I found it useful to ship the nextcloud package as a module, particularly in
EPEL, but if after multiple years there really are only 12 packages in the repo
and even those may or may not work then that is a pretty clear argument for
eating the sunk cost & abandoning the idea.
-- Christopher
Hi,
On 01.08.22 14:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
php-aws-sdk3 lcts
php-pimple lcts
both fixed.
Best,
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 2021-07-19 11:58, Tomas Korbar wrote:
Hi guys,
I will review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621
Thanks. Note that php-giggsey-libphonenumber-for-php requires
php-giggsey-locale, which is also not in the repos yet.
On 2021-07-19 09:07, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
However, copr seems to understand rpmautospec. Here is a build that
started from a specfile that uses rpmautospec and completed
successfully:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/build/2329596/
Not quite. It doesn't error, but it
On 18.07.21 16:06, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I
> synthesizer modules
> A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes
> from a monorepo that also contains other related projects.
>
On 17.07.21 00:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
>>> for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
>>>
>>> This means installing
Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer
libraries from the nextcloud package.
The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good news is that I think quite a few of them will be
Hi,
does anyone know how to get in touch with Shawn? There are a couple bugs
I opened a while ago that have seen no response, e.g. here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933633
Non-responsive maintainer bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982667
Thanks,
Christopher
Hi,
unless I'm very much mistaken, since Discord isn't open source software
it cannot be packaged by Fedora.
Christopher
On 11.06.21 19:54, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> Dear team
> Dear team.
> I would like to know if anyone took care of integrating the discord
> application in the Fedora
On 18.05.21 22:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> php-opencloud-openstack
I'll take this, I'll need it for nextcloud unbundling.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On 08.03.21 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> php-deepdiver-zipstreamer orphan 0
> weeks ago
> php-opencloud-openstack orphan 0
> weeks ago
I've taken these, I will need them for nextcloud
On 09.12.20 15:20, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Does anyone know of a group that is going to start their own RHEL Clone?
I'm sure the Scientific Linux people will do something, given that they
just recently decided to not release SL8 but rather use CentOS 8. I feel
quite bad for them, actually ...
Some
On 09.12.20 11:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> However, since CentOS Linux 8 (and 9!) will be no more, do we have some
> ideas how to handle this? Do we require all EPEL contributors to obtain
> the developer RHEL subscription (seems like a huge pain)? Do we switch
> to Oracle Linux (only half joking)?
On 2020-12-03 09:31, David Kaufmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 06:11:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
That would be amazing! In order for it to remain as an edition, we
(speaking
generally for the Council) like to see regular meetings -- at least
monthly.
I'll check the situation there
nextcloud nextcloud-httpd nextcloud-mysql nextcloud-nginx
> nextcloud-postgresql nextcloud-sqlite
> Size: 415.35 MiB
> Size change: 325.60 MiB
> Changelog:
> * Wed Nov 11 2020 Christopher Engelhard - 20.0.1-3
> - Remove CentOS/RHEL 7 support from spec file
The only dif
On 22.10.20 10:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Also, I think we should go by the *total* number of speakers, not just the
> speakers
> for whom the language is the *first* language. My thinking (and I would love
> to hear from people who are in this situation) is that many parts of the
On 14.10.20 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We now allow scls if:
>
> * They only need to be used at build time (ie, the rpms produced do not
> require users to install/enable any scls)
> * They are approved by the epel steering comittee.
>
> So far we have only enabled devtoolset. (so for
On 13.10.20 12:14, Leon Fauster wrote:
> My recall was this
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DBAQB3V35TXPNUV4UKKHXUC52BENZJUQ/
OK, thanks, that clears that up. So I'll go ahead and retire the EPEL7
package. Maybe I can put an updated
On 12.10.20 10:49, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Not sure but IIRC EPEL should not depend on software collections ...?
Can someone confirm that? If the package can't depend on php7.2+, then
the question of how to deal with EPEL7 is moot.
