On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 at 17:41, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 August 2023 at 18:28:54 BST, Dave Crossland
> wrote:
>
> > Since almost all new fonts are vf, I'm no longer seeing ttfautohint in
> common usage, but I don't think it's effected by this.
>
> That's not n
Since almost all new fonts are vf, I'm no longer seeing ttfautohint in
common usage, but I don't think it's effected by this.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 4:51 PM pravin@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 02:39, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> I'm the Noto product owner at Google Fonts, I expect the wider range of
>> styles available by itself would make Noto fonts a better choice :) I would
Noto fonts are available with sources and fully libre CI build systems at
GitHub.com/notofonts and follow open source development methodology,
although they use the format preferred by the font designer. Some use sfd,
one even uses their own custom font code in python, but - as in the
majority of
I'm the Noto product owner at Google Fonts, I expect the wider range of
styles available by itself would make Noto fonts a better choice :) I would
be happy to hear any aspects of Lohit that are superior
___
fonts mailing list --
I was thinking of organizing a small libre fonts gathering in Europe or
USA. The ATypI.org conference is in Paris in May, so I was thinking about
something in London (or Reading city) before/after that event; could also
do it in Berlin since my manager at Google is living there again atm ;) But
a
What was the result of the poll? :)
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
Hi
I have a few XOs in my wardrobe and need to clear out some space, where's
the best place to send them?
I'm in NYC but can mail them where needed
Cheers
Dave
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Very sad news. Thanks for sharing
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Very sad news. Thanks for sharing
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
I'm curious if you have any updates on this? :)
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
I'm curious how often those XO machines are updated to the latest release
of Sugar.
Does anyone have any estimates for how many machines are in active use and
how many are really upgraded?
On Mon, May 20, 2019, 3:18 AM Tony Anderson wrote:
> Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who
Thanks Karen! Glad to hear that Conservancy will help make the transition
smooth :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks Karen! Glad to hear that Conservancy will help make the transition
smooth :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Hi
Does freetype support OpenType in SVG fonts?
--
Cheers
Dave
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Welcome!!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Server seems to be offline
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 7:18 AM Sumit Srivastava Can't access it too.
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, 5:46 pm Vipul Gupta,
> wrote:
>
>> Just tried on Chrome, can't seem to access it.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 4:17 PM Samson Goddy
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is it
on, which
> includes Sugar and these activities. The rest of my time is already
> sold.
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:27:56AM -0500, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > James, are you soliciting SL pay you as a contractor to fix Activities
> not on
> > the list?
> >
> > On
James, are you soliciting SL pay you as a contractor to fix Activities not
on the list?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 1:15 AM James Cameron Nice idea, but hasn't happened yet, and I don't expect it to ever
> happen without scaling up the number of testers and fixers.
>
> We just don't have enough people
Thanks for summarizing the recent organizational activity and best wishes
to all :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Thanks for summarizing the recent organizational activity and best wishes
to all :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks for sharing!
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 7:06 PM Alex Perez In case anyone was curious...
>
> Of the 238 subscribers on iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org:
>
> * 32 people have chosen to place their subscription in the "nomail"
> state, so they are able to send e-mail to the list, but don't receive
>
physical event, from "I'll bring X, Y, Z" to "meet us here on
> Friday" that simply _should not_ be happening on the iaep mailing list.
>
> Dave Crossland wrote:
> > I agree with Caryl, in that unlike me and the 229 others not doing
> > anything for
I agree with Caryl, in that unlike me and the 229 others not doing anything
for scale, she is doing something and that should only be commended.
I also think splintering the discussion in many mailing lists is a pity,
since email reader app features exist to deal with muting uninteresting
I've set that up. Thanks for the instructions :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
I've set that up. Thanks for the instructions :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 09:09, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:04 PM Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> Thanks for sharing the logs!
>>
>
> FWIW, the logs from every meeting are available in the wiki:
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 09:09, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:04 PM Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> Thanks for sharing the logs!
