After what happened with Dow and Oil last night, this is a very bold
statement. Let's see...
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:47 AM, ichingprediction wimanto...@yahoo.comwrote:
ICHING answer :
Apa yang terjadi dengan BUMI hari ini?
Yin (Old)
Yin (New)
Yang (Old)
Yin (New)
Yin (Old)
Yang
Bill Blackford wrote:
Currently I have a 7606 RSP720 hitting 94% CPU.
A 'sh proc cpu sorted' indicates that SNMP ENGINE is the source.
Any thoughts on this?
It lays to rest the old A watched pot never boils adage... :-)
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp
Greetings. I have an unusual (perhaps) FWSM application that is not
quite working out as expected, and after several variations from
different angles, still not producing quite the desired result.
I have a 6509 doing VRFs for different campus communities, and since
many of our services /
Are the stack members hot swappable ?
Or is it power-cycle time when changing the stack cable configurations?
[Wanting to add a new member...]
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Nothing like inauguration, but then we're on summer semester schedule
and sparsely populated :-)
There was a noticeable spike in OUTBOUND traffic and connections, mostly
that ill-behaved Octoshape (udp/8247), used by CNN and maybe others.
Jeff
Halo OB'ers,
Ada yg punya Lap.Keu BUMI yg terakhir? Q4 2008 atau Q12009?? Bisa tolong di
share buat yg punya..
Thanks sebelumnya!
Regards
Holmes,David A wrote:
In a layer 3 switch I consider unicast flooding due to an L2 cam table
timeout a design defect. To test vendors' L3 switches for this defect we have
used a traffic generator to send 50-100 Mbps of pings to a device that does
not reply to the pings, where the L3 switch
Clue Store wrote:
Anyone using a vrf for their global tables?? This solution could possibly
work for me but not sure what insane issues would come up by doing this.
After trying several other approaches and failing, if you can't beat
them, join them...
We use the global table only for
Clue Store wrote:
Hi All,
Looked through the archives but couldn't find anything about this specific
issue. I'm trying to leak a route from the global table on a PE to an
iterface that is on the same PE but I get the folowwing when I try to just
point it to a loopback.
ip route vrf
Chris Knipe wrote:
We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot
of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry
level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most
important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty
RandallM wrote:
Unwanted spam is Apple trying to load Safari on my computer everyday
just because I have Itunes intstalled. That's spam. If I WANTED Safari
I would go get it and even ask for it!!
Or the latest Microsoft .NET update which installs an un-installable
Firefox extension so that
Reminds me of the old warning/attention sign over a termination rack...
WARNING: Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Jeff
In the process of an upgrade/reconfiguration today, I discovered that
PIM multicast routing and VRF-lite are apparently mutually exclusive on
a 4506. In this case, specifically IOS
cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.122-50.SG1 on a Sup-IV WS-X4515.
With an ip vrf forwarding ... directive, there is no
Nice one Prof JT,
Last comment below answer so many questions right to the point.
-JKell-
2009/5/21 JsxTrader jsxtra...@yahoo.com
Yang pasti main yearly Pak Rei.., kalau Cuma dibawah satu tahun sih saya
pikir bukan investorlah, tapi Long Haul trader lah…, rit nya bukan Blok
M-Tanah
Geoffrey Pendery wrote:
You might want to look at 4500 Series switches, rather than 6500.
If 2960's were sufficient for your requirements (no advanced routing,
Netflow, NBAR, etc) then 4500 is closer to an apples-to-apples
comparison than 6500.
4500 will generally be cheaper than 6500,
Jon Lewis wrote:
I didn't think ACL logging worked in either direction on the 3550. I
ran across something even more disturbing recently. A customer had an
apparently compromised system found SSH scanning remote hosts. I put
a simple ACL on the customer's layer 3 port (i.e. no switchport,
We have some 3550 EMIs that have some ACLs on their SVIs. I just ran
across (through troubleshooting something else) a case where an access
list with deny ... log is NOT being logged.
I ran some other cases across the access list, with some additional
logging, and I have been unable to get any
Anyone running a 3750 or 4500 as a PE router (nothing fancy, just
inter-VRF iBGP that really imports/exports routes)?
