Re: [PRQ#60023] Deletion Request for amarok

mackel [1] filed a deletion request for amarok [2]: Now the Castaway version was updated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mackel/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/amarok/ deletion requests are not intented for this an orphan one is pending Please go

Re: [PRQ#59870] Orphan Request for quickemu-git

nikarh [1] filed an orphan request for quickemu-git [2]: The package does not build for almost a year, please either update the PKGBUILD or orphan the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nikarh/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/quickemu-git/ Adopted and made a first revision,

About user Manjusaka

Hi, Manjusaka continue to re-upload his personal pkgbuild which have been deleted 3 times already, they have been informed to not do this yes persist https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/linux-xanmod-manjusaka

Re: [PRQ#59658] Deletion Request for rustic-bin

AlphaJack [1] filed a deletion request for rustic-bin [2]: Package is now available as [extra]/rustic [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AlphaJack/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rustic-bin/ A deletion request is already pending, [PRQ#59583], submitted yesterday

Re: [PRQ#59466] Orphan Request for midori-bin

Il 23/04/24 00:38, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: lluisparcet [1] filed an orphan request for midori-bin [2]: I try to install midori-bin and I receive an error on the package download website: Error downloading https://astian.org/wp-

Re: [PRQ#59232] Orphan Request for iscan

Pafrape [1] filed an orphan request for iscan [2]: Erreur : Impossible de télécharger le logiciel [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Pafrape/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/iscan/ Please disregard, inappropriate request. This should have been a comment in english on AURweb Fun

Re: [PRQ#58633] Orphan Request for android-file-transfer-linux-git

Il 01/04/24 19:27, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MartinVonReich [1] filed an orphan request for android-file-transfer- linux-git [2]: Hello there, I can take over this package as I already maintain the non-GIT variant: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-file-transfer-linux

Re: [PRQ#57904] Merge Request for eclipse-cpp-bin

altermetax [1] filed a request to merge eclipse-cpp-bin [2] into eclipse-cpp [3]: - The eclipse-cpp-bin package seems unmaintained - Both eclipse-cpp and eclipse-cpp-bin create the package from pre- built artifacts, however as per the AUR submission guidelines Java software shouldn't have the

Re: [PRQ#57846] Deletion Request for libpamac-aur

paulgureghian [1] filed a deletion request for libpamac-aur [2]: Are you going to update this soon? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/paulgureghian/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libpamac-aur/ Deletion requests are not made for prompting updates You already commented today with:

Re: [PRQ#52687] Deletion Request for skypeforlinux-stable-bin

bulletmark [1] filed a deletion request for skypeforlinux-stable-bin [2]: The upstream package is not produced by Microsoft/Skype anymore. Ref https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/all/skype-for-linux- updates/da864865-d9e9-4819-8a5d-8de8934dd312 [1]

Re: [PRQ#52809] Deletion Request for hqplayer Accepted

On 1/7/24 18:20, Fabio Loli wrote: Request #52809 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for hqplayer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why deleting hqplayer? Typically we update the main pkgbuild to the new version and create other pkgbuilds for legacy

Re: [PRQ#52809] Deletion Request for hqplayer Accepted

Request #52809 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for hqplayer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why deleting hqplayer? Typically we update the main pkgbuild to the new version and create other pkgbuilds for legacy versions Also IMO naming of

Re: [PRQ#52620] Orphan Request for beets-git

angelss19 [1] filed an orphan request for beets-git [2]: Please fix the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/angelss19/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/beets-git/ Additional context not provided by angelss19, beets-git have an otdated .SRCINFO (python-sphinx is not listed),

Re: [PRQ#52498] Deletion Request for hyprland-nvidia

raffaem [1] filed a deletion request for hyprland-nvidia [2]: The nvidia patches are not needed anymore since v 0.33.0 (https://github.com/hyprwm/Hyprland/releases/tag/v0.33.0). This is also outdated (0.31) and should be removed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/raffaem/ [2]

Re: four failed packages

I need maintainer's email addresses for four failed packages on this system. zapm; primeurl, and iphonebackuptools won't compile on this system. The fourth package whatscli installs and every time the package runs it does a core dump as it exits even on whatscli /commands and whatscli /help.

