Unexpected scoring results
On a legacy product that is still based upon Lucene-3.6.2, we (or our customers) occasionally encounter a situation like this: For what ever reason, a customer causes more than one duplicate source document to be ingested into the same index. A subsequent query whose criteria selects these duplicate documents can sometimes report score values that differ considerable for the supposedly duplicate content? Searching through some of the older Lucene mail archives I did notice what I believe to be discussions concerning development test failures having to due with unexpected scoring results as past points in time. Anyway, we do hope to soon upgrade to a newer version of Lucene (how new will depend upon our ability to provide re-indexing capability to existing customers' v3.6.2 existing indexes). My question is: is it likely that this occasional scoring aberrations have been fixed and/or reduced in later versions (say 5.x or 6.x)? Thank you for any info. Jeff Wallace Software Development, FileNet IBM Corp. 1540 Scenic Ave. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 327-7163 direct - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Exclusions.list not working
Romain -
Thanks for the response.
I just downloaded the Zip, extracted it, manually copy my EAR into
TOMEE/apps, start TOMEE via 'catalina.bat start' in TOMEE/bin
I went into TOMEE/conf/context.xml and I don't have anything configured in
there.
The class that is getting picked up is an EJB. It lives inside of that
'calculation-svc' JAR
I will look into activating debug logs and see what I can find.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Le 15 juin 2016 21:49, "Jeff Wallace" <chiefwarpa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > I am using Apache Tomcat Version 7.0.55.
> >
>
> How do you setup tomee? Manually?
>
> > I am trying to get TOMEE to completely ignore a specific JAR of mine when
> > it loads up.
> >
> > To do this, I created {TOMEE}/conf/exclusions.list
> > and this is the entire contents of the that file ::
> >
> > default-list
> > calculation-svc-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
> >
>
> Looks good - you can skip the version too.
>
> > For some reason though, after restarting TOMEE it still continues to pick
> > up classes from within that JAR.
> >
>
> Maybe activate debug logs. Also ensure your war doesnt use a custom tomcat
> scanner in context.xml. finally can you say us which kind of class it picks
> up? Servlet/jaxrs/
>
> > Am I missing something?
> >
> > I can see from the catalina log, that it looks like TOMEE is trying to
> pull
> > in exclusions, but it's not finding any. Plus, it appears to be doing it
> > twice. Not sure if that's normal or not. Below is the log output ::
>
> Can be ok it does it is logged twice for old versions.
>
> > Jun 15, 2016 2:32:22 PM org.apache.openejb.config.NewLoaderLogic
> > getExclusions
> > INFO: Loaded classpath exclusions from:
> > C:\Applications\tomee\conf\exclusions.list
> > Jun 15, 2016 2:32:22 PM org.apache.openejb.config.NewLoaderLogic
> > getExclusions
> > INFO: Loaded classpath exclusions from:
> > C:\Applications\tomee\conf\exclusions.list
> >
> >
> > For additional resources, I also have a discussion about this issue on
> > Stack Overflow at ::
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37798824/tomee-exclude-a-jar
>
Exclusions.list not working
I am using Apache Tomcat Version 7.0.55.
I am trying to get TOMEE to completely ignore a specific JAR of mine when
it loads up.
To do this, I created {TOMEE}/conf/exclusions.list
and this is the entire contents of the that file ::
default-list
calculation-svc-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
For some reason though, after restarting TOMEE it still continues to pick
up classes from within that JAR.
Am I missing something?
I can see from the catalina log, that it looks like TOMEE is trying to pull
in exclusions, but it's not finding any. Plus, it appears to be doing it
twice. Not sure if that's normal or not. Below is the log output ::
Jun 15, 2016 2:32:22 PM org.apache.openejb.config.NewLoaderLogic
getExclusions
INFO: Loaded classpath exclusions from:
C:\Applications\tomee\conf\exclusions.list
Jun 15, 2016 2:32:22 PM org.apache.openejb.config.NewLoaderLogic
getExclusions
INFO: Loaded classpath exclusions from:
C:\Applications\tomee\conf\exclusions.list
For additional resources, I also have a discussion about this issue on
Stack Overflow at ::
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37798824/tomee-exclude-a-jar
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063402] Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 testing Alternate install after initial login the Incomplete Language Support dialog box appears.