We have a VRF-lite network but at this point only one iBGP mesh point
(PE). There are cases where some of the nodes attached to the current
PE could ideally route between VRFs
Quick question... the new[ish] Catalyst 2975 switch looks like a
2960+stacking. Do these things stack with 3750s / 3750Es ? They show
up as another blade on the stack?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Steve Pirk wrote:
So, Microsoft has implemented a squid like server as part of their gateway
solution for office connections to the net. If done correctly, sould be
safe enough, no?
You didn't catch the bit about using all the local user's caches in the
common pool?
One nice big fat file
rac...@mcs.anl.gov wrote:
There was also the fun of setting a radio in specific places on the
main control panel and listen to the music it played. Somewhat
better than the printer banging away as you'd get actual tones to
play.
An AM radio in the vicinity of an IBM 360/30 and 360/40 would
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Now taking bets whether this sucker waltzed onto the campus via a USB stick
rather than Internet. ;)
...and propagated from that point via some Active Directory One Big
Happy Family shared resource?
Jeff
___
Fun and
Tony Varriale wrote:
But, you can upgrade separate 3750 members and do one switch at a time
today.
You can? Doesn't the reload crash the whole stack?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Paul Stewart wrote:
Netflow would be our first choice if possible...
If you can monitor it on a single span port, iftop is nice, quick, easy,
and free.
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To add to my previous note...
Jeff Kell wrote:
If you can monitor it on a single span port, iftop is nice, quick, easy,
and free.
Or ipaudit, if you want longer-term samples (provides 30-minute, daily,
weekly).
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
Are there any facilities to generate top reports? e.g., top 10 %
utilization, top 10 transmit/receive, top errors, lowest uptime, oldest
unreachable since, etc?
Even if the web interface 'full' reports were sorted, it would be an
approach.
If not, please consider it as an enhancement
Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications and feedback received from all.
GRE on 3750 = software switched with no candy and tastes bad :-(
GRE on 3845 = software switched but with candy so it's more palatable
But careful, too much of it will rot your teeth :-)
Jeff
Peter Rathlev wrote:
As far as I can understand the loadsharing is strictly deterministic, so
out-of-order frames shouldn't be a problem. I assume the switch itself
doesn't care about the difference; we plan to use LACP as we do on all
other etherchannels.
AFAIK, etherchannel will select one
Drsolly wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon Hannah wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, David M Chess wrote:
But, but...! Perl is the One True Programming Langauge!
From:Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org
C or nothing!
Wimps. Just like
Drew Weaver wrote:
We have a 3550 which connects to two 6500s.
The 3550 has some L3 vlans on it, but we also need to trunk a few of the
ports up to the 6500s.
I've been banging my head because I cannot figure out how to make the two
uplink ports on the 3550 both trunk and route.
What I
Aren't PBR and VRF mutually exclusive on all Catalysts, or are they
possible concurrently on a 4500 or 6500?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
We have a couple of areas with a need to aggregate some legacy 100FX/MM
fiber runs. There are three different housing clusters that are
currently all 100FX uplinks, and 100FX back to campus. In two areas we
have small IDFs with 100FX back to a common plant back to campus over
100FX, one of
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Your original message indicated you had a router. Based on Cisco's
documentation tclsh doesn't work on most Catalyst switches.
They do have their pride, after all :-)
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
The day before a breach, the ROI is zero. The day after, it is
infinite. -- Dennis Hoffman, RSA
Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
I think that you're missing one other possibility (which may or may not
suit you) - putting all of your routing into vrfs and doing the normal
leaking between the vrfs. This way you can retain the level of granularity
you want (any particular interface might be either in
Church, Charles wrote:
I'm still using 5.2.x ASDM, as the ASA is running 7.2.x still (both late
interim releases). Hoping for a newer ASDM soon. 5.2(4)50 still is
broken.
There is a 5.2(4)52 that works with 7.2, but you have to have TAC to a
custom file download (or at least you did when I
John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP wrote:
They've done so much to help online crime, why quit while they are behind.
On 2/6/09, Jim Murray j...@digitaldaemons.co.uk wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7874151.stm
Microsoft appears to now be encouraging users to run code directly
Church, Charles wrote:
The way I read it was that they were rolling the Adv IP features (mainly
IPv6, I think) into IP Services, making Adv IP Services unnecessary.
The $64K question would be, are they now going to hike the price of IP
Services to make up the difference? It's already
Hitesh Vinzoda wrote:
Dear All
Is there a way to supress vlan 1 from passing from a trunk link coz i m not
able to shutdown the L2 vlan 1.