Christopher
___
On 12.10.20 12:09, Petr Pisar wrote:
> RHEL releases a minor version every six months. And as I remember, EPEL8
> allows breaking upgrades at each new RHEL release. Thus technically, it's
> possible to rebase the package every year without getting into conflict with
> packaging guidelines. On the
On 11.10.20 23:29, Nick Howitt wrote:
> How do you intend to handle the switch to PHP7.3?
Not sure yet - I wanted to make sure it even makes sense to keep
nextcloud in EPEL7 first. But that's another reason it's probably risky
to jump people from NC10 to NC18+ (NC13 was the last release to
On 11.10.20 15:10, H wrote:
> I'd like it updated, and kept updated, for EPEL 7.
Do you happen to have a system with the current 10.0.something EPEL7
package set up & would you be willing to - if I make an updated package
- test the upgrade process? I could set up something myself, but I think
One thing I forgot that makes things even worse:
- upstream does not support updates across more than one major version,
so anybody who actually has the old v10 installed will have their
installation completely broken by ANY update at this point
- for the same reason, trying to limit major
On 11.10.20 13:57, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I'm fine with retiring it.
>
> But on the alternatives , you can have modules (or application
> streams) for both epel and fedora.
> It would be a good way forward. so it won't enforce nextcloud version
> with a given fedora and or epel and would allow
Hi,
the nextcloud server package is currently stuck at ancient version 10
(current is 20) in EPEL7 (It's not (yet) available EPEL8 repos).
I'd like to fix that, but
- upstream releases a new version roughly every 4 months
- they support them only for roughly 1 year (officially it's "at least 8
On 10.10.20 00:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This might be a good Quick Doc candidate.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home
Good idea, I'll do that.
Christopher
___
devel mailing list --
On 09.10.20 20:59, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> It's certainly a little different. See if an answer in this thread works
> for you:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VZFJ2MWPJLSP3RFCWN4H7MWDXXWEXLNL/
Thanks, I must have missed that thread. Deleting &
Hi,
I just tried to reinstall a Fedora 33 Workstation system that uses the
F33 default btrfs partitioning (i.e. subvolumes for / and /home). I
can't seem to find an option to install to / while preserving the /home
subvolume, Anaconda insists on a reformatted partition for root - which
would of
On 07.10.20 11:47, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> When using debootstrap, the user has to do some things manually, like
> mounting /proc, /sys, /dev and /dev/shm
>
> It is relatively easy to duplicate those things for both Fedora and
> Debian chroots
ArchLinux has a nice script for this (arch-chroot) as
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for ichavero, in accordance
with
policy [0].
I submitted 2 bugs [1][2] related to outdated nextcloud versions
containing multiple (moderate) CVEs [3] about a month ago, but have not
had any response. nextcloud has a huge number of open bugs [4],
On 22.09.20 10:21, Andrea Perotti wrote:
> That has changed in the last hour, after the bugzilla has been opened [0].
> Glad to see the status in our systems now match the (sad) reality:
> at least if there are ppl interested in it, they could step up.
I took it, I'll work on getting it updated
On 10.09.20 17:53, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned that two different people are seeing this. I don't
> think we have any scriptlets tha writes to /etc/nsswitch.conf or
> /etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf on its own. But maybe, for non-live
> installs, that could happen if the systemd
Hi Muneendra,
On 28.08.20 10:47, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote:
> After stable time i.e 14 day's the updates will be automatically moved to
> stable .Is this correct.
That is the default yes, but you can configure it differently in the
Bodhi web interface if you choose.
Check out the EPEL
On 28.08.20 10:04, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:
> Do I need to call fedpkg update --type enhancement after fedpkg build for
> epel8 ?
