On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:11 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> If we extrapolate linearly just from 2023-09-29 on, that gives an end-date
> of 2026-02-22. And linearly is probably optimistic too, given the classic
> "last 10% is 90% of the time" thing.
That sounds reasonable, but we'll also be
Hello Patrick,
What was the command you issued? Were there any errors before the
excerpt you've posted? Does your user belong to the 'mock' group?
Best regards,
A.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hello Dominik,
Thank you again.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:45 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 28 December 2023 at 10:27, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> Done. I put @scitech_sig as the default bugzilla assignee for EPEL.
> Can you change the default assi
Hi Julian,
Thank you for the work you've put into this over the years.
I have taken gnome-chemistry-utils, bodr and chemical-mime-data. I am
using the calculator almost daily and sometimes the spectrum and
structure viewers.
Antonio, will you be able to lend a hand if need be?
Happy new year
Hello Dominik,
For the time being I will take inchi, if nobody else wants it. I
haven't used EPEL in a very long time, so I'm only interested in the
Fedora branches.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:26 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> chemtool
> xdrawchem
Having used these two for almost
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:40 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
> sure that doesn't happen?
>
> As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the Bodhi update, and I don't see
> an option to delete it.
If it's still pending, do you have the
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I maintain the gnome-shell extension for bubblemail. I was informed by
> > the upstream developer that in o
Hello,
I maintain the gnome-shell extension for bubblemail. I was informed by
the upstream developer that in order to support GNOME ≥ 45, he is
rewriting most of the code. What is currently the master branch will
support (recent) GNOME versions up to 44.x and there will be another
branch for 45
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> Without docs, the whole process is a black box.
+1
That was actually one of the two reasons I started this thread.
For instance, is this the package that must be rebuilt in order to see
an AppStream metadata file appear/refreshed
The current state of things, Fedora-wise, is summarized in FPC ticket #1053:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1053
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
According to our packaging guidelines[1], "you MUST run appstream-util
validate-relax (in %check or %install) and have BuildRequires:
libappstream-glib, to help ensure the validity and safety of the
appdata files you’re installing".
For quite some time now, I've been seeing references to
Hello,
I have just corrected gucharmap's license from:
GPL-3.0-or-later AND GFDL-1.3-or-later AND Unicode-DFS-2015
to:
GPL-3.0-or-later AND GFDL-1.3-or-later AND Unicode-DFS-2016
The change happened upstream six months ago, but I hadn't spotted it
at the time.
Best regards,
Alexander
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 1:09 PM Liam Proven wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 11:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > (Everyone, it's best to not feed the troll)
>
> Since you don't quote any part of any message, we have no idea who you
> consider to be a troll and so who we are not supposed to
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:27 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> If there is a /etc/kernel/cmdline file then that will be used
> for the generated /boot/loader/entries/*.conf files.
>
> (I was recently bitten by this myself)
Yes, there is and its contents are those of the problematic
Hello,
On one of my computers, for the last couple of kernel updates I'm not
getting the proper options in the corresponding *.conf files in
/boot/loader/entries. Some of the options specified in
/etc/default/grub are there, but anything related to the root
partition and some other options are
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
[…]
>
> Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> commit/build.
A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never happened:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374
The task does not exist
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:14 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 26/07/2023 11:04, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > You could, for example, buy a supported Logitech
> > Receiver
>
> I don't recommend anyone to buy this proprietary hardware:
>
> > The vulnerabilities allow
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> Only Dell, HP and Lenovo laptops are fully supported:
> https://fwupd.org/lvfs/devices/
Not just laptops, desktops/workstations too. In the last six years,
I've had five different models provided by my employers and they were
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Please do bump and rebuild it.
It's done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103849749
> Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> commit/build.
Indeed.
___
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
>
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to
> f39.
So it's over?
> Things still needing rebuilding
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html
Is it up to the packagers to
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> switcheroo-controlorphan 2 weeks ago
Has anyone from the Workstation WG noticed this? Won't losing
switcheroo-control be a considerable usability regression? At the same
time, the upstream
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 1:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> What corporate desktop customers do not use LibreOffice?
I know two big-name scientific instrument manufacturers that offer
RHEL workstations on which to run the control software. I suspect
there are other domains with similar use
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:11 AM Parag Nemade wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:58 PM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I know this has been asked before, more recently four years ago in
>> https://lists.fedoraproject
Hello,
I know this has been asked before, more recently four years ago in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/OQDWCHFDTBKCPHWF2VLPUF74WC76TCNY/#6VUBRYAAZMX6SOREM7ZENDV44MIPE7WH
I'm not sure what the "right" way of dealing with this is, so I would
Hi Zbigniew,
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:
>
> #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output
I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would
really
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 3:44 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Something is glitching on my provider's side and it's impossible to
> create new VMs. I've opened a ticket, but I doubt anyone is going to
> deal with it before Monday.