Re: [PRQ#52415] Orphan Request for quiterss

edward3 [1] filed an orphan request for quiterss [2]: Hey, can you fix this situation: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libicuuc.so.73, needed by /usr/lib/libQt5WebKit.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libicui18n.so.73, needed by /usr/lib/libQt5WebKit.so, not found (try

Re: [PRQ#52406] Orphan Request for blivet-gui

CyberShadow [1] filed an orphan request for blivet-gui [2]: Fails to build in a clean chroot, maintainer unresponsive [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/CyberShadow/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/blivet-gui/ Additional context, python-setuptools is the missing makedepnds and have

Re: [PRQ#52300] Deletion Request for airgeddon-git

BoBeR182 [1] filed a deletion request for airgeddon-git [2]: As maintainer of this package (airgeddon-git), we were aligned with the "airgeddon" package maintainer. Now we co-maintain it. We decided to leave "airgeddon" package instead of this one. Not needed and it duplicates maintenance

Re: [PRQ#52296] Deletion Request for icu74

dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for icu74 [2]: Now version 74 has made it to the Artix repositories. No need for this package right now; but might be useful as a legacy version later on when official version has moved on. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#51358] Deletion Request for obs-studio-git

Il 16/11/23 21:54, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: dhtseany [1] filed a deletion request for obs-studio-git [2]: Duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hamrs-appimage which has been packaged better than my original work here, no need to keep it. Please remove. [1]

Re: [PRQ#45927] Deletion Request for midori-git Rejected

Il 15/11/23 10:14, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Request #45927 has been Rejected by artafinde [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/ Midori source is now at https://github.com/goastian/midori-desktop

Re: [PRQ#50362] Merge Request for itk

Il 06/11/23 00:06, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge itk [2] into insight-toolkit [3]: Eliminating duplication. 'insight-toolkit' has been on AUR for much longer, and also aligns better with Arch package guidelines, which recommend that a package name

Re: [PRQ#50346] Deletion Request for psx

Il 05/11/23 17:02, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for psx [2]: Dead foreign-built binary PSX emulator from 2007; source code unavailable as this was closed source. PKGBUILD does not install the needed license (which seems to be unknown/undeclared by

Re: [PRQ#49904] Deletion Request for csl-git

Il 31/10/23 11:19, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for csl-git [2]: Abandoned, unused developmental VCS package; upstream not maintained since 2014. [a] [a]: https://github.com/piernov/Cube-Server-Lister [1]

Re: [PRQ#49142] Orphan Request for tor-browser-bin

Elrondo46 [1] filed an orphan request for tor-browser-bin [2]: I can maintain it if the author don't want to manage it anymore [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Elrondo46/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tor-browser-bin/ * it was flagged OOD since only 4 days * you could have asked

Re: [PRQ#48911] Merge Request for chainner-bin

ShalokShalom [1] filed a request to merge chainner-bin [2] into chainner20-bin [3]: I would continue to maintain this package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ShalokShalom/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/chainner-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/chainner20-bin/ Merge

Re: [PRQ#48762] Orphan Request for zerobrane-studio

ShalokShalom [1] filed an orphan request for zerobrane-studio [2]: I already asked to overtake this package, the maintainer does not react at all. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ShalokShalom/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zerobrane-studio/ Duplicate request of [PRQ#47884] made

Re: [PRQ#48900] Orphan Request for clementine

swimm3r [1] filed an orphan request for clementine [2]: Clementine is using older libprotobuf version (is using v23, and 24.3-1 is the latest). clementine: error while loading shared libraries: libprotobuf.so.23: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [1]

Re: [PRQ#48543] Deletion Request for krita-next-bin

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for krita-next-bin [2]: Abandoned prerelease build from 2022-08. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/krita-next-bin/ Other reason for removal: this is repackaging a user build made with makepkg of

Re: [PRQ#48488] Orphan Request for bazelisk

Il 07/10/23 08:14, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: FantasqueX [1] filed an orphan request for bazelisk [2]: The maintainer hasn't responded to OOD flag for two months. I would like to maintain the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FantasqueX/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#47898] Deletion Request for tor-browser

Il 24/09/23 19:11, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: garlicbreadwolfs [1] filed a deletion request for tor-browser [2]: This package is not built from source, but simply downloads and deploys binaries. The Tor browser is open source. This means that you can build it from source. In keeping

Re: [PRQ#47884] Orphan Request for zerobrane-studio

Il 24/09/23 10:28, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ShalokShalom [1] filed an orphan request for zerobrane-studio [2]: I like to maintain this. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ShalokShalom/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zerobrane-studio/ It have been flagged out of date