Yes. Any branch that is Bodhi-enabled (normally any branch except
rawhide & epel8-playground) will require a 'fedpkg update' to actually
submit the build to the
On 27.08.20 13:27, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote:
> Hi Josey,
> Will the below steps work to upgrade the package for epel7.
Epel works just like any other Fedora branch, so unless there are
differences in dependencies on CentOS/RHEL vs Fedora (doesn't seem to be
the case, as you already have
On 24.08.20 20:06, Simo Sorce wrote:
> This has been proposed (somewhere, I forgot where) before, and it is a
> definite possibility.
> Unclear what package would distribute them, potentially the crypto-
> policies package.
Or a separate package, but at least the logic of selecting a default
from
On 24.08.20 18:43, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:13 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> We already are making it easier in some ways, but feel free to open a
> bug if there are specific components you are worried about.
What ways are that?
I'm not worried about any
On 24.08.20 12:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> numix-gtk-theme mymindstorm, orphan 0 weeks ago
> numix-icon-theme mymindstorm, orphan 0 weeks ago
> numix-icon-theme-circle mymindstorm, orphan 0 weeks ago
If Brendan / mymindstorm isn't interested, I can
On 23.08.20 04:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> While I understand the motivation behind the RFC (interoperability, safety
> against intentionally or unintentionally bad parameters), hardcoded
> parameters sound suspicious to me. How do we know that these are not chosen
> to allow the NSA or some
Hi,
tl;dr should we make it easier/automatic for users to use the
Diffie-Hellman parameters defined in RFC7919?
For a long time, the general recommendation for Finite-Field
Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters (FFDHE, for use with
non-elliptic-curve DH, i.e. the dhparam-file many server
On 04.08.20 11:54, Paul Howarth wrote:
> If you remove the "with multiple user accounts" then being able to log
> in and out on a single-user system would satisfy the requirement even
> if the multi-user bug was present, which wouldn't be very helpful.
Hm, true. As usual, the devil is in the
On 04.08.20 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I would even go further and remove the "with multiple user accounts"
> condition. Even on a singe user system, I'd like to be able to log out
> and back in again.
+1 on that.
Christopher
___
devel mailing list
On 08.07.20 23:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think it's `efibootmgr -b -L DefinitelyNotFedora`, where is
> the number of the entry called 'Fedora', which you could find by just
> running `efibootmgr` to get a list of entries. -b selects the entry to
> operate on and -L changes the
On 04.07.20 17:59, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> btw, sd-boot has a few tricks up its sleeve: if during boot you keep
> "w" pressed down it will automatically boot into windows, similar if
> you keep "l" pressed down it will automaticall boot into linux, "a"
> will boot into macos, all without
Can we maybe not restart this entire debate? i686 in Fedora has run down
the curtain and joined the choir invisible. Whether we think that was
the correct decision or not, there is absolutely no point in rehashing
all the original arguments, let alone in a thread about BIOS support.
Christopher
On 02.07.20 17:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It would be great if we could fairly reliably boot with a read-only
> root file system, all the way to the graphical environment. Obviously,
> such a machine will not be fully functional, but for users, debugging a
> disk problem when they
I like this approach, a lot. I'm all in favour of switching to btrfs
(I've been using it for a while, on server & desktop), and I think this
would be a safe approach to do so.
Christopher
On 01.07.20 20:24, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:54:02AM +, Zbigniew
On 26.06.20 12:20, Ian McInerney wrote:
> git is not the only program that uses the EDITOR variable. Some
> configuration tools on the command-line, such as crontab, will use the
> editor set in the environment variable if there is one.
visudo is also a good spot for a beginner to be stuck in
This is awesome, thank you.
On my dashboard (https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/lcts), the
mouse-over tooltips of top-row icons don't show up (I can see them in
other people's dashes).
This might be related to the fact that my packages currently have
nothing to display, as the same thing
It was orphaned, due to lack of time [1].
I'd be happy to take it.
