Thanks Christian!
I've been having trouble with my mail server lately and didn't get your email
on the 26th.
Thank you for sorting this out for me. I really appreciate it.
Cheers!
Jon
Dear maintainer of qmail,
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2010 10:31:07 -0400
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler jmar...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jon Marler jmar...@debian.org
Hello Jon,
Have you been able to sort things out?
if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for
being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up,
also. I'd suggest tagging moreinfo and ignoring ATM.
It's a valid bug. It is super easy to reproduce ... just try
with Qmail, and there is nothing in Qmail that prevents IPV6 from
working.
Why have you reopened this bug?
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 23, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 326415
Bug #326415 {Done: Jon Marler jmar
Have you tested that this patch works? I don't have an IPV6 network to play
with.
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 23, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
reopen 326415
stop
From: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
There are no TCP listeners in the qmail package. The TCP
Thank you for working on this Christian.
I like the changes, and I approve all of them without exception. Please let me
know how you would like me to proceed. Shall I wait for your bug report to
file a new package, or shall I do that now?
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:13 PM,
let me know.
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Jon Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
Thank you for working on this Christian.
I like the changes, and I approve all of them without exception. Please let
me know how you would like me to proceed. Shall
Please proceed.
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 20, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Dear Debian maintainer,
The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English
localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf
templates used in qmail.
This review takes place for all
Please proceed.
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 20, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Dear Debian maintainer,
The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English
localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf
templates used in qmail.
This review takes place for all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:54:30 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-48
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler jmar...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jon Marler jmar...@debian.org
qmail-source not qmail. It also was not touched for some time now.
Hence, i filed this bug. Sure by all means close this bug. However,
you should note that this was a wishlist report and not a bug report,
as such
Does Gerrit intend to package qmail ?
2009/9/29 Jon Marler jmar...@debian.org
I requested a merge of this bug with #457318
Gerrit Pape filed an ITP for qmail in Dec. of 2007. There is an
ongoing debate on how to handle qmail, and I suggest you look through
the maillist archives or the ITP bug report for more information.
Also, Gerritj has an excellent binary
Thanks for the suggestion.
Adding TLS support would basically require every user to setup certs
just to get a base qmail system up and running. This would also mean
breaking existing configurations.
May users are using other mechanisms, such as stunnel, to provide SSL
and/or TLS
reassign 532484 qmail
stop
# qmail-src generates no logs
___
Logcheck-devel mailing list
Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
Please see bug #457318.
Cheers!
Jon
On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:45 PM, Greg Price wrote:
Now that the author of this software has seen the light and made it
free software, it'd be great to have it in Debian.
Is there a particular obstacle known to be in the way of doing so,
or is just a matter
On Sep 13, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Carsten Hey wrote:
Package: ucspi-tcp-src
Severity: grave
Hi,
while checking whether bug #174353 build-ucspi-tcp fails on libc6
2.3.1-7 is still present and if it is release critical - more
precisely, before I had the chance to do so, I tried to build
I would like to formally request a freeze exception for ucspi-tcp-src
release -15.
This fixes RC Bug #498869 that prevents the package from building
using fakeroot which was reported yesterday.
Hopefully, this should conclude my freeze exception requests for Lenny.
Cheers!
Jon
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:58:36 -0400
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-47
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sep 13, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#patch didnt touch debian/rules
found 485956 qmail/1.03-46
Fixed in -47
Cheers!
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sep 13, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#patch didnt touch debian/rules
found 485956 qmail/1.03-46
Fixed in -47
Cheers!
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
According to my calculation, the -46 release should move into testing
today, as the 10 day hold will have lapsed.
Since the 10 day hold is up, I also filed requests to close the bugs.
I had planned on doing it only after the migration to testing, but
your snippy email has inspired me to
apologize for the oversight.
Cheers!