Re: [PRQ#46951] Deletion Request for soundscrape-git

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for soundscrape-git [2]: Development discontinued since 2020, [a] reported failing to build in 2022-05 in last and only user comment. I think it is best to delete this. [a]: https://github.com/Miserlou/SoundScrape [1]

Re: [PRQ#46514] Orphan Request for frame-eth-dev-appimage

xrchz [1] filed an orphan request for frame-eth-dev-appimage [2]: This has been flagged out of date for more than a week. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xrchz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/frame-eth-dev-appimage/ Please make oprhan requests after 2 weeks have passed

Re: [PRQ#45939] Deletion Request for tlauncher-org

Il 07/08/23 15:56, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Ziarnova [1] filed a deletion request for tlauncher-org [2]: This package makes possible to play Minecraft without paying, against the EULA: https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/eula. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Ziarnova/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#45582] Merge Request for gblocks-bin

malacology [1] filed a request to merge gblocks-bin [2] into gblocks [3]: gblocks is a close-source pkg [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/malacology/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gblocks-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gblocks/ It is not mandatory to remove the -bin

Re: unable to build with makepkg (No such file or directory)

trying to build this https://github.com/matthewq337/auto-fdisk https://bpa.st/H6XQ Hello James, I have revisioned it here https://bin.disroot.org/?015ffca3f47c1fe4#AVwV1EZ9TdDTZDgpu5ryZtVS5m2as3upQB4EgcBeaf3c * path and name

Re: Applying for maintainer role

Il 16/07/23 14:37, Tomaz Canabrava ha scritto: Hello, My name is Tomaz Canabrava, Im a kde developer and mostly focus on Konsole. Other than that, I use arch Linux for the past 10 years, as my only Linux distro. I have experience with packaging (debian, for work) but not on arch, but it’s

Re: [PRQ#44363] Deletion Request for falco

kris-nova [1] filed a deletion request for falco [2]: Trying to understand how to delete the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kris-nova/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/falco/ A deletion request for this is already pending, Trusted Users will take care of that. You can

Re: [PRQ#44169] Deletion Request for megasync-bin

zaujulio [1] filed a deletion request for megasync-bin [2]: Package is pointing to a binary that is not available online... [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zaujulio/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/megasync-bin/ zaujulio please contact the maintainer when there are problems

Re: [PRQ#44138] Deletion Request for tlauncher

SupremeDeity [1] filed a deletion request for tlauncher [2]: Installs a package other than what it should. That is, it install "Legacy Launcher" instead of "TLauncher". I want to submit the actual package instead of this. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/SupremeDeity/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#44133] Deletion Request for syncthing-bin

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]: Same x86_64 build is available from repo: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/syncthing/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/syncthing-bin/ Have been reported that this

Re: [PRQ#42087] Deletion Request for boost-libs-171-opt

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for boost-libs-171-opt [2]: Defunct legacy boost 1.71 package, source 404, and there are other problems. Uploaded in 2020 and never fixed. There is another boost 1.71 package in AUR which is better maintained. So I recommend deletion, as a few commenters

Re: [PRQ#43224] Deletion Request for positron-appimage Rejected

On 30/06/2023 14:14, Fabio Loli wrote: Request #43224 has been Rejected by artafinde [1]: Different packages, one is based on appimage the other on deb. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/ It is an electron program created with FPM, the content is the same That information would

Re: [PRQ#43224] Deletion Request for positron-appimage Rejected

Request #43224 has been Rejected by artafinde [1]: Different packages, one is based on appimage the other on deb. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/ It is an electron program created with FPM, the content is the same

Re: [PRQ#42406] Orphan Request for spotify

There are already other 2 orphan requests pending Il 20 giugno 2023 12:05:50 CEST, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: >MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for spotify [2]: > >Not updated since flagged on 2023-05-27. > >Users are goint stir-crazy because they cannot even install current >pkgver

Re: [PRQ#42135] Orphan Request for rapidsvn

- I cannot simply change it to a -git package, as that is a new package; and the fellow complaining should know that. - My offer to make a new -git package is still extant, as is my offer that he can do so if he would like. - "Orphaning" a package that cannot be updated to a new release because

Re: [PRQ#41425] Orphan Request for pcsx2

Il 14/05/23 11:09, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: OpenSauce [1] filed an orphan request for pcsx2 [2]: This package has never been updated since it was submitted, and is now 4 months out of date, which is very outdated for an application with nightly updates [1]