It has taken them over a month to (sort of) resolve
Hello Matthew, everyone,
The TL;DR version of my thoughts and suggestions on this topic:
implement the improvements suggested so far as best as possible, so
that the people who want to interact with Discourse through their mail
reader can do so with little to no friction. Clearly define and
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 3:37 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 01:38 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:29 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ah. I think this is one bug in Fedora review (already reported)
>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
> >
> > I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
> >
> > fedpkg
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:25 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > I will submit systemd-tests-251.14-2.fc37 with the patch.
> > I doubt that it solves the issue completely, but it shouldn't
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> I will submit systemd-tests-251.14-2.fc37 with the patch.
> I doubt that it solves the issue completely, but it shouldn't make
> it worse, so let's at least do this for now.
Thank you, I see it's still being built in koji. I
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:33 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:25:33PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:08:03AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:09 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > TL;DR:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:09 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Additionally, the smallest offerings of popular VPS providers have
> just 1 or 2 GB of RAM, is Fedora Server no longer supported on systems
> like these?
> Do we need to update the documentation for system requirements? Ping
> cloud
I don't think we're using that anymore. See this:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Installing_Packager_Tools/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:29 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> ah. I think this is one bug in Fedora review (already reported)
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824526
Thanks for that, though I do not have any non-rpm files in that folder:
$ ls -AC Desktop/coding/reviews/deps/
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 5:59 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> works for me [1] , have you any custom configuration on
> ~/.config/mock.cfg ?
No, nothing custom there.
> [1]
> rpm -q fedora-review
> fedora-review-0.9.0-1.fc37.noarch
>
> fedora-review -b 2180243
> ERROR: 'mock build failed, see logs
Hi Sergio,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 5:23 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> what is you fedora-review version ? and Fedora version ?
It's fedora-review-0.9.0-1 on F37.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello,
When running fedora-review on RHBZ#2180243, the program crashes and I
can't figure out what the problem is. There are a few dependencies of
the package currently under review, which I've downloaded and passed
on to fedora-review with the -L flag. This is the error I'm getting:
03-21 15:46
Hello Jerry,
I've taken the musescore review (I haven't been able to keep up with
the font packaging changes).
Could you please have a look at this package in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 7:07 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> The keys need to be regenerated in COPR I believe to fix this.
How does one do that in COPR?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 12:15 AM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
>
> Where are the macros defined? I.e., %configure probably expands
> to ./configure and %make_build to make.
In addition to Chuck's reply, you can also use the --eval (or -E) flag
with rpm to see the values of variables or to what a macro
Hello,
TL;DR:
DNF memory usage during upgrades from F37 to F38 on a couple of Fedora
Cloud images (with 2 GB of RAM each) led to oomd kicking in and
killing the upgrade process. It might be worth looking into before the
final (also beta?) release.
The longer story:
I have a couple of hosted
Todd is right, we ditched createrepo back in F30 an what's left is a
symlink to createrepo_c.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:52 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
> OK, I tried createrepo_c . but I get the same error.
>
> Here is what I tried:
>
>
> createrepo_c --update .
>
> And now, nothing
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:15 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> I wonder if anyone has any suggestions on how to get around this problem. I
> create my local repo using
>
> createrepo .
>
> inside my RPMS/x86_64 directory.
Is there a specific reason you are not using createrepo_c? Does that
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:39 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> I am writing a spec file for SliM, the Simple Login Manager for Fedora 37. I
> was thiniking of changing the default login image to the Fedora one. It
> appears that that is stored in the RPM: f37-backgrounds-base and the file is
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:43 PM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
> According to
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
>
> unretiring a package requires review if retired for more than eight weeks.
> According to releng, the package slim
Hi Georg,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:17 AM Georg Sauthoff wrote:
>
> In case this comes up again - how does unretirement work, exactly?
> Does one request to unretire a package via writing to this mailing list
> or does the process work differently?
