: monotone-viz
Binary: monotone-viz
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.14-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:40:22 -0600
Source: freeguide
Binary: freeguide
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 4/7/06, Andy Balaam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shaun,
#285719: freeguide: favourites with time entries do not work
I have never seen this. It may be to do with the boundary when one day
changes into the next - the words before and after are interpreted
on the assumption that the day
On 4/13/06, Matthew A. Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
I have packaged monotone-viz for Debian. It should make its way into
the Debian archives shortly. Enjoy!
On 4/12/06, Matthew A. Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this going to get
On 4/12/06, Andy Balaam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes in 0.10.1/2 your grabber information gets lost. It might be
worth Looking under Options, Advanced, Grabbers and making sure XMLTV
is checked, and then looking under XMLTV to see whether you have any
grabbers defined. If not,
Shaun Jackman wrote:
I have packaged monotone-viz for Debian. It should make its way into
the Debian archives shortly. Enjoy!
On 4/12/06, Matthew A. Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this going to get included in the net.venge.monotone-viz tree?
I hadn't planned on it. In the past
tag 362008 confirmed
thanks
I can confirm this bug exists. Although, I'm not sure what's causing
it. freeguide 0.10.1-1 worked for me before. Did it ever work for you?
Cheers,
Shaun
On 4/11/06, Uwe Storbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: freeguide
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: important
On 4/9/06, Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
libnjb - Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox library
gnomad2 - Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
I have a Creative Zen touch which use these so I can take them. I would
rather work with someone to comaintain
I could test on alpha, but there's no version of swt-gtk in sarge for this
architecture.
Why is it the old versions of this package which need testing, not the
current version?
Don't worry about testing the Sarge version then; that only applies to
ia64. If you could test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:29:38 -0600
Source: monotone-viz
Binary: monotone-viz
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.14-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
It builds find for me without liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev. It seems
the package liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev 2.4.0+2005.02.18-1 in stable was
split into liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev and liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev
2.6.0-3 in testing. I'll change the build dependencies to
liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev,
On 4/10/06, Manuel García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shaun, i didn't work on it yet, i have only one warning by linthian about
a config archive that remains on the package but it have to be erased, i'll
be working on gnomad this week, so on wednesday, i tell Anibal or Damog to
upload the
On 4/10/06, John Bovey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shaun,
I am a user of of Debian libnjb package. I'm not a Debian developer but I'd
be willing to learn if you don't hear from anyone with more experience. I do
have a reasonable amount of experience with software development: the xvt
There are two tasks in adopting libnjb, and they can be pursued
independently of one-another. One is to re-package libnjb, listing
yourself as the new maintainer. The second is to apply to become a
Debian developer. The new maintainer process is not difficult, but
the queue can be long, so I
On 4/10/06, Manuel García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Manuel,
I believe I fixed that warning just this weekend. Download gnomad2
2.8.3-1 from unstable.
Cheers,
Shaun
Sorry but i forgot something, could you plis tell me what do you do?
I'm wrong Manuel. I was thinking of a
On 4/9/06, Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
libnjb - Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox library
gnomad2 - Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
I have a Creative Zen touch which use these so I can take them. I would
rather work with someone to comaintain
I could test on alpha, but there's no version of swt-gtk in sarge for this
architecture.
Why is it the old versions of this package which need testing, not the
current version?
Don't worry about testing the Sarge version then; that only applies to
ia64. If you could test
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 3.09.1-3
Severity: normal
ocamlopt sets the rpath of the binaries it builds. The documentation
gives no indication of how to disable this behaviour.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 4/10/06, Manuel García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shaun, i didn't work on it yet, i have only one warning by linthian about
a config archive that remains on the package but it have to be erased, i'll
be working on gnomad this week, so on wednesday, i tell Anibal or Damog to
upload the
There are two tasks in adopting libnjb, and they can be pursued
independently of one-another. One is to re-package libnjb, listing
yourself as the new maintainer. The second is to apply to become a
Debian developer. The new maintainer process is not difficult, but
the queue can be long, so I
On 4/10/06, John Bovey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shaun,
I am a user of of Debian libnjb package. I'm not a Debian developer but I'd
be willing to learn if you don't hear from anyone with more experience. I do
have a reasonable amount of experience with software development: the xvt
On 4/10/06, Manuel García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Manuel,
I believe I fixed that warning just this weekend. Download gnomad2
2.8.3-1 from unstable.
Cheers,
Shaun
Sorry but i forgot something, could you plis tell me what do you do?
I'm wrong Manuel. I was thinking of a
On 4/9/06, Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
libnjb - Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox library
gnomad2 - Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
I have a Creative Zen touch which use these so I can take them. I would
rather work with someone to comaintain
It builds find for me without liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev. It seems
the package liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev 2.4.0+2005.02.18-1 in stable was
split into liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev and liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev
2.6.0-3 in testing. I'll change the build dependencies to
liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev,
I could test on alpha, but there's no version of swt-gtk in sarge for this
architecture.