>>
>
> FWIW, the logs from every meeting are available in the wiki:
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes
The benefits of keeping old data around that you currently see no use for,
is that in the future you may want to use the data for some purpose, after
all. And data storage is cheap.
That being said, I have no objection to deleting them. I'm not sure anyone
would notice if they just go. If
Nice!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
I don't see the harm in leaving old stuff lying around if the disk has
plenty of room. Surely there's more important things to do :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
What % of the server disk space is used?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks for sharing the logs!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Thanks for sharing the logs!
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
What sugar activity packages did you install vis yum? My guess is you don't
have any pulled in as dependencies from sugar-desktop.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018, 11:05 PM Kevin Hi all, and thanks for making and sharing sugar. It looks like wonderful
> software.
>
> I'd like to introduce my 8yo kid to
Love to see this happening! :)
Please provide timezones in EST, CST, MT and PT for folks in the USA
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Amazing news!! I think this is huge :) congratulations on making this
happen :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 25 May 2018 at 00:47, Tony Anderson wrote:
> ASLO provides access to Sugar activities (*.xo bundles). Ways in which
> users get Sugar is not relevant.
When James said, "plenty of disk space these days to include all
working activities
in a build", that suggested to me
On 23 May 2018 at 23:29, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:26 PM Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>>
>>&
On Wed, May 23, 2018, 11:28 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:23:24PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> > If the source licen
On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron wrote:
>
>
>
> Tony's insistence on ASLO continues to amuse me. Most distribution of
> activities now happens through bundles, tarballs, and GitHub. ASLO is
> rarely used by distributors or indeed useful for anything except
>
On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron wrote:
>
> If the source license is GPLv3+, then anyone can relicense as Apache
> 2.0.
>
N :)
>
This is ABSOLUTELY false.
If the source license is GPLv3+, then anyone can add new code that combines
with the GPLv3(+) code
On 17 May 2018 at 13:44, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
>
> 2. Do you have a plan for reconciling the licensing issue [2]? The issue
>> is marked as Wont Fix, but I don't think that is adequate. In addition,
>> there has been a lot of unilateral re-licensing of GPL and AGPL
www.theverge.com/2018/4/16/17233946/olpcs-100-laptop-education-where-is-it-now
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Really great to hear this progressing :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Congrats guys!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi
This seems important for the Sugar Labs strategy discussions that Sameer is
reinvigorating.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "James Cameron"
Date: Jan 24, 2018 3:56 AM
Subject: [Sugar-devel] Farewell GStreamer on Python 2, a push for Python 3
porting
To:
Hi
I agree with the general idea - this is going to only become more painful
the longer it is left undone, and if not done, will mean the end of the
python codebase. That might be acceptable, given the maturation of
Sugarizer.
Perhaps its worth having the Sugar core and toolkit part (vs the
This is great! Thank you Sameer!
I recently began updating the ideas I drafted a few years ago with Samson.
Please let us know where to submit the ideas when you are ready :D
On 11 January 2018 at 17:21, Sameer Verma wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Here is a proposal to solicit
Hi Yash :)
A funny coincidence, another Yash Agrawal contributed to sugar in 2016 (
https://github.com/YashAgarwal :)
On Dec 1, 2017 3:56 PM, "Yash Agrawal" wrote:
Hello to all,
I know it may be too early but I want to introduce myself anyways and
maybe get some help in
Awesome!!
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
https://www.fastcompany.com/40435064/what-alan-kay-thinks-about-the-iphone-and-technology-now
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Love it! Thanks for sharing
On Sep 17, 2017 8:20 AM, "Sebastian Silva"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> *"A combination of this "carry anywhere" device and a global information
> utility such as the ARPA network or two-way cable TV, will bring the
> libraries and schools (not to
In the photocomp era, may different machines were developed that produced
the same visual typography using different methods :)
On 2 September 2017 at 19:30, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> At least in the English that I learned, two things that are not the same
> are different. So
I think supporting Outreachy, even at a small loss, is worthwhile
On 23 August 2017 at 18:58, Walter Bender wrote:
> I've been approached by Outreachy [1] regarding our potential
> participation in the next round (this fall in the northern hemisphere). We
> are just
Congrats on getting this release out there :)
On 15 August 2017 at 16:52, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> Finally got round to build the binary - just get
> FontVal-2.1.0-py-bin-net4.zip from
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/hp-pxl-jetready/files/Microsoft%20Font%
>
Hi
On 24 July 2017 at 20:04, Kenny Friedman wrote:
>
> Even with the low volume output, the occasional postings (and people on
> this list) can still be a valuable resource.