These links are pertinent to your questions, it
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XI2QFIRCUJGX2FMEJ5K6ILLXOIWBGBIN/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> IQmoljussilehtola
I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous
mail like last time. I know that they're working with upstream to
package the next version of IQmol, so this
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:47 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 02:44:01 AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> > Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of
> > ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:59 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 01:33:18 AM +0100, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > Also, given that it is now apparently considered "allowed" to enable
> > unfiltered flathub with the "Enable third-party repositories" switch,
> > I wonder if that
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 7:21 PM Dale Turner via devel
wrote:
>
> As I mentioned last week, I would be interested in xaos. BUT, I am not
> presently a packager/maintainer...
Hi Dale,
Unfortunately there's nothing that can be done (except perhaps
delaying the retirement of xaos) until you become
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 9:29 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> I want to point one - if you are maintainer of package with license
> "Copyright only" or "Redistributable" then please read:
>
>
>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 7:21 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> This is nice, but all I ever seen is a black screen and a spinning circle. No
> text of any kind. If something were written to the console, how do you see
> it?
Have you tried hitting "Esc" when that happens?
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:55 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Also I wonder if there's a way for desktops to opt into this behavior? Or a
> way for servers, iot, cloud, and rpm-ostree based systems to opt out?
Do you mean like setting the "DefaultTimeoutStopSec" variable in
/etc/systemd/system.conf?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 4:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> seahorse-nautilus gnome-sig, orphan, stefw 2 weeks ago
Taken, though I'm wondering if someone from the GNOME SIG wants it (I
wouldn't mind giving it up).
___
devel mailing
Hello Terry,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:28 AM Terry Barnaby wrote:
>
> Well I don't want to rock the boat with the maintainer, they are just
> doing what they think is expected.
>
> I will just continue with my own local RPM for our own uses and provide
> it for anyone else that is in the same
Thanks for the detailed response. There was quite a lot of reading,
but in the end the upgrade from 2.5 was uneventful. I do hope there
will be a migration guide when version 3 lands though.
I see these messages in my system logs:
Dec 07 22:56:24 bb3 audit[1786]: AVC avc: denied { setpcap }
Hello David,
Thanks for the heads up.
Is there a tool that can test server and client configurations for
compatibility before upgrading? If not, how can one verify that
certificates, TLS version etc. comply with the minimum requirements?
Best regards,
A.
Hello Gary,
And welcome aboard!
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 6:17 PM Gary Mann wrote:
>
> […]
>
> My goal here is to contribute to Fedora/Redhat by
> becoming a package maintainer. I've noticed that the 'mylvmbackup'
> package is a simple package that currently has been retired in EL8
> that could
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 9:02 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2022 20:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > It's not "demanding", but rather "suggesting". It's not offering the
> > font either.
>
> FOSS fonts should be placed first.
It's not "demanding", but rather "suggesting". It's not offering the
font either. It makes sense from the web developer's perspective to
have the page appear as good or consistent as possible on every
platform.
___
devel mailing list --
Will you please stop making new threads about the same issue?
You were told 4 days ago that your metadata is stale and how to
refresh it (pkcon refresh force). If you think there's a bug, file a
bug report in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
___
I've just checked 4 systems (2x Workstation, MATE and Cloud), and the
migration was successful on all of them. They were all upgraded to the
latest versions in testing at the time with dnf system-upgrade.
Regular package updates were performed weekly at the latest.
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 8:46 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> the docs doesn't talk about gating, I have received the same messages
> ("gating failed" first, then "ignored", but no details why), hopefully
> someone familiar with these process details will reply here :-)
> Otherwise we should wait
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:46 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Is some sort of manual intervention required or not?
>
> Do I need to put in a ticket somewhere or not?
>
> Nothing in the message gives me any context as to what is required.
There's nothing to do, but wait.
Hello Richard,
We are at the final freeze stage, so that's probably why these updates
haven't moved to stable.
What do you mean by "ignored"? The only thing I see is that test
gating is ignored.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:11 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> So
>
> Maybe this is documented
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:35 PM Sébastien Le Roux
wrote:
>
> Le 28/09/2022 à 20:13, Alexander Ploumistos a écrit :
> >
> Yes I did look into this documents today, followed the procedure, and
> submitted the bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
Hello Sébastien,
Bienvenue !
Have you taken a look at these documents? They should help you get started.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors/
The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions.
Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion
package.
However, I think that for people on Workstation who
encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not
comfortable with a terminal), the
Thank you Vitaly.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hello,
Two of my packages failed to build due to a trailing "." after the
%cmake macro in the spec file. I have a couple of questions:
First, do I need to wait for the FTBFS bugs to be filed before I fix
the packages or can I submit updated builds to the f37-rebuild side
tag myself?