'switchport trunk allowed vlan xx,xx,xx-xx,xx'
or where supported, 'switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1'
Jeff
Church, Charles wrote:
Policy route with a time-based ACL maybe? Just a thought...
Snortsam can do this (http://snortsam.net). It's really a plugin for
snort, plus a server that manages timed blocks on a variety of
firewalls/devices. You can insert the blocks via a command-line utility
Jon Kibler wrote:
No surprise:
MCSE: Must Call Someone Experienced
Microsoft Claims as Substitute for Experience
Microsoft Certified Solitaire Expert.
Jeff
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
Two XSS's (youtube and googleapi) and flash. NORAD needs a new web
designer :-)
Jeff
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland wrote:
As Jen Likova wrote it should be possible to change the answer from an public
dns server.
My problem is that we got to access RFC1918 address from our internal network
to dmz web-servers, and public users need to use public address off cause.
So by
Paul Ferguson wrote:
Somewhat ironic -- maybe they should call it ShamCity instead. :-)
I especially liked the Nigerian information technology firm with
specialisation in identity management and related solutions bit.
Jeff
___
Fun and Misc security
Paul Ferguson wrote:
Today EstDomains, Inc (http://www.estdomains.com) is glad to introduce to
the internet-oriented community advanced software created especially for
browsing through the World Wide Web in order to detect corrupted and
potentially dangerous websites.
Well, they fscking
Can anyone explain what exactly are the differences between the
2950/2960 LAN base versus lite versions, other than the 33% price hike?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Michel Grossenbacher wrote:
Uhm my bad, yes you're right. I dont know why I still think that all IOS
versions got the same architecture and base features, I should know it by
now :-)
Indeed. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a
duck, it's probably an Early Deployment
Having an issue with BGP...
I have a border router that can't do full feeds (6500/Sup2) so it is
taking partials (upstream customers). I am trying to make decisions
on which upstream to use as a default route. For traffic shaping
purposes, I have a server that acts as an eBGP peer to get the
discrepancy in the
filter response? Or am I missing something obvious...
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2007-
05/msg00191.html
[2] http://www.nabble.com/file/8500/%280%20-
%2032%29MHz%29%20CIC%20Frequency%20Response%20%28CIC%20decimation%20%3D3
2%
29.JPG
[Kell
What gain do you have set for the receive side?
Good point - I forgot to mention that I set the gain to 0 via the
--gain=0 switch passed to usrp_fft.py. So I shouldn't be seeing any
clipping.
Also, another detail that I forgot to mention - I didn't consider the
carrier at the center
The recent discussion of VRFs, RDs, RTs, VPNv4 labels, etc was
interesting, and starting to sink in.
I've been in early stages of a VRF-lite deployment for some time.
Admittedly, from a VRF-lite perspective, a lot of the configuration is
essentially cut-and-paste, and most of the values you can
in the filter
response? Or am I missing something obvious...
Thanks!
Scott
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2007-05/msg00191.html
[2]
http://www.nabble.com/file/8500/%280%20-%2032%29MHz%29%20CIC%20Frequency%20Response%20%28CIC%20decimation%20%3D32%29.JPG
Scott Kell
Technical
Anyone here with Charter? Please contact me off-list unless you're
already aware of DNS weirdness...
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, we have quite a lot of 100Mb fibre distribution but it is spread across
many locations so 24 fibre ports out from any location is just about
enough.
My question is now, the 3550-FX has gone and I need to replace some units
the way forward with integrated ports is
We're trying to light up our first 10G Xenpak link, so far without
success, so I'm looking for a quick sanity check.
3750G-16TD switch with an LR Xenpak [ours], trying to link to a Ciena
[not ours] add/drop ONS.
We had some marginal power levels trying to backhaul the circuit across
campus, so
Nick Griffin wrote:
I've figured out how to exchange routes between VRF's with the bgp address
family configuration coupled with redistribute static|connected, etc however
I'm trying to propagate this information and I'm having problems getting it
to work as desired.
I'll take a guess at your
Quick question for someone that's been there done that from someone
who has said I thought it would work more often than I'd like :-)
Can you get a full BGP feed (two peers) into a Sup2? with uRPF? Which
RAM needs to be upgraded?
I found out the hard way it won't fit into a SUP2/MSFC2/PFC2
Mathias Spoerr wrote:
Hello Steve,
when I remember correctly - when you rename the interface, then also the
related config parts, where the interface name is used, are changed.