Re: [PRQ#41299] Deletion Request for naiveproxy-git

Il 05/05/23 15:15, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: soh [1] filed a deletion request for naiveproxy-git [2]: Though it is a VCS(git) package, the PKGBUILD hasn't been updated for two years and contains invalid dependencies, which makes it unable to build, and unnecessary dependencies. The

Re: [PRQ#41212] Orphan Request for archivemount

Il 29/04/23 13:02, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: fbrennan [1] filed an orphan request for archivemount [2]: I have a patch. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/fbrennan/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/archivemount/ pkgbuild was orphan, made you the maintainer :)

Re: [PRQ#40894] Deletion Request for wolframengine

Il 07/04/23 17:53, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframengine [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This

Re: [PRQ#40895] Deletion Request for mathematica

Il 07/04/23 17:56, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for mathematica [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This

Re: [PRQ#40896] Deletion Request for wolframscript

Il 07/04/23 17:56, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframscript [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This

Re: [PRQ#40866] Deletion Request for keenwrite-bin

Il 05/04/23 23:58, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: thangalin [1] filed a deletion request for keenwrite-bin [2]: Please remove KeenWrite from AUR. For the following reasons: 1. The license is incorrectly listed as GPL3. 2. The license terms for BSD-2 are not being followed. Thank you.

Re: [PRQ#40586] Orphan Request for hugin-hg

Il 11/03/23 12:43, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: edombek [1] filed an orphan request for hugin-hg [2]: Ignores the comment about the fix for half a year [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/edombek/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hugin-hg/ Pkgbuild is now updated, had made the

Re: [PRQ#40478] Deletion Request for nvim-nightly

Il 04/03/23 17:18, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: REmorin [1] filed a deletion request for nvim-nightly [2]: Duplicate of (now fixed, updated and maintained) neovim-nightly-bin. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/REmorin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nvim-nightly/

Re: [PRQ#40234] Deletion Request for libmdbx

Il 19/02/23 16:59, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: erthink [1] filed a deletion request for libmdbx [2]: Please delete the current obsolete package so that I can create and maintain a new one as the author and owner of the libmdbx upstream (https://gitflic.ru/project/erthink/libmdbx). [1]

Re: [PRQ#40064] Merge Request for python-apprise

Il 04/02/23 17:43, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: AlphaJack [1] filed a request to merge python-apprise [2] into apprise [3]: Python package guidelines on name, build() and package() [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AlphaJack/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-apprise/

Re: [PRQ#40025] Deletion Request for droidmote

Il 31/01/23 11:12, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: boogiepop [1] filed a deletion request for droidmote [2]: I have prepared an updated package for this "droidmote-bin" i think you can delete this repo. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/boogiepop/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#39965] Orphan Request for nemo-git

Il 27/01/23 21:08, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ahmedmoselhi [1] filed an orphan request for nemo-git [2]: not updated since 2018 and i want to adopt to make changes [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ahmedmoselhi/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nemo-git/ No problems have

Re: [PRQ#39658] Deletion Request for ffmpeg-scripts

Il 11/01/23 19:18, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for ffmpeg-scripts [2]: Very questionable, please delete ASAP. apache licensed but is a precompiled binary, random file from matrix, the binary is run in package() (./helper), no project url,

Re: [PRQ#39627] Deletion Request for ctris

Il 08/01/23 22:48, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: spynetS [1] filed a deletion request for ctris [2]: Could not build. Mine is better [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/spynetS/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ctris/ The pkgbuild only need to be pacthed with existing committs

Re: [PRQ#39263] Merge Request for firefox-gnome-theme-git-nofirefox

Il 18/12/22 20:10, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge firefox-gnome-theme-git- nofirefox [2] into firefox-gnome-theme-git [3]: Ask the Maintainer to consider removing the dependency instead of creating a duplicate package. [1]

Re: git in makedepends?

Il 15/12/22 19:08, Greg Minshall ha scritto: hi, again. if git is needed only for the "source" line of PKGBUILD (i.e., to download, and optionally verify, the source file(s)), does git need to be listed in "makedepends"? cheers, Greg Yes

Re: [PRQ#39199] Orphan Request for yuzu-mainline-bin

Il 15/12/22 11:35, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: kode54 [1] filed an orphan request for yuzu-mainline-bin [2]: I would like to be added as a co-maintainer of this project, at least in case the current maintainer runs aground of updates temporarily. I use this project and have been

Re: PKGBUILD review.