Jon
On Sep 2, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Jon Marler wrote:
I would like to formally request a freeze exception for qmail-src
release 1.0.3-46, which is currently in unstable
This release fixes 2 RC Bugs:
#485956 FTBFS: uses chown inappropriately - Unable to buiild
I would like to formally request a freeze exception for qmail-src
release 1.0.3-46, which is currently in unstable
This release fixes 2 RC Bugs:
#485956 FTBFS: uses chown inappropriately - Unable to buiild
#491916 Preinst fails if /etc/inetd.conf does not exist
Both bugs have been addressed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:26:55 -0400
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-46
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jon Marler wrote:
If you use fakeroot to call dpkg-buildpackage, it works prefectly.
Something is wrong with the way that dpkg-buildpackage is calling
fakeroot. The chown calls work perfect, and you can build
On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jon Marler wrote:
If you use fakeroot to call dpkg-buildpackage, it works prefectly.
Something is wrong with the way that dpkg-buildpackage is calling
fakeroot. The chown calls work perfect, and you can build
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Jon Marler wrote:
All of that inetd.conf stuff is old legacy code from a migration long
long ago before update-inetd was available. I believe I will just
remove it all together as it is no longer necessary, and probably
never
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Jon Marler wrote:
All of that inetd.conf stuff is old legacy code from a migration long
long ago before update-inetd was available. I believe I will just
remove it all together as it is no longer necessary, and probably
never
No problem.
I am working on a new release to fix the outstanding RC bugs, and will
get this fix in as well.
I am going to back out that link-sync patch. It's more trouble than
it's worth.
Cheers!
Jon
On Jul 28, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Pablo 'merKur' Kohan wrote:
I just started getting MANY
Thanks for the report.
All of that inetd.conf stuff is old legacy code from a migration long
long ago before update-inetd was available. I believe I will just
remove it all together as it is no longer necessary, and probably
never was in the first place.
I have a release that I am
Let's please not re-open that debacle. I was informed that Debconf
was specifically -*not*- to be used to preset information to users,
and had one of those spray-and-pray bugs filed against the package. I
ripped all of it out because there was no other solution. You can't
show it in
Thanks for the report.
All of that inetd.conf stuff is old legacy code from a migration long
long ago before update-inetd was available. I believe I will just
remove it all together as it is no longer necessary, and probably
never was in the first place.
I have a release that I am
If you use fakeroot to call dpkg-buildpackage, it works prefectly.
Something is wrong with the way that dpkg-buildpackage is calling
fakeroot. The chown calls work perfect, and you can build the package
using a different syntax.
Not sure what you need done here.
Jon
On Jun 12, 2008, at
485956 serious
thanks
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:09:14PM -0500, Jon Marler wrote:
severity 485956 minor
Erm, no, this is a FTBFS bug, and deserves the severity I gave it.
The package fails to build with standard Debian tools, called in their
standard ways, and violates a policy MUST.
Please see
If you use fakeroot to call dpkg-buildpackage, it works prefectly.
Something is wrong with the way that dpkg-buildpackage is calling
fakeroot. The chown calls work perfect, and you can build the package
using a different syntax.
Not sure what you need done here.
Jon
On Jun 12, 2008, at
485956 serious
thanks
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:09:14PM -0500, Jon Marler wrote:
severity 485956 minor
Erm, no, this is a FTBFS bug, and deserves the severity I gave it.
The package fails to build with standard Debian tools, called in their
standard ways, and violates a policy MUST.
Please see
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
As qmail is now in the public domain, it should be possible to build a
binary-package of qmail and move it out of non-free. It would be nice
to see this happen.
Please look at old bug reports before reporting new bugs, as this bug
has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:32:58 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-45
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have a question ... How do I keep my Debian maintainer status if I
miss the vote? Is there a website I can log in to raise my hand and
keep from being booted out?
Is there somewhere this is being debated where I can join the debate?
I frequently respond to bug reports, upload new releases,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:50:27 -0600
Source: ucspi-tcp
Binary: ucspi-tcp-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.88-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Nick Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: ucspi-tcp
Version: 0.88-9
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I rate this bug as Important, but if Paul does set a wildcard on
maps.vix.com as discussed then it could quickly escalate.
--
If we don't, some Debian users could lose email when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:53:39 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-44
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:16:14PM -0600, Jon Marler wrote:
This is fixed in -43 which has just been uploaded.