Best,
Christopher
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XCLRSHRQBJRW5FPGIMBGOIH2KYLVSBNH/#XCLRSHRQBJRW5FPGIMBGOIH2KYLVSBNH
___
devel
I can't speak to the implementation of this, but I am in favour of the
approach in general, with one caveat: I think it is important to
implement this in a way that makes it possible for users to keep
*individual* retired packages around. Blacklisting
fedora-retired-packages is too broad a brush
On 02.06.20 14:24, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Do you think adding a notice like
> "The following command may take some time to work after this update has
> been pushed to testing, because the dnf mirrors should synchronize."
> would work? It may be not the best way to express that, since I'm
Hi Alessio,
On 02.06.20 09:32, Alessio wrote:
> sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-
> 81a3b3df7d
>
> Is it supposed to work? Because every time I tried it, it didn't work.
> In addition a package received a negative karma due to that ^_^;
It usually takes a bit
On 14.05.20 10:37, Pieter Lexis via dnsdist wrote:
> The build environment we set up for Centos 8 (and 7) builds and installs
> libh2o before building dnsdist[2]. libh2o, by default, builds a static
> library *and* it provides a pkg-config file allow it to be found,
> dnsdist picks it up and
On 13.05.20 14:55, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:57:43PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> The only way to make sure that the stuff included with Fedora is open
>> source is to build it from source - simply grabbing a binary provided
>> by an upstream means upstream could slip
On 17.04.20 16:07, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Especially the one in Fedora 15 (GNOME edition) and 16 was outstanding.
> Can we do more of those, please?
Not weighing in on the merits of the current art, but 16 is still my
favourite default artwork of any distro, ever.
On 03.04.20 22:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> So... could we please get a way to express this in rpm with a sane syntax:
>
> %define_cond docs 0%{?fedora} > 0
Oh please, yes.
Christopher
___
devel mailing list --
On 30.03.20 19:35, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 18:09 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
>> Il giorno sab, 28/03/2020 alle 15.13 +, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
>>> I will try packaging all Jitsi Meet suite [1]
>
> Me too, I've been watching that suite of tools and would love to be
On 2/24/2020 1:46 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
>I would be very happy if somebody could pick up the libffi packaging
> responsibility from me.
I'd be happy to adopt libffi, but given that I am a VERY new packager
and this is a pretty core package, I think it would be best if someone
with a bit
On 2/12/2020 11:01 AM, Vojtěch Trefný wrote:
> If nobody wants to maintain this package I can do that. It's definitely
> easier than rewriting our code to something else.
I can take it, or co-maintain, whichever works for you.
christopher
___
devel
On 07.12.19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
> I'm interested.
>
I'd be happy to co-maintain, if desired.
> On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python
>>> packages, makes
On 11/11/2019 3:51 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Hi, one of the wxGTK maintainers here. Where is the requirement to use
> wxGTK 3.1 documented? Like Kevin, I can't find that documented. And if
> it is definitely required, *why* is it required?
On Archlinux audacity-git [1] builds against the
On 11/5/2019 9:17 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'd like to gather a constructive list of the actual use-cases that
> you feel Modularity is causing problems for,
Thank you, that seems like a very good way forward.
> 6. We don't provide a direct solution for parallel-installability.
> This is
On 10/20/2019 11:28 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> welcome to Fedora. sshguard review is more than enough for a first package,
> quite a complicated beast. I'll sponsor you into the packager group.
>
> Zbyszek
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, I was away over the
On 18.10.19 17:21, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> While you're right that the solutions from source distros (i.e., NixOS
> and Gentoo) would be very hard to adapt, binary distros have also solved
> this problem in different ways. I'm most familiar with Debian's
> solution (virtual packages[2],
On 14.10.19 23:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how long did the build take on your machine there?
Almost 3 hours.
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
On 14.10.19 19:59, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> Is the documentation using parallel builds?
>
> They don't say.