Why is it the old versions of this package which need testing, not the
current version?
Don't worry about testing the Sarge version then; that only applies to
ia64. If you could test
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 3.09.1-3
Severity: normal
ocamlopt sets the rpath of the binaries it builds. The documentation
gives no indication of how to disable this behaviour.
Cheers,
Shaun
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni
Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Please put the Gnome and Mozilla shared libraries into their own
binary packages to reduce the coarseness of libswt3.1-gtk-jni's
dependencies.
Thanks,
Shaun
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing
* Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
libnjb - Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox library
gnomad2 - Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
neutrino - GNOME shell for managing your Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox
* LaTeX
glosstex - prepare glossaries and lists of acronyms
pic2fig - convert PIC drawings to FIG drawings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:39:15 -0700
Source: monotone-viz
Binary: monotone-viz
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 12:59:37 -0600
Source: simulavr
Binary: simulavr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:29:15 -0600
Source: neutrino
Binary: neutrino
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Is it possible to make use of freedesktop.org's standardization of
menu layout within Debian? If we find their standard lacking, could we
lobby them for improvements similar to those listed here?
This work is certainly an improvement. Thanks,
Shaun
On 4/8/06, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni
Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Please put the Gnome and Mozilla shared libraries into their own
binary packages to reduce the coarseness of libswt3.1-gtk-jni's
dependencies.
Thanks,
Shaun
package simulavr
tag 361603 patch
thanks
It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
patch is untested on 64-bit targets, but should fix the issue.
Cheers,
Shaun
--- simulavr-0.1.2.2.orig/src/intvects.h
+++ simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/intvects.h
@@ -82,8 +82,9 @@
/* Macro to
package wnpp
retitle 354628 O: romeo -- Palm ROM Discombobulator
thanks
Package: wnpp
I do not use this tool regularly. This package we would be better
maintained by someone who does.
Cheers,
Shaun
tag 351792 +moreinfo
thanks
Since the error message is in Catalan, I can guess that the
environment variable LANGUAGE=ca is set. What is the value of the LANG
environment variable?
Can you confirm that this bug is still an issue? Were you able to find
a work around?
Thanks,
Shaun
On 2/7/06,
On 3/22/06, Brandon Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently installed Ubuntu Dapper and found that gnomad2 would not
work for me due to the problem described in this bug. Here is my new
script version which works for both the hotplug system and udev, I
think.
Changes:
1) permissions
Package: wnpp
Hello libnjb users,
Is anyone a user of the Debian package of libnjb? I currently maintain
the package for Debian, and would like to search out a new maintainer
for the package. The package is in good shape with no outstanding
bugs. If you're not yet a Debian developer, but
Hello Manuel,
How is your adoption of gnomad2 coming along?
Cheers,
Shaun
package wnpp
retitle 354628 O: romeo -- Palm ROM Discombobulator
thanks
Package: wnpp
I do not use this tool regularly. This package we would be better
maintained by someone who does.
Cheers,
Shaun
Package: wnpp
Hello libnjb users,
Is anyone a user of the Debian package of libnjb? I currently maintain
the package for Debian, and would like to search out a new maintainer
for the package. The package is in good shape with no outstanding
bugs. If you're not yet a Debian developer, but
Hello Manuel,
How is your adoption of gnomad2 coming along?
Cheers,
Shaun
Is it possible to make use of freedesktop.org's standardization of
menu layout within Debian? If we find their standard lacking, could we
lobby them for improvements similar to those listed here?
This work is certainly an improvement. Thanks,
Shaun
On 4/8/06, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni
Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying
On 3/22/06, Brandon Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently installed Ubuntu Dapper and found that gnomad2 would not
work for me due to the problem described in this bug. Here is my new
script version which works for both the hotplug system and udev, I
think.
Changes:
1) permissions
It has been reported that swt-gtk -- and azureus, which depends on it
-- does not work on amd64. I suspect this is true of all 64-bit
architectures. If you have access to a 64-bit architecture besides
amd64, I would very much appreciate your help with this bug. The
version in Sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:58:16 -0600
Source: gnomad2
Binary: gnomad2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
354358 +confirmed upstream
thanks
swt-gtk (3.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Revert the patch to xpcom.cpp used to fix #324030. It fixed the build
but did not produce a working package on 64-bit architectures.
-- Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:25:49 -0700
On 4/8/06
It has been reported that swt-gtk -- and azureus, which depends on it
-- does not work on amd64. I suspect this is true of all 64-bit
architectures. If you have access to a 64-bit architecture besides
amd64, I would very much appreciate your help with this bug. The
version in Sarge
354358 +confirmed upstream
thanks
swt-gtk (3.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Revert the patch to xpcom.cpp used to fix #324030. It fixed the build
but did not produce a working package on 64-bit architectures.
-- Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:25:49 -0700
On 4/8/06
It has been reported that swt-gtk -- and azureus, which depends on it
-- does not work on amd64. I suspect this is true of all 64-bit
architectures. If you have access to a 64-bit architecture besides
amd64, I would very much appreciate your help with this bug. The
version in Sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:01:46 -0600
Source: pocketpc-cab
Binary: pocketpc-cab
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:22:09 -0600
Source: pocketpc-cab
Binary: pocketpc-cab
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:53:49 -0600
Source: lcab
Binary: lcab
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0b11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Great! I've fixed the order of the files. The problem, I suspect, was
not the order of the files (they did appear in reverse order as the
document suggested), but that the manifest.000 file did not come
first, a clear bug.
I'm inclined not to change the version number gratuitously, since it's
I've uploaded pocketpc-cab 1.0.1-1, which closes this bug. It should
hit the mirrors soon. Once it does, can you test that it works? FWIW,
I also uploaded a new version of lcab (1.0b11-1).
Cheers!
Shaun
On 4/6/06, Rouven Schürch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! I've fixed the order of the
Package: pocketpc-sdk
Version: 1.0.0-2
Submitter: Rouven Schürch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tags: patch
Hello Shaun
we have been using your script 'pocketpc-cab' for creating an
installable cab for an application of ours. Recently, after having
bought a newer PDA with WIN CE 5 installed, the CABs failed
On 4/5/06, eehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool!
But I can't apply the patch. I get 1.0.0-2 when I do 'apt-get source'
for pocketpc-cab. Did Rouven do a dch before sending this to you?
Thanks,
--Eric
The sense of the patch is backwards. You can use patch -R (revert
patch) to apply it,
Thanks for the bug report and patch, Rouven!
Can you confirm that the it's the order of the files, and not the
version change that fixes the bug?
Oh, the sense of your patch was backwards (you swapped the arguments
to diff), but I understood what you meant.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 4/5/06, Rouven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 17:24:00 -0700
Source: eagle
Binary: eagle-data eagle
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4.16-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
GCC reports an error for this snippet:
int main()
{
foo:
int x;
}
foo.c:4: error: expected expression before 'int'
... but not this snippet:
int main()
{
foo:
(void)0;
int x;
}
Is this expected behaviour? At the very least, it seems like an
unusual distinction.
Please
Thank you for your bug report. I have forwarded it to the Azureus team.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 3/28/06, David Murn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.6-3
Severity: minor
Azureus 2.3.0.6 added a 'feature' where the average swarm speed is shown
...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:41:03 -0700
Source: freeguide
Binary: freeguide
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: tagsoup
Version: 1.0rc3
Upstream Author: John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://mercury.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/
License: GPL or AFL
Description: SAX-compliant HTML parser for Java
This is the home page of TagSoup, a SAX-compliant parser
I've also encountered this same bug with vimpart 4:3.3.2-4 and both
vim-gtk 1:6.3-071+1sarge1 and 1:6.4-007+1. Is there any resolution or
work-around to this bug?
Thanks,
Shaun
I've also encountered this same bug with vimpart 4:3.3.2-4 and both
vim-gtk 1:6.3-071+1sarge1 and 1:6.4-007+1. Is there any resolution or
work-around to this bug?
Thanks,
Shaun
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: tagsoup
Version: 1.0rc3
Upstream Author: John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://mercury.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/
License: GPL or AFL
Description: SAX-compliant HTML parser for Java
This is the home page of TagSoup, a SAX-compliant parser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:44:09 -0700
Source: pptview
Binary: pptview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 8.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:10:56 -0700
Source: azureus
Binary: azureus
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.0.6-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have packaged monotone-viz for Debian. It should make its way into
the Debian archives shortly. Enjoy!
Cheers,
Shaun
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
On 3/20/06, Olivier Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What version of monotone are you using, if that's 0.25, indeed it
won't work, the venge.net repository is now using the development
version (0.26prex) which uses a different port (hence the
network-related error).
Anyway, here's the
On 3/17/06, Erwin Rennert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you; your advise was very helpful (and after 5 years using debian I
finally looked into the whole alternatives business ...). I should have
asked on a list instead of filing a bug.
Thanks,
Erwin
I don't mind your filing a bug at
GCJ 4.1 has some troubles (internal errors) compiling Azureus 2.4.0.0.
I've sent a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I can resolve this, I'll upload a
package to experimental.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 3/14/06, robin putters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to
On 2/7/06, Olivier Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just released monotone-viz 0.13
...
Call me crazy, but I can't find the branch drop-down box in monotone-viz 0.13.
Cheers,
Shaun
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:46:58 -0700
Source: pocketpc-cab
Binary: pocketpc-cab
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman [EMAIL
Would anyone in the Calgary area like to meet up for lunch and a
key-signing some time this week? The tentative location is a
restaurant, to be determined, on Ninth Avenue in Inglewood.
Please cc me in your reply. Cheers!
Shaun
901 - 1000 of 1716 matches
Mail list logo