>
> If people are willing, I will happily host this mailing list at MIT (email
> is free, and will last...
On Jun 14, 2017 1:59 AM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote:
Felipe,
> (I really miss a Freetype method to alter a single design-space
> coordinate, instead of having to pass the full array, by the way)
what API do you suggest? Given that normally an application wants to
control *all*
Thanks for the kind note Graham! I love these bits of history :))
On May 24, 2017 6:33 AM, "Graham Asher" wrote:
> I'm now leaving the FreeType development mailing list. My product,
> CartoType, still relies on FreeType for its typography and will always do
> so, but
in GSoC which must
> ease activities management, for both image builders and developers. I will
> be helping on that.
>
> On May 12, 2017 1:25 PM, "Dave Crossland" <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>
>> Do those xo run the latest release?
>>
>> On May 12, 201
in GSoC which must
> ease activities management, for both image builders and developers. I will
> be helping on that.
>
> On May 12, 2017 1:25 PM, "Dave Crossland" <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>
>> Do those xo run the latest release?
>>
>> On May 12, 201
nager if Sam P can't make it anymore.
>
> Certainly there are many things to improve, but we shall overcome. I don't
> think solution is to discard all XOs schools have around here.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sam C.
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6
nager if Sam P can't make it anymore.
>
> Certainly there are many things to improve, but we shall overcome. I don't
> think solution is to discard all XOs schools have around here.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sam C.
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6
It seems to me that the classic Sugar python codebase could be returned to
Quozl / OLPC, and Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
It seems to me that the classic Sugar python codebase could be returned to
Quozl / OLPC, and Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Congrats!! :) Looking forward to Monday IRC meeting :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Congrats!! :) Looking forward to Monday IRC meeting :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi Laura
I sympathize with your concern for active users. But my recommendation is
to use this as motivation to shut down Sugar Network.
In my opinion: Everything associated with the old Python codebase has
entered terminal decline, is no longer sustainable, and should be archived
and turned
On Apr 23, 2017 11:21 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote:
Hi James, Walter
I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
github/sugarlabs
Thank you Tony!
Unless I hear to the contrary, I'll delete these duplicates.
Sounds good to me
My understanding from the
On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" wrote:
We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license.
That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer true. In fact
it's a big problem, because a lot of stuff is posted on github without a
libre license
Which of Papert's is definitive?
On Apr 23, 2017 10:54 PM, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2017 10:37 PM, "Walter Bende
On Apr 23, 2017 10:37 PM, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I watched some of Papert's lectures from the mid 90s on YouTube last
> year... Is Mindstorms the definit
On Apr 21, 2017 9:06 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote:
How is this not redundant to the motion approved in January 2017?
For me it's an obvious incremental improvement. You can call it redundant
if you think it's adds zero new value, but I am skeptical of that.
M, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> What motivates me to contribute to sugar labs is an intuition that it is a
> reasonable response to the topics raised in the fol
Hi
Great work :)
On Apr 13, 2017 12:41 PM, "Manuel Quiñones"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a flatpak package for Sugarizer.
>
> Flatpak http://flatpak.org/ is the new way to distribute applications
> in GNU/Linux. Is great for many reasons. One reason is that the
Hi
Thanks Walter. I'd like to better understand some additional context before
diving in :)
Does this mean Sameer you have stopped the project planning process you
started, and we should not expect you to restart it again?
Walter, are these the goals for this year, or are they your proposal for
Hi
Thanks Walter. I'd like to better understand some additional context before
diving in :)
Does this mean Sameer you have stopped the project planning process you
started, and we should not expect you to restart it again?