Second, I
There are some issues with Open Babel's dependencies:
Error:
Problem 1: package expo-1.18.11-1.fc28.x86_64 requires
libopenbabel.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- openbabel-libs-2.4.1-37.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with
Hi Steve,
It looks like you had some (browser?) caching issue, all the rpms in
all the chroots are there.
Best regards,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello Antonio,
I'll take care of it.
Till later,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Now they're back up and running again. I think that when I started the
builds before, s390x did not appear in the output of "koji list-tasks
--mine".
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello Kevin,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Planned Outage - build systems ( koji, osbs, mbs, src, pdc, kojipkgs, odcs,
> registriy) - 2021-11-09 17:00 UTC
[…]
>
> We will be doing several maint tasks during this outage:
>
> All the s390x builders will be moving from
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Hello Antonio,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We are ready to push openbabel3 in R
Thanks a lot Björn, this is very helpful!
All the best,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's an "elegant" and "rpm" way to do the
following, without calling an external tool (and maybe adding another
dependency to a package):
Project "foo" tracks the development of project "bar" and both use
basic semantic versioning, X.Y.Z. Project "bar" rarely
Hello Antonio,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide
Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is
done in order to rebuild dependent packages?
Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x?
Thank you for
Hello Ron,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:55 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> I haven’t found any info about renaming an existing project/package, and was
> wondering what the procedures would be.
We have this:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:59 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 9/26/21 10:22, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> > I moved the openbabel's libraries under a private lib directory.
> > 'desktop' files are modified for working in this sense.
>
> Sorry, i meant gchemistry's libraries under a private
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back.
I got pretty much the same results on F34.
I think xdrawchem works better with Open Babel 3 than it does with
Open Babel 2, at least as far as structure cleanup goes (I ins
Hello Antonio,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:50 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done.
> Please, can anyone that uses these software test them?
I spun up a Fedora 35 VM and installed everything from your copr,
didn't mess with any system settings.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:37 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project.
Well done Antonio!
I will give it a try this weekend.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello Antonio,
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:32 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Links of Copr projects to get srpms for testing:
>
> openbabel3-3.1.1:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/
As expected, Molsketch had no problem with 3.1.1, it built fine.
I also played with
Hi Antonio,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:11 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> 'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they
> have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts".
>
> Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora?
I think that the people
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >
>
> We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary.
> Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet?
Almost two years ago (h
Hello Antonio,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is
> updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least:
What about the packages that haven't been ported to work with Open
Hi Vitaly,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 10:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> They just closed the sources. Memtest86 is a commercial product now. It
> has full UEFI support, etc.
Just to be sure, you are talking about Memtest86, not Memtest86+, right?
Salut Nicolas,
And welcome aboard!
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 3:54 AM Nicolas FORMICHELLA wrote:
> and in process of packaging Canon IJfilter driver for AUR/RPM and DEB
A long time ago I had managed to create an rpm from canon's package
for the iP7200 printer, which conformed to our guidelines at
:
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:38:08AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Should gdb be able to read from a sound device?
>
> It shouldn't attempt to.
Should I file a bug against gdb or abrt?
> > Having root logged in a terminal, I tried to check the state of
> > p
Hello,
Apologies if you find the subject line vague or misleading, I couldn't
figure out what to write. I've been trying to debug a transient
pipewire issue so that I can file a bug report, but I keep stumbling
from one roadblock to the next.
When the problem occurs, pipewire receives a SIGSEGV
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Did you by chance add them to the update during the upgrade this
> morning? (starting at 10UTC)? It doesn't look like bodhi did the right
> thing with the tagging here... I can try and correct things.
It was towards the end of
Hello,
Can anyone help me figure out what's going on with this update?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b8551abae2
It says that the side-tag is not among a bunch of other tags. It does
exist though.
What I did was build a package and its dependencies in side-tags for
F33, F34
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 6:37 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > Dnia Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:51:31PM +0200, Björn Persson napisał(a):
> > > I used yum system-upgrade to upgrade from Fedora 32 to Fedora 34. Now
> > > Grub complains about not finding some theme files, and then
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 3/9/21 1:39 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Well, the first option is still a no-no, as the fixup has to happen in
> > the user's home directory. For the second one, I think I'd need to add
> > something like &
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:28 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 3/8/21 5:10 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
> > just bite the bullet, build the update and wait for the bug reports to
> > come in?
>
> Yo
1 - 100 of 471 matches
Mail list logo