Il 12/12/22 19:03, Wyatt C Jackson ha scritto: I recently put together a PKGBUILD file for a tool I made and want to put on the AUR. While I believe it should be fine, I would like to have it reviewed before I upload it. --- ``` # Maintainer: Minecraftchest1 pkgname=file-sharing-tool

Re: [PRQ#39015] Deletion Request for hplip-raw-ledm

Il 03/12/22 16:37, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: bsosenba [1] filed a deletion request for hplip-raw-ledm [2]: The official repos have version 3.22 (see https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/hplip/), and this has not been maintained in over 4 years [1]

Re: [PRQ#38987] Deletion Request for drumstick-svn

Il 01/12/22 13:15, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: plcl [1] filed a deletion request for drumstick-svn [2]: This package is orphan, and a perfectly fine package is available in the Community repository. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/plcl/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#38986] Deletion Request for vmpk-svn

Il 01/12/22 13:14, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: plcl [1] filed a deletion request for vmpk-svn [2]: This package is orphan, and a perfectly fine package is available in the Community repository at Arch. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/plcl/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#39010] Deletion Request for overwitch-git

Il 03/12/22 12:10, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: tgirod [1] filed a deletion request for overwitch-git [2]: Now that overwitch-1.0 is out, this package is rather useless. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tgirod/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/overwitch-git/ VCS pkgbuilds

Comment on cemu page

User Anuskuss have returned today to harass the cemu maintainer https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cemu#comment-890175 Previous behaviour can be seen on aur-requests about cemu and cemu comments section

Re: [PRQ#38330] Merge Request for xlights-appimage

Il 17/11/22 07:26, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: jesserockz [1] filed a request to merge xlights-appimage [2] into xlights [3]: I have removed the -appimage suffix from the package name [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jesserockz/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#38189] Deletion Request for openssl3-git

Il 06/11/22 17:57, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: a36233 [1] filed a deletion request for openssl3-git [2]: No longer required since openssl now is at version 3x [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a36233/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openssl3-git/ There are already 2

Re: [PRQ#38183] Deletion Request for openssl3-git

Il 06/11/22 17:23, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: SamLukeYes [1] filed a deletion request for openssl3-git [2]: duplicate of openssl-git [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/SamLukeYes/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openssl3-git/ There is already is pending deletion request

Re: [PRQ#38143] Deletion Request for heroic-games-launcher

Il 03/11/22 22:27, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: clmbtti [1] filed a deletion request for heroic-games-launcher [2]: The the developer of Heroic Games launcher complained that there's a package here on AUR called heroic-games-launcher-bin that, by looking at the source of this one, it is

Re: [PRQ#37716] Merge Request for mcreator-bin

Il 07/10/22 15:03, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Inetol [1] filed a request to merge mcreator-bin [2] into mcreator [3]: The license only allows you to use their own prebuilt binaries. (my mistake) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Inetol/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#38092] Deletion Request for mcreator-bin

Il 31/10/22 10:31, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Inetol [1] filed a deletion request for mcreator-bin [2]: The license does not allow the use of binaries built by third parties with the branding of "Pylo" or "MCreator" (logos included).

Re: [PRQ#38047] Deletion Request for freezer-electron-git

Il 28/10/22 18:51, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: riky [1] filed a deletion request for freezer-electron-git [2]: salve questo pacchetto non funziona [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/riky/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/freezer-electron-git/ Messages in English please

Re: [PRQ#38027] Orphan Request for neovim-git

Il 27/10/22 22:35, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Vaargk [1] filed an orphan request for neovim-git [2]: Popular package out of date, maintainer does not maintain package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Vaargk/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/neovim-git/ There are other 7

Re: [PRQ#37993] Deletion Request for freeman-korbi-bin

Il 25/10/22 18:24, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for freeman-korbi-bin [2]: Abandoned by packager/developer, source no longer exist (a personal git server) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2]

Re: [PRQ#37780] Orphan Request for neovim-git

Il 14/10/22 08:49, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: akshettrj [1] filed an orphan request for neovim-git [2]: The package is not building anymore and the maintainer is not fixing the package (which will take changing only 3-4 lines) from past few weeks. [1]

Re: [PRQ#37780] Orphan Request for neovim-git

Il 14/10/22 08:49, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: akshettrj [1] filed an orphan request for neovim-git [2]: The package is not building anymore and the maintainer is not fixing the package (which will take changing only 3-4 lines) from past few weeks. [1]

Re: [PRQ#37448] Orphan Request for exfatprogs-git

Il 17/09/22 19:01, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ahmedmoselhi [1] filed an orphan request for exfatprogs-git [2]: not updated since 2021 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ahmedmoselhi/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/exfatprogs-git/ It is a VCS pkgbuild. You flagged it OOD