Walter, are these the goals for this year, or are they your proposal for
Hi
I agree completely
On Apr 2, 2017 7:52 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld" wrote:
> But what is a more proper port to Windows going to give us beyond what
> Lionel has already done by including Sugarizer in pretty much every major
> app store (including Microsoft's and Apple's)?
>
I love it
On Mar 29, 2017 8:48 AM, "Hin-Tak Leung" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29/3/17, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Nice! This essentially makes a command line
> version of FontVal,
> right?
>
>
> Yes, it is a
Would git submodules be too complex?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Love it!
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Love it!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Will anyone run a Facebook live video of the presentation? :)
On Mar 7, 2017 11:46 AM, "Aaron Borden" wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> OLPC San Francisco will be hosting our monthly meeting Saturday,
> March 11th, from 10AM - 1PM at the downtown SFSU campus, 835 Market
> Street, 6th
Will anyone run a Facebook live video of the presentation? :)
On Mar 7, 2017 11:46 AM, "Aaron Borden" wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> OLPC San Francisco will be hosting our monthly meeting Saturday,
> March 11th, from 10AM - 1PM at the downtown SFSU campus, 835 Market
> Street, 6th
Will anyone run a Facebook live video of the presentation? :)
On Mar 7, 2017 11:46 AM, "Aaron Borden" wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> OLPC San Francisco will be hosting our monthly meeting Saturday,
> March 11th, from 10AM - 1PM at the downtown SFSU campus, 835 Market
> Street, 6th
Great questions! Thank you Caryl :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
I encourage you to add this to the wiki so it can be revised
collaboratively
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Sorry to say I'm on vacation tomorrow but I will check the logs :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Sorry to say I'm on vacation tomorrow but I will check the logs :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
he Sugarizer activities are mostly
> also available as Sugar web activities. We are using the Python Turtle
> blocks.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 02/28/2017 02:29 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2017 11:34 PM, "Tony Anderson" <tony_ander...@usa.net> wro
On Feb 27, 2017 11:34 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote:
For what it's worth, Sugar 0.110 (OLPC OS 13.2.8) has been installed on
hundreds of XO laptops, all models in Rwanda. The codebase is reaching
these classrooms.
That is great to know!!! :)
What xo models are those?
Does
Hi Caryl!
Were you able to obtain more photos? :)
On 21 February 2017 at 22:56, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Hi Folks...
>
>
> We will be having a booth at SCaLE next month featuring OLPC spin-offs
> like Sugarizer, IIAB, and UnleashKids. If you are involved in any kind of
>
Hi
Was this resolved?
On 21 February 2017 at 10:34, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Again we are having a spam attack that modifies the texts of one of the
> contexts of the main visualization of the Sugar Network :(
>
> This problem was reported last year and resolved
Congrats!
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Congrats!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi
The Mountain View school district apparently budgeted $521,000 to implement
and operate this new-fangled math program in two local schools (Graham and
Crittenden Middle Schools). Had they adequately beta tested the program
beforehand, the school district might have discovered that Teach to One
Hi
On 26 February 2017 at 09:32, Samson Goddy wrote:
>
> At the last meeting, walter gave (Ignacio, Laura and me) tasks on how we can
> attract funding to the Community, i came up with the idea of creating
> awareness to the general public through SMM role. Which
Hi
On 26 February 2017 at 11:44, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On 25/02/17 20:33, Tymon Radzik wrote:
>
>> Sugar Labs is by its statement volunteer-driven project. We are volunteers.
>> We work for the idea of the free and open software and not for own
On 26 February 2017 at 04:15, Chris Leonard wrote:
>
> To clarify, I had negotiated a contract with Sugar Labs / SFC for a
> monthly stipend to support the Translation Manager position. I did
> NOT submit a single invoice for that work (which I have been doing)
> and
On Feb 25, 2017 6:27 PM, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Sam Parkinson <sam@sam.today> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 08:36 +0530, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > Actually I am not convinced of this; I do not belie
1 - 100 of 2754 matches
Mail list logo