I don't think I can't add anything insightful here, but I experienced this in my first login after installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 with the alternate-installer CD image. During the install, I'd selected English as my language as well as a US English keyboard (the default choice). Clicking on the Run this action now on the popup dialog (same one that warren submitted), pulled up the Language Support dialog, in which English (United States) and English were both available.Further, the Install / Remove Languages... dialog had English indicated as installed -- so there did not appear to be meaningful changes to make as I wasn't interested in other languages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063402 Title: Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 testing Alternate install after initial login the Incomplete Language Support dialog box appears. Status in “language-selector” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: 1) Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 daily build 10-7-2012 2) language-selector-gnome 0.79 3) I expect to boot up login and Incomplete Language Support dialog box appear. 4) After the installation has completed then booting into the new install for the first time the Incomplete Language Support dialog box appears asking to run this action now. I have a screenshot of the Incomplete Language Support dialog box. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: language-selector-gnome 0.79 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-31.50-generic-pae 3.2.28 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-31-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 7 14:47:38 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20121007) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: language-selector UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/1063402/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Bug 1063402] Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 testing Alternate install after initial login the Incomplete Language Support dialog box appears.
I don't think I can't add anything insightful here, but I experienced this in my first login after installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 with the alternate-installer CD image. During the install, I'd selected English as my language as well as a US English keyboard (the default choice). Clicking on the Run this action now on the popup dialog (same one that warren submitted), pulled up the Language Support dialog, in which English (United States) and English were both available.Further, the Install / Remove Languages... dialog had English indicated as installed -- so there did not appear to be meaningful changes to make as I wasn't interested in other languages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063402 Title: Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 testing Alternate install after initial login the Incomplete Language Support dialog box appears. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/1063402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Bug#660579: ruby-build: new version 20120216 released
Subject: ruby-build: new version 20120216 released Package: ruby-build Version: 20111230-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, ruby-build version20120216 has been released, see https://github.com/sstephenson/ruby-build/tree/v20120216. Cheers, Jeff -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-6.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ruby-build depends on: ii build-essential 11.5 ii curl 7.24.0-1 ii libreadline6-dev 6.2-8 ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.6.dfsg-1 Versions of packages ruby-build recommends: ii libsqlite3-dev 3.7.10-1 ii libssl-dev 1.0.0g-1 ii libxml2-dev 2.7.8.dfsg-7 ii libxslt1-dev [libxslt-dev] 1.1.26-8 ii rbenv 0.3.0-1 Versions of packages ruby-build suggests: ii autoconf 2.68-1 ii automake 1:1.11.3-1 ii bison none ii git [git-core] 1:1.7.9-1 ii git-core 1:1.7.9-1 ii libtool 2.4.2-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[DRE-maint] Bug#660579: ruby-build: new version 20120216 released
Subject: ruby-build: new version 20120216 released Package: ruby-build Version: 20111230-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, ruby-build version20120216 has been released, see https://github.com/sstephenson/ruby-build/tree/v20120216. Cheers, Jeff -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-6.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ruby-build depends on: ii build-essential 11.5 ii curl 7.24.0-1 ii libreadline6-dev 6.2-8 ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.6.dfsg-1 Versions of packages ruby-build recommends: ii libsqlite3-dev 3.7.10-1 ii libssl-dev 1.0.0g-1 ii libxml2-dev 2.7.8.dfsg-7 ii libxslt1-dev [libxslt-dev] 1.1.26-8 ii rbenv 0.3.0-1 Versions of packages ruby-build suggests: ii autoconf 2.68-1 ii automake 1:1.11.3-1 ii bison none ii git [git-core] 1:1.7.9-1 ii git-core 1:1.7.9-1 ii libtool 2.4.2-1 -- no debconf information ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[Bug 619352] [NEW] package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose Trying to update the virtualbox-ose-dkms package fails. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 16 10:07:59 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: virtualbox-ose Title: package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5 VirtualBoxOse.ModInfo: ** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619352] Re: package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495665/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495666/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495667/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495668/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495669/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495670/+files/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: VirtualBoxOse.DpkgList.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352/+attachment/1495671/+files/VirtualBoxOse.DpkgList.txt -- package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619352] Re: package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5
That file does not exists. j...@sage $ cat /var/lib/dkms/vboxdrv/3.1.6/source/dkms.conf cat: /var/lib/dkms/vboxdrv/3.1.6/source/dkms.conf: No such file or directory -- package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.1.6-dfsg-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Bug#586143: unaligned pointer 0x4c12b6ea
I also have the same problem. I see unaligned pointer 0x4c12b6ea when booting. After restarting 2 times I was able to boot grub properly and get into Debian.