-43 also updates the standards version, and removes some old 1.02 upgrade
code and fixes a usr/doc link issue thanks to a great patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:47:14 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-43
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: qmail
Tags: patch
Hi,
qmail still creates a /usr/doc symlink. Since 2002, policy
has not required these symlinks, and we're waiting for all packages
to be updated to remove them before the /usr/share/doc transition can
be complete. This
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't see any reason to close this bug. If you don't want to fix this
issue, please tag it as wontfix.
In order to have this bug fixed, I wrote a full patch. Here are my
comments on the debconf templates, as the rest just depends on these
fixes:
I have fixed the RC build bug (#402331) in qmail-src 1.03-42.
Cheers!
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:54:58 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-42
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:13:33 -0600
Source: ucspi-tcp
Binary: ucspi-tcp-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.88-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/12/2006):
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note also that once this is fixed, you should update the description of
the qmail-src package.
I am not exactly sure what pbuilder is doing here, but I don't
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/12/2006):
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note also that once this is fixed, you should update the description of
the qmail-src package.
I am not exactly sure what pbuilder is doing here, but I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:30:32 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-41
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Alex Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As others have said there is no need to compile the source when
building a source as binary package. Hence there is no need to have
depandancies on specific users when building the qmail-src deb from
the qmail source deb.
There are two ways of solving
Quoting Alex Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As others have said there is no need to compile the source when
building a source as binary package. Hence there is no need to have
depandancies on specific users when building the qmail-src deb from
the qmail source deb.
There are two ways of solving
Quoting Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think you are letting your crankiness interfere with your logic. The
people arguing that qmail is non-free are a different group than those
that have anything to do with funding anything. If you can't adequately
maintain the package, say so instead
Quoting Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think you are letting your crankiness interfere with your logic. The
people arguing that qmail is non-free are a different group than those
that have anything to do with funding anything. If you can't adequately
maintain the package, say so instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:34:54 -0600
Source: ucspi-tcp
Binary: ucspi-tcp-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.88-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: ucspi-tcp-src
Version: 0.88-10
Severity: normal
While installing ucspi-tcp-src, my installation stopped with:
To build ucspi-tcp binary package, you have to run
build-ucspi-tcp
Press ENTER to continue...
According to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:40:16 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-40
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:02:29 -0500, Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This bug is being closed as it is not a bug. It was a request from
a translator to make a change that I disagree with. As the package
maintainer, I am allowed to make
Quoting Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First of all, thank you, Jon, for giving me more input on the
background of your reaction to this bug report.
I was actually not asking for more and I regret that we went in this
long argument.
Please also note that this mail has been initially
Quoting Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well .. if notes are going away, that's something entirely different.
I looked at the .config file in question, and I have three notes.
I have a warning message that is marked as high, a message that tells the
user
how to actually build
Quoting Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
user debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
usertag 388952 + no-cooperation
thanks
I could argue my case with you, but I see no point in it. If you have gone
through all the trouble to do a massive bug posting against most likely
countless hundreds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:43:31 -0600
Source: ucspi-tcp
Binary: ucspi-tcp-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.88-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:29:40 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-39
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Elliott Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sendmail definitely supports IPv6, and I strongly suspect Postfix does as
well. This makes Qmail the unusual one in /not/ supportting IPv6. Given
the increasing prevalence of support, I'd suggest either documenting the
lack of support or including
Quoting G A Craig Carey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: ucspi-tcp-src
Version: 0.88-9
Followup-For: Bug #57102
After years of having . at the start of the PATH, it
eventually one problem can be discovered: the install of
just this package fails.
I really don't understand how having a broken,
I have uploaded a new release of qmail-src that fixes a security bug into
unstable. I would like to request that it be added back into sarge.
Cheers!