Keep a good backup of the config just in case, especially if you're
talking about trying this with PDM/ASDM. They
Justin Shore wrote:
You might be thinking that you can simply download a copy of the
startup-config to a tftp server, modify it and upload it back over top
of the startup-config (or running-config). First off I can't remember
where the startup-config is located on the PIX/ASAs or if it can be
Gadi Evron wrote:
The original number is from some research in the 70s.
Yeah. Before the internet :-)
Jeff
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open
Richard M. Smith wrote:
So under HA, a Web browser can only show ASCII text files. After all, HTML
itself is a programming language with intermingled code (ie., HTML tags) and
data (text).
Well, it's not *that* bad. HTML tags and other markup that affects the
layout is fine. Tables, forms,
As Valdis stated earlier:
I predict that if you graph it, there's a ton of packets that are right
around the MTU of the network. almost equal number of tiny packets carrying
the ACK's of the mobygrams, and then a small noise level of everything else.
That's pretty much the case for the last
I seem to have backed myself into a corner and am looking for suggestions...
Our campus is largely RFC1918 internally. The original hub-and-spoke
design was along the lines of assigning a 10.x.x.x/16 or larger block to
significant buildings, so each building was it's own routed domain
Salut,
http://FqpY.lakepaint.cn
Be called on for a sample? Suppose i should be i began to
thank him, but he cut me short. It but i have heard your
apostlei have heard master few years, when christmas began
to be considered will cover them, or whitewine, winevinegar,
or in greasy coils. Other
Gary Roberton wrote:
Anyone know the IOS image required (e.g. Enterprise Base) for Multi-VRF
(VRF-Lite) on a 2811 router.
Almost all L3 images will do VRF lite. But non-static routing between
them, or especially providing an MPLS or tunnelled endpoint pipe between
CEs/PEs is gonna cost you
Dave Nelson wrote:
IIRC Microsoft's reasoning for not shipping SP3 with a newer version was
that their license for flash only covered the older version that they
include in the update.
Does it reinstall the older ActiveX, the older plugin [e.g., Firefox],
or both?
Jeff
We're in the planning process for a better way to get multiple VRFs
meshed into a common 'internet' gateway, preferably without
unintentional cross-leakage between them.
There are brute-force methods (run them all to the edge) but we really
do need to have some leakage across certain VRFs.
On a somewhat related note... we have a 6509 that was somehow
originally wired for 110v, so we're only getting half the power rating
out of them. I have new 220v mains, plugs, and cables ready... can they
be bumped over one at a time hot, or does it have to be down cold?
Seems to be a similar
So has netflow disappeared into the great real soon now cloud in the
sky? :-)
Jeff
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kaj Niemi wrote:
The ASA does not support STP. If you run recent enough software you
may be able to use redundant interface pairs (assuming you are looking
for redundancy).
Redundant pairs? On the same box? Is that in 8.x?
The typical redundancy setup is similar to
Have an interesting issue, and no testbed available to evaluate my
options, curious if anyone has been there, done that...
Have a pair of ASAs running multiple contexts in active/active failover
mode. They are basically multiple contexts with an inside and
outside interface.
The insides are
Are you using route authentication? We had issues with SVI VRF
interfaces with some recent specific IOS releases (worked in older
releases). If you are doing authentication and this might be relevant,
let me know and I'll fish up the details.
In our case, EIGRP with route authentication
Dean Smith wrote:
If you've ever had a real networkand accidentally created a loop in an
environment without spanningtreeand then watched the network melt and
all the activity lights go solidspanning-tree becomes much easier to
understand.
You can learn a lot about spanning tree
Hopefully this will ring a bell with someone that has been there done
that and can save me a road trip with a sniffer...
We recently added a few HP ProCurve switches (2810s) at the access layer
using simple trunks back to our existing Ciscos (2950/2960/3550/3560s).
All is well with the
Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
OT but cool:
http://www.firstsounds.org/press/032708/index.php
Au Clair de la Lune - French folk song, back to 1860...
And the RIAA can't be far behind in shutting down that website :-)
Jeff
___
Fun and Misc security
I received this little gem yesterday...
Jeff
-Registered and USDA/FDA apprvoved-
You're invited to purchase!
We are pleased that you were referred to us.
We would like to invite you to our special
website only available to existing customers.