Bug#586143: unaligned pointer 0x4c12b6ea
I also have the same problem. I see unaligned pointer 0x4c12b6ea when booting. After restarting 2 times I was able to boot grub properly and get into Debian.
RE: [CBML] ** CyberBoard Version 3.10 Release Available **
I need some mot basic instruction on what to do to get started with CB I would like to play somthing squad level and solo im thinkin small to start.. any help?.Thanks To: CyberBoardML@yahoogroups.com; cbdevelop...@yahoogroups.com From: dlarso...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:54:37 -0600 Subject: Re: [CBML] ** CyberBoard Version 3.10 Release Available ** Paul Summitt wrote: Probably discussed elsewhere but was just wondering if there had ever been a Linux port of CyberBoard? No. Work had been started on porting for such a FOSS version but the lack of experienced C++/GUI programmers pretty much stalled progress (only one person has been able to contribute the lion's share of the effort). The amount of work to port the C++ Windows GUI code from MFC and XtremeToolKit has been daunting. The current version will run under Wine. Also, VirtualBox works very well for running CyberBoard. I've also run it under VMWare server on Linux but I've been gravitating to VirtualBox of late. I'm exploring other ways to open source CyberBoard with the XtremeToolKit dependency removed and relying on a newer version of MFC to move the program into the future. At least those tools are widely available to Windows programmers. A side benefit of that approach is that I have real-time play partially implemented using the excellent RakNet multi-player toolkit. RakNet provides a license for open source software. http://www.jenkinssoftware.com/raknet/index.html Dale _ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow
I can concur with Digital5700. My 1TB external drive has no performance issues, but my 8GB flash drive has trouble getting a 700MB file onto it in a reasonable amount of time. -- file transfers on USB disk are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 197762] Re: file transfers on USB disk are very slow
I can concur with Digital5700. My 1TB external drive has no performance issues, but my 8GB flash drive has trouble getting a 700MB file onto it in a reasonable amount of time. -- file transfers on USB disk are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Bug#559264: Gone away...
I'm not sure what happened, but I can boot up fine now, no hanging on Waiting for \dev to fully populate.
Bug#559264: Gone away...
I'm not sure what happened, but I can boot up fine now, no hanging on Waiting for \dev to fully populate.
Bug#559264: Same problem
I am also having this problem, Dell D630 laptop, amd64. If you need any more information please let me know. Cheers, Jeff
Bug#559264: /lib/udev/input_id
After boot up /lib/udev/input_id /devices/virtual/input/mice is running at ~99% CPU until I kill -9 it. Doesn't seem to affect anything after I kill it either.
Bug#559264: Same problem
I am also having this problem, Dell D630 laptop, amd64. If you need any more information please let me know. Cheers, Jeff
Bug#559264: /lib/udev/input_id
After boot up /lib/udev/input_id /devices/virtual/input/mice is running at ~99% CPU until I kill -9 it. Doesn't seem to affect anything after I kill it either.
