Re: [CF-metadata] Standard name for land/sea mask

Dear all, My proposal from July 11th for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*" hasn't raised much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in the next table update? Regards, Elodie On 23/08/2017 11:07, Elodie Fernandez wrote: > Dear all, > > My proposal for

Re: [CF-metadata] New standard names for OMIP: physics

Dear all, I have a request about the "integral heat content" names. The *"**integral_of_sea_water_potential_temperature_wrt_depth_expressed_as_heat_content**"* will be added to the next release, from what I understand. It's very good timing for me as we, at CMEMS, are now processing files

[CF-metadata] Standard name for land/sea mask

Dear all, I would like to suggest the addition of a new standard_name to describe land-sea masks. A standard_name already exists: land_binary_mask ( X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 = land, 0 = sea.). But in the ocean modelling community, we have already existing files

Re: [CF-metadata] Wave periods sub-proposal

Dear all, Thank you Alison for all your work on our wave proposal, and thanks for postponing the table update. I agree with all of your suggestions, for updated definitions and new names. Regards, Elodie On 16/03/2017 16:57, alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: > > Dear Stephane, > > > > Thanks

Re: [CF-metadata] Standard name and area type tables updated

Dear Alison, dear all, Back in September, I suggested the addition of new standard names "geostrophic_eastward_sea_water_velocity" and "geostrophic_northward_sea_water_velocity" (see http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2016/059015.html). There have been quite a few updates of the

[CF-metadata] New standard_names for ocean biogeochemistry

Dear all, We would like to suggest the addition of two new standard_names for ocean biogeochemistry: - *mass_concentration_of_chlorophyll_a_fluorescence_in_sea_water* unit: kg m-3 definition: Mass concentration means mass per unit volume and is used in the construction

[CF-metadata] New standard name for geostrophic ocean velocities

Dear all, I would like to suggest the addition of two new standard_names to describe geostrophic sea water velocities. Standard_names exist for the surface velocities (|surface_geostrophic_eastward_sea_water_velocity and surface_geostrophic_northward_sea_water_velocity

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

Thanks Alison. I'm OK with the change from "average" to "mean". Regards, Elodie On 22/06/2016 17:02, Nan Galbraith wrote: > Thanks you, Alison, Roy, Elodie and all - > Nan > > On 6/22/16 9:32 AM, alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: >> >> Dear Roy, Elodie, Nan, Jonathan, Chris, et al, >> >> Many

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

Hi all, Thanks a lot for your feedback. I think Roy's "4-steps" work plan is a great idea to keep things manageable. Thanks Roy! We, Marta and I, agree with your suggestions Roy and Jonathan. So, to summarize, for height parameters, we have: - *sea_surface_wave_significant_height* Wave height

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

ement is urgent. > > > > -------- > *From:* CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of > Elodie Fernandez <elodie.fernan...@mercator-ocean.fr> > *Sent:* 03 May 2016 08:56 > *To:* cf-

Re: [CF-metadata] Waves

only > working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on > Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be > sent to enquir...@bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your > requirement is urgent. > > > > -

[CF-metadata] Waves

rated into several partitions: wind wave contribution (WW), primary swell (SW1) contribution (the most energetic swell) and secondary swell contribution (SW2). The mean wave direction is the average direction from which waves are coming for the secondary swell wave partition. Regards, Elodie Fernandez ___ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

[CF-metadata] Copernicus Marine Service standard_names

ervice that will include waves. We are planning on introducing 35 variables, of which only 7 have already existing standard_names. What do you think is the best way to proceed? Start a new thread on this topic and propose for each variable a standard_name, unit and definition?