Seems unlikely, see below
> It uses configure/make/make install. I had run the build with make -j1
> too, but that had seemed to run even slower.. I hadn't checked the
> resource usage
Hi all,
since I recently submitted my package for sshguard [1] for review [2],
this is probably a good time to introduce myself (some of you might
remember me from the packaging list). I'm also looking for a sponsor,
assuming the package is positively reviewed.
I"m Christopher, 35yr old, from
On 14.08.19 16:38, Remi Gacogne wrote:
> It looks like we don't support that explicitly.. You could probably work
> something around by tuning the allowed ciphers, but I guess an option to
> to select the TLS versions allowed, like ssl_protocols in nginx or
> SSLProtocol in Apache HTTPD, would
On 2/8/2019 5:03 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> It doesn't like that:
My bad, that was unclear of me, I meant the function in general, not the
specific command.
> [...] but the purist in me wants it to only listen on 853.
Hooray for purism. But I don't think that is possible. You could use
Hi,
On 10/8/18 12:01 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Are the instructions in this article meant to be executed with ease on Fedora
> Server 28 or perhaps easier on other Linux distros?
As long as you've installed the normal tools needed for compiling source
code (gcc, make, etc.),
On 08/21/2017 02:59 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> We should just remove that column. We do not merge new custom matrixes,
> because we do not have any means to validate them, and no one to do that.
Just to be clear, I'm not talking about custom matrices, but raw image
files to derive a matrix from.
Hi,
the list of supported cameras shows Canon PowerShot S100 and Sony a6300
(ILCE-6300) as missing a custom matrix [1].
I have made raw images of a Wolf Faust C1 IT8 color target [2]. Exposure
matches correct white level to within 0.15EV.
Is there somewhere I can upload them (~33MB) or should I
Found the problem - as usual, PEBKAC: I had a typo in $sa_configpath, so
SA when called from Amavis never loaded it's default config, only my
overrides. So of course all my individual config was working, but
nothing else ...
For future reference: SA failing to read it's default configuration
> Please open a bug on bugzilla. Nothing jumps to mind. If you can
> include the version of mysql just for completeness sake as well as how
> you created the tables, that would be good.
>
I'll do that, unless you can spot an error below.
> Do you have a line like user_awl_sql_table
> I'd start by giving it all perms (excepting things like GRANT), see if
> it works, and then scale back the perms until you find the minimal
> necessary set.
After giving the user full permissions I still get the exact same error
message(s).
For completeness' sake I tried the Bayes module with
On 08/14/2017 05:24 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> does mysql -u -p localhost spamdb work?
Yes, that works. The user has INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE, SELECT privileges.
Does it need CREATE? The table 'txrep' exists with columns username,
email, ip, count, totscore, signedby.
The Bayes-related tables
Hi,
I'm trying to set up txrep with SQL storage, but TxRep does not seem to
allow SQLBasedAddrList as factory module.
Log:
spamd[8299]: TxRep: illegal factory setting
spamd[8299]: TxRep: could not open storages, quitting!
spamd[8299]: TxRep: illegal factory setting
spamd[8299]: TxRep: could not
So far I haven't found any lenses that needed more either, I was just
curious.
Good to know about duplicated entries in the database. Means I'll
have to remember to clean up my local database occasionally.
--
Put Bad
Hi,
I've noticed an issue with the Equalizer and Profiled Denoise plugins
when they are applied to large areas with smooth colour gradients (see
e.g. the sky in [0], that's with the equaliser-plugin (sharpen denoise
preset)). I'm unfamiliar with the eq's algorithms, maybe there it is to
be
Hi,
I've created a denoise profile for the Pentax K-5 II (new version of the
K-5). It is available here:
http://pastebin.com/vSLddu4d
The full archive can be found here:
http://minos.ht.tu-berlin.de/public.php?service=filest=e859f2821b7eec90745103eaa87137c9
As you can see from the presets, I
81 matches
Mail list logo