Re: [PRQ#37436] Deletion Request for supabase-git

Il 16/09/22 20:16, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: vixalien [1] filed a deletion request for supabase-git [2]: has been orphaned for too long. alternative exists (supabase-bin) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vixalien/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/supabase-git/ The

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#37293] Deletion Request for xkbset

Il 08/09/22 17:14, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: ramen [1] filed a deletion request for xkbset [2]: xkbset-git already exists, i dont think it is necessary to create an extra xkbset with specific versions for such a small program, right now xkbset and xkbset-git do the same. [1]

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#36500] Orphan Request for bottles

Il 19/07/22 22:36, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: RubenKelevra [1] filed an orphan request for bottles [2]: Building issues: claims to be a newer version than it actually is. Maybe maintainers are not aware of epoch, v2022.6.14 have been rolled back after 1 day because several people

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#32590] Deletion Request for bzr

Il 16/02/22 14:45, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for bzr [2]: Python2-based Canonical Bazaar has been discontinued in 2017 and got dropped from Arch in 2020. This package is not needed anymore and should be deleted. Bazaar got forked to Breezy

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35293] Deletion Request for basilisk

Il 11/06/22 19:50, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: figue [1] filed a deletion request for basilisk [2]: In December of 2021, Basilisk was discontinued. Please, delete it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Moon#Basilisk [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/figue/ [2]

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33908] Orphan Request for xmind

Il 09/04/22 13:16, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: JoveYu [1] filed an orphan request for xmind [2]: need update [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JoveYu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xmind/ The pkgbuild is updated now

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33484] Orphan Request for xmind Accepted

Il 08/04/22 00:39, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Request #33484 has been Accepted by ainola [1]: Uh, Fabio, you're the maintainer of this :) I'll disown since it's still OOD, though. :D [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/ The maintainer disowned the pkgbuild after I made

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33687] Orphan Request for python-pygraphviz Rejected

Il 02/04/22 15:01, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: Request #33687 has been Rejected by yan12125 [1]: The package is updated by a co-maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/ The pkgbuild has been updated by one of the other 2 co-maintainers but the maintainer asked

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33652] Orphan Request for php-language-server

Il 31/03/22 01:11, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: jmd [1] filed an orphan request for php-language-server [2]: When installed, from what I've tested the majority of files must be available in the same directory in order for php-language-server to "work" (stubs, vendor, src, and bin).

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33440] Orphan Request for python2-colorama-0.3.3

Il 22/03/22 16:18, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for python2-colorama-0.3.3 [2]: Please kindly isown, maintainer MIA. Flagged out-of-date (2021-12-18) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2]

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33422] Deletion Request for zotero-dev-bin

Il 21/03/22 17:01, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: json [1] filed a deletion request for zotero-dev-bin [2]: This package is basically a duplicate of the zotero-beta package. In Zotero, the binary build of the the current development branch IS the beta. There is no difference. See

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33226] Deletion Request for python-pygraphviz

Il 18/03/22 15:49, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: alienzj [1] filed a deletion request for python-pygraphviz [2]: python-pygraphviz was packaged by the member of archlinux-cn, so there is no need to manage by me. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alienzj/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] TU application for sudoforge

Il 29/01/22 23:27, Ben Denhartog via aur-general ha scritto: > # AUR packages that I'll move to community [...] - kind (`kind-bin`) Hello, kind is open source and hosted on github, is there any problem compiling it from source?

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#32509] Deletion Request for evilwm

Il 13/02/22 13:42, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: Vedun [1] filed a deletion request for evilwm [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evilwm#comment-851538 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Vedun/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/evilwm/ When there are problems and the

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31647] Deletion Request for ttf-pragmatapro

Il 23/01/22 22:53, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: GDsouza [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-pragmatapro [2]: Upstream is a (now unavailable) repository that hosts the font files illegally. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GDsouza/ [2]

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31643] Orphan Request for openradtool

Il 23/01/22 17:26, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: grawlinson [1] filed an orphan request for openradtool [2]: Package needs some love. Latest release is 0.14.0. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openradtool/ The pkgbuild is not

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31231] Deletion Request for uwsgi-ng Rejected

Il 10/01/22 22:17, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Request #31231 has been rejected by Muflone [1]: it seems to apply some additional patches [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ It apply some kind of patches because the pkgbuilder don't want to open bugs in the Arch

  1   2   >