As a referral we are extending this
Hi,
I would like to create a Microsoft DirectShow source filter for the USRP
(so I can integrate the USRP with an existing base of DirectShow
filters; DirectShow is Microsoft's multimedia architecture). Before I
re-invent the wheel, has anyone done this before?
Thanks!
Scott Kell
Justin Shore wrote:
Personally I'm still using ACLs on my border routers. At this point in
time I want the ACE hit counters for those rogue packets
Hrmmm... will these show up in netflow in some identifiable fashion?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
roy wrote:
IIRC, ip route bogon/net null0 will filter on near line-rate based on
destination addresses.
rpf (strict/loose) on the other hand will accomplish a somewhat similar
solution as with your acl to filter packets based on source addresses
consuming less resources (assuming you have
Lotus, a luxury goods company, based in Netherlands, is currently seeking
virtual assistants to work at the convenience of their home, part-time. We have
reviewed your resume on Careerbuilder and would like to consider you for this
position.
Lotus presents the best off-season luxury finds from
Adrian Minta wrote:
Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Here is any magic way to filter / remove any multicast traffic from machines
connected on Gi 0/1 (eg avoid machine that is on this port to send any
multicast packets on network).
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 3
? OpenBSD
3.9 is quite old but rdr should work quite well. I use this since OpenBSD 3.4
Regards
Stefan Kell
Kell
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
Hi,
If I set a core limit to unlimited and a stack limit to 32768,
then run a program with indefinite recursion, the system would
generate 8G coredump file.
Here we go:
$ uname -a
OpenBSD obx1000 4.2 GENERIC#375 i386
$ ulimit -a
time(cpu-seconds
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-02-23, Stefan Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
Greetings
...snip...
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 - 127.0.0.1 port
5000
...snip
I'm running
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
Greetings
...snip...
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 - 127.0.0.1
port 5000
...snip
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 (i386) on both
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:29:06 +
Von: elaconta.com Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Stefan Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Web Traffic forwarding, PF and NC
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008
, especially paragraph Translation rules apply only to
packets that pass through the specified interface,...
Regards
Stefan Kell
and then you have probably no
security. If possible I would not allow direct access to the internet but
only via squid.
regards
Stefan Kell
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Albert Chin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:55:44AM +0100, Stefan Kell wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:36:20 -0600
Von: Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Sending mail from external firewall
files has to
be complete regarding to configurations and options. Otherwise in which
order should these files be included?
Regards
Stefan Kell
definition. Otherwise there would
be numerous problems with sorting these files and so on.
I cannot see this well explained in the documentation but you can see it
easily in the source of httpd.
Regards
Stefan Kell
Frank Schadwill wrote:
From TAC you got the image 7.2.3.17, there is this issue fixed.
Last interim release available on CCO is 7.2.3(12). You'll have to open
a TAC case to get it (they gave me 7.2.3(13), which worked).
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Recently upgraded 7.2(2) - 7.2(3)12 and our network monitors stopped
reading interface stats off the ASAs. Anyone know of any issues?
We can get system status fine, so it's not an SNMP permissions issue;
but interface stats disappeared.
Jeff
___
Thank's a lot!
This is good to know!
Stefan
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:07:23 + (UTC)
Von: Fredrik Carlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: ports.openbsd.nu
Edd Barrett vext01 at gmail.com writes:
hey,
what happened to
Hello,
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Brian Richardson wrote:
Stefan Kell wrote:
some other questions: why a bridge and why not simple router with pf? What
is your bridge configuration?
vr0 is internal interface. ral0 is wireless interface.
brconfig bridge0 add ral0
brconfig bridge0 add vr0
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:55:43 -0700
Von: Brian Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Stefan Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: WAP setup problems
Stefan Kell wrote:
Did you try using one shared-network with two different
.
Regards
Stefan Kell
Gadi Evron wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Larry Seltzer wrote:
I believe 24/7 covers it. Why the rest?
Why not just 24?
24 hours means 24 hours. 24 hours 7 days a week means all the time.
Reminds me of the old Steven Wright joke about the man walking up to a
convenience
or wireless?
Regards
Stefan Kell
Hello,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Richard Daemon wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008 2:49 PM, Stefan Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Jim M wrote:
Sorry I wasn't clear. What my mind was thinking wasn't coming across.
I
hope this helps.
I have a firewall that runs on a Sun Ultra 5
501 - 600 of 810 matches
Mail list logo