Bug#554599: Another solution
Another solution would be to have mount.ntfs point mount.ntfs-3g in the /sbin directory. Also my ntfs-3g is in /usr/bin, not /usr/sbin. Cheers, Jeff
Bug#558673: gvfs: External NTFS partition mounted as read-only
Package: gvfs Version: 1.4.1-6 Severity: important In Gnome NTFS partitions are automounted as read-only. If I remount manually using mount.ntfs-3g I can write to them. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-6.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gvfs depends on: ii devicekit-disks 009-2 abstraction for enumerating block ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.16-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libgconf2-4 2.28.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdu0 2.28.1-2 GObject based Disk Utility Library ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.2-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 2.28.1-2 GNOME keyring services library ii libudev0 147-5 libudev shared library ii x11-utils 7.4+1 X11 utilities Versions of packages gvfs recommends: ii dbus 1.2.16-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii policykit-1-gnome 0.95-1 GNOME authentication agent for Pol Versions of packages gvfs suggests: ii gvfs-backends 1.4.1-6userspace virtual filesystem - bac -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#558674: reportbug: Gdk:ERROR:/tmp/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.3 ... assertion failed
Package: reportbug Version: 4.9 Severity: important Using the GTK interface I get the following error after pressing forward after being displayed the list of current bugs: Gdk:ERROR:/tmp/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.3/gdk/gdkregion-generic.c:1108:miUnionNonO: assertion failed: (y1 y2) -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: INTERFACE=text ** /home/jeff/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 4.9 mode advanced ui text email j...@tjwallace.ca -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-6.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii apt 0.7.24 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii python2.5.4-2An interactive high-level object-o ii python-reportbug 4.9Python modules for interacting wit reportbug recommends no packages. Versions of packages reportbug suggests: pn debconf-utils none (no description available) pn debsums none (no description available) pn dlocate none (no description available) ii exim4 4.69-11metapackage to ease Exim MTA (v4) ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.69-11+b1 lightweight Exim MTA (v4) daemon ii file 5.03-3 Determines file type using magic ii gnupg 1.4.10-2 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep ii python-gtk2 2.16.0-1 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge pn python-gtkspell none (no description available) pn python-urwid none (no description available) ii python-vte1:0.22.5-1 Python bindings for the VTE widget ii xdg-utils 1.0.2-6.1 desktop integration utilities from -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[jibx-users] AUTO: Jeff Wallace is out of the office. (returning 11/30/2009)
I am out of the office until 11/30/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. Note: This is an automated response to your message jibx-users Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8 sent on 11/21/09 2:06:58. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.-- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july___ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
Bug#557260: totem: Can't play xvid files
Subject: totem: Can't play xvid files Package: totem Version: 2.28.3-1 Severity: important Trying to play an xvid video in totem and nothing happens. Totem loads but doesn't start playing, and time cannot be scrolled. I have a feeling this has something to do with gstreamer or ffmpeg, because thumbnails no longer show up properly either. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-6.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages totem depends on: ii gnome-icon-theme 2.28.0-1 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gstreamer0.10-plugins- 0.10.17-1 GStreamer plugins from the bad s ii gstreamer0.10-plugins- 0.10.25-6 GStreamer plugins from the base ii gstreamer0.10-plugins- 0.10.17-1 GStreamer plugins from the good ii gstreamer0.10-pulseaud 0.10.17-1 GStreamer plugin for PulseAudio ii gstreamer0.10-x0.10.25-6 GStreamer plugins for X11 and Pang ii iso-codes 3.11.1-1 ISO language, territory, currency, ii libatk1.0-01.28.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.10.1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.8.8-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-31.2.16-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.82-2simple interprocess messaging syst ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-42.28.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.2-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgstreamer-plugins-b 0.10.25-6 GStreamer libraries from the base ii libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.25-3 Core GStreamer libraries and eleme ii libgtk2.0-02.18.3-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice62:1.0.5-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libnautilus-extension1 2.28.1-1 libraries for nautilus components ii libpango1.0-0 1.26.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libtotem-plparser122.28.1-2 Totem Playlist Parser library - ru ii libunique-1.0-01.1.6-1 Library for writing single instanc ii libx11-6 2:1.2.2-1 X11 client-side library ii libxml22.7.6.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-2 X11 RandR extension library ii libxtst6 2:1.0.3-1 X11 Testing -- Resource extension ii libxxf86vm11:1.0.2-1 X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii python2.5 2.5.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o ii totem-common 2.28.3-1 Data files for the Totem media pla ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime Versions of packages totem recommends: ii gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0.10.9-2 FFmpeg plugin for GStreamer ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad 0.10.17-1 GStreamer plugins from the bad s ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly0.10.13-2 GStreamer plugins from the ugly ii totem-mozilla 2.28.3-1 Totem Mozilla plugin ii totem-plugins 2.28.3-1 Plugins for the Totem media player Versions of packages totem suggests: pn gnome-codec-install none (no description available) ii gstreamer0.10-pulseaudio 0.10.17-1 GStreamer plugin for PulseAudio ii totem-coherence 2.28.3-1 Coherence UPnP/DLNA plugin for tot -- no debconf information
Bug#556780: Similar Bug
This bug might be similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#556780: Similar Bug
This bug might be similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832
Bug#548828: Same problem
I am using a Dell D630, nvidia graphics, and am having the same problem. I am using the oct 29 build.
Bug#548828: Same problem
I am using a Dell D630, nvidia graphics, and am having the same problem. I am using the oct 29 build.