Jon
---
This mail sent through Click2E-Mail http://www.click2e-mail.com
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 11:22:27 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
Quoting Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: qmail-src
Severity: important
Tags: security
Apparently qmail has some security bugs on 64 bit systems with large
amounts ( 4 gb) of memory:
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1515
Quoting Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: qmail-src
Severity: important
Tags: security
Apparently qmail has some security bugs on 64 bit systems with large
amounts ( 4 gb) of memory:
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1515
Do you have another location for that patch, or perhaps more information? I've
been unable to get to that URL, or find a different patch than the one
included.
Cheers!
Jon
---
This mail sent through Click2E-Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:54:04 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-37
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
Quoting Tomas Hoger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
I think it is an FTBFS bug. The following should generally work:
apt-get source qmail
cd qmail-*
dpkg-buildpackage
For qmail, this does not work because of the missing Build-Depends on
groff-base and because of the missing users/groups.
I am including a fix for the missing build-depends line in the control file.
However, I am not changing how the package presently handles creating the users.
qmail-src is not in the main package repository. It's in the non-free
repository, which, in reality, means it's not officially part of
Quoting Tomas Hoger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
I think it is an FTBFS bug. The following should generally work:
apt-get source qmail
cd qmail-*
dpkg-buildpackage
For qmail, this does not work because of the missing Build-Depends on
groff-base and because of the missing users/groups.
I am including a fix for the missing build-depends line in the control file.
However, I am not changing how the package presently handles creating the users.
qmail-src is not in the main package repository. It's in the non-free
repository, which, in reality, means it's not officially part of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I currently maintain the qmail-src package. I would like to fork qmail-src into
qmail-ldap-src as a separate package to handle Debian users who wish to use the
qmail-ldap patch from André Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had several users ask for a version of
Package: wnppp
Severity: wishlist
I currently maintain the qmail-src package. I would like to fork qmail-src into
qmail-ldap-src as a separate package to handle Debian users who wish to use the
qmail-ldap patch from André Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had several users ask for a version of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I currently maintain the qmail-src package. I would like to fork qmail-src into
qmail-ldap-src as a separate package to handle Debian users who wish to use the
qmail-ldap patch from André Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had several users ask for a version of
I received the following wishlist bug today, and really like the idea.
My thoughts are to change the dependancies to allow ipsvd to be used in place of
ucspi-tcp and ucspi-tcp-src.
I'll need to do some magic to get the init.d file to work properly, but I can
just make that a build-time debconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:15:19 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-35
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 06:50:39 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-34
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:36:51 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-33
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:24:49 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-32
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
==
Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
programs that don't conform to the Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:03:08 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:57:18 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:28:04 -0600
Source: ucspi-tcp
Binary: ucspi-tcp-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.88-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
Quoting Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're not doing so well on ports. There has been some activity on the
ia64 and hppa ports since beta 1, and I hope to see one or both included
in beta 2, but both need more testing. Of course powerpc continues to be
supported. The mips port more or less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:13:33 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:48:34 -0500
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:16:41 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:56:19 -0600
Source: qmail
Binary: qmail-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:57:27 -0600
Source: ucspi-tcp
Binary: ucspi-tcp-src
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.88-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eh? You don't understand the issue correctly. If you use errno.h
(which is hopefully the fix you're talking about) then it will behave
correctly; old glibc, new glibc, whatever.
The change may be backed down for compatibility reasons, if we can
To all users of the official QMail and Ucspi-tcp Debian source packages:
I am aware of the recent libc6 problems, and appreciate your bug reports and
input.
I am currently analyzing what the best course of action to take is. I am
worried that if I make a quick patch to the DJB packages, that
Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eh? You don't understand the issue correctly. If you use errno.h
(which is hopefully the fix you're talking about) then it will behave
correctly; old glibc, new glibc, whatever.
The change may be backed down for compatibility reasons, if we can
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Marc A. Donges wrote:
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 22:41:36 (-0700), Randolph Chung wrote:
[...]
There have been several requests to support these popular RAID devices
for potato boot floppies. Unfortunately, none of the current boot
floppies developers have easy
I have some Mac (the horror) users that are printing to papd through
Appletalk and everything works great ... except one thing ...
The print jobs stay in the queue and I have to do a lpc start all to get
them to come out.
When reading the papd documentation, it states:
papd spools jobs directly
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
